{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_athina","slug":"athina","name":"Athina","type":"product","url":"https://athina.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/athina","categories":["observability","deployment-infra"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_athina__cap_0","uri":"capability://monitoring.real.time.llm.output.monitoring","name":"real-time llm output monitoring","description":"Continuously monitors LLM API calls and responses in production, tracking latency, token usage, cost, and error rates. Provides dashboards and alerts when performance metrics deviate from baselines or thresholds are exceeded.","intents":["I need to know when my LLM application is performing poorly in production","I want to track API costs and usage patterns across my LLM deployments","I need alerts when response times spike or error rates increase"],"best_for":["ML teams","DevOps engineers","LLM application owners"],"limitations":["Requires integration with LLM provider APIs","Only monitors what is instrumented","Alert fatigue possible with poorly tuned thresholds"],"requires":["Active LLM API calls","Integration with Athina SDK or API","Network connectivity"],"input_types":["LLM API calls","response metadata"],"output_types":["dashboards","alerts","metrics"],"categories":["monitoring","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_1","uri":"capability://quality.assurance.hallucination.detection.and.flagging","name":"hallucination detection and flagging","description":"Automatically detects and flags LLM outputs that contain factual inaccuracies, contradictions, or unsupported claims. Uses semantic analysis and custom evaluation rules to identify hallucinations without manual review.","intents":["I need to automatically catch when my LLM is making up facts or providing false information","I want to flag potentially unreliable outputs before they reach users","I need to measure the hallucination rate of my LLM in production"],"best_for":["QA teams","compliance officers","mission-critical LLM applications"],"limitations":["Detection accuracy depends on context and domain","May require ground truth data for training","Cannot catch all types of subtle hallucinations"],"requires":["LLM outputs","optional: reference data or ground truth","evaluation rules configuration"],"input_types":["text (LLM responses)","optional: reference documents"],"output_types":["hallucination flags","confidence scores","detailed reports"],"categories":["quality assurance","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_10","uri":"capability://quality.assurance.a.b.testing.and.model.comparison","name":"a/b testing and model comparison","description":"Enables side-by-side comparison of different LLM models, prompts, or configurations by running them against the same inputs and comparing outputs using defined evaluation metrics.","intents":["I want to test if a new model version is better than the current one","I need to compare different prompts to see which produces better results","I want to evaluate if a configuration change improves quality"],"best_for":["ML engineers","product managers","researchers"],"limitations":["Requires clear evaluation criteria","Statistical significance may require large sample sizes","Cost increases with number of models tested"],"requires":["multiple model/prompt variants","test dataset","evaluation rules"],"input_types":["test inputs","model configurations","evaluation criteria"],"output_types":["comparison reports","statistical analysis","winner determination"],"categories":["quality assurance","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_11","uri":"capability://compliance.compliance.and.audit.logging","name":"compliance and audit logging","description":"Maintains detailed audit logs of all LLM interactions, evaluations, and decisions for compliance and regulatory purposes. Provides exportable reports for audits and compliance verification.","intents":["I need to maintain audit trails for regulatory compliance","I want to prove that my LLM application meets safety and quality standards","I need to generate compliance reports for auditors or regulators"],"best_for":["compliance officers","legal teams","regulated industries"],"limitations":["Log storage can become expensive at scale","Requires clear compliance requirements definition","May have data retention/privacy implications"],"requires":["audit logging enabled","compliance requirements definition","storage capacity"],"input_types":["LLM interactions","evaluation results","system events"],"output_types":["audit logs","compliance reports","evidence documentation"],"categories":["compliance","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_12","uri":"capability://monitoring.latency.and.performance.profiling","name":"latency and performance profiling","description":"Profiles LLM application latency at different stages (API call, processing, response generation) to identify bottlenecks. Provides detailed timing breakdowns and performance recommendations.","intents":["I need to understand where latency is coming from in my LLM application","I want to identify bottlenecks that are slowing down responses","I need to optimize performance to meet SLA requirements"],"best_for":["DevOps engineers","performance