{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers","slug":"andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers","name":"Andy's Test API MCP Server","type":"mcp","url":"https://modelcontextprotocol.io","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers","categories":["mcp-servers","automation","testing-quality"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:AndyManastorm/smithery-reference-servers"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.github.repository.file.operations.via.mcp.protocol","name":"github repository file operations via mcp protocol","description":"Exposes GitHub file read/write/delete operations through the Model Context Protocol, allowing LLM agents to directly manipulate repository contents without manual API integration. Implements MCP resource handlers that translate protocol requests into GitHub REST API calls, with automatic authentication via stored credentials and error propagation back through the MCP transport layer.","intents":["I want my AI agent to read and modify files in a GitHub repo without writing custom GitHub API code","I need to enable Claude or other MCP-compatible LLMs to perform file operations on my repositories","I want to abstract away GitHub API authentication and error handling in my agent workflows"],"best_for":["AI agent developers building GitHub-integrated workflows","Teams using Claude or other MCP-compatible LLMs for code automation","Developers who want to expose GitHub capabilities to language models without custom integration code"],"limitations":["Requires valid GitHub API credentials (token or OAuth) to be configured before runtime","File operations are subject to GitHub API rate limits (60 requests/hour unauthenticated, 5000/hour authenticated)","No built-in support for binary file operations — text-based files only","Latency depends on GitHub API response times, typically 200-500ms per operation"],"requires":["GitHub API token or OAuth credentials","MCP client implementation (Claude, or custom MCP-compatible tool)","Network connectivity to GitHub API endpoints","Repository access permissions matching the provided credentials"],"input_types":["file paths (string)","file content (text/code)","repository identifiers (owner/repo format)"],"output_types":["file content (text/code)","operation status (success/error)","GitHub API response metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","github-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.automatic.git.branch.creation.and.management","name":"automatic git branch creation and management","description":"Automatically creates feature branches following Git conventions when an LLM agent initiates file modifications, with configurable naming patterns and automatic branch tracking. Uses MCP tool handlers to intercept file write operations, create branches via GitHub API, and maintain branch context throughout the agent session, ensuring all changes are isolated and Git history is preserved.","intents":["I want my AI agent to automatically create feature branches when making code changes","I need to ensure all agent-generated changes are isolated in separate branches for review","I want to maintain clean Git history with automatic branch management"],"best_for":["Teams using AI agents for code generation who want automated branch management","Development workflows requiring code review before merging agent changes","Organizations with strict Git hygiene requirements"],"limitations":["Branch naming patterns are configurable but must follow GitHub branch naming rules (no spaces, special characters)","Automatic branch creation requires write access to the repository","No built-in merge conflict resolution — conflicts must be resolved manually or via separate workflow","Branch cleanup is not automatic — orphaned branches must be deleted manually or via separate CI/CD step"],"requires":["GitHub API token with repository write permissions","Base branch must exist (typically 'main' or 'master')","MCP client must support tool execution for branch creation"],"input_types":["branch name pattern (string)","base branch reference (string)","file modification intent (implicit from write operations)"],"output_types":["created branch reference (string)","branch URL (string)","branch creation status (success/error)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","github-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers__cap_2","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.advanced.repository.search.with.semantic.and.syntax.aware.indexing","name":"advanced repository search with semantic and syntax-aware indexing","description":"Provides full-text and semantic search across repository contents using indexed file metadata and content analysis, enabling LLM agents to locate relevant code files without scanning entire repositories. Implements search handlers that query GitHub's search API or local file indexing, with support for filtering by file type, language, and content patterns, returning ranked results with context snippets.","intents":["I want my AI agent to find relevant code files in a large repository without reading every file","I need to search for functions, classes, or patterns across a codebase to understand its structure","I want to enable semantic search so my agent can find code by intent, not just keyword matching"],"best_for":["Developers working with large codebases who need AI-assisted code navigation","AI agents performing code analysis or refactoring across multiple files","Teams using LLMs for code search and understanding tasks"],"limitations":["GitHub search API has rate limits (30 requests/minute for authenticated users)","Semantic search requires pre-computed embeddings, adding indexing overhead","Search results are limited to 100 matches per query on GitHub API","Local indexing requires periodic updates to stay synchronized with repository changes"],"requires":["GitHub API token for search API access","Repository must be indexed (automatic for GitHub-hosted repos, manual for local indexing)","MCP client must support search tool execution"],"input_types":["search query (string)","file type filters (string array)","language filters (string array)","content pattern (regex or semantic intent)"],"output_types":["file paths (string array)","context snippets (text with line numbers)","relevance scores (numeric)","file metadata (language, size, last modified)"],"categories":["search-retrieval","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.comprehensive.error.handling.and.git.history.preservation","name":"comprehensive error handling and git history preservation","description":"Implements multi-layer error handling that captures GitHub API errors, Git operation failures, and protocol-level issues, with automatic rollback capabilities and detailed error reporting. Uses MCP error handlers to catch failures at each operation stage, preserve Git history through atomic commits, and provide actionable error messages back to the agent, ensuring failed operations don't corrupt repository state.","intents":["I want my AI agent to handle GitHub API errors gracefully without corrupting my repository","I