{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec","slug":"clawplays--ospec","name":"ospec","type":"framework","url":"https://ospec.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/clawplays--ospec","categories":["app-builders","documentation"],"tags":["ai","ai-workflow","document-driven","planning","sdd","spec","spec-driven-development","specification"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.specification.driven.code.generation.with.document.to.code.mapping","name":"specification-driven code generation with document-to-code mapping","description":"Converts structured specification documents (SDD format) into executable code generation prompts by parsing document structure, extracting requirements, and mapping them to code generation contexts. Uses document metadata and hierarchical sections to maintain semantic relationships between specifications and generated code artifacts, enabling AI coding assistants to generate code that directly implements documented requirements.","intents":["I want to generate code that strictly implements a written specification without manual prompt engineering","I need to maintain traceability between my design documents and the code an AI assistant generates","I want to reduce hallucination in AI code generation by grounding it in explicit requirements documents"],"best_for":["teams practicing spec-driven development (SDD) with AI coding assistants","developers building LLM-powered code generation workflows","organizations requiring audit trails linking specifications to generated code"],"limitations":["Requires specifications to be written in supported document format (SDD/markdown) — unstructured prose specifications may not map cleanly to code contexts","No built-in validation that generated code actually satisfies the specification — relies on downstream testing","Document parsing assumes consistent structure; malformed or non-standard specifications may produce incomplete mappings"],"requires":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime (repo is JavaScript-based)","Specification documents in supported format (SDD or markdown with structured sections)","Integration with an AI coding assistant API (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)"],"input_types":["specification documents (markdown, SDD format)","structured requirement definitions","code context/codebase metadata"],"output_types":["code generation prompts","specification-to-code mappings","structured generation contexts"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.document.structure.parsing.and.requirement.extraction","name":"document structure parsing and requirement extraction","description":"Parses specification documents (markdown, SDD format) into abstract syntax trees, extracting sections, requirements, constraints, and metadata. Maps document structure to semantic units that can be queried and referenced by code generation pipelines. Handles nested sections, requirement hierarchies, and cross-references to build a queryable specification model.","intents":["I want to automatically extract requirements from my specification documents","I need to query specific sections of a specification to use as context for code generation","I want to understand the hierarchical structure of my requirements programmatically"],"best_for":["developers building specification-aware code generation tools","teams managing large specification documents with complex hierarchies","tools that need to map document sections to code artifacts"],"limitations":["Parser is optimized for markdown and SDD formats — other formats (Asciidoc, RST) may require custom adapters","Extraction accuracy depends on consistent document structure — inconsistently formatted specs may lose semantic information","No semantic understanding of requirement content — extracts structure but not intent without additional NLP processing"],"requires":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime","Specification documents in markdown or SDD format","Consistent document structure (sections, subsections, requirement markers)"],"input_types":["markdown files","SDD specification documents","structured text with hierarchical sections"],"output_types":["parsed document AST","requirement objects with metadata","hierarchical section maps","queryable specification models"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.specification.to.prompt.context.generation.for.ai.coding.assistants","name":"specification-to-prompt context generation for ai coding assistants","description":"Transforms extracted specification requirements into optimized prompts for AI coding assistants by selecting relevant sections, formatting constraints, and building context windows that maximize code generation quality. Uses document structure to prioritize high-level requirements, acceptance criteria, and constraints in the prompt, reducing token waste and improving model focus.","intents":["I want to automatically generate high-quality prompts for AI coding assistants from my specifications","I need to control what parts of my specification are included in code generation prompts","I want to optimize prompt length and relevance to improve AI code generation quality"],"best_for":["teams using AI coding assistants (Copilot, Claude, etc.) with specification-driven workflows","developers building custom code generation pipelines","organizations optimizing token usage in LLM-based development"],"limitations":["Prompt optimization is heuristic-based — no guarantee that generated prompts are optimal for all AI models","Context window limits vary by model — tool may not handle very large specifications that exceed model context","No feedback loop to improve prompt generation based on code generation outcomes"],"requires":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime","Parsed specification model (from document structure parsing capability)","Target AI model specification (context window size, token limits)"],"input_types":["parsed specification documents","requirement hierarchies","constraint definitions"],"output_types":["formatted prompts for AI models","context windows with prioritized requirements","prompt metadata (token count, coverage)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.bidirectional.specification.to.code.traceability.mapping","name":"bidirectional specification-to-code traceability mapping","description":"Maintains mappings between specification sections and generated code artifacts, enabling