{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_aspen-io","slug":"aspen-io","name":"Aspen.io","type":"product","url":"https://getaspen.io","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/aspen-io","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_aspen-io__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.swift.objective.c.code.generation.from.rest.api.specifications","name":"swift/objective-c code generation from rest api specifications","description":"Generates native Swift and Objective-C code directly from REST API requests and responses, using AI to infer type signatures, error handling patterns, and URLSession/Alamofire boilerplate. The system analyzes HTTP request/response pairs to construct type-safe model objects and networking layer code that integrates seamlessly with Xcode's build system, eliminating manual translation from API documentation or Postman exports.","intents":["Generate Swift model types and Codable conformance from JSON API responses without manual typing","Create URLSession or Alamofire networking code from REST endpoint specifications","Eliminate boilerplate for HTTP request construction, error handling, and response parsing in iOS/macOS projects","Accelerate API integration by skipping manual type definition and networking layer scaffolding"],"best_for":["iOS/macOS developers integrating third-party APIs into Xcode projects","Solo developers prototyping API clients without dedicated backend teams","Teams standardizing on Swift for cross-platform Apple development"],"limitations":["Output limited to Swift and Objective-C — no Python, JavaScript, or Go support","Requires well-formed JSON responses for accurate type inference; ambiguous or polymorphic APIs may produce incorrect models","No support for GraphQL, gRPC, or WebSocket APIs — REST-only","Generated code may not match team-specific naming conventions or architectural patterns without post-generation refactoring"],"requires":["Xcode 13.0 or later","macOS 11.0 or later for IDE integration","Valid REST API endpoint or OpenAPI/Swagger specification","Active Aspen.io account (free tier available)"],"input_types":["REST API endpoint URL","HTTP request/response examples (JSON, XML)","OpenAPI 3.0 / Swagger 2.0 specifications","cURL commands"],"output_types":["Swift source code (.swift files)","Objective-C header and implementation files (.h, .m)","Xcode project snippets","Type definitions with Codable conformance"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","apple-ecosystem"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_aspen-io__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.interactive.api.testing.with.ai.assisted.request.construction","name":"interactive api testing with ai-assisted request construction","description":"Provides an API testing interface where developers construct HTTP requests and AI suggests parameters, headers, authentication schemes, and request bodies based on API documentation or prior requests. The system learns from successful request patterns and can auto-populate common headers (Authorization, Content-Type) and suggest realistic test data for different parameter types, reducing manual trial-and-error in API exploration.","intents":["Quickly test API endpoints without manually typing headers, authentication tokens, or request bodies","Explore unfamiliar APIs by having AI suggest valid parameter combinations and expected response structures","Validate API behavior before writing integration code","Generate test cases and request templates for team reuse"],"best_for":["iOS/macOS developers testing APIs during local development","API consumers validating third-party integrations before committing to code","Teams documenting API behavior through interactive testing"],"limitations":["AI suggestions depend on API documentation quality — poorly documented APIs produce generic suggestions","No persistent request history or team collaboration features visible in free tier","Limited to REST APIs; no native GraphQL, gRPC, or WebSocket testing","Response mocking and conditional logic for complex test scenarios not evident"],"requires":["Aspen.io account (free tier available)","macOS 11.0 or later","Valid API endpoint URL and authentication credentials (if required)"],"input_types":["REST API endpoint URL","HTTP method (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH)","Request headers (manual or AI-suggested)","Request body (JSON, form-encoded, XML)","Authentication credentials (API keys, OAuth tokens, Basic Auth)"],"output_types":["HTTP response (status code, headers, body)","Response time and performance metrics","Formatted JSON/XML response preview","Generated Swift/Objective-C code for the tested request"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","apple-ecosystem"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_aspen-io__cap_2","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.xcode.ide.integration.and.code.insertion","name":"xcode ide integration and code insertion","description":"Provides native Xcode extension or plugin that allows developers to generate and insert API client code directly into open Swift/Objective-C files without context-switching. The integration likely uses Xcode's SourceKit API or similar introspection to understand the current file's context (imports, existing types, target framework) and generate code that matches the project's structure and naming conventions.","intents":["Generate API client code and insert it directly into the current Xcode editor window","Maintain consistency with existing project structure and naming conventions during code generation","Avoid context-switching between Xcode and external API testing tools","Quickly scaffold networking code without leaving the IDE"],"best_for":["Xcode-centric iOS/macOS developers who want to minimize tool-switching","Teams with strict Xcode-based workflows and no external tool adoption"],"limitations":["Xcode extension API stability varies across Xcode versions; compatibility may break with major updates","Extension permissions limited by Xcode's sandboxing — may not support all code generation scenarios","Requires Xcode 13.0+ and macOS 11.0+; older development environments not supported","No visible support for SwiftUI previews or real-time code validation within the extension"],"requires":["Xcode 13.0 or later","macOS 11.0 or later","Aspen.io plugin/extension installed and enabled