{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-allinonemcp","slug":"allinonemcp","name":"AllInOneMCP","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/particlefuture/MCPDiscovery","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/allinonemcp","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-allinonemcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.mcp.server.discovery.and.registry.indexing","name":"mcp server discovery and registry indexing","description":"Maintains a centralized, searchable registry of available MCP servers by crawling, cataloging, and indexing server metadata including capabilities, installation instructions, and compatibility information. The system aggregates server definitions from multiple sources and exposes them through a unified query interface, enabling developers to discover compatible servers without manual research across fragmented repositories.","intents":["Find available MCP servers that match my use case without searching GitHub manually","Discover what capabilities different MCP servers provide before integrating them","Learn installation and configuration steps for a specific MCP server","Understand which MCP servers are actively maintained and compatible with my environment"],"best_for":["AI application developers building multi-tool agent systems","Teams evaluating MCP ecosystem maturity and available integrations","Developers new to MCP looking for curated, vetted server options"],"limitations":["Registry freshness depends on crawl frequency — newly released servers may not appear immediately","No built-in server health checks or uptime monitoring — relies on server maintainers for accuracy","Limited to servers that expose standardized metadata; custom or undocumented servers may not be discoverable","No versioning information for servers — cannot distinguish between major version compatibility"],"requires":["Network access to https://mcp.pfvc.io/mcp/ endpoint","MCP client compatible with remote server connections","Basic understanding of MCP protocol and server concepts"],"input_types":["text queries (server name, capability keywords)","structured filters (category, language, maintenance status)"],"output_types":["structured server metadata (JSON)","installation instructions (markdown/text)","capability descriptions (text)","compatibility matrices (structured data)"],"categories":["search-retrieval","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-allinonemcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.remote.mcp.server.provisioning.and.connection.management","name":"remote mcp server provisioning and connection management","description":"Exposes a remote MCP endpoint (https://mcp.pfvc.io/mcp/) that clients can connect to directly without local installation, handling server lifecycle management, request routing, and connection pooling on behalf of the client. This architecture eliminates the need for developers to run MCP servers locally while maintaining full protocol compatibility with standard MCP clients.","intents":["Connect to MCP discovery functionality without installing anything locally","Use MCP discovery as a remote service integrated into my existing MCP client setup","Access the MCP registry from multiple machines or environments without duplication","Avoid managing server dependencies and deployment complexity"],"best_for":["Developers using cloud-based or containerized AI applications","Teams wanting to centralize MCP infrastructure rather than distribute server instances","Rapid prototyping scenarios where local setup overhead should be minimized"],"limitations":["Network latency for every discovery query — remote calls add ~50-200ms per request vs local execution","Dependency on external service availability — service downtime blocks all connected clients","No local caching of registry data — repeated queries hit the remote endpoint each time","Rate limiting or quota constraints may apply to remote endpoint usage"],"requires":["Outbound HTTPS connectivity to mcp.pfvc.io","MCP client that supports remote server connections (most standard clients do)","Valid MCP protocol handshake capability"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC)","discovery queries formatted as MCP tool calls"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (JSON-RPC)","server metadata and registry results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-allinonemcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.mcp.server.capability.schema.extraction.and.documentation","name":"mcp server capability schema extraction and documentation","description":"Parses and extracts formal capability schemas from MCP server definitions, including tool signatures, resource types, prompt templates, and supported operations. The system generates standardized documentation that describes what each server can do, what inputs it accepts, and what outputs it produces, enabling developers to understand server capabilities without reading source code.","intents":["Understand what tools and resources a specific MCP server exposes","Find servers that support a particular operation or data type","Generate client code or prompts based on server capability schemas","Compare capabilities across multiple servers to choose the best fit"],"best_for":["LLM application developers building agent systems with multiple tool integrations","Teams creating code generation tools that need to understand available server capabilities","Documentation generators that need to auto-generate API references from MCP servers"],"limitations":["Schema extraction accuracy depends on server compliance with MCP specification — non-standard servers may not parse correctly","No semantic understanding of capabilities — cannot infer relationships or dependencies between tools","Documentation generation is syntactic only — does not include usage examples or best practices","Requires servers to expose capability metadata; servers with minimal or missing schemas will have incomplete documentation"],"requires":["Access to MCP server definitions or running server instances","MCP protocol compliance from target servers","JSON schema validation libraries (typically built-in to MCP clients)"],"input_types":["MCP server definitions (JSON)","MCP protocol capability announcements"],"output_types":["structured capability schemas (JSON Schema)","formatted documentation (markdown/HTML)","tool/resource inventories (structured data)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-allinonemcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.server.installation.and.setup.instruction.generation","name":"mcp server installation and setup instruction generation","description":"Aggregates and surfaces installation instructions, dependency requirements, configuration examples, and setup guides for each MCP server in the registry. The system normalizes these instructions across servers with different package managers, languages, and deployment models, presenting them in a consistent format with platform-specific variants (pip, npm, cargo, Docker, etc.).","intents":["Get step-by-step installation instructions for a specific MCP server","Find the correct package manager and version to use for my environment","Understand what dependencies or system requirements a server needs","Copy-paste configuration examples to integrate a