{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-awesome-marketing","slug":"awesome-marketing","name":"Awesome Marketing","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/marketingtoolslist/awesome-marketing","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/awesome-marketing","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"inactive","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-awesome-marketing__cap_0","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.curated.marketing.tools.directory.aggregation","name":"curated-marketing-tools-directory-aggregation","description":"Aggregates and maintains a manually-curated list of marketing tools organized by category and use case, using GitHub's markdown-based repository structure as the persistence and versioning layer. The artifact functions as a crowdsourced knowledge base where contributors submit, review, and validate tool entries through pull requests, enabling community-driven curation with git-based audit trails for all changes.","intents":["discover marketing tools relevant to specific business problems without vendor bias","find alternatives to existing tools by browsing categorized recommendations","contribute new tools to a community-maintained resource and get visibility","understand the marketing tool landscape through structured categorization"],"best_for":["marketing teams evaluating tool stacks","startup founders building marketing infrastructure","independent developers building marketing integrations","marketing tool vendors seeking distribution channels"],"limitations":["manual curation creates latency — new tools may take weeks to appear after submission","no automated tool validation — relies on community review to catch outdated or defunct tools","no structured metadata — tools are listed as markdown text, making programmatic filtering difficult","no real-time data — pricing, features, and availability are static snapshots that decay over time","GitHub-only access — requires familiarity with git/markdown for contributions"],"requires":["GitHub account for browsing (free tier sufficient)","Git knowledge for contributing via pull requests","Markdown editing capability for submissions"],"input_types":["tool metadata (name, description, category, link)","markdown text","GitHub pull requests"],"output_types":["markdown-formatted tool listings","categorized tool recommendations","git commit history with change attribution"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-marketing__cap_1","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.category.based.tool.discovery.and.filtering","name":"category-based-tool-discovery-and-filtering","description":"Organizes marketing tools into hierarchical categories (e.g., email marketing, social media, analytics, automation) using markdown section headers and bullet-point lists, enabling users to navigate by use case rather than tool name. The categorization structure acts as a lightweight taxonomy that groups similar tools together, allowing users to compare alternatives within a specific functional domain without requiring database queries or search algorithms.","intents":["find all email marketing tools in one place to compare features and pricing","browse tools by marketing function (SEO, content, CRM, etc.) to understand available options","identify tool categories I haven't explored yet in my marketing stack","quickly locate tools for a specific marketing problem"],"best_for":["marketing practitioners building or auditing their tool stack","non-technical founders evaluating marketing solutions","marketing agencies comparing tools for client recommendations"],"limitations":["static categorization — tools can only belong to one category, missing cross-functional use cases","no filtering by price, features, or integrations — users must read each entry manually","category names are human-defined and may not match user mental models","no search functionality — users must scroll through markdown to find relevant tools"],"requires":["GitHub account or web browser to view markdown","ability to read markdown formatting"],"input_types":["markdown category headers","tool entries with name and description"],"output_types":["categorized tool lists","markdown-formatted recommendations"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-marketing__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.community.contribution.workflow.with.pull.request.governance","name":"community-contribution-workflow-with-pull-request-governance","description":"Enables community members to submit new tools, update existing entries, and propose category changes through GitHub pull requests, which are reviewed by repository maintainers before merging. This workflow creates a lightweight governance model where contributions are validated, discussed, and attributed through GitHub's native code review interface, with full transparency into who changed what and why via commit messages and PR discussions.","intents":["submit a new marketing tool I've built or discovered to reach a relevant audience","propose improvements to tool descriptions or categories based on my experience","see the reasoning behind why a tool was added or removed from the list","contribute to a community resource and get credit for my contributions"],"best_for":["open-source contributors looking for low-friction ways to participate","marketing tool vendors seeking organic distribution","community members wanting to improve shared resources"],"limitations":["requires GitHub account and git knowledge — excludes non-technical contributors","pull request review latency depends on maintainer availability — no SLA for response times","no automated validation — spam or low-quality submissions require manual review","merge conflicts possible when multiple contributors edit the same section simultaneously","no built-in discussion forum — complex conversations must happen in PR comments"],"requires":["GitHub account (free tier sufficient)","Git installed locally or ability to use GitHub web editor","Markdown editing knowledge","Understanding of pull request workflow"],"input_types":["git commits with tool metadata","markdown changes","pull request descriptions"],"output_types":["merged pull requests","updated repository state","contributor attribution in git