{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp","slug":"ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp","name":"EU regulations & frameworks","type":"mcp","url":"https://ansvar.eu/open-source/eu-regulations-mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp","categories":["mcp-servers","app-builders"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:ansvar/eu_compliance_mcp"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.dora.regulation.query.and.retrieval","name":"dora regulation query and retrieval","description":"Enables semantic search and retrieval of Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) requirements, articles, and compliance obligations through MCP protocol. The server indexes DORA's full text and responds to natural language queries by matching intent against regulatory sections, returning relevant excerpts with article citations and compliance context for financial institutions.","intents":["I need to understand DORA's ICT third-party risk management requirements for my fintech platform","What are the incident reporting timelines under DORA for critical operational incidents?","Show me DORA articles related to testing and resilience validation"],"best_for":["Financial services compliance teams implementing DORA","FinTech founders building ICT risk frameworks","Compliance engineers automating regulatory documentation"],"limitations":["Retrieval accuracy depends on indexed version of DORA text — amendments after indexing may not be reflected","No real-time regulatory updates — requires manual re-indexing when regulations change","Context window limited by MCP message size constraints, may truncate very long regulation sections"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client (Claude, Cursor, or custom MCP host)","Network connectivity to MCP server endpoint","Basic understanding of DORA regulatory framework for query formulation"],"input_types":["natural language queries","regulatory keywords","article numbers"],"output_types":["regulatory text excerpts","article citations","compliance guidance"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.nis2.directive.compliance.mapping","name":"nis2 directive compliance mapping","description":"Provides structured retrieval of Network and Information Security Directive 2 (NIS2) requirements mapped to specific security obligations, asset classifications, and incident reporting procedures. The server parses NIS2 articles and cross-references them with implementation guidance, enabling developers to query compliance requirements by security domain (e.g., supply chain, incident response, governance).","intents":["What are NIS2's supply chain security requirements for critical infrastructure operators?","How does NIS2 define 'significant incidents' and what are the reporting timelines?","Map NIS2 obligations to my organization's security governance structure"],"best_for":["Critical infrastructure operators implementing NIS2","CISO teams building incident response procedures compliant with NIS2","Security architects designing governance frameworks for essential service providers"],"limitations":["NIS2 implementation varies by member state — server provides EU-level directive but not country-specific transpositions","No automated compliance assessment — returns requirements but does not evaluate current state against them","Indexed content may lag behind regulatory guidance updates from ENISA or national authorities"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client","Understanding of critical infrastructure classification under NIS2","Network access to MCP server"],"input_types":["natural language queries about security domains","article references","compliance requirement keywords"],"output_types":["regulatory requirements","implementation guidance","incident reporting procedures"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.gdpr.article.and.obligation.lookup","name":"gdpr article and obligation lookup","description":"Enables rapid retrieval of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) articles, recitals, and compliance obligations through semantic search. The server indexes GDPR's full text and responds to queries about data subject rights, controller/processor obligations, lawful basis requirements, and enforcement mechanisms, returning relevant sections with legal context.","intents":["What are the lawful bases for processing personal data under GDPR Article 6?","What are data subject rights under GDPR and how do I implement them?","What are the penalties for GDPR violations and how are they calculated?"],"best_for":["Data protection officers implementing GDPR compliance","Product teams building privacy-by-design features","Legal teams reviewing data processing agreements"],"limitations":["GDPR interpretation varies by national DPA guidance — server provides regulation text but not country-specific interpretations","No real-time case law integration — does not reflect recent CJEU or national court decisions","Cannot assess compliance of specific data processing activities — only retrieves regulatory text"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client","Basic GDPR literacy for query formulation","Network connectivity to MCP server"],"input_types":["natural language questions about data rights","article numbers","processing scenario descriptions"],"output_types":["regulation text","article citations","legal obligations"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.eu.ai.act.compliance.requirement.retrieval","name":"eu ai act compliance requirement retrieval","description":"Provides semantic search and retrieval of EU AI Act requirements mapped to risk categories (prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk, minimal-risk). The server indexes the AI Act's articles and Annexes, enabling queries about prohibited practices, high-risk system requirements, transparency obligations, and conformity assessment procedures specific to AI system classification.","intents":["What are the prohibited AI practices under the EU AI Act?","Is my AI system classified as high-risk and what are