{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2","slug":"awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2","name":"Awesome MCP Servers by wong2","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/wong2/awesome-mcp-servers","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2__cap_0","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.mcp.server.discovery.and.cataloging.via.curated.registry","name":"mcp server discovery and cataloging via curated registry","description":"Maintains a centralized, human-curated registry of 350+ MCP servers organized into six primary sections (Sponsors, Reference, Official, Community, Clients, Frameworks) within a single README.md source of truth. The catalog uses hierarchical categorization (Cloud/Infrastructure, Data/Database, DevOps, Business/Finance, Communication, AI/Search, Web Automation) with automated GitHub Actions validation to enforce alphabetical ordering, link validity, and submission format compliance before entries are merged.","intents":["Discover available MCP servers by category and use case without searching fragmented documentation","Find reference implementations and official servers from companies for production integration","Locate community-contributed servers and development frameworks for building custom MCP implementations","Evaluate MCP clients and tools that support the protocol for AI application integration"],"best_for":["AI application developers building LLM agents that need external tool integration","Teams evaluating MCP ecosystem maturity and available server implementations","Open-source contributors discovering community servers to extend or fork","DevOps engineers selecting MCP servers for infrastructure automation and data access"],"limitations":["Registry is static documentation — no programmatic API for querying servers by capability or metadata","Curation is manual and subjective; no automated server health checks or deprecation tracking","No versioning or compatibility matrix between servers and MCP protocol versions","Web submission portal (mcpservers.org) is separate from GitHub repo; submission workflow is opaque to contributors"],"requires":["GitHub account for pull request submissions (though PRs are auto-rejected; web portal required)","Access to mcpservers.org web submission interface for adding new servers","Basic understanding of MCP protocol and server categories for proper classification"],"input_types":["Server metadata (name, description, repository URL, category, language)","Server implementation code (for reference/official servers)","Client tool information (for MCP-compatible AI applications)"],"output_types":["Structured markdown catalog with categorized server listings","Links to server repositories, documentation, and live deployments","Framework and client tool references with integration examples"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.automated.pull.request.rejection.with.github.actions.workflow","name":"automated pull request rejection with github actions workflow","description":"Implements a zero-tolerance submission policy using GitHub Actions that automatically closes any pull request opened against the repository within seconds of creation. The workflow uses the pull_request_target event (rather than pull_request) to execute in the base repository context, preventing contributors from bypassing the workflow by modifying workflow files in their forks. A standardized rejection comment directs users to the external web submission portal (mcpservers.org) as the only valid submission channel.","intents":["Enforce a single submission channel (web portal) to prevent merge conflicts and maintain curation consistency","Prevent accidental or malicious pull requests from cluttering the repository and requiring manual triage","Redirect contributor effort toward the web submission system where submissions can be validated and deduplicated","Maintain repository cleanliness by eliminating the need for manual PR review and rejection"],"best_for":["Curated registries and awesome-lists that need strict submission control without manual review overhead","Projects with high submission volume that require automated gatekeeping","Teams managing community contributions through external portals rather than direct Git workflows"],"limitations":["Provides no feedback on why a submission was rejected or what criteria it must meet","Users unfamiliar with the web portal may be confused by automatic rejection without clear guidance","No mechanism for emergency direct contributions (e.g., critical security fixes) — all submissions must go through web portal","Workflow configuration is immutable to contributors; no way to propose workflow improvements via PR"],"requires":["GitHub Actions enabled on the repository","superbrothers/close-pull-request@v3 action available in GitHub Actions marketplace","External web submission portal (mcpservers.org) operational and accessible","Repository admin access to configure workflow permissions and pull_request_target event"],"input_types":["Pull request metadata (opened event, PR title, description, author)"],"output_types":["Automated PR closure with standardized rejection comment","Redirect message with link to web submission portal"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.server.categorization.and.hierarchical.organization.system","name":"server categorization and hierarchical organization system","description":"Organizes 350+ MCP servers into a six-level hierarchy: primary sections (Reference, Official, Community), secondary categories (Cloud/Infrastructure, Data/Database, DevOps, Business/Finance, Communication, AI/Search, Web Automation), and tertiary entries with metadata (name, description, repository URL, language, status). The README.md structure uses markdown headers and nested lists to create a navigable taxonomy that allows users to browse by use case and deployment context. Alphabetical ordering within each category is enforced via automated GitHub Actions validation.","intents":["Browse MCP servers by functional category (e.g., 'find all database servers') without reading through unorganized lists","Distinguish between reference implementations, official production servers, and community contributions","Quickly identify servers relevant to specific domains (DevOps, Finance, Communication) for targeted integration","Understand the breadth of MCP ecosystem by exploring all available categories and their server counts"],"best_for":["Developers new to MCP ecosystem who need to understand available server types and use cases","Teams selecting servers for specific domains (e.g., DevOps teams looking for infrastructure servers)","Maintainers of the registry who need to classify new submissions into appropriate categories","Documentation writers building integration guides that reference servers by category"],"limitations":["Categories are static and manually maintained — no