{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai","slug":"bananaz-ai","name":"bananaz.ai","type":"product","url":"https://www.bananaz.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/bananaz-ai","categories":["automation","code-editors"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_0","uri":"capability://productivity.cad.aware.design.manufacturability.analysis","name":"cad-aware design manufacturability analysis","description":"Analyzes CAD files to automatically identify manufacturability issues and design-for-manufacturing (DFM) violations without manual engineer review. Detects geometric features that may be difficult or costly to manufacture and flags them for correction.","intents":["I want to catch manufacturability problems early before sending designs to manufacturing","I need to reduce the time senior engineers spend on DFM reviews","I want to identify cost-saving opportunities by detecting over-engineered features"],"best_for":["mechanical engineers","product design teams","manufacturing engineers","mid-to-large manufacturing companies"],"limitations":["effectiveness depends on CAD file format compatibility","may not handle non-standard geometries or custom manufacturing processes","requires clear definition of manufacturing constraints and capabilities"],"requires":["CAD file in supported format","manufacturing process parameters configured","integration with CAD software"],"input_types":["CAD files (STEP, IGES, or native CAD formats)"],"output_types":["manufacturability report","flagged design issues","recommendations"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_1","uri":"capability://productivity.geometric.tolerance.and.gd.t.compliance.checking","name":"geometric tolerance and gd&t compliance checking","description":"Automatically validates geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) specifications against design intent and manufacturing capabilities. Identifies tolerance conflicts, over-specification, and compliance issues with industry standards.","intents":["I want to ensure my GD&T specifications are correct and achievable","I need to verify tolerance stacks don't create impossible manufacturing requirements","I want to reduce errors in tolerance specification that cause manufacturing failures"],"best_for":["mechanical engineers","quality engineers","tolerance specialists","companies with strict tolerance requirements"],"limitations":["may not account for all industry-specific GD&T conventions","effectiveness varies across different manufacturing contexts","requires accurate CAD representation of tolerances"],"requires":["CAD file with GD&T annotations","manufacturing capability data","industry standard definitions"],"input_types":["CAD files with GD&T specifications"],"output_types":["compliance report","tolerance analysis","violation flags"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_10","uri":"capability://productivity.manufacturing.process.capability.matching","name":"manufacturing process capability matching","description":"Matches design requirements against available manufacturing processes and equipment capabilities to identify feasible manufacturing approaches. Recommends optimal processes based on design geometry and constraints.","intents":["I want to know which manufacturing processes can produce this design","I need to identify the most cost-effective manufacturing approach","I want to verify that our equipment can manufacture this design"],"best_for":["manufacturing engineers","process engineers","design engineers","companies with multiple manufacturing options"],"limitations":["requires comprehensive manufacturing capability database","may not account for supplier capabilities outside the company","recommendations depend on accurate process parameter data"],"requires":["CAD file","manufacturing equipment database","process capability data"],"input_types":["CAD files"],"output_types":["process recommendations","capability assessment","feasibility report"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_11","uri":"capability://productivity.design.standard.and.compliance.rule.library.management","name":"design standard and compliance rule library management","description":"Maintains and manages a library of design standards, manufacturing rules, and compliance requirements that can be applied to designs. Allows customization of rules for company-specific or industry-specific standards.","intents":["I want to define our company's design standards in the tool","I need to ensure all designs comply with industry regulations","I want to update design rules as our manufacturing capabilities change"],"best_for":["design leads","quality managers","manufacturing engineers","companies with standardized processes"],"limitations":["rule library maintenance requires ongoing effort","may not cover all industry-specific standards","requires technical knowledge to define rules"],"requires":["access to rule management interface","knowledge of design standards and requirements"],"input_types":["rule definitions","standard specifications"],"output_types":["rule library","compliance rules","validation criteria"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_2","uri":"capability://productivity.tolerance.stack.up.and.cumulative.error.analysis","name":"tolerance stack-up and cumulative error analysis","description":"Automatically calculates tolerance stack-up across assemblies and identifies