{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hf-space-bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard","slug":"bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard","name":"bigcode-models-leaderboard","type":"benchmark","url":"https://huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/bigcode-models-leaderboard","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard","categories":["testing-quality"],"tags":["gradio","leaderboard","eval:code","test:public","judge:auto","submission:semiautomatic","region:us"],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hf-space-bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.automated.code.generation.model.benchmarking.with.standardized.evaluation.metrics","name":"automated code generation model benchmarking with standardized evaluation metrics","description":"Executes code generation models against a curated benchmark suite using automated test execution and pass/fail scoring. The system runs submitted model outputs through functional correctness tests, measuring performance across multiple code generation tasks with standardized metrics (pass@1, pass@10, etc.). Integration with HuggingFace Model Hub enables direct model loading and evaluation without manual setup.","intents":["Compare code generation model performance across a standardized benchmark to identify best-in-class models","Track performance improvements of code generation models over time as new versions are released","Validate that a custom code generation model meets minimum performance thresholds before production deployment","Identify which code generation models perform best for specific programming languages or task categories"],"best_for":["ML researchers evaluating code generation model architectures","Teams selecting code generation models for production systems","Open-source model maintainers tracking competitive performance"],"limitations":["Evaluation limited to models available on HuggingFace Model Hub — proprietary or private models cannot be benchmarked","Benchmark suite is fixed and may not reflect domain-specific code generation requirements (e.g., embedded systems, domain-specific languages)","Evaluation latency depends on model size and available compute resources — large models may have delayed results","No fine-grained performance analysis by error type or failure mode — only aggregate pass/fail metrics"],"requires":["Model must be hosted on HuggingFace Model Hub or accessible via HuggingFace API","Model must support text-to-code generation interface compatible with benchmark harness","Internet connectivity to HuggingFace infrastructure"],"input_types":["code generation task descriptions (natural language prompts)","function signatures or docstrings","programming language specifications"],"output_types":["pass@k metrics (pass@1, pass@10, pass@100)","execution success/failure status","leaderboard rankings with model metadata"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.semi.automated.model.submission.and.evaluation.pipeline","name":"semi-automated model submission and evaluation pipeline","description":"Implements a submission workflow where model authors can register their code generation models for evaluation through a structured form interface. The system validates model metadata, queues submissions for automated evaluation, and publishes results to the leaderboard with minimal manual intervention. Uses Gradio forms to collect model identifiers and configuration, then orchestrates evaluation jobs asynchronously.","intents":["Submit a new code generation model for evaluation without manually configuring benchmark infrastructure","Track submission status and receive notifications when evaluation completes","Update model metadata (description, tags, links) on the leaderboard after initial submission","Ensure fair evaluation by standardizing submission format and evaluation environment"],"best_for":["Model authors and researchers wanting to benchmark models without infrastructure setup","Community-driven leaderboard maintainers managing high-volume submissions","Organizations publishing code generation models and wanting public validation"],"limitations":["Semi-automated process still requires manual review for spam/malicious submissions — fully automated acceptance not feasible","Submission queue may have variable latency depending on available compute resources and submission volume","Model must already be published on HuggingFace Hub — no support for direct model file uploads","Limited validation of model correctness before evaluation — invalid models may consume evaluation resources"],"requires":["HuggingFace account with published model repository","Model must be in HuggingFace Model Hub format with proper model card","Access to Gradio form interface (web browser)"],"input_types":["model identifier (HuggingFace model path)","model metadata (name, description, tags)","configuration parameters (batch size, generation parameters)"],"output_types":["submission confirmation with tracking ID","evaluation status updates","leaderboard entry with benchmark results"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multi.language.code.generation.task.evaluation","name":"multi-language code generation task evaluation","description":"Evaluates code generation models across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, C++, etc.) with language-specific test harnesses and execution environments. Each language has dedicated test runners that compile/interpret generated code and validate correctness against expected outputs. The evaluation framework abstracts language-specific details while maintaining consistent pass/fail semantics across languages.","intents":["Assess code generation model performance across different programming languages to identify language-specific strengths/weaknesses","Determine if a code generation model generalizes well to multiple languages or requires language-specific fine-tuning","Compare models on language-specific code generation tasks (e.g., Python data processing vs Java enterprise patterns)","Identify which models are best suited for polyglot code generation scenarios"],"best_for":["Researchers studying cross-language code generation capabilities","Teams building multi-language code generation systems","Model developers optimizing for specific language performance"],"limitations":["Evaluation quality depends on test suite coverage — languages with fewer test cases may have less reliable metrics","Language-specific runtime environments add complexity and potential for environment-specific failures unrelated to model quality","Some languages may have longer execution times, creating evaluation bottlenecks","Test harness may not capture language-specific idioms or best practices — purely functional correctness focus"],"requires":["Test harness implementation for each supported language","Runtime environments for all evaluated languages (Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, C++, etc.)","Language-specific compilers/interpreters available in evaluation environment"],"input_types":["code generation prompts in natural language","language-specific function signatures","test cases with expected outputs"],"output_types":["per-language pass@k metrics","language-specific performance rankings","cross-language performance comparison matrices"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.real.time.leaderboard.ranking.and.aggregation","name":"real-time leaderboard ranking and aggregation","description":"Maintains a dynamically updated leaderboard that aggregates benchmark results across all submitted models, computing rankings based on standardized metrics (pass@k scores). The leaderboard updates automatically as new evaluation results are published, sorting models by performance and displaying metadata (model size, architecture, training data, etc.). Uses Gradio table components to render rankings with filtering and sorting capabilities.","intents":["View