{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_armilla-ai","slug":"armilla-ai","name":"Armilla AI","type":"product","url":"https://www.armilla.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/armilla-ai","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_armilla-ai__cap_0","uri":"capability://risk.management.ai.system.risk.assessment.and.scoring","name":"ai system risk assessment and scoring","description":"Analyzes AI systems to identify and quantify potential risks, vulnerabilities, and failure modes. Produces a risk score that helps organizations understand the reliability and safety profile of their AI deployments before going live.","intents":["I need to understand what could go wrong with this AI system before we deploy it","I want to quantify the risk level of our AI decision-making system for stakeholders","I need to identify vulnerabilities in our AI model before it causes problems"],"best_for":["Enterprise organizations in regulated industries","Risk and compliance officers","AI governance teams"],"limitations":["Verification process adds operational overhead and delays deployment","Limited transparency on which specific AI systems and model types are supported","Requires detailed system documentation and access for assessment"],"requires":["Detailed AI system documentation","Model architecture information","Training data specifications","Use case context and deployment environment details"],"input_types":["AI system specifications","Model documentation","Training data descriptions","Use case parameters"],"output_types":["Risk assessment report","Risk score/rating","Vulnerability identification","Mitigation recommendations"],"categories":["risk management","compliance","enterprise"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_armilla-ai__cap_1","uri":"capability://compliance.third.party.ai.system.verification","name":"third-party ai system verification","description":"Provides independent verification and validation of AI systems through expert review and testing. Acts as a neutral third party to certify that an AI system meets specified performance, safety, and reliability standards.","intents":["I need an independent expert to validate that our AI system is safe and reliable","We need third-party certification to satisfy regulatory auditors and compliance teams","I want to prove to stakeholders that this AI system has been properly vetted"],"best_for":["Regulated industries (finance, healthcare, legal)","Organizations facing audit requirements","Companies needing regulatory sign-off"],"limitations":["Human review component creates bottlenecks for rapid iteration","Verification timeline may not align with fast-moving development cycles","Unclear which specific AI architectures and use cases are covered"],"requires":["Complete AI system access or detailed specifications","Performance metrics and test results","Documentation of training and validation processes","Use case and deployment context"],"input_types":["AI system code or model files","System documentation","Test results and performance data","Deployment specifications"],"output_types":["Verification report","Certification or approval status","Compliance assessment","Audit-ready documentation"],"categories":["compliance","quality assurance","enterprise"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_armilla-ai__cap_2","uri":"capability://risk.management.ai.warranty.and.liability.coverage","name":"ai warranty and liability coverage","description":"Offers insurance-like warranty coverage for AI system decisions and outputs. Provides financial protection and liability coverage when AI systems fail or produce harmful outcomes, similar to traditional product warranties.","intents":["I need liability protection if our AI system makes a bad decision that causes harm","We want financial coverage for potential AI-related failures or errors","I need to assure stakeholders that we're protected against AI system failures"],"best_for":["Enterprise organizations in high-liability industries","Companies deploying AI in critical decision-making roles","Organizations with significant risk exposure"],"limitations":["Paid model creates friction for startups and smaller teams","Coverage scope and exclusions are not transparently documented","May not cover all AI system types or use cases","Warranty terms and claim processes unclear"],"requires":["Successful AI system verification","Risk assessment completion","Compliance with coverage requirements","Ongoing monitoring and reporting"],"input_types":["Verified AI system specifications","Risk assessment results","Deployment and usage parameters","Claims documentation (if applicable)"],"output_types":["Warranty agreement","Coverage documentation","Claims process guidance","Coverage limits and terms"],"categories":["risk management","compliance","enterprise"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_armilla-ai__cap_3","uri":"capability://compliance.regulatory.compliance.validation","name":"regulatory compliance validation","description":"Evaluates AI systems against regulatory requirements and industry standards to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Produces documentation suitable for regulatory audits and compliance reviews.","intents":["I need to prove our AI system complies with regulatory requirements for our industry","We need documentation to pass regulatory audits and inspections","I want to ensure our AI deployment meets all