in Xcode","Active Aspen.io account"],"input_types":["Current Xcode file context (imports, type definitions, target framework)","API specification or endpoint URL","User-selected code insertion point"],"output_types":["Swift or Objective-C source code inserted into the active editor","Formatted code matching Xcode's indentation and style settings"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","tool-use-integration","apple-ecosystem"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_aspen-io__cap_3","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.openapi.swagger.specification.parsing.and.code.generation","name":"openapi/swagger specification parsing and code generation","description":"Parses OpenAPI 3.0 and Swagger 2.0 specifications to automatically generate Swift and Objective-C API client code, including type definitions, request builders, and response models. The system extracts endpoint definitions, parameter schemas, and response structures from the specification and generates strongly-typed Swift code that conforms to the API contract, reducing manual interpretation of documentation.","intents":["Generate complete API client libraries from OpenAPI specifications without manual coding","Ensure generated code stays in sync with API specification changes","Reduce time spent reading API documentation and manually defining types","Support APIs that publish OpenAPI specs without requiring manual endpoint discovery"],"best_for":["Teams consuming APIs with published OpenAPI/Swagger specifications","Developers integrating with well-documented third-party APIs (AWS, Stripe, etc.)","Organizations standardizing on OpenAPI for API contracts"],"limitations":["Requires valid, well-formed OpenAPI/Swagger specification — malformed specs produce incorrect code","Custom OpenAPI extensions or vendor-specific fields may not be fully supported","No support for OpenAPI 2.0 extensions like x-amazon-apigateway or x-google-backend","Generated code may require manual adjustments for complex authentication schemes (OAuth 2.0 flows, mTLS)"],"requires":["OpenAPI 3.0 or Swagger 2.0 specification (JSON or YAML format)","Valid URL or local file path to the specification","Aspen.io account"],"input_types":["OpenAPI 3.0 specification (JSON or YAML)","Swagger 2.0 specification (JSON or YAML)","URL to remote OpenAPI specification","Local file path to specification"],"output_types":["Swift source code with type definitions and API client classes","Objective-C header and implementation files","Request builder classes with fluent API","Response model classes with Codable conformance"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_aspen-io__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.ai.powered.api.documentation.inference.and.schema.extraction","name":"ai-powered api documentation inference and schema extraction","description":"Uses AI to infer API schemas, parameter types, and response structures from HTTP request/response examples, cURL commands, or incomplete documentation. The system analyzes patterns in request/response pairs to construct JSON schemas, identify required vs. optional parameters, and suggest type definitions without requiring explicit OpenAPI specifications or manual schema definition.","intents":["Extract API schemas from real request/response examples without OpenAPI documentation","Infer parameter types and constraints from usage patterns","Generate type definitions from undocumented or poorly documented APIs","Automatically detect authentication schemes and required headers"],"best_for":["Developers integrating with legacy APIs that lack OpenAPI specifications","Teams reverse-engineering third-party APIs from network traffic","Rapid prototyping scenarios where formal API documentation isn't available"],"limitations":["Inference accuracy depends on example quality and diversity — single examples produce generic schemas","AI may misidentify optional vs. required fields if examples don't cover all cases","Polymorphic or union types in responses may be incorrectly inferred as single types","No validation that inferred schemas match actual API behavior — requires manual testing"],"requires":["HTTP request/response examples (JSON, XML, or form-encoded)","cURL commands or network traffic logs","Aspen.io account"],"input_types":["HTTP request/response pairs (raw or formatted)","cURL commands","Network traffic logs or HAR files","Partial API documentation or README files"],"output_types":["JSON Schema definitions","Swift type definitions with Codable conformance","Objective-C model classes","Inferred parameter documentation"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_aspen-io__cap_5","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.request.response.history.and.template.management","name":"request/response history and template management","description":"Maintains a searchable history of API requests and responses tested within Aspen.io, allowing developers to save, organize, and reuse request templates. The system likely stores request metadata (endpoint, method, headers, body) and response snapshots, enabling quick recall of previously tested endpoints and generation of code from historical requests without re-entering parameters.","intents":["Quickly re-run previously tested API requests without re-entering parameters","Save request templates for common API operations and share with team members","Search request history to find how a specific endpoint was tested","Generate code from historical requests that worked correctly"],"best_for":["Developers frequently testing the same APIs across multiple sessions","Teams documenting API usage patterns through request templates","Rapid iteration scenarios where request reuse saves time"],"limitations":["History storage likely limited in free tier — may have retention or capacity limits","No visible team collaboration or shared template library in free tier","Sensitive data (API keys, tokens) in request history poses security risk if not properly encrypted","No version control or diff functionality for tracking request changes over time"],"requires":["Aspen.io account (free tier available)","Prior API requests tested within Aspen.io"],"input_types":["Saved request templates (endpoint, method, headers, body)","Search queries for finding historical requests"],"output_types":["Request history list with metadata","Saved request templates","Generated code from