{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_binarly","slug":"binarly","name":"BINARLY","type":"product","url":"https://www.binarly.io","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/binarly","categories":["code-review-security"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_0","uri":"capability://security.binary.level.vulnerability.detection","name":"binary-level vulnerability detection","description":"Analyzes compiled firmware binaries to identify zero-day vulnerabilities and security flaws without requiring access to source code. Uses AI-powered binary analysis to detect logic errors, privilege escalation paths, and memory safety issues that traditional static analysis tools miss.","intents":["I need to find unknown vulnerabilities in firmware I don't have source code for","I want to detect zero-day exploits before they're publicly disclosed","I need to identify privilege escalation paths in embedded systems"],"best_for":["Enterprise security teams","OEMs managing firmware portfolios","Supply chain security managers","Firmware vendors"],"limitations":["Requires compiled binary artifacts, not source code","Analysis time scales with firmware complexity and size","May produce false positives requiring expert validation","Steep learning curve for interpreting results"],"requires":["Compiled firmware binaries","Security expertise to interpret findings","Integration with CI/CD or firmware management systems"],"input_types":["firmware binaries","compiled executables","device ROM images"],"output_types":["vulnerability reports","risk scores","exploit path diagrams","remediation recommendations"],"categories":["security","firmware analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_1","uri":"capability://security.automated.compliance.verification","name":"automated compliance verification","description":"Scans firmware against regulatory and security standards including NIST, IEC 62443, and CWE to automatically verify compliance status. Generates audit-ready reports that map findings to specific compliance requirements.","intents":["I need to prove firmware compliance for regulatory audits","I want to automate compliance checking across my firmware portfolio","I need to map vulnerabilities to specific compliance standards"],"best_for":["Regulated industries (healthcare, automotive, industrial)","Organizations undergoing security audits","Compliance officers and security teams","OEMs selling to regulated customers"],"limitations":["Compliance rules are static; standards updates require platform updates","Cannot replace human compliance review for complex regulatory requirements","Coverage limited to supported standards"],"requires":["Firmware binaries","Selection of applicable compliance standards","Understanding of regulatory requirements"],"input_types":["firmware binaries","compliance standard selection"],"output_types":["compliance reports","audit documentation","gap analysis","remediation checklists"],"categories":["security","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_10","uri":"capability://security.firmware.component.dependency.mapping","name":"firmware component dependency mapping","description":"Identifies and maps all components, libraries, and dependencies within firmware binaries to track supply chain risk and identify vulnerable third-party components. Creates software bill of materials (SBOM) from binary analysis.","intents":["I need to know what third-party components are in my firmware","I want to track vulnerable dependencies across my devices","I need to create a software bill of materials for compliance"],"best_for":["Supply chain security teams","Compliance and audit teams","Firmware development teams","Organizations managing component vulnerabilities"],"limitations":["Accuracy depends on recognizing library signatures","Cannot identify custom or proprietary components","May miss dynamically loaded components","Requires regular library signature updates"],"requires":["Firmware binaries","Library signature database","Component vulnerability tracking system"],"input_types":["firmware binaries"],"output_types":["software bill of materials (SBOM)","component inventory","dependency graphs","vulnerable component lists"],"categories":["security","supply chain"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_11","uri":"capability://security.firmware.hardening.recommendations","name":"firmware hardening recommendations","description":"Provides specific, actionable recommendations for hardening firmware based on identified vulnerabilities and security gaps. Suggests compiler flags, security features, and architectural changes to improve security posture.","intents":["I need guidance on how to fix firmware vulnerabilities","I want recommendations for hardening my firmware","I need to understand security best practices for my device"],"best_for":["Firmware development teams","Security engineers","Organizations improving security posture","Teams with limited security expertise"],"limitations":["Recommendations are generic; device-specific constraints may limit applicability","Implementation effort varies widely by recommendation","May not account for performance or compatibility constraints","Requires development expertise to implement"],"requires":["Vulnerability analysis results","Device specifications and constraints","Development environment and toolchain knowledge"],"input_types":["vulnerability reports","firmware specifications"],"output_types":["hardening recommendations","implementation guides","priority-ranked suggestions"],"categories":["security","development"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_12","uri":"capability://security.firmware.threat.modeling.and.risk.scoring","name":"firmware threat modeling and risk scoring","description":"Automatically generates threat models for firmware and assigns risk scores based on vulnerability severity, exploitability, and business impact. Prioritizes vulnerabilities by actual risk to the organization.","intents":["I need to understand which vulnerabilities pose the greatest risk","I want to prioritize remediation efforts based on actual impact","I need to communicate security risk to non-technical stakeholders"],"best_for":["Security leadership and CISOs","Risk management teams","Organizations with limited remediation capacity","Teams needing to justify security investments"],"limitations":["Risk scoring is based on generic threat models","Cannot account for organization-specific threat landscape","Requires business context to validate risk assessments","May underestimate or