{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"vscode-bito-bito","slug":"bito-ai-code-reviews","name":"Bito AI Code Reviews","type":"extension","url":"https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=Bito.Bito","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/bito-ai-code-reviews","categories":["code-review-security","code-editors","testing-quality"],"tags":["ai","chatGPT","code explanation","code generation","code summary","code transform","copilot","debugging","keybindings","performance","qa","security","style check","unit testing"],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.codebase.aware.line.by.line.code.review.with.context.synthesis","name":"codebase-aware line-by-line code review with context synthesis","description":"Analyzes code changes at granular line-level precision while maintaining full codebase context, using Claude Sonnet 4 as the underlying reasoning engine combined with Bito's proprietary prompt framework to synthesize project structure, patterns, and conventions. The extension ingests the entire codebase (not isolated file analysis) to generate contextually-aware feedback that reflects project-specific best practices rather than generic rules.","intents":["I want AI to review my code changes before I push to GitHub, catching issues I might miss","I need line-specific feedback on what's wrong and how to fix it in my current file","I want reviews that understand my project's architecture and coding patterns, not generic linting"],"best_for":["solo developers and small teams using VS Code who want pre-PR feedback without creating draft pull requests","teams migrating from manual code review to AI-assisted review workflows","developers working in codebases with strong architectural patterns that require context-aware analysis"],"limitations":["Codebase context synthesis latency unknown — 'instant' reviews may add 2-10 seconds depending on codebase size","No documented limit on codebase size that can be analyzed; behavior on 1M+ LOC projects unknown","Cannot access IDE settings, workspace configuration, or external linting rules to inform review context","Review quality depends on codebase having sufficient pattern examples; sparse or inconsistent codebases may receive generic feedback"],"requires":["VS Code (minimum version unknown)","Bito account (free tier available)","Git repository initialized in workspace","Code changes staged, committed, or in working directory"],"input_types":["source code (30+ languages: Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, Go, SQL, C, C++, PHP, Ruby, Swift, etc.)","uncommitted file changes","staged files","specific commits","file paths"],"output_types":["structured review feedback (line-by-line annotations)","bug/security/quality issue descriptions","fix suggestions with 1-click application","best practice recommendations"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.scope.review.trigger.with.configurable.analysis.intensity","name":"multi-scope review trigger with configurable analysis intensity","description":"Provides flexible review scope selection (local uncommitted changes, staged files, specific commits, uncommitted edits, or file paths) combined with two analysis intensity modes (Essential for critical issues only, Comprehensive for detailed cross-category analysis). This allows developers to trigger reviews at different points in their workflow and control the depth of feedback based on time constraints or review goals.","intents":["I want to review only my staged changes before committing, not my entire working directory","I need a quick review focused on bugs and security issues, not style suggestions","I want to review a specific commit or file path without reviewing the entire PR"],"best_for":["developers with varying review needs across different workflow stages (pre-commit, pre-push, pre-PR)","teams with time-constrained code review processes who need quick Essential-mode feedback","developers working on large PRs who want to review specific files or commits in isolation"],"limitations":["Essential vs Comprehensive mode distinction not documented in detail — unclear which issue categories are filtered in Essential mode","No documented way to customize which issue types appear in Essential mode; filtering is binary","Scope selection UI/UX not documented — unclear if selection is via command palette, sidebar, or context menu","No batch review capability documented; each scope selection requires separate review invocation"],"requires":["VS Code (minimum version unknown)","Bito account","Git repository with at least one commit"],"input_types":["uncommitted file changes (working directory)","staged files (git index)","commit hashes or commit ranges","file paths or glob patterns"],"output_types":["filtered review feedback (Essential or Comprehensive)","issue categorization (bugs, security, quality, style)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_10","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.self.hosted.and.on.premises.deployment.with.private.infrastructure","name":"self-hosted and on-premises deployment with private infrastructure","description":"Offers self-hosted and on-premises deployment options (Professional and Enterprise Plans) allowing organizations to run Bito reviews on private infrastructure without transmitting code to Bito's cloud. This enables organizations to maintain complete control over code, comply with data residency requirements, and integrate with private AI models or custom Claude Sonnet 4 endpoints.","intents":["I need to run code reviews on our private infrastructure without sending code to the cloud","I want to comply with data residency laws that require code to stay in our region","I need to integrate code reviews with our private AI infrastructure or custom models"],"best_for":["enterprises with strict data governance requiring on-premises code analysis","organizations