applicable legal and compliance standards"],"best_for":["Regulated industries (finance, healthcare, legal)","Organizations undergoing compliance audits","Companies in jurisdictions with AI regulations"],"limitations":["Regulatory landscape is rapidly evolving, may not cover emerging requirements","Compliance validation is jurisdiction and industry-specific","Requires understanding of organization's specific regulatory context"],"requires":["AI system documentation","Industry and jurisdiction context","Applicable regulatory framework information","System deployment and usage details"],"input_types":["AI system specifications","Regulatory framework details","Industry context","Deployment environment information"],"output_types":["Compliance assessment report","Gap analysis","Audit-ready documentation","Regulatory sign-off certification"],"categories":["compliance","enterprise","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_armilla-ai__cap_4","uri":"capability://quality.assurance.ai.system.performance.benchmarking","name":"ai system performance benchmarking","description":"Tests and evaluates AI system performance against defined metrics and benchmarks. Provides quantitative assessment of accuracy, reliability, latency, and other performance characteristics.","intents":["I want to know how reliable and accurate our AI system actually is","We need performance metrics to compare different AI solutions","I need to verify that our AI system meets performance requirements before deployment"],"best_for":["Organizations evaluating AI systems","Teams making AI technology decisions","Companies with strict performance requirements"],"limitations":["Benchmarking may not reflect real-world performance in production","Requires representative test data and scenarios","Performance metrics may vary by use case and context"],"requires":["AI system access or model files","Test datasets","Performance requirement specifications","Use case context"],"input_types":["AI model or system","Test data","Performance criteria","Use case specifications"],"output_types":["Performance metrics report","Benchmark results","Comparative analysis","Performance recommendations"],"categories":["quality assurance","enterprise","evaluation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_armilla-ai__cap_5","uri":"capability://governance.ai.governance.framework.implementation","name":"ai governance framework implementation","description":"Helps organizations establish and implement governance frameworks for AI systems. Provides guidance on policies, processes, and controls needed to manage AI responsibly and maintain compliance.","intents":["We need to set up proper governance for our AI systems","I want to establish policies and controls for responsible AI deployment","We need a framework to manage AI risks across our organization"],"best_for":["Enterprise organizations scaling AI adoption","Companies establishing AI governance programs","Organizations with multiple AI systems to manage"],"limitations":["Framework implementation requires organizational change","May require significant internal resources to execute","Governance needs vary by industry and organization"],"requires":["Organizational commitment to governance","Clear AI strategy and objectives","Stakeholder alignment","Resource allocation for implementation"],"input_types":["Organization context and industry","Current AI systems inventory","Risk tolerance and requirements","Regulatory environment"],"output_types":["Governance framework documentation","Policy templates","Process guidelines","Control recommendations"],"categories":["governance","enterprise","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Detailed AI system documentation","Model architecture information","Training data specifications","Use case context and deployment environment details","Complete AI system access or detailed specifications","Performance metrics and test results","Documentation of training and validation processes","Use case and deployment context","Successful AI system verification","Risk assessment completion"],"failure_modes":["Verification process adds operational overhead and delays deployment","Limited transparency on which specific AI systems and model types are supported","Requires detailed system documentation and access for assessment","Human review component creates bottlenecks for rapid iteration","Verification timeline may not align with fast-moving development cycles","Unclear which specific AI architectures and use cases are covered","Paid model creates friction for startups and smaller teams","Coverage scope and exclusions are not transparently documented","May not cover all AI system types or use cases","Warranty terms and claim processes unclear","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.77,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:29.133Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.550Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=armilla-ai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=armilla-ai"}},"signature":"9mPRcRRr3tPmtohPqkqx0yMTpllifmDPQ1FuDmrHMQi1ckkgRpKoKLXB6C8TaTHz1kcRDQBtZnR+KJ9EG0yBAA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T22:45:56.295Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/armilla-ai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/armilla-ai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=armilla-ai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}