{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_apix420-apix420","slug":"apix420-apix420","name":"apix420","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/apix420/apix420","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/apix420-apix420","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:apix420/apix420"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_apix420-apix420__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.model.context.protocol.server.instantiation.and.lifecycle.management","name":"model context protocol server instantiation and lifecycle management","description":"Provides a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation that handles the full lifecycle of MCP connections, including protocol negotiation, capability advertisement, and message routing between LLM clients and backend resources. The server implements the MCP specification for bidirectional communication, allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to discover and invoke exposed tools and resources through a standardized interface.","intents":["I need to expose custom tools and resources to Claude or other MCP-compatible LLM clients","I want to integrate my backend services with Claude's native tool-calling capabilities","I need to implement the MCP server-side protocol to enable LLM-driven automation of my APIs"],"best_for":["developers building Claude integrations who need standardized protocol compliance","teams deploying MCP servers in production environments requiring protocol-compliant communication","builders creating multi-tool ecosystems where LLMs need discoverable, standardized access patterns"],"limitations":["Limited to MCP protocol specification — cannot extend beyond MCP's resource and tool abstraction model","Requires explicit tool/resource definition — no automatic API introspection or OpenAPI-to-MCP conversion","No built-in authentication layer — security must be implemented at the transport or application level"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (Claude, or compatible LLM with MCP support)","Network connectivity between client and server","Understanding of MCP protocol specification and tool/resource schemas"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Tool invocation requests with typed arguments","Resource read/list requests"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Tool execution results","Resource content and metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-server"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_apix420-apix420__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.schema.definition.and.invocation.routing","name":"tool schema definition and invocation routing","description":"Enables declarative definition of tools with typed parameters, return types, and descriptions that are advertised to MCP clients for discovery and invocation. The server routes incoming tool calls from LLM clients to backend handlers, performing argument validation against the declared schema and marshaling results back through the MCP protocol. This pattern allows LLMs to understand available capabilities and invoke them with type-safe parameter passing.","intents":["I want to expose a set of backend functions as discoverable tools that Claude can call","I need to ensure type safety and validation when LLMs invoke my backend APIs","I want Claude to understand what parameters my tools accept and what they return"],"best_for":["developers building LLM agents that need reliable, type-checked tool invocation","teams integrating existing backend APIs with Claude without manual wrapper code","builders creating tool libraries where schema-driven discovery is critical for LLM reasoning"],"limitations":["Schema validation is limited to MCP's type system — complex nested validations may require custom handlers","No automatic OpenAPI/Swagger conversion — schemas must be manually defined or generated","Tool execution errors must be explicitly handled and returned as structured responses"],"requires":["Tool handler implementations (functions or methods)","Schema definitions in MCP-compatible format (JSON Schema or equivalent)","Error handling strategy for tool execution failures"],"input_types":["Tool invocation requests with typed arguments","Schema definitions (JSON Schema format)"],"output_types":["Tool execution results (typed, structured)","Error responses with diagnostic information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_apix420-apix420__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.resource.exposure.and.content.serving.through.mcp","name":"resource exposure and content serving through mcp","description":"Allows definition and serving of static or dynamic resources (documents, configurations, knowledge bases) that MCP clients can read and list through the protocol. Resources are advertised with metadata (MIME type, URI, description) and can be accessed by LLMs to augment context or retrieve reference material. The server handles resource enumeration, content retrieval, and streaming for large payloads.","intents":["I want Claude to have access to my documentation, knowledge base, or configuration files","I need to serve dynamic content (e.g., database records, API responses) as resources that Claude can read","I want to enable Claude to list available resources and select relevant ones for a task"],"best_for":["teams building RAG-like systems where Claude needs access to curated knowledge sources","developers exposing internal documentation or reference materials to LLM agents","builders creating context-aware agents that dynamically fetch resources based on task requirements"],"limitations":["Resource discovery is limited to server-side enumeration — no full-text search or semantic indexing built-in","Large resources may require streaming or pagination — no automatic chunking or compression","No built-in caching — repeated resource access requires re-fetching from the backend"],"requires":["Resource definitions with URI, MIME type, and metadata","Backend implementation for resource retrieval (file system, database, API)","Handling of resource access control and permissions"],"input_types":["Resource read requests (URI-based)","Resource list/enumerate requests with optional filters"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, binary, structured