server into my setup"],"best_for":["Developers new to MCP who need guided setup instructions","Teams standardizing MCP server deployment across multiple environments","DevOps engineers automating MCP server provisioning"],"limitations":["Instructions may become stale if server maintainers don't update registry metadata","No validation that instructions actually work — relies on server maintainers for accuracy","Cannot handle complex multi-step setup processes that require manual configuration","Platform-specific instructions (Windows vs Linux vs macOS) may not be available for all servers"],"requires":["Access to the MCP registry","Appropriate package manager for your environment (pip, npm, cargo, Docker, etc.)","System dependencies specified by individual servers"],"input_types":["server name or identifier","environment/platform preference (Python, Node.js, Rust, Docker, etc.)"],"output_types":["installation commands (shell/bash)","configuration files (YAML/JSON/TOML)","dependency lists (requirements.txt, package.json, Cargo.toml, etc.)","setup guides (markdown)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-allinonemcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.mcp.server.compatibility.and.dependency.resolution","name":"mcp server compatibility and dependency resolution","description":"Analyzes MCP server metadata to determine compatibility with specific client versions, Python/Node.js versions, and other system dependencies. The system resolves transitive dependencies, identifies version conflicts, and provides compatibility matrices showing which servers work together without conflicts.","intents":["Check if a specific MCP server is compatible with my Python/Node.js version","Find which servers can be used together without dependency conflicts","Understand what system-level dependencies a server requires","Plan upgrades by checking compatibility across multiple servers"],"best_for":["Teams managing multiple MCP servers in production environments","Developers building complex agent systems with many integrated servers","DevOps engineers planning infrastructure and dependency management"],"limitations":["Compatibility information is only as accurate as server maintainers' metadata — incomplete or incorrect version specifications will produce wrong results","Cannot detect runtime compatibility issues that only appear during execution","No semantic versioning validation — assumes servers follow semantic versioning correctly","Transitive dependency resolution is limited to explicitly declared dependencies; implicit or optional dependencies may be missed"],"requires":["Complete and accurate dependency metadata from all servers","Access to version constraint specifications (semantic versioning)","Knowledge of your target environment (Python version, Node.js version, OS, etc.)"],"input_types":["server identifiers","target environment specifications (Python 3.9+, Node.js 18+, etc.)","list of servers to check for mutual compatibility"],"output_types":["compatibility reports (structured data)","dependency conflict warnings (text/structured)","compatibility matrices (tables/JSON)","version recommendations (text)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-allinonemcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.mcp.server.categorization.and.semantic.tagging","name":"mcp server categorization and semantic tagging","description":"Classifies MCP servers into semantic categories (e.g., data processing, web integration, code tools, knowledge bases) and applies descriptive tags based on server capabilities and use cases. This enables filtering and discovery by functional domain rather than requiring exact server name knowledge, using both automated classification and community-contributed tags.","intents":["Find all MCP servers that work with databases or data processing","Discover servers in a specific domain (web scraping, code analysis, etc.) without knowing server names","Filter servers by use case (RAG, automation, integration, etc.)","Browse the MCP ecosystem by functional category"],"best_for":["Developers exploring the MCP ecosystem for the first time","Teams building domain-specific agent systems (e.g., data pipelines, web automation)","Product managers evaluating MCP ecosystem coverage in specific areas"],"limitations":["Categorization is subjective and may not match all use cases — a server could fit multiple categories","Community-contributed tags may be inconsistent or duplicative across servers","Automated classification may misclassify servers that span multiple domains","No hierarchical taxonomy — flat tag structure can become unwieldy as ecosystem grows"],"requires":["Access to the MCP registry","Server metadata including descriptions and capability lists"],"input_types":["category or tag name (text)","multiple tags for combined filtering"],"output_types":["filtered server lists (structured data)","category hierarchies (tree structure)","tag clouds or frequency distributions (visualization data)"],"categories":["search-retrieval","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":31,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["Network access to https://mcp.pfvc.io/mcp/ endpoint","MCP client compatible with remote server connections","Basic understanding of MCP protocol and server concepts","Outbound HTTPS connectivity to mcp.pfvc.io","MCP client that supports remote server connections (most standard clients do)","Valid MCP protocol handshake capability","Access to MCP server definitions or running server instances","MCP protocol compliance from target servers","JSON schema validation libraries (typically built-in to MCP clients)","Access to the MCP registry"],"failure_modes":["Registry freshness depends on crawl frequency — newly released servers may not appear immediately","No built-in server health checks or uptime monitoring — relies on server maintainers for accuracy","Limited to servers that expose standardized metadata; custom or undocumented servers may not be discoverable","No versioning information for servers — cannot distinguish between major version compatibility","Network latency for every discovery query — remote calls add ~50-200ms per request vs local execution","Dependency on external service availability — service downtime blocks all connected clients","No local caching of registry data — repeated queries hit the remote endpoint each time","Rate limiting or quota constraints may apply to remote endpoint usage","Schema extraction accuracy depends on server compliance with MCP specification — non-standard servers may not parse correctly","No semantic understanding of capabilities — cannot infer relationships or dependencies between tools","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.37,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:02.370Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=allinonemcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=allinonemcp"}},"signature":"KHXHcZfQuVBbLLHPnSh0yCoD8BVA7BtUBAYqHgDy6QI3D2Fz/NMEW6AR7G+Cn6bsKpNe4Cd6Z40z5ETjEfBPCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T19:04:47.025Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/allinonemcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/allinonemcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=allinonemcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}