engineers","ML engineers"],"limitations":["Profiling overhead may impact performance","Requires baseline for comparison","Some latency sources may be external"],"requires":["instrumented LLM calls","performance monitoring enabled"],"input_types":["LLM call traces","timing data"],"output_types":["latency reports","bottleneck analysis","optimization suggestions"],"categories":["monitoring","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_2","uri":"capability://quality.assurance.custom.evaluation.rule.creation.and.execution","name":"custom evaluation rule creation and execution","description":"Allows teams to define custom evaluation criteria and rules specific to their use case, then automatically applies these rules to all LLM outputs. Supports semantic similarity checks, toxicity detection, format validation, and domain-specific metrics.","intents":["I need to evaluate LLM outputs against my specific business requirements","I want to check if responses match a required format or structure","I need to measure domain-specific quality metrics beyond standard benchmarks"],"best_for":["ML engineers","product managers","domain experts"],"limitations":["Requires upfront effort to define meaningful rules","Rule complexity may impact evaluation latency","Maintenance burden as requirements evolve"],"requires":["Clear definition of evaluation criteria","Optional: labeled examples for training","Access to Athina evaluation framework"],"input_types":["evaluation rule definitions","LLM outputs","reference data"],"output_types":["evaluation scores","pass/fail results","detailed feedback"],"categories":["quality assurance","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_3","uri":"capability://quality.assurance.semantic.similarity.and.relevance.scoring","name":"semantic similarity and relevance scoring","description":"Measures how semantically similar LLM outputs are to expected or reference responses using embeddings and similarity algorithms. Provides scores that indicate relevance and alignment with intended answers.","intents":["I want to measure how closely my LLM's answer matches the expected response","I need to evaluate if the response is relevant to the user's query","I want to track consistency of responses across similar queries"],"best_for":["QA engineers","ML researchers","product teams"],"limitations":["Requires reference/expected responses for comparison","Semantic similarity doesn't guarantee factual correctness","May not capture domain-specific nuances"],"requires":["LLM outputs","reference responses or expected answers","embedding model"],"input_types":["text (LLM responses)","text (reference responses)"],"output_types":["similarity scores","relevance metrics","comparison reports"],"categories":["quality assurance","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.toxicity.and.safety.content.detection","name":"toxicity and safety content detection","description":"Automatically scans LLM outputs for toxic language, harmful content, bias, and safety violations. Flags outputs that violate safety policies before they reach end users.","intents":["I need to prevent harmful or toxic content from being served to users","I want to ensure my LLM complies with content safety policies","I need to track safety incidents and violations in production"],"best_for":["compliance teams","content moderation teams","public-facing LLM applications"],"limitations":["Detection may have false positives/negatives","Context-dependent toxicity is harder to detect","Requires regular updates for emerging harmful patterns"],"requires":["LLM outputs","safety policy definitions","toxicity detection models"],"input_types":["text (LLM responses)"],"output_types":["safety flags","toxicity scores","violation reports"],"categories":["safety","quality assurance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_5","uri":"capability://monitoring.performance.regression.detection.and.alerting","name":"performance regression detection and alerting","description":"Automatically detects when LLM application performance degrades compared to historical baselines or previous versions. Triggers alerts and provides root cause analysis to identify what changed.","intents":["I need to know immediately when my LLM's quality drops in production","I want to catch performance regressions before users notice","I need to understand what caused a sudden drop in output quality"],"best_for":["DevOps engineers","ML engineers","product managers"],"limitations":["Requires historical baseline data","May have lag between regression and detection","Requires clear definition of 'regression'"],"requires":["Historical performance metrics","current production metrics","baseline thresholds"],"input_types":["performance metrics","evaluation scores"],"output_types":["regression alerts","comparison reports","root cause analysis"],"categories":["monitoring","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_6","uri":"capability://integration.llm.provider.integration.and.instrumentation","name":"llm provider integration and instrumentation","description":"Provides SDKs and APIs to seamlessly integrate with major LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) and frameworks (LangChain) with minimal code changes. Automatically captures all relevant