the compliance requirements?","What transparency and documentation requirements apply to my AI system?"],"best_for":["AI product teams ensuring EU AI Act compliance before launch","Compliance officers assessing AI system risk classifications","Developers implementing transparency and documentation requirements"],"limitations":["EU AI Act risk classification is context-dependent — server retrieves requirements but cannot automatically classify systems","Annexes and delegated acts may be updated — indexed version may not reflect latest amendments","No integration with conformity assessment bodies or notified body requirements"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client","Understanding of AI system types and risk categories","Network access to MCP server"],"input_types":["natural language queries about AI system types","risk category keywords","article references"],"output_types":["compliance requirements","risk classification criteria","documentation obligations"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.cyber.resilience.act.requirement.mapping","name":"cyber resilience act requirement mapping","description":"Enables retrieval of Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) requirements for hardware and software manufacturers, including security-by-design obligations, vulnerability disclosure procedures, and product security update requirements. The server indexes CRA articles and maps requirements to product lifecycle stages, allowing queries about design, testing, deployment, and maintenance obligations.","intents":["What are the security-by-design requirements under the Cyber Resilience Act for my software product?","What vulnerability disclosure and patching timelines does the CRA mandate?","How does the CRA define 'significant vulnerabilities' and what are the reporting obligations?"],"best_for":["Software and hardware manufacturers implementing CRA compliance","Product security teams designing vulnerability management processes","DevSecOps engineers implementing CRA-compliant update and patch procedures"],"limitations":["CRA implementation guidance from ENISA may evolve — server provides regulation text but not latest guidance","No automated vulnerability assessment — retrieves requirements but does not evaluate products against them","Delegated acts and implementing acts may not be fully indexed"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client","Understanding of product lifecycle and vulnerability management","Network connectivity to MCP server"],"input_types":["natural language queries about product security obligations","lifecycle stage keywords","vulnerability management scenario descriptions"],"output_types":["security requirements","vulnerability disclosure procedures","update and patch obligations"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.multi.regulation.cross.reference.and.comparison","name":"multi-regulation cross-reference and comparison","description":"Enables semantic queries that retrieve and compare overlapping requirements across multiple EU regulations (DORA, NIS2, GDPR, AI Act, CRA) simultaneously. The server maintains cross-reference mappings between regulations and returns aligned requirements, helping developers understand how different regulations address the same compliance domain (e.g., incident reporting, security governance, transparency).","intents":["How do DORA and NIS2 incident reporting requirements overlap and differ?","What are the common security governance requirements across DORA, NIS2, and the AI Act?","How do GDPR and the AI Act address transparency and consent differently?"],"best_for":["Compliance teams managing multi-regulation obligations across organizations","Enterprises subject to multiple EU regulations seeking unified compliance frameworks","Consultants advising clients on consolidated compliance strategies"],"limitations":["Cross-reference mappings are manually maintained — may not capture all subtle overlaps or conflicts","Regulations may have conflicting requirements — server retrieves both but cannot resolve conflicts automatically","Comparison accuracy depends on indexed versions of all regulations being current"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client","Understanding of multiple EU regulatory frameworks","Network access to MCP server"],"input_types":["natural language queries comparing regulations","compliance domain keywords (e.g., 'incident reporting', 'governance')","regulation name combinations"],"output_types":["aligned requirements from multiple regulations","comparison matrices","cross-reference citations"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp__cap_6","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.integration.and.context.injection","name":"mcp protocol integration and context injection","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, exposing EU regulation retrieval as tools callable from Claude, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible clients. The server handles MCP message serialization, tool schema definition, and context injection, allowing LLMs to autonomously query regulations and incorporate results into reasoning chains without manual copy-paste of regulatory text.","intents":["I want Claude to automatically look up relevant GDPR articles when I ask about data processing","Enable Cursor to retrieve NIS2 requirements while I'm writing security documentation","Build a custom agent that queries multiple EU regulations to assess compliance"],"best_for":["Developers building LLM agents that need regulatory context","Teams using Claude or Cursor who want integrated compliance lookup","Custom MCP host builders extending the server with additional tools"],"limitations":["MCP message size limits may truncate very long regulation sections — requires pagination or summarization","Server availability is a single point of failure for MCP clients — no built-in redundancy or failover","Tool schema must be manually updated if new regulations are added to the server"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client (Claude, Cursor, or custom MCP