{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-blade-ai-agent-sdk","slug":"blade-ai-agent-sdk","name":"@blade-ai/agent-sdk","type":"repo","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@blade-ai/agent-sdk","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/blade-ai-agent-sdk","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":["sdk","blade","ai","assistant","agent","llm","node"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-blade-ai-agent-sdk__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.llm.agnostic.agent.orchestration.with.multi.provider.support","name":"llm-agnostic agent orchestration with multi-provider support","description":"Provides a unified agent runtime that abstracts away provider-specific API differences, allowing developers to swap between OpenAI, Anthropic, and other LLM providers without rewriting agent logic. Uses a provider adapter pattern to normalize request/response formats and handle streaming, token counting, and error handling across heterogeneous LLM APIs.","intents":["I want to build an agent that can switch LLM providers without changing my agent code","I need to compare performance and cost across different LLM providers for my agent","I want to use open-source models (via Ollama or local inference) alongside commercial APIs"],"best_for":["Teams building multi-provider AI applications to avoid vendor lock-in","Developers prototyping agents and wanting to experiment with different model backends","Cost-conscious builders wanting to route to cheaper models based on task complexity"],"limitations":["Provider abstraction may not expose advanced features unique to specific LLMs (e.g., vision capabilities, tool-use schemas vary by provider)","Streaming response handling adds complexity when normalizing across providers with different streaming protocols","Token counting approximations may differ from actual provider counts, affecting cost estimation"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","API keys for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","TypeScript 4.5+ (for type safety, though JavaScript is supported)"],"input_types":["text prompts","structured messages with role/content","system instructions"],"output_types":["text completions","structured JSON (via schema validation)","streaming token streams"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","llm-abstraction"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-blade-ai-agent-sdk__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.function.calling.with.schema.based.validation.and.execution","name":"tool/function calling with schema-based validation and execution","description":"Enables agents to declare available tools via JSON schemas and automatically route LLM-generated function calls to registered handlers with type validation. Implements a registry pattern where tools are defined with input/output schemas, and the SDK handles schema serialization to the LLM, call validation, and error propagation back to the agent loop.","intents":["I want my agent to call external APIs or internal functions based on LLM decisions","I need to ensure function calls match a strict schema before execution","I want to provide the agent with a set of tools and let it decide which to use"],"best_for":["Developers building autonomous agents that need to interact with external systems","Teams implementing ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) agent patterns","Builders creating specialized assistants with domain-specific tool sets"],"limitations":["Schema validation is synchronous — no async schema resolution or dynamic tool discovery at runtime","Tool execution errors are not automatically retried; error handling is delegated to agent logic","No built-in rate limiting or quota management for tool calls across multiple invocations"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Tool handlers must be JavaScript/TypeScript functions","JSON Schema knowledge for defining tool input/output contracts"],"input_types":["JSON Schema definitions","JavaScript/TypeScript function handlers","LLM-generated function call requests"],"output_types":["Validated function call results","Structured error responses","Tool execution logs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-blade-ai-agent-sdk__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agentic.loop.orchestration.with.memory.and.state.management","name":"agentic loop orchestration with memory and state management","description":"Provides a structured agent loop that manages conversation history, tool call cycles, and state transitions. The SDK maintains a message buffer, tracks tool invocations, and implements a step-by-step execution model where each iteration calls the LLM, validates outputs, executes tools, and appends results back to context for the next iteration.","intents":["I want to run an agent that iteratively reasons and acts until it reaches a goal","I need to maintain conversation history and context across multiple agent steps","I want to implement a max-steps limit to prevent infinite loops"],"best_for":["Developers building multi-turn autonomous agents","Teams implementing task-oriented assistants that need to maintain state","Builders creating agents that must reason over multiple steps before providing answers"],"limitations":["No built-in persistence — agent state is held in memory and lost on process restart","Context window management is manual; no automatic summarization or sliding-window compression","Step-by-step execution is