historical requests","Response snapshots and comparison views"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_aspen-io__cap_6","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.authentication.scheme.detection.and.credential.management","name":"authentication scheme detection and credential management","description":"Automatically detects authentication schemes (API keys, OAuth 2.0, Basic Auth, Bearer tokens, mTLS) from API requests and generates appropriate authentication code in Swift/Objective-C. The system analyzes request headers and parameters to identify the authentication pattern and generates code that handles token refresh, credential storage, and secure transmission without exposing secrets in generated code.","intents":["Automatically detect authentication scheme from API requests without manual specification","Generate Swift/Objective-C code that handles authentication securely (Keychain storage, token refresh)","Support multiple authentication schemes (API keys, OAuth, Basic Auth, Bearer tokens)","Avoid hardcoding credentials in generated code"],"best_for":["Developers integrating with authenticated APIs and wanting secure credential handling","Teams standardizing on Keychain-based credential storage for iOS/macOS apps","Rapid prototyping of OAuth 2.0 integrations"],"limitations":["OAuth 2.0 code flow generation may require manual configuration of redirect URIs and client secrets","mTLS certificate handling not clearly documented — may require manual certificate provisioning","No visible support for custom authentication schemes or API-specific auth patterns","Generated code may not handle token expiration and refresh automatically for all OAuth providers"],"requires":["API request with authentication headers or parameters","For OAuth: client ID and client secret (not embedded in generated code)","For mTLS: certificate files and private keys"],"input_types":["HTTP request with authentication headers (Authorization, X-API-Key, etc.)","OAuth 2.0 configuration (client ID, redirect URI, scopes)","mTLS certificates and private keys"],"output_types":["Swift code for credential storage (Keychain integration)","URLRequest extensions with authentication headers","OAuth 2.0 token refresh logic","Error handling for authentication failures"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_aspen-io__cap_7","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.response.parsing.and.type.safe.model.generation","name":"response parsing and type-safe model generation","description":"Analyzes API response bodies (JSON, XML) and automatically generates Swift Codable models or Objective-C model classes with proper type mappings, null handling, and nested object support. The system infers types from response examples, handles edge cases like optional fields and arrays, and generates models that can be directly decoded from API responses using JSONDecoder or similar mechanisms.","intents":["Generate Swift Codable models from JSON API responses without manual type definition","Handle nested objects, arrays, and optional fields automatically","Support type-safe response parsing with proper error handling","Reduce boilerplate for response model definition and JSONDecoder configuration"],"best_for":["iOS/macOS developers building type-safe API clients","Teams standardizing on Codable for JSON serialization","Rapid prototyping of API integrations"],"limitations":["Type inference from single response example may be inaccurate — polymorphic or union types misidentified","Custom JSON key mappings (camelCase to snake_case) may require manual CodingKeys definition","No support for XML parsing or custom serialization formats beyond JSON","Generated models may not match team-specific naming conventions or architectural patterns"],"requires":["API response example (JSON or XML)","Aspen.io account"],"input_types":["JSON response body","XML response body","Response examples with multiple variants (for inferring optional fields)"],"output_types":["Swift Codable model classes","Objective-C model classes with NSCoding conformance","CodingKeys for custom JSON key mappings","Error handling code for decoding failures"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":37,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Xcode 13.0 or later","macOS 11.0 or later for IDE integration","Valid REST API endpoint or OpenAPI/Swagger specification","Active Aspen.io account (free tier available)","Aspen.io account (free tier available)","macOS 11.0 or later","Valid API endpoint URL and authentication credentials (if required)","Aspen.io plugin/extension installed and enabled in Xcode","Active Aspen.io account","OpenAPI 3.0 or Swagger 2.0 specification (JSON or YAML format)"],"failure_modes":["Output limited to Swift and Objective-C — no Python, JavaScript, or Go support","Requires well-formed JSON responses for accurate type inference; ambiguous or polymorphic APIs may produce incorrect models","No support for GraphQL, gRPC, or WebSocket APIs — REST-only","Generated code may not match team-specific naming conventions or architectural patterns without post-generation refactoring","AI suggestions depend on API documentation quality — poorly documented APIs produce generic suggestions","No persistent request history or team collaboration features visible in free tier","Limited to REST APIs; no native GraphQL, gRPC, or WebSocket testing","Response mocking and conditional logic for complex test scenarios not evident","Xcode extension API stability varies across Xcode versions; compatibility may break with major updates","Extension permissions limited by Xcode's sandboxing — may not support all code generation scenarios","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.2833333333333333,"quality":0.63,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:29.133Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.562Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=aspen-io","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=aspen-io"}},"signature":"pgrpfxZwUGQoF39HRQx8EWOAZ01bih4ka6WcC6rpqrNkCVUUbVHFe+ZzAj7cWJQHvxTr86g8DzFOOOioGj18Dw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T01:50:23.626Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/aspen-io","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/aspen-io","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=aspen-io","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}