need detailed error messages when operations fail so I can understand what went wrong","I want automatic rollback of failed operations to preserve repository integrity"],"best_for":["Production AI agent deployments where repository integrity is critical","Teams requiring audit trails and error tracking for AI-assisted changes","Developers building reliable AI-powered code automation"],"limitations":["Rollback is limited to uncommitted changes — committed changes require manual revert","Error recovery depends on GitHub API availability — network failures cannot be recovered automatically","Atomic commits require all operations to complete within a single transaction, limiting parallelization","Error messages are GitHub API-dependent and may not always be user-friendly"],"requires":["GitHub API token with appropriate permissions","Git client installed and configured for local operations","MCP client with error handling support"],"input_types":["operation context (file paths, content, branch info)","error recovery strategy (rollback, retry, skip)"],"output_types":["error details (error code, message, context)","recovery status (rolled back, retried, failed)","Git history state (commit hash, branch state)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.transport.and.resource.exposure","name":"mcp protocol transport and resource exposure","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol server specification, exposing GitHub operations as standardized MCP resources and tools that any MCP-compatible client can invoke. Uses MCP's resource definition system to declare available operations (file read/write, branch creation, search), implements tool handlers for each operation, and manages the bidirectional message protocol between client and server, enabling seamless integration with Claude, custom agents, and other MCP clients.","intents":["I want to expose GitHub capabilities to Claude or other MCP-compatible LLMs","I need a standardized way to integrate GitHub operations into my AI agent framework","I want to build GitHub-integrated agents without writing custom protocol code"],"best_for":["Developers building MCP-compatible AI agents","Teams standardizing on MCP for tool integration","Organizations using Claude or other MCP-supporting LLMs"],"limitations":["MCP protocol overhead adds ~50-100ms latency per operation vs. direct API calls","Client must implement MCP protocol support — not compatible with non-MCP tools","Resource definitions are static and must be updated when new operations are added","No built-in caching — each operation results in a fresh API call"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client (Claude, custom agent framework with MCP support)","MCP server runtime (Node.js, Python, or other supported language)","Network connectivity between client and server"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC format)","resource requests (file paths, operation types)","tool invocations (operation parameters)"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (JSON-RPC format)","resource content (file data, metadata)","tool results (operation outcomes, error details)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.credential.management.and.authentication.abstraction","name":"credential management and authentication abstraction","description":"Manages GitHub API authentication credentials (tokens, OAuth) with secure storage and automatic credential injection into API requests. Implements credential handlers that retrieve stored credentials at runtime, support multiple authentication methods (personal tokens, OAuth apps, GitHub Apps), and handle credential refresh/rotation, abstracting authentication complexity from the MCP client.","intents":["I want to securely store GitHub credentials without exposing them in my agent code","I need to support multiple authentication methods for different GitHub accounts","I want automatic credential refresh so my agent doesn't fail due to expired tokens"],"best_for":["Production deployments requiring secure credential management","Multi-tenant systems supporting multiple GitHub accounts","Teams with strict security requirements for API credentials"],"limitations":["Credential storage security depends on the underlying system (environment variables, vaults, etc.)","No built-in credential rotation — must be managed externally","OAuth token refresh requires additional configuration and may add latency","Credential scope is limited to GitHub API — cannot be used for other services"],"requires":["Secure credential storage mechanism (environment variables, AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, etc.)","GitHub API token or OAuth app credentials","MCP server runtime with access to credential storage"],"input_types":["credential type (token, OAuth, GitHub App)","credential value (token string, OAuth code, app key)"],"output_types":["authentication headers (Authorization header value)","credential validation status (valid, expired, invalid)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":34,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["GitHub API token or OAuth credentials","MCP client implementation (Claude, or custom MCP-compatible tool)","Network connectivity to GitHub API endpoints","Repository access permissions matching the provided credentials","GitHub API token with repository write permissions","Base branch must exist (typically 'main' or 'master')","MCP client must support tool execution for branch creation","GitHub API token for search API access","Repository must be indexed (automatic for GitHub-hosted repos, manual for local indexing)","MCP client must support search tool execution"],"failure_modes":["Requires valid GitHub API credentials (token or OAuth) to be configured before runtime","File operations are subject to GitHub API rate limits (60 requests/hour unauthenticated, 5000/hour authenticated)","No built-in support for binary file operations — text-based files only","Latency depends on GitHub API response times, typically 200-500ms per operation","Branch naming patterns are configurable but must follow GitHub branch naming rules (no spaces, special characters)","Automatic branch creation requires write access to the repository","No built-in merge conflict resolution — conflicts must be resolved manually or via separate workflow","Branch cleanup is not automatic — orphaned branches must be deleted manually or via separate CI/CD step","GitHub search API has rate limits (30 requests/minute for authenticated users)","Semantic search requires pre-computed embeddings, adding indexing overhead","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.47,"ecosystem":0.5900000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.635Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:18:48.789Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers"}},"signature":"4OLFGEFz+Oef7JGOWh21W+zeT6k4fIEf3dAHqMPg3HUu1ceqE4KhD8ppJQGgrHn9dV2llHLRw+R/rV+iZftaCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T08:33:49.626Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=andymanastorm-smithery-reference-servers","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}