dynamic tagging or multi-category assignment for servers that span domains","No metadata fields for server maturity, maintenance status, or compatibility with specific MCP protocol versions","Alphabetical ordering requirement makes it difficult to highlight popular or recommended servers within each category","No search functionality within the markdown document — users must manually scan or use browser find"],"requires":["Understanding of MCP protocol and server types to properly classify new submissions","Markdown editing capability to add or modify category entries","Familiarity with the existing category taxonomy to avoid creating duplicate categories"],"input_types":["Server metadata (name, description, category, language, repository URL)","Category definitions and scope (what belongs in 'DevOps' vs 'Cloud/Infrastructure')"],"output_types":["Hierarchical markdown structure with nested headers and lists","Categorized server listings with metadata links","Navigation anchors for jumping to specific categories"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.web.portal.submission.and.validation.workflow","name":"web portal submission and validation workflow","description":"Provides an external web submission interface (mcpservers.org) that accepts new MCP server entries, validates them against submission criteria, and routes approved submissions to the GitHub repository maintainers. The portal acts as a gating layer that prevents direct Git contributions while collecting structured metadata (server name, description, repository URL, category, language) and performing pre-submission validation (duplicate detection, URL validity, category matching). Approved submissions are then integrated into the README.md catalog by maintainers.","intents":["Submit new MCP servers to the registry without requiring Git knowledge or GitHub account","Validate server metadata before submission to catch common errors (invalid URLs, missing fields, duplicates)","Prevent duplicate server entries by checking against existing catalog before accepting submissions","Provide a user-friendly interface for non-technical contributors to add servers to the ecosystem"],"best_for":["Open-source server maintainers who want to list their projects in the MCP registry","Non-technical contributors who lack Git/GitHub experience but want to contribute to the ecosystem","Registry maintainers who need a structured submission pipeline with validation and deduplication","Teams building MCP servers who want centralized discovery without managing their own documentation"],"limitations":["Portal implementation details are not documented in the repository — submission criteria and validation rules are opaque","No public submission queue or status tracking — users cannot see if their submission is pending, approved, or rejected","Submission approval timeline is undefined — no SLA for how long it takes for entries to appear in the catalog","Portal is separate from GitHub, creating a two-system maintenance burden and potential sync issues"],"requires":["Access to mcpservers.org web interface (URL and availability not documented in repository)","Valid server repository URL (GitHub, GitLab, or other Git hosting)","Accurate server metadata (name, description, category classification)","Server must meet undocumented submission criteria (assumed: active maintenance, valid documentation, functional implementation)"],"input_types":["Server metadata form (name, description, repository URL, category, language, tags)","Server repository link for validation and documentation review"],"output_types":["Submission confirmation or validation error messages","Approved server entry added to README.md catalog","Notification to submitter when entry is published"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.mcp.protocol.reference.documentation.and.specification.coverage","name":"mcp protocol reference documentation and specification coverage","description":"Provides documentation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) architecture, including JSON-RPC 2.0 message format, three core primitives (Tools, Resources, Prompts), and three transport mechanisms (STDIO for local processes, SSE for remote HTTP, HTTP for REST wrappers). The repository includes references to deployment patterns (local spawned processes, remote cloud services, containerized deployments, hybrid configurations) and client-server interaction patterns, enabling developers to understand how MCP servers integrate with AI applications and what capabilities they can expose.","intents":["Understand MCP protocol fundamentals and how servers communicate with clients via JSON-RPC 2.0","Learn about transport mechanisms and choose appropriate deployment pattern for a server (local STDIO vs remote SSE vs HTTP)","Discover what primitives (Tools, Resources, Prompts) a server can expose and how clients interact with them","Reference MCP specification details when building custom servers or integrating with MCP clients"],"best_for":["Developers building new MCP servers who need to understand protocol requirements and capabilities","AI application developers integrating MCP clients to connect with external tools and data sources","DevOps engineers deploying MCP servers in cloud or containerized environments","Protocol implementers building MCP client libraries or SDKs"],"limitations":["MCP protocol documentation is referenced but not fully specified in the repository — detailed spec is in external Anthropic documentation","No code examples or implementation walkthroughs for each transport mechanism","Deployment patterns are described conceptually but lack concrete configuration examples","No troubleshooting guide for common MCP integration issues or transport-specific gotchas"],"requires":["Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 protocol basics","Knowledge of HTTP, STDIO, and SSE transport mechanisms","Familiarity with AI/LLM concepts and how tools/resources/prompts fit into agent workflows"],"input_types":["MCP protocol specification (JSON-RPC 2.0 format, method definitions)","Transport mechanism documentation (STDIO, SSE, HTTP)","Deployment pattern descriptions and configuration examples"],"output_types":["Protocol reference documentation in markdown format","Deployment pattern diagrams and descriptions","Links to external MCP specification and client implementations"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.client.and.framework.discovery.for.integration","name":"mcp client and framework discovery for integration","description":"Catalogs 10+ MCP-compatible AI tools and IDEs (clients) and 8+ development frameworks for building MCP servers, enabling developers to find integration points for their servers or discover tools that support MCP protocol. The registry includes both official clients (from companies like Anthropic) and community-built clients, along with frameworks that abstract common MCP server patterns (authentication, tool registration, resource management, prompt templating). This section helps developers understand the ecosystem of tools that can consume MCP servers.","intents":["Find AI applications and IDEs that support MCP protocol for integrating custom servers","Discover development frameworks that simplify building MCP servers in preferred programming languages","Evaluate which clients support specific MCP primitives (Tools, Resources, Prompts) for targeted integration","Understand the breadth of tooling ecosystem to make informed decisions about server implementation"],"best_for":["Server developers choosing frameworks that match their tech stack and use case","AI application developers selecting MCP clients that support their integration requirements","Teams evaluating MCP adoption by assessing available client and framework options","Open-source maintainers discovering existing frameworks to extend or contribute to"],"limitations":["No comparison matrix showing which clients support which MCP primitives or transport mechanisms","Framework maturity and maintenance status not indicated — no way to distinguish active projects from abandoned ones","No information about framework learning curve, documentation quality, or community support","Client feature parity not documented — unclear which clients support all MCP capabilities vs subsets"],"requires":["Understanding of MCP protocol and what clients/frameworks do","Knowledge of programming languages and frameworks to evaluate compatibility","Access to client and framework documentation for detailed feature comparison"],"input_types":["Client tool metadata (name, description, supported MCP features, repository URL)","Framework metadata (name, language, supported primitives, documentation link)"],"output_types":["Categorized list of MCP clients with links to documentation","Categorized list of MCP frameworks with language and feature information","Links to client and framework repositories and integration guides"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.alphabetical.ordering.enforcement.via.automated.validation","name":"alphabetical ordering enforcement via automated validation","description":"Implements GitHub Actions-based validation that checks all server entries within each category are in strict alphabetical order, rejecting or flagging pull requests that violate this constraint. The validation runs on every submission attempt and provides clear error messages indicating which entries are out of order. This automation ensures consistent catalog structure without requiring manual review of alphabetical compliance, reducing maintenance burden and preventing entropy that typically degrades community-maintained lists over time.","intents":["Maintain consistent, scannable catalog structure without manual alphabetical verification","Prevent merge conflicts caused by multiple contributors adding servers to the same category","Provide immediate feedback to contributors about formatting violations before submission","Ensure long-term maintainability by automating a tedious but critical consistency check"],"best_for":["Large registries with frequent submissions where manual alphabetical verification becomes impractical","Teams that want to enforce consistent formatting without human review overhead","Projects where alphabetical ordering is a critical usability feature (e.g., searchable catalogs)"],"limitations":["Alphabetical ordering can make it difficult to highlight recommended or popular servers within a category","Validation only checks alphabetical order — does not validate other metadata (URL validity, description quality, category correctness)","Error messages may not clearly indicate which entries are out of order or how to fix them","Alphabetical ordering is language-dependent (ASCII vs Unicode) — potential issues with non-English server names"],"requires":["GitHub Actions workflow configured to run on pull requests","Validation script that parses markdown and checks alphabetical ordering","Clear documentation of alphabetical ordering rules (case sensitivity, special characters, etc.)"],"input_types":["Markdown content from README.md with server entries","Pull request diff showing added or modified entries"],"output_types":["Validation pass/fail status on pull request","Error messages indicating out-of-order entries and their correct positions","Suggestions for fixing alphabetical violations"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":29,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["GitHub account for pull request submissions (though PRs are auto-rejected; web portal required)","Access to mcpservers.org web submission interface for adding new servers","Basic understanding of MCP protocol and server categories for proper classification","GitHub Actions enabled on the repository","superbrothers/close-pull-request@v3 action available in GitHub Actions marketplace","External web submission portal (mcpservers.org) operational and accessible","Repository admin access to configure workflow permissions and pull_request_target event","Understanding of MCP protocol and server types to properly classify new submissions","Markdown editing capability to add or modify category entries","Familiarity with the existing category taxonomy to avoid creating duplicate categories"],"failure_modes":["Registry is static documentation — no programmatic API for querying servers by capability or metadata","Curation is manual and subjective; no automated server health checks or deprecation tracking","No versioning or compatibility matrix between servers and MCP protocol versions","Web submission portal (mcpservers.org) is separate from GitHub repo; submission workflow is opaque to contributors","Provides no feedback on why a submission was rejected or what criteria it must meet","Users unfamiliar with the web portal may be confused by automatic rejection without clear guidance","No mechanism for emergency direct contributions (e.g., critical security fixes) — all submissions must go through web portal","Workflow configuration is immutable to contributors; no way to propose workflow improvements via PR","Categories are static and manually maintained — no dynamic tagging or multi-category assignment for servers that span domains","No metadata fields for server maturity, maintenance status, or compatibility with specific MCP protocol versions","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.39,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:02.371Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:18.053Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2"}},"signature":"GfvuRuQMeo4Dn4eHIA9jKOulXxqT0owd6xaZ3VYVbhNpWvbswjdV+pHhV9Z/MSTdQL79z4flMWTbPl2AFhELAg==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T19:33:13.239Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=awesome-mcp-servers-by-wong2","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}