overestimate actual risk"],"requires":["Vulnerability analysis results","Device deployment context","Business impact assessment","Threat landscape knowledge"],"input_types":["vulnerability reports","device specifications","deployment information"],"output_types":["threat models","risk scores","prioritized vulnerability lists","executive summaries"],"categories":["security","risk management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_2","uri":"capability://security.closed.source.firmware.analysis","name":"closed-source firmware analysis","description":"Analyzes proprietary and closed-source firmware without requiring source code access, enabling security assessment of third-party components and vendor-supplied binaries. Works with encrypted, obfuscated, or proprietary firmware formats.","intents":["I need to audit firmware from vendors who won't share source code","I want to assess security of third-party components in my devices","I need to verify firmware integrity of proprietary systems"],"best_for":["Organizations using third-party firmware components","Supply chain security teams","Device manufacturers integrating vendor components","Enterprises managing heterogeneous device ecosystems"],"limitations":["Cannot access design intent or architectural documentation","May miss context-specific vulnerabilities","Reverse engineering limitations on heavily obfuscated code","Cannot verify source code authenticity"],"requires":["Compiled firmware binaries","Device specifications or datasheets (optional)","Access to firmware extraction tools if needed"],"input_types":["proprietary firmware binaries","encrypted firmware images","obfuscated executables"],"output_types":["security assessment reports","vulnerability findings","component analysis"],"categories":["security","supply chain"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_3","uri":"capability://security.firmware.portfolio.risk.aggregation","name":"firmware portfolio risk aggregation","description":"Analyzes multiple firmware versions and device variants at scale to identify patterns, aggregate risk across the portfolio, and prioritize remediation efforts. Provides organization-wide visibility into firmware security posture.","intents":["I need to understand security risk across all my device firmware","I want to prioritize which firmware versions to patch first","I need to track firmware security trends over time"],"best_for":["Large enterprises with diverse device portfolios","OEMs managing multiple product lines","Security operations centers","Organizations with thousands of device variants"],"limitations":["Pricing scales with firmware volume, becoming expensive at scale","Requires consistent firmware submission and tracking","Analysis latency increases with portfolio size","Aggregation quality depends on firmware metadata quality"],"requires":["Multiple firmware binaries","Firmware versioning and metadata","Device inventory management system","Centralized firmware repository"],"input_types":["multiple firmware binaries","firmware metadata","device inventory data"],"output_types":["portfolio risk dashboards","prioritized remediation lists","trend analysis reports","risk heat maps"],"categories":["security","operations"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_4","uri":"capability://security.supply.chain.firmware.verification","name":"supply chain firmware verification","description":"Verifies the security integrity of firmware throughout the supply chain by analyzing binaries at multiple points (manufacturing, distribution, deployment). Detects tampering, unauthorized modifications, and compromised firmware.","intents":["I need to verify firmware hasn't been tampered with in transit","I want to detect compromised firmware before deployment","I need to ensure firmware authenticity across supply chain partners"],"best_for":["Supply chain security teams","Device manufacturers","Distributors and resellers","Organizations with complex distribution networks"],"limitations":["Cannot verify firmware source without cryptographic signatures","Requires baseline firmware for comparison","Cannot detect sophisticated supply chain attacks that don't modify binaries","Integration with supply chain systems required"],"requires":["Firmware binaries at multiple supply chain points","Baseline or reference firmware versions","Supply chain tracking systems","Cryptographic verification infrastructure"],"input_types":["firmware binaries","firmware checksums","supply chain event logs"],"output_types":["tampering detection reports","firmware integrity verification","supply chain audit logs"],"categories":["security","supply chain"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_5","uri":"capability://security.iot.device.security.assessment","name":"iot device security assessment","description":"Specialized analysis for IoT and embedded device firmware to identify vulnerabilities specific to resource-constrained environments, network protocols, and IoT attack surfaces. Assesses firmware for common IoT security weaknesses.","intents":["I need to assess security of IoT devices in my deployment","I want to find vulnerabilities in embedded device firmware","I need to verify IoT devices meet security requirements before deployment"],"best_for":["IoT platform operators","Smart device manufacturers","Enterprise IoT security teams","Industrial IoT (IIoT) security managers"],"limitations":["Requires understanding of specific IoT protocols and architectures","Cannot assess runtime behavior or network-level attacks","Limited visibility into cloud backend security","Device-specific vulnerabilities may require custom analysis"],"requires":["IoT device firmware binaries","Device specifications and datasheets","Knowledge of deployed protocols and network topology"],"input_types":["IoT firmware binaries","device configuration files","protocol specifications"],"output_types":["IoT security assessment reports","protocol vulnerability findings","device hardening recommendations"],"categories":["security","IoT"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_6","uri":"capability://security.privilege.escalation.path.detection","name":"privilege escalation path detection","description":"Identifies potential privilege escalation vulnerabilities and attack paths within firmware that could allow attackers to gain elevated system access. Maps exploitation chains from user-level to kernel or system privileges.","intents":["I need to find privilege escalation vulnerabilities in firmware","I want to understand how attackers could gain system access","I