host)","MCP server running and accessible on network","Client-side MCP configuration pointing to server endpoint"],"input_types":["MCP tool calls with regulation queries","natural language prompts from LLM"],"output_types":["MCP tool results with regulatory text","structured JSON responses"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp__cap_7","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.regulation.specific.semantic.indexing.and.retrieval","name":"regulation-specific semantic indexing and retrieval","description":"Implements semantic search over EU regulations using embedding-based retrieval, where regulation text is indexed by semantic meaning rather than keyword matching. The server converts queries and regulation articles into embeddings, enabling retrieval of conceptually related requirements even when exact keyword matches don't exist, improving recall for compliance queries.","intents":["Find all GDPR requirements related to 'data minimization' even if that exact phrase isn't used","Retrieve NIS2 articles about 'supply chain risk' without knowing exact article numbers","Search for DORA requirements about 'third-party risk' across all relevant articles"],"best_for":["Compliance teams performing broad regulatory searches across multiple articles","Developers building compliance automation that needs semantic understanding","Non-legal users querying regulations in natural language without regulatory terminology"],"limitations":["Embedding quality depends on model used — may miss nuanced legal distinctions","Semantic search can return false positives if regulations use similar language for different concepts","Embedding computation adds latency compared to keyword search — typically 100-500ms per query"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client","Embedding model (likely OpenAI, Anthropic, or local model) for query encoding","Vector storage backend for regulation embeddings"],"input_types":["natural language compliance queries","conceptual requirement descriptions"],"output_types":["semantically relevant regulation excerpts","relevance scores","article citations"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp__cap_8","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.open.source.regulation.database.maintenance","name":"open-source regulation database maintenance","description":"Provides an open-source, community-maintained database of EU regulations with version control and update tracking. The server sources regulation text from official EU sources, maintains change history, and enables community contributions for corrections and improvements, ensuring the indexed regulations remain current and accurate as new versions are published.","intents":["I want to contribute corrections or clarifications to the indexed GDPR text","Track when regulations are updated and see what changed","Ensure the server is using the latest official version of each regulation"],"best_for":["Open-source contributors improving regulation databases","Organizations requiring auditable, version-controlled regulation sources","Compliance teams needing transparency into which regulation versions are indexed"],"limitations":["Community maintenance model may have slower update cycles than commercial compliance databases","No official legal review of community contributions — accuracy depends on contributor expertise","Regulation text sourcing from official EU sources may have licensing restrictions"],"requires":["GitHub or similar version control access for contributions","Understanding of regulation structure and content","Ability to verify changes against official EU sources"],"input_types":["pull requests with regulation updates","issue reports for inaccuracies","version control commits"],"output_types":["updated regulation database","change history and version tracking","community contributions"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":31,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP-compatible client (Claude, Cursor, or custom MCP host)","Network connectivity to MCP server endpoint","Basic understanding of DORA regulatory framework for query formulation","MCP-compatible client","Understanding of critical infrastructure classification under NIS2","Network access to MCP server","Basic GDPR literacy for query formulation","Network connectivity to MCP server","Understanding of AI system types and risk categories","Understanding of product lifecycle and vulnerability management"],"failure_modes":["Retrieval accuracy depends on indexed version of DORA text — amendments after indexing may not be reflected","No real-time regulatory updates — requires manual re-indexing when regulations change","Context window limited by MCP message size constraints, may truncate very long regulation sections","NIS2 implementation varies by member state — server provides EU-level directive but not country-specific transpositions","No automated compliance assessment — returns requirements but does not evaluate current state against them","Indexed content may lag behind regulatory guidance updates from ENISA or national authorities","GDPR interpretation varies by national DPA guidance — server provides regulation text but not country-specific interpretations","No real-time case law integration — does not reflect recent CJEU or national court decisions","Cannot assess compliance of specific data processing activities — only retrieves regulatory text","EU AI Act risk classification is context-dependent — server retrieves requirements but cannot automatically classify systems","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.43,"ecosystem":0.49000000000000005,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.635Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:05.145Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp"}},"signature":"PzEufupoZFMrAsFgrBhhPzhufUGJsnPSMI8GvkG9ZtT3+CRHJPbZZJzoiDdM34el/L357zrp2Sx9hPkimD5EBg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T19:49:26.181Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=ansvar-eu-compliance-mcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}