developers to trace which code implements which requirements and which requirements are covered by which code. Supports querying code to find its source requirements and querying requirements to find implementing code, with metadata about coverage and implementation status.","intents":["I want to know which code implements a specific requirement from my specification","I need to verify that all requirements in my specification have corresponding code implementations","I want to track which requirements are covered by generated code and which are missing"],"best_for":["teams requiring audit trails and compliance documentation","organizations practicing spec-driven development with regulatory requirements","developers managing large codebases generated from specifications"],"limitations":["Traceability is only as good as the mapping metadata — requires explicit linking between specs and code","No automatic verification that code actually implements requirements — relies on testing and review","Mapping maintenance requires discipline; refactored code may break traceability links"],"requires":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime","Specification documents with unique identifiers for requirements","Generated code with metadata tags linking to specification sections"],"input_types":["specification documents with requirement IDs","generated code with traceability metadata","mapping definitions"],"output_types":["traceability matrices","requirement-to-code mappings","coverage reports","implementation status queries"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ai.workflow.orchestration.for.spec.driven.development.cycles","name":"ai workflow orchestration for spec-driven development cycles","description":"Orchestrates multi-step workflows that combine specification parsing, prompt generation, code generation, and traceability tracking into automated pipelines. Manages state across workflow steps, handles errors, and coordinates between specification documents and AI coding assistants. Supports both synchronous generation and asynchronous workflows with callback handling.","intents":["I want to automate the entire process from specification to generated code","I need to run code generation workflows that respect my specification structure","I want to integrate specification-driven code generation into my CI/CD pipeline"],"best_for":["teams automating code generation workflows","developers building spec-driven development platforms","organizations integrating AI code generation into CI/CD"],"limitations":["Workflow state is in-memory by default — no built-in persistence for long-running workflows","Error handling is basic — complex error recovery requires custom handlers","Workflow definitions may require code changes for significant logic modifications"],"requires":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime","Specification documents in supported format","Integration with AI coding assistant API","Optional: CI/CD system for pipeline integration"],"input_types":["specification documents","workflow configuration","AI model parameters"],"output_types":["generated code","workflow execution logs","traceability metadata","status reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.specification.validation.and.requirement.coverage.analysis","name":"specification validation and requirement coverage analysis","description":"Analyzes specifications to identify incomplete requirements, missing acceptance criteria, and coverage gaps. Validates specification structure against SDD standards and checks for consistency. Generates coverage reports showing which requirements have been addressed by generated code and which remain unimplemented.","intents":["I want to validate that my specification is complete before generating code","I need to identify gaps in my requirements that might cause incomplete code generation","I want to track what percentage of my specification has been implemented"],"best_for":["teams practicing spec-driven development who want to catch specification issues early","developers managing complex specifications with many interdependent requirements","organizations requiring specification quality metrics"],"limitations":["Validation is structural and syntactic — cannot verify semantic correctness or feasibility of requirements","Coverage analysis requires explicit linking between specs and code — cannot infer implementation from code alone","No domain-specific validation — cannot check if requirements are realistic or testable without custom rules"],"requires":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime","Specification documents in supported format","Optional: Generated code with traceability metadata for coverage analysis"],"input_types":["specification documents","SDD format definitions","generated code with metadata"],"output_types":["validation reports","coverage metrics","gap analysis","requirement status summaries"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec__cap_6","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.file.code.generation.with.specification.aware.context.management","name":"multi-file code generation with specification-aware context management","description":"Generates code across multiple files while maintaining specification context and consistency. Manages dependencies between generated files, ensures cross-file references are correct, and tracks which specification sections apply to which files. Handles file organization, naming conventions, and directory structure based on specification organization.","intents":["I want to generate multiple related code files from a single specification","I need to ensure generated code files are consistent with each other and the specification","I want the generated code structure to match my specification organization"],"best_for":["developers generating complete modules or services from specifications","teams building microservices where each service has its own specification","organizations with complex codebases requiring multi-file generation"],"limitations":["Cross-file dependency resolution is heuristic-based — complex circular dependencies may not be handled correctly","File organization is based on specification structure — may not match actual codebase conventions","No built-in support for partial regeneration — regenerating one file may require regenerating dependent files"],"requires":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime","Specification documents