in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) with data residency requirements","teams with private AI infrastructure who want to integrate Bito reviews"],"limitations":["Self-hosted/on-premises deployment mechanism not documented — unclear if Docker, Kubernetes, VM image, or source code","Infrastructure requirements not documented — CPU, memory, storage, network bandwidth unknown","No documented support for custom AI models; unclear if self-hosted deployment uses Claude Sonnet 4 or alternative","Maintenance and update procedures not documented","Feature only available in Professional and Enterprise Plans; significant cost increase vs. cloud-based"],"requires":["Bito Professional Plan or Enterprise Plan","Private infrastructure (on-premises servers, private cloud, or self-hosted environment)","Infrastructure meeting unknown resource requirements","Deployment and maintenance expertise"],"input_types":["source code"],"output_types":["code review feedback (stored on private infrastructure)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_11","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.team.level.review.management.and.slack.notifications","name":"team-level review management and slack notifications","description":"Provides team-level review management (Team Plan+) with centralized visibility into code reviews across team members, combined with Slack integration for asynchronous notifications. Teams can track review status, view aggregated quality metrics, and receive Slack notifications when reviews are complete or critical issues are found, enabling distributed teams to stay informed without context-switching to the IDE.","intents":["I want to see code review status for my entire team in one place","I need Slack notifications when critical issues are found in code reviews","I want to track code quality trends across my team over time"],"best_for":["distributed teams using Slack who want asynchronous code review notifications","team leads and engineering managers wanting visibility into team code quality","teams practicing async code review where developers need notifications without IDE context"],"limitations":["Team-level review management UI/UX not documented — unclear what metrics or views are available","Slack integration mechanism not documented — unclear if webhook, bot, or native integration","No documented way to customize Slack notification content or frequency","Feature only available in Team Plan and higher; free tier users cannot access team management","No documented support for other chat platforms (Microsoft Teams, Discord, etc.)"],"requires":["Bito Team Plan or higher","Slack workspace with integration configured","Team members with Bito accounts"],"input_types":["code review results from team members"],"output_types":["team review dashboard (mechanism unknown)","Slack notifications with review status and critical issues"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_12","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.free.tier.code.review.with.usage.limits.and.feature.gating","name":"free tier code review with usage limits and feature gating","description":"Provides free access to basic code review capabilities in VS Code (specific limits unknown) allowing individual developers to try Bito without payment. Free tier includes line-by-line reviews, bug/security/quality detection, and fix suggestions, but excludes team features (PR reviews, Jira integration, CI/CD integration, custom guidelines, self-hosted deployment) which are gated behind paid plans.","intents":["I want to try AI code review without paying upfront","I need basic code review for my personal projects or learning","I want to evaluate Bito before committing to a team plan"],"best_for":["individual developers and students evaluating AI code review","solo developers working on personal projects","teams wanting to pilot Bito before purchasing team licenses"],"limitations":["Free tier usage limits not documented — unclear if daily review count, file size, or codebase size limits exist","No documented trial period for paid features; unclear if free tier is perpetual or time-limited","Cannot access team features (PR reviews, Jira, CI/CD, custom guidelines) without upgrading","Cannot use self-hosted or on-premises deployment","No documented support tier; unclear if free users receive support"],"requires":["Bito account (free signup)","VS Code"],"input_types":["source code"],"output_types":["code review feedback (within free tier limits)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_2","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.1.click.automated.fix.application.with.inline.code.transformation","name":"1-click automated fix application with inline code transformation","description":"Generates specific, actionable fix suggestions for identified issues and applies them directly to source files via IDE integration, transforming code in-place without requiring manual copy-paste or external tooling. Fixes are scoped to the specific issue location (line-level precision) and can be applied individually or in batch, integrating with VS Code's edit API for seamless undo/redo support.","intents":["I want to fix the issues Bito found without manually rewriting code","I need to apply multiple suggested fixes across my file quickly","I want to see the fix before applying it and have the ability to undo if needed"],"best_for":["developers seeking rapid iteration on code quality without manual refactoring","teams using Bito reviews as a pre-commit quality gate with automated remediation","developers learning best practices by seeing AI-suggested fixes applied in context"],"limitations":["Fix applicability not documented — unclear if fixes work across all 30+ supported languages or have language-specific limitations","No documented rollback strategy beyond VS Code's standard undo; batch fix failures may leave partial state","Fix quality depends on Claude Sonnet 4's