{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_amberpann-test-demo","slug":"amberpann-test-demo","name":"test-demo","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/AmberPann/test-demo","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/amberpann-test-demo","categories":["mcp-servers","testing-quality"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:AmberPann/test-demo"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_amberpann-test-demo__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.protocol.implementation.and.endpoint.exposure","name":"mcp server protocol implementation and endpoint exposure","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) specification as a server, exposing a standardized interface for LLM clients to discover and invoke capabilities through JSON-RPC 2.0 messaging over stdio or HTTP transports. The server handles protocol negotiation, capability advertisement via the initialize handshake, and request/response routing according to MCP specification versions.","intents":["I need to expose custom tools and resources to Claude, ChatGPT, or other MCP-compatible LLM clients","I want to build a composable tool ecosystem where multiple MCP servers can be chained together","I need standardized protocol compliance for enterprise LLM integrations"],"best_for":["LLM application developers integrating custom backends with Claude or other MCP-aware models","Teams building modular tool ecosystems that need protocol-agnostic interoperability","Enterprises requiring standardized, auditable LLM tool interfaces"],"limitations":["MCP is still evolving — breaking changes possible between minor versions","No built-in authentication/authorization — security must be implemented at transport layer","Synchronous request/response model may bottleneck on long-running operations without async wrapper patterns","Limited to JSON-RPC 2.0 — no streaming responses natively (requires chunking workarounds)"],"requires":["MCP client library compatible with server version (e.g., Claude SDK, Anthropic SDK)","Node.js 18+ or Python 3.9+ depending on implementation language","Transport layer (stdio, HTTP, or WebSocket) configured on both client and server"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 requests with method names and parameters","Tool invocation payloads with typed arguments","Resource URIs and query parameters"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 responses with results or error objects","Tool execution results (text, structured data, or binary)","Resource content (text, JSON, or opaque data)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-protocol"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_amberpann-test-demo__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.definition.and.capability.advertisement","name":"tool definition and capability advertisement","description":"Defines a schema-based tool registry that advertises available tools to MCP clients during the initialize handshake, including tool names, descriptions, input schemas (JSON Schema format), and execution handlers. The server maintains a registry of callable tools and responds to tools/list and tools/call requests with proper error handling and type validation.","intents":["I want to expose a set of custom functions to Claude so it can call them autonomously","I need to define strongly-typed tool interfaces with JSON Schema validation","I want Claude to understand what tools are available and when to use them"],"best_for":["Developers building Claude agents with custom business logic","Teams integrating proprietary APIs or internal services with LLM clients","Builders prototyping multi-tool agentic workflows"],"limitations":["Tool schemas must be valid JSON Schema — complex conditional schemas may be difficult to express","No built-in tool versioning — breaking schema changes require client-side coordination","Tool execution is synchronous by default — long-running operations block the MCP connection","No native support for tool result streaming — large outputs must be paginated or chunked manually"],"requires":["JSON Schema knowledge for defining input/output types","MCP client that supports tools/list and tools/call methods","Handler functions or methods bound to each tool name"],"input_types":["Tool name (string)","Tool arguments (JSON object matching schema)"],"output_types":["Tool result (text, JSON, or structured data)","Error responses with error codes and messages"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_amberpann-test-demo__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.resource.serving.and.content.retrieval","name":"resource serving and content retrieval","description":"Implements MCP resource endpoints that serve static or dynamic content (documents, code snippets, configuration files, etc.) to clients via resources/list and resources/read methods. Resources are identified by URIs and can include MIME type metadata, enabling clients to request and cache content with proper type handling and optional template expansion.","intents":["I want Claude to have access to documentation, codebase files, or configuration without embedding them in every prompt","I need to serve dynamic content (e.g., database query results) as resources that Claude can reference","I want to enable Claude to browse and retrieve specific files from a resource tree"],"best_for":["Developers building RAG-adjacent systems where Claude needs on-demand file access","Teams exposing internal documentation or knowledge bases to LLM clients","Builders creating context-aware agents that reference external resources"],"limitations":["Resources are read-only by default — no built-in write/mutation support","No pagination or streaming for large resources — entire content must fit in memory and response","Resource URIs are opaque to the protocol — no standardized URI scheme (custom schemes required)","No built-in caching hints — clients must implement their own cache invalidation logic"],"requires":["Resource content accessible from server (files, database, API, etc.)","MIME type metadata for proper client-side handling","MCP client that supports resources/list and resources/read"],"input_types":["Resource URI (string)","Optional query parameters or