cumulative errors that could impact fit, function, or assembly. Analyzes how individual component tolerances combine to affect overall assembly performance.","intents":["I want to understand how component tolerances affect final assembly fit","I need to identify which tolerances are critical to tighten to ensure assembly success","I want to optimize tolerances to reduce manufacturing cost while maintaining function"],"best_for":["mechanical engineers","assembly engineers","tolerance engineers","companies with complex multi-part assemblies"],"limitations":["limited evidence of handling complex assemblies","may struggle with non-linear tolerance relationships","requires accurate component tolerance data"],"requires":["CAD assembly file","component tolerance specifications","assembly relationship definitions"],"input_types":["CAD assembly files","tolerance specifications"],"output_types":["stack-up analysis","cumulative error report","critical tolerance identification"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_3","uri":"capability://productivity.geometric.change.detection.between.design.revisions","name":"geometric change detection between design revisions","description":"Automatically compares CAD files across design revisions to identify and highlight geometric changes, modifications, and differences. Enables rapid feedback on design iterations without manual side-by-side comparison.","intents":["I want to quickly see what changed between design versions","I need to verify that only intended changes were made in the latest revision","I want to track design evolution and understand the impact of each iteration"],"best_for":["design engineers","design review teams","product development managers","teams with rapid iteration cycles"],"limitations":["may not detect subtle geometric changes","requires both CAD files in compatible formats","change visualization quality depends on CAD complexity"],"requires":["two CAD files in supported formats","version control or file management system"],"input_types":["CAD files (current and previous versions)"],"output_types":["change report","highlighted differences","visual comparison"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_4","uri":"capability://productivity.automated.design.inspection.and.rule.based.validation","name":"automated design inspection and rule-based validation","description":"Runs automated checks against user-defined or standard design rules to validate CAD models for compliance with company standards, best practices, and design guidelines. Flags violations and generates inspection reports.","intents":["I want to ensure all designs follow our company's design standards","I need to catch design rule violations before they reach manufacturing","I want to automate repetitive design validation checks"],"best_for":["design engineers","quality assurance teams","design review leads","companies with standardized design processes"],"limitations":["effectiveness depends on rule definition accuracy","may not catch context-dependent violations","requires maintenance of rule library"],"requires":["CAD file","design rules or standards defined","rule engine configuration"],"input_types":["CAD files"],"output_types":["inspection report","rule violation list","compliance status"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_5","uri":"capability://productivity.feature.level.manufacturability.assessment","name":"feature-level manufacturability assessment","description":"Analyzes individual geometric features (holes, pockets, threads, bosses, etc.) to assess their manufacturability and identify problematic feature combinations. Provides specific feedback on feature design improvements.","intents":["I want to know if this hole pattern is manufacturable with our equipment","I need feedback on whether this pocket depth is achievable","I want to understand which features are driving up manufacturing cost"],"best_for":["mechanical engineers","manufacturing engineers","design engineers","companies with specific manufacturing constraints"],"limitations":["accuracy depends on manufacturing process parameters being correctly configured","may not handle custom or non-standard features","requires knowledge of available manufacturing equipment"],"requires":["CAD file with features","manufacturing equipment capabilities database","process parameters"],"input_types":["CAD files"],"output_types":["feature assessment report","manufacturability scores","improvement suggestions"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_6","uri":"capability://productivity.material.and.surface.finish.specification.validation","name":"material and surface finish specification validation","description":"Validates material selections and surface finish specifications against design requirements, manufacturing capabilities, and cost constraints. Identifies incompatibilities or suboptimal specifications.","intents":["I want to verify that my material choice is compatible with the manufacturing process","I need to check if the surface finish specification is achievable and cost-effective","I want to optimize material and finish selections for cost"],"best_for":["mechanical engineers","materials engineers","manufacturing engineers"],"limitations":["requires comprehensive material and finish capability database","may not account for all supplier-specific capabilities","effectiveness depends on accurate specification of