current best-performing code generation models ranked by standardized metrics","Filter leaderboard by model type, size, or other attributes to find models matching specific requirements","Track how a specific model's ranking changes over time as new models are submitted","Export leaderboard data for analysis or integration into other systems"],"best_for":["Researchers and practitioners selecting models for code generation tasks","Model developers monitoring competitive performance","Community members discovering and comparing available models"],"limitations":["Leaderboard rankings reflect only benchmark performance — may not correlate with real-world production performance or user satisfaction","Metric aggregation uses simple averaging — no weighting by task difficulty or importance","Historical ranking data may be limited — difficult to analyze long-term trends without data export","Leaderboard does not account for model size, latency, or resource requirements — only accuracy metrics"],"requires":["Completed benchmark evaluations for models to appear on leaderboard","Web browser to access Gradio interface","Internet connectivity to HuggingFace Spaces"],"input_types":["benchmark evaluation results (pass@k metrics)","model metadata (name, size, architecture)"],"output_types":["ranked leaderboard table","filtered/sorted model lists","model detail pages with full metrics"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.model.metadata.and.provenance.tracking","name":"model metadata and provenance tracking","description":"Captures and displays comprehensive metadata for each evaluated model including model size, architecture type, training data sources, license information, and links to model cards and documentation. Metadata is extracted from HuggingFace model repositories and supplemented with submission-provided information. The system maintains provenance information linking models to their source repositories and enabling reproducibility.","intents":["Understand model characteristics (size, architecture, training approach) when comparing performance metrics","Verify model licensing and usage restrictions before adopting a model","Access model documentation and source code for deeper investigation","Identify models trained on specific datasets or using particular architectures"],"best_for":["Practitioners evaluating models for production deployment","Researchers analyzing relationships between model characteristics and performance","Teams managing model governance and compliance requirements"],"limitations":["Metadata completeness depends on HuggingFace model card quality — some models may have incomplete or outdated information","No standardized schema for metadata — different models may provide inconsistent information","Metadata does not include runtime characteristics (latency, memory usage) — only static model properties","No automated validation of metadata accuracy — relies on model authors for correctness"],"requires":["Model published on HuggingFace Hub with model card","Metadata fields populated in model repository"],"input_types":["HuggingFace model card (YAML/Markdown)","submission form metadata","model repository information"],"output_types":["structured metadata display","model cards with links to source repositories","license and attribution information"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.public.evaluation.result.transparency.and.reproducibility","name":"public evaluation result transparency and reproducibility","description":"Publishes complete evaluation results including test cases, model outputs, and pass/fail status for public inspection, enabling independent verification of benchmark results. Results are stored persistently and linked from leaderboard entries, allowing researchers to audit evaluation methodology and identify potential issues. The system maintains evaluation logs with timestamps and configuration details for reproducibility.","intents":["Verify that benchmark results are accurate and not subject to gaming or manipulation","Understand why a model failed specific test cases to identify weaknesses","Reproduce benchmark evaluation locally using published test cases and methodology","Audit evaluation methodology to ensure fairness and identify potential biases"],"best_for":["Researchers requiring transparent evaluation for academic credibility","Model developers debugging evaluation failures","Community members verifying leaderboard integrity"],"limitations":["Publishing detailed results may expose test cases to overfitting — models could be fine-tuned specifically for benchmark tasks","Large-scale result storage creates infrastructure costs and data management complexity","Result transparency may reveal model weaknesses that authors prefer to keep private","No built-in mechanism to prevent test case memorization or benchmark-specific optimization"],"requires":["Persistent storage for evaluation results and logs","Web interface to browse and search results","Sufficient storage capacity for all evaluation artifacts"],"input_types":["test cases and expected outputs","model generation outputs","evaluation execution logs"],"output_types":["detailed result reports with pass/fail status","model output samples","evaluation methodology documentation","reproducibility artifacts"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":25,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Model must be hosted on HuggingFace Model Hub or accessible via HuggingFace API","Model must support text-to-code generation interface compatible with benchmark harness","Internet connectivity to HuggingFace infrastructure","HuggingFace account with published model repository","Model must be in HuggingFace Model Hub format with proper model card","Access to Gradio form interface (web browser)","Test harness implementation for each supported language","Runtime environments for all evaluated languages (Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, C++, etc.)","Language-specific compilers/interpreters available in evaluation environment","Completed benchmark evaluations for models to appear on leaderboard"],"failure_modes":["Evaluation limited to models available on HuggingFace Model Hub — proprietary or private models cannot be benchmarked","Benchmark suite is fixed and may not reflect domain-specific code generation requirements (e.g., embedded systems, domain-specific languages)","Evaluation latency depends on model size and available compute resources — large models may have delayed results","No fine-grained performance analysis by error type or failure mode — only aggregate pass/fail metrics","Semi-automated process still requires manual review for spam/malicious submissions — fully automated acceptance not feasible","Submission queue may have variable latency depending on available compute resources and submission volume","Model must already be published on HuggingFace Hub — no support for direct model file uploads","Limited validation of model correctness before evaluation — invalid models may consume evaluation resources","Evaluation quality depends on test suite coverage — languages with fewer test cases may have less reliable metrics","Language-specific runtime environments add complexity and potential for environment-specific failures unrelated to model quality","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.5000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.35,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.2,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.766Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:22:48.012Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard"}},"signature":"ZQpJwD0Emqgvw92lxolYD+yJ9/VtlJsdRxvzH3/86puQt31L5ib1lrELaUp0IFAsBaaaOlye/LuTInuT2PYlBA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T12:36:52.425Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=bigcode--bigcode-models-leaderboard","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}