filters"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, JSON, binary, or opaque data)","MIME type metadata","Resource metadata (name, description, URI)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_amberpann-test-demo__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.template.serving.and.context.injection","name":"prompt template serving and context injection","description":"Exposes reusable prompt templates via the prompts/list and prompts/get methods, allowing clients to retrieve pre-defined prompts with optional argument substitution. Templates can include dynamic placeholders that are filled with client-provided arguments, enabling standardized prompt patterns across multiple LLM invocations without embedding prompts in client code.","intents":["I want to define standard prompt templates that Claude uses consistently across different invocations","I need to inject dynamic context (user input, data) into pre-defined prompts server-side","I want to version and update prompts centrally without modifying client code"],"best_for":["Teams managing prompt templates for multiple LLM applications","Builders creating prompt-as-a-service architectures","Enterprises requiring centralized prompt governance and versioning"],"limitations":["Template syntax is not standardized in MCP — custom templating logic required","No built-in prompt versioning or A/B testing support","Argument substitution is client-driven — server cannot validate argument types","No support for conditional or branching prompts — all variations must be separate templates"],"requires":["Prompt template storage (files, database, or in-memory registry)","Template syntax parser (e.g., Handlebars, Jinja2, or custom)","MCP client that supports prompts/list and prompts/get"],"input_types":["Prompt name (string)","Optional arguments (JSON object for template substitution)"],"output_types":["Rendered prompt text","Prompt metadata (name, description, arguments)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_amberpann-test-demo__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.request.routing.and.method.dispatch","name":"request routing and method dispatch","description":"Implements JSON-RPC 2.0 request routing that maps incoming method names (e.g., tools/call, resources/read, prompts/get) to corresponding handler functions, with proper error handling, request validation, and response formatting. The router maintains a registry of supported methods and dispatches requests asynchronously or synchronously based on handler implementation.","intents":["I need to handle multiple MCP method types (tools, resources, prompts) with a single server instance","I want proper error handling and validation for all incoming requests","I need to route requests to different handlers based on method name and parameters"],"best_for":["Developers building multi-capability MCP servers","Teams requiring robust error handling and request validation","Builders implementing custom MCP extensions or method types"],"limitations":["Synchronous routing adds latency for concurrent requests — async patterns required for high throughput","No built-in request queuing or rate limiting — must be implemented at transport layer","Error responses follow JSON-RPC 2.0 spec but custom error codes require documentation","No middleware or interceptor pattern — cross-cutting concerns must be implemented per handler"],"requires":["JSON-RPC 2.0 parser and response formatter","Handler registry mapping method names to functions","Error handling strategy for malformed requests and handler exceptions"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 request objects with jsonrpc, method, params, id"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 response objects with jsonrpc, result/error, id"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":25,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client library compatible with server version (e.g., Claude SDK, Anthropic SDK)","Node.js 18+ or Python 3.9+ depending on implementation language","Transport layer (stdio, HTTP, or WebSocket) configured on both client and server","JSON Schema knowledge for defining input/output types","MCP client that supports tools/list and tools/call methods","Handler functions or methods bound to each tool name","Resource content accessible from server (files, database, API, etc.)","MIME type metadata for proper client-side handling","MCP client that supports resources/list and resources/read","Prompt template storage (files, database, or in-memory registry)"],"failure_modes":["MCP is still evolving — breaking changes possible between minor versions","No built-in authentication/authorization — security must be implemented at transport layer","Synchronous request/response model may bottleneck on long-running operations without async wrapper patterns","Limited to JSON-RPC 2.0 — no streaming responses natively (requires chunking workarounds)","Tool schemas must be valid JSON Schema — complex conditional schemas may be difficult to express","No built-in tool versioning — breaking schema changes require client-side coordination","Tool execution is synchronous by default — long-running operations block the MCP connection","No native support for tool result streaming — large outputs must be paginated or chunked manually","Resources are read-only by default — no built-in write/mutation support","No pagination or streaming for large resources — entire content must fit in memory and response","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.49000000000000005,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.635Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:15.095Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=amberpann-test-demo","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=amberpann-test-demo"}},"signature":"90U+eFkAB3gfJupsaXQpHcob+9d46ruRg9f0f4mQa+n/LlgaQPlaPPWBhaqChFZYjlfd+Sb7/mlBnrx6LAhGBA==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T18:11:30.776Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/amberpann-test-demo","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/amberpann-test-demo","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=amberpann-test-demo","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}