code generation; complex refactorings may produce incorrect or incomplete fixes","No preview mode documented — unclear if developers can review fix diffs before applying"],"requires":["VS Code (minimum version unknown)","Bito account","Write permissions to source files","Active code review with generated fix suggestions"],"input_types":["fix suggestion from code review (structured with issue location and proposed code)"],"output_types":["transformed source code (in-place file modification)","undo/redo stack entries in VS Code"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.platform.git.workflow.integration.with.pr.level.reviews","name":"multi-platform git workflow integration with pr-level reviews","description":"Extends code review capabilities beyond the IDE into Git hosting platforms (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket) by integrating with platform-native APIs to trigger reviews on pull requests, post feedback as PR comments, and optionally block merges based on review findings. Reviews can be triggered automatically on PR creation or manually invoked, with feedback appearing as native platform comments rather than external tool output.","intents":["I want Bito to automatically review my PRs on GitHub without creating a separate review tool","I need AI feedback to appear as comments on my PR so reviewers see it alongside human feedback","I want to enforce code quality gates in CI/CD by blocking merges until Bito reviews pass"],"best_for":["teams using GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket who want AI code review integrated into native PR workflows","teams with CI/CD pipelines who want to enforce AI-driven quality gates before merge","distributed teams where asynchronous PR feedback from AI supplements human review"],"limitations":["Git platform integration mechanism not documented — unclear if triggered via webhooks, GitHub Actions, or manual API calls","Only GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket documented; other platforms (Gitea, Forgejo, self-hosted) not supported","PR comment formatting and threading behavior not documented — unclear if feedback appears as single comment or per-line annotations","Merge-blocking capability only available in Professional/Enterprise plans; free tier cannot enforce quality gates","No documented way to customize which issue types block merges vs. appear as warnings"],"requires":["Bito account (Team Plan minimum for PR reviews; Professional Plan for CI/CD integration)","GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket account with repository access","OAuth or API token for platform authentication","Repository webhook configuration (mechanism unknown)"],"input_types":["pull request metadata (PR number, branch, changed files)","commit diffs from PR"],"output_types":["PR comments with review feedback","merge status checks (Professional Plan+)","CI/CD pipeline integration signals"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.security.vulnerability.and.bug.detection.with.category.specific.analysis","name":"security vulnerability and bug detection with category-specific analysis","description":"Performs targeted analysis across multiple issue categories (bugs, security vulnerabilities, code quality, style/best practices) using Claude Sonnet 4's reasoning capabilities combined with Bito's proprietary detection framework. Each category uses specialized detection patterns — security analysis identifies OWASP-class vulnerabilities, bug detection identifies logic errors and null-pointer risks, quality analysis identifies maintainability issues, and style analysis identifies convention violations.","intents":["I want to catch security vulnerabilities in my code before they reach production","I need to identify potential bugs and logic errors that static analysis might miss","I want to understand code quality issues and how to improve maintainability"],"best_for":["security-conscious teams building applications with sensitive data or authentication","developers working on critical systems where bug detection is essential","teams establishing code quality standards and wanting AI-assisted enforcement"],"limitations":["Specific vulnerability classes detected not documented — unclear if covers OWASP Top 10, CWE, or custom categories","No documented false positive rate or detection accuracy metrics","Security analysis depends on codebase context; vulnerabilities in unfamiliar patterns may be missed","Bug detection limited to code-level analysis; runtime or environment-specific bugs cannot be detected","No integration with external security scanning tools (SAST, dependency scanning) documented"],"requires":["VS Code (minimum version unknown)","Bito account","Source code in supported language (30+ languages)"],"input_types":["source code","code changes/diffs"],"output_types":["categorized issue list (bugs, security, quality, style)","severity indicators (implied but not documented)","issue descriptions and fix suggestions"],"categories":["safety-moderation","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_5","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.language.support.with.language.specific.analysis.patterns","name":"multi-language support with language-specific analysis patterns","description":"Supports code review across 30+ programming languages (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, Go, SQL, C, C++, PHP, Ruby, Swift, and others) with language-specific analysis patterns that understand language idioms, standard libraries, and common anti-patterns. Review feedback is generated in 20+ spoken languages, enabling non-English-speaking developers to receive reviews in their native language while analyzing code in any supported programming language.","intents":["I want code reviews for my Python/Go/Rust project, not just JavaScript","I need reviews in my native language (Spanish, French, German, etc.), not just English","I