data)","Resource metadata (MIME type, size, modification time)","Resource list with metadata"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_apix420-apix420__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.bidirectional.mcp.protocol.communication.and.message.handling","name":"bidirectional mcp protocol communication and message handling","description":"Implements the full MCP protocol stack for bidirectional JSON-RPC 2.0 communication between server and client, including request/response pairing, error handling, and optional server-initiated notifications. The server maintains protocol state, handles concurrent requests, and ensures message ordering and delivery guarantees. Supports both synchronous request-response patterns and asynchronous notification patterns.","intents":["I need reliable, protocol-compliant communication between my backend and Claude","I want to handle concurrent tool invocations without blocking or losing messages","I need to send notifications or updates from my server to the MCP client"],"best_for":["developers building production MCP servers requiring high reliability and protocol compliance","teams needing concurrent request handling with proper error recovery","builders implementing bidirectional communication patterns where server-initiated updates are critical"],"limitations":["Message ordering is per-connection — distributed systems require external coordination","No built-in message persistence — server restart loses in-flight requests","Protocol overhead adds latency compared to direct function calls — typical ~50-200ms per round-trip"],"requires":["MCP protocol specification understanding","Network transport (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket, or other MCP-compatible transport)","JSON serialization/deserialization capability"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Request/response pairs with correlation IDs"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Error responses with error codes and messages","Server-initiated notifications"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_apix420-apix420__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.client.capability.negotiation.and.feature.advertisement","name":"client capability negotiation and feature advertisement","description":"Handles MCP protocol initialization where the server advertises its supported capabilities (tools, resources, prompts) and negotiates protocol version and features with the connecting client. The server responds to client capability queries and adapts its behavior based on client-supported features. This enables graceful degradation and forward/backward compatibility across MCP versions.","intents":["I want my MCP server to advertise what tools and resources it supports to connecting clients","I need to handle clients with different MCP protocol versions or feature sets","I want to ensure my server is compatible with multiple LLM clients (Claude, others)"],"best_for":["developers building MCP servers that need to support multiple client versions","teams deploying MCP servers in heterogeneous environments with varied client capabilities","builders creating extensible tool ecosystems where capability discovery is critical"],"limitations":["Capability negotiation is one-time at connection initialization — no dynamic capability changes","No automatic capability inference — all capabilities must be explicitly declared","Version compatibility logic must be manually implemented — no automatic fallback mechanisms"],"requires":["MCP protocol version specification","Explicit capability declarations (tools, resources, prompts)","Client protocol version information"],"input_types":["Client initialization request with protocol version and capabilities"],"output_types":["Server initialization response with protocol version and supported capabilities","Capability metadata (tool schemas, resource types, prompt definitions)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client implementation (Claude, or compatible LLM with MCP support)","Network connectivity between client and server","Understanding of MCP protocol specification and tool/resource schemas","Tool handler implementations (functions or methods)","Schema definitions in MCP-compatible format (JSON Schema or equivalent)","Error handling strategy for tool execution failures","Resource definitions with URI, MIME type, and metadata","Backend implementation for resource retrieval (file system, database, API)","Handling of resource access control and permissions","MCP protocol specification understanding"],"failure_modes":["Limited to MCP protocol specification — cannot extend beyond MCP's resource and tool abstraction model","Requires explicit tool/resource definition — no automatic API introspection or OpenAPI-to-MCP conversion","No built-in authentication layer — security must be implemented at the transport or application level","Schema validation is limited to MCP's type system — complex nested validations may require custom handlers","No automatic OpenAPI/Swagger conversion — schemas must be manually defined or generated","Tool execution errors must be explicitly handled and returned as structured responses","Resource discovery is limited to server-side enumeration — no full-text search or semantic indexing built-in","Large resources may require streaming or pagination — no automatic chunking or compression","No built-in caching — repeated resource access requires re-fetching from the backend","Message ordering is per-connection — distributed systems require external coordination","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.635Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:22.209Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=apix420-apix420","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=apix420-apix420"}},"signature":"JwjliksP2fbnNZqDPvRw7QFy/LA0vF1/cq0+mY7r28ULTD7h4QjiH4QgLwuZDs3wt2vubX2NQxNLtfJB/y1NBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T04:27:32.306Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/apix420-apix420","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/apix420-apix420","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=apix420-apix420","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}