requirements"],"requires":["CAD file with material and finish specifications","material/finish capability database","cost data"],"input_types":["CAD files with material and finish annotations"],"output_types":["validation report","compatibility assessment","cost analysis"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_7","uri":"capability://productivity.design.cost.estimation.and.optimization.recommendations","name":"design cost estimation and optimization recommendations","description":"Estimates manufacturing cost based on design geometry, material, processes, and manufacturing capabilities. Provides recommendations for design modifications that could reduce cost without compromising function.","intents":["I want to understand the manufacturing cost impact of my design choices","I need suggestions for how to reduce manufacturing cost","I want to compare cost implications of different design approaches"],"best_for":["design engineers","product managers","manufacturing engineers","cost-conscious product development teams"],"limitations":["cost estimates depend on accuracy of manufacturing data","may not account for volume discounts or supplier-specific pricing","recommendations are suggestions only and require engineering judgment"],"requires":["CAD file","manufacturing cost database","material costs","process costs"],"input_types":["CAD files"],"output_types":["cost estimate","cost breakdown","optimization recommendations"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_8","uri":"capability://productivity.cad.data.extraction.and.structured.documentation.generation","name":"cad data extraction and structured documentation generation","description":"Automatically extracts relevant design data from CAD files and generates structured documentation including bills of materials, dimension tables, and design summaries. Reduces manual documentation work.","intents":["I want to automatically generate a BOM from the CAD model","I need to extract all dimensions and tolerances into a structured format","I want to create design documentation without manual data entry"],"best_for":["design engineers","documentation specialists","manufacturing engineers"],"limitations":["extraction accuracy depends on CAD model completeness and structure","may require manual verification of extracted data","output format flexibility depends on tool capabilities"],"requires":["CAD file with complete design information","documentation template definitions"],"input_types":["CAD files"],"output_types":["BOM","dimension tables","design documentation","structured data"],"categories":["productivity","engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_bananaz-ai__cap_9","uri":"capability://productivity.design.review.collaboration.and.annotation","name":"design review collaboration and annotation","description":"Enables collaborative design review by allowing multiple engineers to view, annotate, and comment on CAD models within the AI copilot interface. Centralizes feedback and tracks review status.","intents":["I want to get feedback from multiple engineers on my design","I need to track design review comments and ensure they're addressed","I want to streamline the design review process"],"best_for":["design teams","design review leads","distributed engineering teams"],"limitations":["collaboration features may be limited compared to dedicated CAD collaboration tools","requires all reviewers to have access to the tool","annotation tools may not be as rich as native CAD software"],"requires":["CAD file","user accounts for reviewers","collaboration platform access"],"input_types":["CAD files"],"output_types":["annotated designs","review comments","review status tracking"],"categories":["productivity","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":45,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["CAD file in supported format","manufacturing process parameters configured","integration with CAD software","CAD file with GD&T annotations","manufacturing capability data","industry standard definitions","CAD file","manufacturing equipment database","process capability data","access to rule management interface"],"failure_modes":["effectiveness depends on CAD file format compatibility","may not handle non-standard geometries or custom manufacturing processes","requires clear definition of manufacturing constraints and capabilities","may not account for all industry-specific GD&T conventions","effectiveness varies across different manufacturing contexts","requires accurate CAD representation of tolerances","requires comprehensive manufacturing capability database","may not account for supplier capabilities outside the company","recommendations depend on accurate process parameter data","rule library maintenance requires ongoing effort","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:29.134Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.549Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=bananaz-ai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=bananaz-ai"}},"signature":"BfIryWEbYomzmsI33FXXLb+BAiP0KmcHh7Aa6b13DzR7LRwylBOiv7/ipUWAa/ZT6uhP0yCrjX9nYhP6ICxwCQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T22:11:07.916Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/bananaz-ai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/bananaz-ai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=bananaz-ai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}