metadata and responses.","intents":["I want to monitor my LLM application without rewriting my code","I need to instrument multiple LLM providers with a single solution","I want automatic capture of all LLM interactions for analysis"],"best_for":["developers","ML engineers","DevOps teams"],"limitations":["Limited to supported providers and frameworks","May have performance overhead","Requires API key management"],"requires":["LLM provider API keys","Athina SDK or API access","application code"],"input_types":["LLM API calls","application code"],"output_types":["instrumented application","captured metadata"],"categories":["integration","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_7","uri":"capability://quality.assurance.batch.evaluation.of.llm.outputs","name":"batch evaluation of llm outputs","description":"Processes large batches of LLM outputs against defined evaluation criteria, generating comprehensive reports on quality metrics. Useful for evaluating model versions, comparing approaches, or auditing historical outputs.","intents":["I want to evaluate thousands of LLM responses against my quality criteria","I need to compare the quality of different model versions or prompts","I want to audit historical outputs for compliance or quality issues"],"best_for":["ML researchers","QA teams","data scientists"],"limitations":["Batch processing may have latency","Requires pre-defined evaluation criteria","Large batches may be expensive"],"requires":["batch of LLM outputs","evaluation rules","optional: reference data"],"input_types":["CSV/JSON files","database queries","text files"],"output_types":["evaluation reports","aggregate metrics","detailed breakdowns"],"categories":["quality assurance","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_8","uri":"capability://analytics.analytics.and.visualization.dashboards","name":"analytics and visualization dashboards","description":"Provides interactive dashboards that visualize LLM performance metrics, evaluation results, and trends over time. Enables drill-down analysis and custom report generation.","intents":["I want to see how my LLM application is performing at a glance","I need to understand trends in quality, cost, and reliability over time","I want to create custom reports for stakeholders and executives"],"best_for":["product managers","executives","analytics teams"],"limitations":["Dashboard complexity may require training","Real-time dashboards may have latency","Custom reports require manual configuration"],"requires":["monitoring data","evaluation results","dashboard access"],"input_types":["metrics","evaluation scores","logs"],"output_types":["dashboards","charts","reports"],"categories":["analytics","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_athina__cap_9","uri":"capability://analytics.cost.tracking.and.optimization.insights","name":"cost tracking and optimization insights","description":"Tracks LLM API costs in real-time, breaks down spending by model/endpoint/user, and provides optimization recommendations. Helps teams understand and control LLM infrastructure costs.","intents":["I need to understand how much my LLM application is costing","I want to identify which features or users are driving the highest costs","I need recommendations on how to reduce my LLM spending"],"best_for":["finance teams","product managers","cost-conscious organizations"],"limitations":["Accuracy depends on provider billing data","Optimization recommendations may require trade-offs","Pricing changes may affect historical comparisons"],"requires":["LLM API usage data","pricing information","cost allocation rules"],"input_types":["API call metadata","pricing data"],"output_types":["cost reports","breakdown charts","optimization suggestions"],"categories":["analytics","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":45,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Active LLM API calls","Integration with Athina SDK or API","Network connectivity","LLM outputs","optional: reference data or ground truth","evaluation rules configuration","multiple model/prompt variants","test dataset","evaluation rules","audit logging enabled"],"failure_modes":["Requires integration with LLM provider APIs","Only monitors what is instrumented","Alert fatigue possible with poorly tuned thresholds","Detection accuracy depends on context and domain","May require ground truth data for training","Cannot catch all types of subtle hallucinations","Requires clear evaluation criteria","Statistical significance may require large sample sizes","Cost increases with number of models tested","Log storage can become expensive at scale","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:29.133Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.550Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=athina","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=athina"}},"signature":"UA9/hm14ZEZnx9gSLHeAQLo18ou2EWjQADzbFVVPbSBbWPw6dqvBWIo04EflxNAdkXCmVSGmpmAC/tVhejglDg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T14:34:49.660Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/athina","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/athina","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=athina","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}