{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-apimatic-mcp","slug":"apimatic-mcp","name":"APIMatic MCP","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/apimatic/apimatic-validator-mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/apimatic-mcp","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-apimatic-mcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.openapi.specification.validation.via.mcp.protocol","name":"openapi specification validation via mcp protocol","description":"Validates OpenAPI/Swagger specifications by accepting specification files through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) interface and delegating validation logic to APIMatic's cloud-based validation API. The MCP server acts as a bridge between LLM applications and APIMatic's validation engine, translating MCP tool calls into HTTP requests to APIMatic's endpoints and returning structured validation results back through the MCP protocol.","intents":["I want to validate an OpenAPI spec from within my LLM agent without making direct API calls","I need to integrate OpenAPI validation into my Claude/LLM workflow as a native tool","I want to catch API specification errors before deploying or generating SDKs"],"best_for":["LLM application developers building API-first agents","Teams using Claude with MCP for API development workflows","DevOps engineers automating API specification validation in LLM-driven pipelines"],"limitations":["Requires network connectivity to APIMatic's cloud API — no offline validation capability","Validation latency depends on APIMatic's API response times, typically 1-5 seconds per spec","No caching of validation results — each identical spec re-submission triggers a new API call","Limited to OpenAPI 2.0 and 3.x formats; other API specification formats (AsyncAPI, GraphQL SDL) not supported"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, LLM framework with MCP support)","Network access to APIMatic's validation API endpoints","OpenAPI specification file (JSON or YAML format)","APIMatic account or public API access (if required)"],"input_types":["OpenAPI specification (JSON)","OpenAPI specification (YAML)","OpenAPI file path or URL reference"],"output_types":["structured validation report (JSON)","validation error/warning list with line numbers","summary of specification compliance issues"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","api-validation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-apimatic-mcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.registration.and.schema.definition.for.validation.operations","name":"mcp tool registration and schema definition for validation operations","description":"Registers OpenAPI validation as a callable tool within the MCP protocol by defining tool schemas that describe input parameters (specification content/URL), output format, and validation options. The server implements MCP's tool definition interface, allowing LLM clients to discover the validation capability and invoke it with properly typed arguments, handling schema serialization and deserialization between the LLM and APIMatic backend.","intents":["I want my LLM to understand what OpenAPI validation can do and what parameters it accepts","I need the validation tool to be discoverable and callable from my Claude conversation","I want type-safe tool invocation with proper input validation before sending to APIMatic"],"best_for":["LLM application developers integrating APIMatic validation into multi-tool agents","Teams building Claude-based API development assistants","Developers extending MCP servers with additional validation capabilities"],"limitations":["Tool schema is static — cannot dynamically adjust parameters based on APIMatic API version changes","No built-in parameter validation before sending to APIMatic — relies on APIMatic to reject invalid inputs","Tool discovery happens at server startup — new validation options require server restart"],"requires":["MCP server implementation (Node.js or Python)","Understanding of MCP tool schema format and protocol","JSON schema knowledge for defining input/output types"],"input_types":["tool schema definition (JSON)","parameter specifications (JSON schema)"],"output_types":["MCP tool definition","callable tool interface for LLM clients"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-apimatic-mcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.streaming.validation.results.through.mcp.protocol","name":"streaming validation results through mcp protocol","description":"Processes OpenAPI validation requests asynchronously and streams validation results back to the LLM client through the MCP protocol's message streaming interface. The server handles APIMatic API responses and transforms them into MCP-compatible output format, supporting both immediate validation feedback and progressive result delivery for large or complex specifications.","intents":["I want real-time feedback on my OpenAPI spec validation without blocking my LLM conversation","I need to see validation results as they complete, not wait for the entire analysis","I want to validate large specifications without timeout issues"],"best_for":["Interactive LLM workflows where users expect responsive feedback","Agents processing multiple OpenAPI specs in sequence","Applications with strict latency requirements for validation feedback"],"limitations":["Streaming depends on APIMatic's API response format — if APIMatic returns results in bulk, streaming benefit is limited","No built-in result caching — streaming the same spec twice requires two full API calls","MCP protocol overhead adds ~50-100ms per message roundtrip"],"requires":["MCP client with streaming support","Async/await or Promise-based implementation in the MCP server","Proper error handling for mid-stream failures"],"input_types":["OpenAPI specification (JSON/YAML)"],"output_types":["streamed validation events (JSON)","progressive validation report"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-apimatic-mcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.error.handling.and.validation.failure.reporting","name":"error handling and validation failure reporting","description":"Captures validation errors from APIMatic's API, malformed OpenAPI specifications, and network failures, then translates them into human-readable error messages and structured error objects that the LLM can understand and act upon. The server implements error categorization (syntax errors, semantic errors, network errors) and provides actionable error context including line numbers, error codes, and remediation suggestions.","intents":["I want to understand why my OpenAPI spec failed validation with specific error details","I need the LLM to help me fix validation errors by providing context about what went wrong","I want to distinguish