synchronous; parallel tool execution is not supported"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","LLM provider API key","Understanding of agent loop patterns (ReAct, loop-of-thought, etc.)"],"input_types":["Initial user query/prompt","Tool definitions and handlers","System instructions"],"output_types":["Final agent response","Execution trace (list of steps, tool calls, results)","Conversation history"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-blade-ai-agent-sdk__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.streaming.response.handling.with.token.level.granularity","name":"streaming response handling with token-level granularity","description":"Supports real-time streaming of LLM responses at the token level, allowing UI applications to display agent reasoning and tool calls as they are generated. Implements provider-specific streaming protocol handlers (Server-Sent Events for OpenAI, event streams for Anthropic) and normalizes them into a unified event stream that applications can consume.","intents":["I want to show users the agent's reasoning in real-time as it thinks","I need to stream tool calls and results back to the client without waiting for completion","I want to implement a chat interface that updates incrementally as the agent responds"],"best_for":["Frontend developers building real-time agent UIs","Teams implementing streaming chat interfaces with agents","Builders creating interactive applications where latency perception matters"],"limitations":["Streaming adds complexity to error handling — partial responses may be sent before errors occur","Token-level streaming increases network overhead compared to batch responses","Browser compatibility requires WebSocket or Server-Sent Events support"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","LLM provider that supports streaming (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Client-side event handling (EventSource API or WebSocket)"],"input_types":["Streaming-enabled LLM requests","Agent loop with streaming enabled"],"output_types":["Token stream events","Tool call events","Completion events"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-blade-ai-agent-sdk__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.message.history.and.context.window.management","name":"message history and context window management","description":"Maintains a conversation history buffer that tracks all messages (user, assistant, tool results) and manages context window constraints. Provides utilities to inspect history, clear old messages, and estimate token usage to prevent exceeding LLM context limits. Implements a simple FIFO eviction policy for older messages when context limits are approached.","intents":["I want to keep track of the conversation history for debugging and auditing","I need to ensure my agent doesn't exceed the LLM's context window","I want to inspect what messages were sent to the LLM in each step"],"best_for":["Developers building multi-turn agents where conversation history matters","Teams implementing agents that must stay within strict context budgets","Builders debugging agent behavior by inspecting message sequences"],"limitations":["FIFO eviction is naive — no semantic importance weighting or summarization of old messages","Token counting is approximate and may not match actual provider counts","No built-in persistence — history is lost on process restart unless explicitly saved"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Understanding of LLM context windows and token limits"],"input_types":["Messages (user, assistant, tool results)","Context window size limit"],"output_types":["Message history array","Token usage estimates","Eviction notifications"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-blade-ai-agent-sdk__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.retry.logic.with.exponential.backoff","name":"error handling and retry logic with exponential backoff","description":"Implements automatic retry logic for transient LLM API failures (rate limits, timeouts, temporary outages) using exponential backoff with jitter. Distinguishes between retryable errors (429, 503) and permanent errors (401, 404), and provides hooks for custom error handling and logging. Includes configurable retry budgets to prevent infinite retry loops.","intents":["I want my agent to automatically retry on rate limits without failing immediately","I need to handle API timeouts gracefully and resume execution","I want to log and monitor agent failures for debugging"],"best_for":["Developers building production agents that need resilience","Teams operating agents at scale where transient failures are common","Builders implementing long-running agents that must survive temporary outages"],"limitations":["Exponential backoff increases total execution time for flaky APIs","Retry logic is applied at the LLM call level, not at the tool execution level","No circuit breaker pattern — repeated failures don't trigger fallback strategies"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Configuration of retry budgets and backoff parameters"],"input_types":["LLM API requests","Error responses from providers"],"output_types":["Successful responses after retries","Permanent error exceptions","Retry attempt logs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-blade-ai-agent-sdk__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.configuration.and.initialization.with.dependency.injection","name":"agent configuration and initialization with dependency