want language-specific best practices (e.g., Pythonic patterns, Go idioms) in my feedback"],"best_for":["polyglot teams working across multiple programming languages","international teams where developers have varying English proficiency","organizations standardizing on Bito for all code review regardless of tech stack"],"limitations":["Language-specific pattern quality not documented — unclear if all 30+ languages have equally sophisticated analysis","No documented support for domain-specific languages (DSLs), configuration languages (Terraform, Ansible), or markup languages","Spoken language support (20+) not enumerated — unclear which languages are supported","No documented way to customize language-specific rules or idiom detection"],"requires":["Source code in one of 30+ supported languages","Bito account with language preference configured"],"input_types":["source code in Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, Go, SQL, C, C++, PHP, Ruby, Swift, and 20+ other languages"],"output_types":["review feedback in 20+ spoken languages","language-specific issue descriptions and fix suggestions"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_6","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.custom.review.guidelines.configuration.with.team.level.policy.enforcement","name":"custom review guidelines configuration with team-level policy enforcement","description":"Allows teams to define custom code review guidelines and organizational standards that are incorporated into review analysis, enabling Bito to enforce team-specific rules and conventions beyond generic best practices. Custom guidelines are configured at the team level (Professional Plan+) and applied to all reviews, allowing organizations to codify architectural decisions, naming conventions, security policies, and project-specific patterns that the AI should enforce.","intents":["I want Bito to enforce our team's specific coding standards, not just generic best practices","I need to ensure all code reviews check for our organization's security policies","I want to codify our architectural patterns so Bito can catch deviations"],"best_for":["teams with established coding standards and architectural patterns","organizations with compliance requirements (security, naming, structure) that need consistent enforcement","enterprises standardizing code review across multiple teams with different tech stacks"],"limitations":["Custom guidelines configuration UI/UX not documented — unclear if web-based, config file, or API-driven","No documented limit on number of custom guidelines or complexity of rule definitions","Guideline syntax/language not documented — unclear if free-form text, structured rules, or regex patterns","No version control or audit trail for guideline changes documented","Feature only available in Professional Plan; free and Team Plan users cannot define custom guidelines"],"requires":["Bito Professional Plan or higher","Team account setup","Custom guidelines defined and configured (mechanism unknown)"],"input_types":["custom guideline definitions (format unknown)","source code to be reviewed against guidelines"],"output_types":["review feedback incorporating custom guidelines","guideline violation reports"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.jira.integration.with.issue.tracking.and.workflow.automation","name":"jira integration with issue tracking and workflow automation","description":"Integrates with Jira to automatically create or link issues from code reviews, enabling review findings to flow directly into team issue tracking workflows. When Bito identifies bugs or quality issues, they can be automatically created as Jira tickets with severity, description, and suggested fixes, allowing teams to track remediation and maintain audit trails of code quality improvements.","intents":["I want code review findings to automatically create Jira tickets so they don't get lost","I need to track which code quality issues have been fixed and which are still open","I want to link code reviews to our sprint planning and issue tracking"],"best_for":["teams using Jira for issue tracking who want code review findings integrated into their workflow","organizations with compliance requirements needing audit trails of code quality issues","teams practicing agile development where code quality issues should be tracked as work items"],"limitations":["Jira integration mechanism not documented — unclear if triggered automatically or requires manual action","No documented mapping between Bito issue categories (bug, security, quality, style) and Jira issue types","No documented way to customize Jira ticket fields (assignee, sprint, epic) from Bito reviews","Feature only available in Professional Plan; free and Team Plan users cannot use Jira integration","No documented support for Jira Cloud vs. Jira Server/Data Center"],"requires":["Bito Professional Plan or higher","Jira account with API access","Jira integration configured (mechanism unknown)"],"input_types":["code review findings (bugs, security issues, quality issues)"],"output_types":["Jira issues created with review details","linked code review to Jira issue"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ci.cd.pipeline.integration.with.merge.blocking.quality.gates","name":"ci/cd pipeline integration with merge-blocking quality gates","description":"Integrates Bito reviews into CI/CD pipelines (mechanism unknown, likely GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or Bitbucket Pipelines) to enforce code quality gates that can block merges until review findings are addressed. Reviews are triggered automatically on PR creation or commit, with results reported as pipeline status checks that prevent merge until critical issues are resolved or explicitly overridden.","intents":["I want to prevent low-quality code from merging by blocking PRs that fail Bito review","I need code quality checks to run