with file/module structure","AI coding assistant API with sufficient context window for multi-file generation"],"input_types":["specification documents with file/module definitions","file organization metadata","cross-file dependency definitions"],"output_types":["multiple generated code files","file dependency graphs","cross-file reference metadata"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.specification.versioning.and.change.tracking","name":"specification versioning and change tracking","description":"Tracks changes to specifications over time, maintains version history, and identifies what changed between specification versions. Enables developers to understand how specifications evolved and what code changes are needed when specifications are updated. Supports diffing specifications and generating change summaries.","intents":["I want to track how my specification has changed over time","I need to understand what code changes are required when my specification is updated","I want to see a diff between two versions of my specification"],"best_for":["teams managing evolving specifications with multiple versions","developers maintaining code that must track specification changes","organizations requiring audit trails of specification evolution"],"limitations":["Change tracking requires explicit version management — no automatic detection of changes","Diff generation is structural — may not capture semantic changes in requirements","No built-in integration with version control systems — requires manual version management"],"requires":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime","Specification documents with version metadata","Optional: Git or other version control system"],"input_types":["specification documents with version information","specification version history"],"output_types":["version diffs","change summaries","version history","impact analysis"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-clawplays--ospec__cap_8","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.integration.with.ai.coding.assistant.apis.and.llm.providers","name":"integration with ai coding assistant apis and llm providers","description":"Provides abstraction layer for integrating with multiple AI coding assistant APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) and LLM providers. Handles API authentication, request formatting, response parsing, and error handling. Supports streaming responses, token counting, and cost tracking. Abstracts provider-specific differences to enable switching between providers.","intents":["I want to use different AI coding assistants without changing my code generation logic","I need to track costs and token usage across different AI providers","I want to handle streaming responses from AI models efficiently"],"best_for":["developers building multi-provider code generation tools","teams evaluating different AI coding assistants","organizations optimizing costs across multiple LLM providers"],"limitations":["Provider abstraction may hide provider-specific capabilities — some advanced features may not be available through the abstraction","Token counting is approximate — actual token usage may vary by provider","Error handling is generic — provider-specific errors may not be handled optimally"],"requires":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime","API keys for target AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Network connectivity to provider APIs"],"input_types":["prompts","code generation requests","provider configuration"],"output_types":["generated code","API responses","token usage metrics","cost estimates"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":41,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["JavaScript/Node.js runtime (repo is JavaScript-based)","Specification documents in supported format (SDD or markdown with structured sections)","Integration with an AI coding assistant API (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)","JavaScript/Node.js runtime","Specification documents in markdown or SDD format","Consistent document structure (sections, subsections, requirement markers)","Parsed specification model (from document structure parsing capability)","Target AI model specification (context window size, token limits)","Specification documents with unique identifiers for requirements","Generated code with metadata tags linking to specification sections"],"failure_modes":["Requires specifications to be written in supported document format (SDD/markdown) — unstructured prose specifications may not map cleanly to code contexts","No built-in validation that generated code actually satisfies the specification — relies on downstream testing","Document parsing assumes consistent structure; malformed or non-standard specifications may produce incomplete mappings","Parser is optimized for markdown and SDD formats — other formats (Asciidoc, RST) may require custom adapters","Extraction accuracy depends on consistent document structure — inconsistently formatted specs may lose semantic information","No semantic understanding of requirement content — extracts structure but not intent without additional NLP processing","Prompt optimization is heuristic-based — no guarantee that generated prompts are optimal for all AI models","Context window limits vary by model — tool may not handle very large specifications that exceed model context","No feedback loop to improve prompt generation based on code generation outcomes","Traceability is only as good as the mapping metadata — requires explicit linking between specs and code","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.35214706184599054,"quality":0.28,"ecosystem":0.7000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:21.549Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:59:55.150Z","last_commit":"2026-04-16T02:53:28Z"},"community":{"stars":611,"forks":33,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=clawplays--ospec","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=clawplays--ospec"}},"signature":"dFu2s/72boFkYun6QX1PwADuyv82dN7ZxmxpvIr1cSedlskCrfCoo/LAGaqeQsTtsHCJuQM1JK3XOKS0iNGlBg==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T16:59:34.012Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/clawplays--ospec","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/clawplays--ospec","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=clawplays--ospec","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}