injection","description":"Provides a fluent builder API for configuring agents with LLM provider settings, tool definitions, system instructions, and execution parameters. Uses dependency injection to wire together the LLM client, tool registry, and message history, allowing for easy testing and swapping of components. Configuration is validated at initialization time to catch errors early.","intents":["I want to configure an agent with specific tools, instructions, and LLM settings","I need to create multiple agent instances with different configurations","I want to test my agent with a mock LLM provider"],"best_for":["Developers building multiple agents with different configurations","Teams implementing unit tests for agent logic","Builders prototyping agents and wanting to quickly swap configurations"],"limitations":["Configuration is immutable after initialization — dynamic tool registration requires agent restart","No built-in validation of tool compatibility with the selected LLM provider","Configuration schema is not exposed for external validation or schema generation"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","TypeScript 4.5+ for full type safety (JavaScript supported)"],"input_types":["LLM provider configuration (API key, model name, etc.)","Tool definitions","System instructions","Execution parameters (max steps, timeout, etc.)"],"output_types":["Initialized Agent instance","Configuration validation errors"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-blade-ai-agent-sdk__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.type.safe.agent.responses.with.structured.output.validation","name":"type-safe agent responses with structured output validation","description":"Enables agents to return structured responses (JSON, objects) with schema validation, ensuring that agent outputs conform to expected types. Uses JSON Schema validation to parse and validate LLM-generated JSON, providing type-safe responses in TypeScript. Includes fallback handling for invalid JSON or schema mismatches.","intents":["I want my agent to return structured data (JSON) instead of plain text","I need to validate that agent responses match a specific schema","I want type-safe agent responses in TypeScript"],"best_for":["Developers building agents that feed into downstream systems requiring structured data","Teams implementing agents with strict output contracts","Builders using TypeScript and wanting compile-time type safety for agent responses"],"limitations":["LLM-generated JSON may be invalid or not match the schema, requiring fallback strategies","Schema validation adds latency to response processing","Complex nested schemas may confuse LLMs, leading to validation failures"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","JSON Schema knowledge","TypeScript 4.5+ for full type safety"],"input_types":["JSON Schema definitions","LLM-generated text responses"],"output_types":["Validated JSON objects","Type-safe TypeScript objects","Validation error details"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Node.js 16+","API keys for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","TypeScript 4.5+ (for type safety, though JavaScript is supported)","Tool handlers must be JavaScript/TypeScript functions","JSON Schema knowledge for defining tool input/output contracts","LLM provider API key","Understanding of agent loop patterns (ReAct, loop-of-thought, etc.)","LLM provider that supports streaming (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Client-side event handling (EventSource API or WebSocket)","Understanding of LLM context windows and token limits"],"failure_modes":["Provider abstraction may not expose advanced features unique to specific LLMs (e.g., vision capabilities, tool-use schemas vary by provider)","Streaming response handling adds complexity when normalizing across providers with different streaming protocols","Token counting approximations may differ from actual provider counts, affecting cost estimation","Schema validation is synchronous — no async schema resolution or dynamic tool discovery at runtime","Tool execution errors are not automatically retried; error handling is delegated to agent logic","No built-in rate limiting or quota management for tool calls across multiple invocations","No built-in persistence — agent state is held in memory and lost on process restart","Context window management is manual; no automatic summarization or sliding-window compression","Step-by-step execution is synchronous; parallel tool execution is not supported","Streaming adds complexity to error handling — partial responses may be sent before errors occur","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.0850033257689769,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.5000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.328Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.651Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":354,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=blade-ai-agent-sdk","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=blade-ai-agent-sdk"}},"signature":"vLLEVOifXG+Hzy51DVeivPUAAzqXUvTwVOuIUEgheTfPBeSawALpi1JQEMCCc/L7xGLl+eq1iRC57QvlxO4CBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T00:31:14.879Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/blade-ai-agent-sdk","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/blade-ai-agent-sdk","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=blade-ai-agent-sdk","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}