between spec syntax errors and semantic/design issues"],"best_for":["API developers learning OpenAPI best practices","LLM agents that need to provide remediation guidance for spec errors","CI/CD pipelines that require detailed error reporting for spec validation failures"],"limitations":["Error messages depend on APIMatic's error reporting — cannot improve error clarity beyond what APIMatic provides","No built-in error recovery or auto-fix suggestions — only reports errors","Limited context for network errors — cannot distinguish between APIMatic downtime and client connectivity issues"],"requires":["Error handling middleware in the MCP server","Mapping of APIMatic error codes to user-friendly messages","Proper HTTP status code handling"],"input_types":["OpenAPI specification (JSON/YAML)"],"output_types":["error object with code, message, and context","structured error list with line numbers","human-readable error summary"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-apimatic-mcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.openapi.specification.file.handling.and.format.detection","name":"openapi specification file handling and format detection","description":"Accepts OpenAPI specifications in multiple formats (JSON, YAML) and automatically detects the format, parses the specification, and validates its structure before sending to APIMatic's validation API. The server handles both inline specification content and file path references, supporting specification loading from local files or URLs, with built-in format validation to ensure specifications are well-formed before validation.","intents":["I want to validate my OpenAPI spec whether it's in JSON or YAML format","I need to pass my spec as a file path or inline content, whichever is convenient","I want the server to catch malformed specs before sending them to APIMatic"],"best_for":["Developers working with mixed OpenAPI format specifications","Teams using both YAML (for readability) and JSON (for tooling) specs","Agents that need to handle specs from multiple sources (files, URLs, inline)"],"limitations":["YAML parsing adds ~50-100ms latency per specification","No support for OpenAPI specification references ($ref) resolution — only validates the provided spec file","File path handling limited to local filesystem — no support for remote file fetching from arbitrary URLs","No built-in specification normalization — YAML and JSON specs may produce different validation results if semantically equivalent"],"requires":["YAML parser library (e.g., js-yaml for Node.js)","JSON parsing capability (built-in to most languages)","File system access for local file loading"],"input_types":["OpenAPI specification (JSON string)","OpenAPI specification (YAML string)","file path to OpenAPI specification","URL to OpenAPI specification"],"output_types":["parsed specification object","format detection result","validation-ready specification"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-apimatic-mcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.validation.result.caching.and.deduplication","name":"validation result caching and deduplication","description":"Implements optional caching of validation results based on specification content hash, allowing the server to return cached validation results for identical specifications without re-querying APIMatic's API. The caching layer uses content-based hashing to detect duplicate specifications and serves cached results with configurable TTL, reducing API calls and improving response latency for repeated validations.","intents":["I want to avoid re-validating the same OpenAPI spec multiple times in a conversation","I need faster validation feedback for specs I've already validated","I want to reduce API calls to APIMatic to stay within rate limits"],"best_for":["Interactive LLM workflows where users validate specs multiple times","Agents processing batches of similar specifications","Teams with strict APIMatic API rate limits"],"limitations":["Caching adds complexity and requires in-memory or external cache storage","Cache invalidation is manual — no automatic refresh when APIMatic's validation rules change","Content-based hashing adds ~10-20ms overhead per validation request","Cache memory usage grows with number of unique specifications — no built-in cache size limits"],"requires":["Hash function implementation (SHA-256 or similar)","In-memory cache or external cache service (Redis, Memcached)","Cache TTL configuration"],"input_types":["OpenAPI specification (JSON/YAML)"],"output_types":["cached validation result","cache hit/miss indicator"],"categories":["automation-workflow","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, LLM framework with MCP support)","Network access to APIMatic's validation API endpoints","OpenAPI specification file (JSON or YAML format)","APIMatic account or public API access (if required)","MCP server implementation (Node.js or Python)","Understanding of MCP tool schema format and protocol","JSON schema knowledge for defining input/output types","MCP client with streaming support","Async/await or Promise-based implementation in the MCP server","Proper error handling for mid-stream failures"],"failure_modes":["Requires network connectivity to APIMatic's cloud API — no offline validation capability","Validation latency depends on APIMatic's API response times, typically 1-5 seconds per spec","No caching of validation results — each identical spec re-submission triggers a new API call","Limited to OpenAPI 2.0 and 3.x formats; other API specification formats (AsyncAPI, GraphQL SDL) not supported","Tool schema is static — cannot dynamically adjust parameters based on APIMatic API version changes","No built-in parameter validation before sending to APIMatic — relies on APIMatic to reject invalid inputs","Tool discovery happens at server startup — new validation options require server restart","Streaming depends on APIMatic's API response format — if APIMatic returns results in bulk, streaming benefit is limited","No built-in result caching — streaming the same spec twice requires two full API calls","MCP protocol overhead adds ~50-100ms per message roundtrip","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.37,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:02.370Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=apimatic-mcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=apimatic-mcp"}},"signature":"UdozU8lQ5hbcQXTf6tI70D58h0TZRO40swqPW8jDk3YViLtMJETczNJ8N5apQfN0C2xw6jn0932go73bo4n2Bw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T16:06:39.854Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/apimatic-mcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/apimatic-mcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=apimatic-mcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}