automatically in our CI/CD pipeline without manual intervention","I want to enforce security standards by blocking merges with unresolved security issues"],"best_for":["teams with strict code quality requirements who want automated enforcement","organizations with security compliance needs requiring code review before merge","teams practicing continuous integration who want quality gates integrated into CI/CD"],"limitations":["CI/CD integration mechanism not documented — unclear if GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Bitbucket Pipelines, or custom webhook","No documented way to customize which issue types block merge vs. appear as warnings","No documented override mechanism for blocking merges (e.g., approval from senior developer)","Feature only available in Professional Plan; free and Team Plan users cannot use CI/CD integration","No documented support for CI/CD platforms beyond GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket"],"requires":["Bito Professional Plan or higher","CI/CD pipeline configured (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Bitbucket Pipelines, or equivalent)","Repository webhook or CI/CD integration configured"],"input_types":["pull request metadata and diffs","code review findings"],"output_types":["CI/CD status check (pass/fail)","merge blocking signal","review report in CI/CD logs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-bito-bito__cap_9","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.code.privacy.and.data.handling.with.configurable.storage.options","name":"code privacy and data handling with configurable storage options","description":"Implements privacy-first code review by default: code is NOT stored on Bito servers, NOT used to train AI models, and NOT shared with AI partners (Claude Sonnet 4 provider) unless explicitly permitted. Developers control storage location (local machine, user's cloud storage, or Bito cloud), with clear data handling policies ensuring code remains under user control. This addresses privacy concerns for proprietary code, regulated industries, and organizations with data residency requirements.","intents":["I need to ensure my proprietary code is not stored on Bito's servers or used for training","I want code reviews for regulated code (healthcare, finance) without violating data residency requirements","I need to control where my code is stored and who can access it"],"best_for":["organizations with proprietary code or trade secrets requiring strict data control","regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) with data residency requirements","enterprises with data governance policies requiring on-premises or private cloud storage"],"limitations":["Storage location options not fully documented — 'local', 'user's cloud storage', and 'Bito cloud' mentioned but mechanisms unclear","No documented encryption in transit or at rest for code transmission to Claude Sonnet 4","No documented audit trail of code access or data handling","Self-hosted and on-premises options only available in Professional/Enterprise Plans","Default cloud-based deployment means code is transmitted to Bito/Anthropic servers unless explicitly configured otherwise"],"requires":["Bito account","Understanding of data handling policies","Professional/Enterprise Plan for self-hosted or on-premises deployment"],"input_types":["source code"],"output_types":["code review feedback (stored per user's configuration)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":55,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["VS Code (minimum version unknown)","Bito account (free tier available)","Git repository initialized in workspace","Code changes staged, committed, or in working directory","Bito account","Git repository with at least one commit","Bito Professional Plan or Enterprise Plan","Private infrastructure (on-premises servers, private cloud, or self-hosted environment)","Infrastructure meeting unknown resource requirements","Deployment and maintenance expertise"],"failure_modes":["Codebase context synthesis latency unknown — 'instant' reviews may add 2-10 seconds depending on codebase size","No documented limit on codebase size that can be analyzed; behavior on 1M+ LOC projects unknown","Cannot access IDE settings, workspace configuration, or external linting rules to inform review context","Review quality depends on codebase having sufficient pattern examples; sparse or inconsistent codebases may receive generic feedback","Essential vs Comprehensive mode distinction not documented in detail — unclear which issue categories are filtered in Essential mode","No documented way to customize which issue types appear in Essential mode; filtering is binary","Scope selection UI/UX not documented — unclear if selection is via command palette, sidebar, or context menu","No batch review capability documented; each scope selection requires separate review invocation","Self-hosted/on-premises deployment mechanism not documented — unclear if Docker, Kubernetes, VM image, or source code","Infrastructure requirements not documented — CPU, memory, storage, network bandwidth unknown","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.79,"quality":0.5,"ecosystem":0.55,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:34.118Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:29.937Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=bito-ai-code-reviews","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=bito-ai-code-reviews"}},"signature":"rVKXiPb30nkP3Wi6LH15FGCmXAmJf55RD+AU9xqoxHBgKR0N40QLCSGI+CoE9Jz3k1XZG1YTpDYwxatbpAFiDg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T22:55:07.652Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/bito-ai-code-reviews","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/bito-ai-code-reviews","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=bito-ai-code-reviews","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}