history"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-marketing__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.tool.metadata.documentation.and.standardization","name":"tool-metadata-documentation-and-standardization","description":"Maintains structured metadata for each tool (name, description, URL, category, pricing model) using consistent markdown formatting conventions, creating a semi-structured knowledge base that can be parsed by scripts or humans. While not a formal schema, the consistent formatting enables downstream automation (e.g., scripts to extract tool names and URLs) and makes it easier for contributors to understand what information should be included for each tool entry.","intents":["quickly extract tool names and URLs for bulk import into my own tool database","understand what information is tracked for each tool to decide if it meets my needs","write a script to analyze the tool landscape (e.g., count tools by category, pricing distribution)","ensure my tool submission includes all relevant information"],"best_for":["developers building tool aggregation or comparison platforms","researchers analyzing the marketing tool ecosystem","tool vendors wanting to understand what metadata is important to users"],"limitations":["no formal schema — metadata structure is implicit in markdown formatting, making parsing fragile","inconsistent data — different contributors may format entries differently","missing fields — not all tools have complete metadata (pricing, integrations, etc.)","no validation — outdated URLs or incorrect information can persist without automated detection","no structured data export — users must parse markdown manually or write custom scripts"],"requires":["markdown parsing capability","ability to write regex or markdown parsers to extract structured data","understanding of the implicit metadata conventions used in the repository"],"input_types":["markdown-formatted tool entries","tool metadata (name, URL, description, category)"],"output_types":["parsed tool metadata","structured data (JSON, CSV) via custom scripts","markdown-formatted tool listings"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-awesome-marketing__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.version.controlled.tool.history.and.change.attribution","name":"version-controlled-tool-history-and-change-attribution","description":"Maintains complete git history of all changes to tool entries, including who added/modified each tool, when changes occurred, and what was changed, enabling users to understand the evolution of the directory and trace the provenance of recommendations. Git's commit log and blame functionality provide transparent attribution and allow users to evaluate the credibility of entries based on contributor history and community review.","intents":["understand when a tool was added and who recommended it to evaluate credibility","see what changed about a tool's description or category over time","identify which contributors are most active and knowledgeable about specific tool categories","revert incorrect or outdated information if a tool entry becomes inaccurate"],"best_for":["users wanting to evaluate the credibility of tool recommendations","contributors wanting to build reputation through visible contributions","maintainers needing to audit changes and manage quality"],"limitations":["git history is immutable — deleted tools remain in history, potentially confusing users","no structured change metadata — commit messages are free-form text, making automated analysis difficult","contributor identity is GitHub username only — no verification of expertise or credentials","history can be large and difficult to navigate for repositories with many contributors"],"requires":["Git knowledge to view commit history","GitHub account to view blame and history views","Understanding of git concepts (commits, branches, history)"],"input_types":["git commits","markdown changes","contributor metadata"],"output_types":["git commit history","blame information (who changed what)","change attribution and timestamps"],"categories":["automation-workflow","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":21,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["GitHub account for browsing (free tier sufficient)","Git knowledge for contributing via pull requests","Markdown editing capability for submissions","GitHub account or web browser to view markdown","ability to read markdown formatting","GitHub account (free tier sufficient)","Git installed locally or ability to use GitHub web editor","Markdown editing knowledge","Understanding of pull request workflow","markdown parsing capability"],"failure_modes":["manual curation creates latency — new tools may take weeks to appear after submission","no automated tool validation — relies on community review to catch outdated or defunct tools","no structured metadata — tools are listed as markdown text, making programmatic filtering difficult","no real-time data — pricing, features, and availability are static snapshots that decay over time","GitHub-only access — requires familiarity with git/markdown for contributions","static categorization — tools can only belong to one category, missing cross-functional use cases","no filtering by price, features, or integrations — users must read each entry manually","category names are human-defined and may not match user mental models","no search functionality — users must scroll through markdown to find relevant tools","requires GitHub account and git knowledge — excludes non-technical contributors","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.27,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"inactive","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:02.371Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:23.056Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=awesome-marketing","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=awesome-marketing"}},"signature":"MtJBppKClaQH8rEy8qV2MOobs7YdAiuw7oW3qq5HVuk3DvyaXVVOce9kLLY3gLsT4x/xhSf0zwAswasfMhR9Aw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T09:21:53.533Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/awesome-marketing","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/awesome-marketing","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=awesome-marketing","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}