need to identify critical privilege boundary violations"],"best_for":["Security researchers","Firmware security teams","Penetration testers","Organizations focused on critical infrastructure protection"],"limitations":["Requires deep understanding of system architecture to validate findings","May produce false positives on complex privilege models","Cannot assess runtime privilege enforcement","Exploitation feasibility requires manual verification"],"requires":["Firmware binaries with privilege separation","System architecture documentation","Security expertise to interpret results"],"input_types":["firmware binaries","privilege model specifications"],"output_types":["privilege escalation reports","attack path diagrams","exploitation difficulty assessments"],"categories":["security","vulnerability analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_7","uri":"capability://security.memory.safety.vulnerability.detection","name":"memory safety vulnerability detection","description":"Analyzes firmware binaries to identify memory safety issues including buffer overflows, use-after-free, heap corruption, and other memory-related vulnerabilities. Detects both obvious and subtle memory safety flaws.","intents":["I need to find buffer overflow and memory corruption vulnerabilities","I want to identify use-after-free and heap exploitation opportunities","I need to assess memory safety of legacy firmware"],"best_for":["Firmware security teams","Security researchers","Organizations with legacy firmware","Teams focused on memory safety hardening"],"limitations":["Accuracy depends on binary optimization level and debugging symbols","Cannot assess runtime memory behavior","May miss vulnerabilities in dynamically allocated memory","False positives on complex memory management patterns"],"requires":["Compiled firmware binaries","Ideally with debugging symbols for better accuracy","Understanding of target architecture"],"input_types":["firmware binaries","debug symbols (optional)"],"output_types":["memory safety vulnerability reports","exploitation difficulty ratings","remediation guidance"],"categories":["security","vulnerability analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_8","uri":"capability://security.firmware.baseline.and.regression.detection","name":"firmware baseline and regression detection","description":"Compares firmware versions to detect security regressions, new vulnerabilities introduced in updates, and deviations from security baselines. Tracks security changes across firmware releases.","intents":["I need to verify firmware updates don't introduce new vulnerabilities","I want to detect security regressions between firmware versions","I need to track security changes across my firmware releases"],"best_for":["Firmware development teams","Release engineering teams","Quality assurance security teams","Organizations with frequent firmware updates"],"limitations":["Requires baseline firmware for comparison","Cannot assess intentional security changes vs. regressions","Comparison accuracy depends on firmware similarity","Requires version control and release tracking"],"requires":["Multiple firmware versions","Baseline or reference firmware","Version control and release metadata","Historical vulnerability data"],"input_types":["firmware binaries","version information","release notes"],"output_types":["regression reports","security change analysis","baseline deviation reports"],"categories":["security","quality assurance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_binarly__cap_9","uri":"capability://security.cryptographic.implementation.analysis","name":"cryptographic implementation analysis","description":"Analyzes firmware for cryptographic implementation vulnerabilities including weak algorithms, improper key management, insecure random number generation, and side-channel weaknesses in crypto code.","intents":["I need to verify cryptographic implementations are secure","I want to find weak encryption or key management issues","I need to assess resistance to side-channel attacks"],"best_for":["Security teams handling sensitive data","Organizations with cryptographic requirements","Firmware teams implementing security protocols","Compliance-focused organizations"],"limitations":["Cannot assess runtime side-channel behavior","Requires cryptographic expertise to validate findings","May miss sophisticated implementation attacks","Cannot verify key generation entropy"],"requires":["Firmware binaries with cryptographic code","Cryptographic standards knowledge","Security expertise for validation"],"input_types":["firmware binaries","cryptographic algorithm specifications"],"output_types":["cryptographic vulnerability reports","algorithm assessment","key management analysis"],"categories":["security","cryptography"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":47,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Compiled firmware binaries","Security expertise to interpret findings","Integration with CI/CD or firmware management systems","Firmware binaries","Selection of applicable compliance standards","Understanding of regulatory requirements","Library signature database","Component vulnerability tracking system","Vulnerability analysis results","Device specifications and constraints"],"failure_modes":["Requires compiled binary artifacts, not source code","Analysis time scales with firmware complexity and size","May produce false positives requiring expert validation","Steep learning curve for interpreting results","Compliance rules are static; standards updates require platform updates","Cannot replace human compliance review for complex regulatory requirements","Coverage limited to supported standards","Accuracy depends on recognizing library signatures","Cannot identify custom or proprietary components","May miss dynamically loaded components","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.45,"quality":0.88,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:29.715Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.535Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=binarly","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=binarly"}},"signature":"C4c3B1VCy0p/F26rBxaC/4vpnmuct+NS6i67kLJQHNybTFSCQIwDNKgNB2skulC49h6ymKUszDMsJUdOgfSICg==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T09:12:43.880Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/binarly","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/binarly","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=binarly","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}