{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hf-dataset-allenai--ai2_arc","slug":"allenai--ai2_arc","name":"ai2_arc","type":"dataset","url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/ai2_arc","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/allenai--ai2_arc","categories":["model-training"],"tags":["task_categories:question-answering","task_ids:open-domain-qa","task_ids:multiple-choice-qa","annotations_creators:found","language_creators:found","multilinguality:monolingual","source_datasets:original","language:en","license:cc-by-sa-4.0","size_categories:1K<n<10K","format:parquet","modality:text","library:datasets","library:pandas","library:polars","library:mlcroissant","arxiv:1803.05457","region:us"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hf-dataset-allenai--ai2_arc__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multiple.choice.question.answering.dataset.curation","name":"multiple-choice question-answering dataset curation","description":"Provides a curated collection of 7,787 multiple-choice science questions (Challenge set) and 99,911 additional questions (full corpus) sourced from real educational assessments and standardized tests. The dataset is structured with question text, four answer options, and ground-truth labels, enabling direct training and evaluation of QA models on grade-school science reasoning tasks without requiring annotation from scratch.","intents":["Train and benchmark multiple-choice QA models on standardized science questions","Evaluate model performance on grade-school level reasoning tasks","Build domain-specific QA systems for educational assessment","Compare model architectures on a standardized, publicly available benchmark"],"best_for":["ML researchers evaluating QA model architectures","Teams building educational AI tutoring systems","Developers benchmarking LLM reasoning capabilities on science tasks"],"limitations":["Limited to English-language science questions only — no multilingual coverage","Grade-school science focus may not generalize to advanced domain-specific QA","Fixed question set limits continuous evaluation — no dynamic question generation","No temporal metadata or difficulty stratification beyond train/test splits"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library (transformers ecosystem)","Python 3.6+","Sufficient disk space for 406K+ download (parquet format ~500MB uncompressed)"],"input_types":["question text (string)","answer options (list of 4 strings)","answer label (integer 0-3)"],"output_types":["structured records (question, options, label)","parquet/CSV export for model training pipelines"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","model-training-benchmark"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-allenai--ai2_arc__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.parquet.based.dataset.streaming.and.lazy.loading","name":"parquet-based dataset streaming and lazy loading","description":"Implements efficient columnar storage via Apache Parquet format with HuggingFace Datasets library integration, enabling lazy row-level access without loading the entire 406K+ question corpus into memory. The streaming architecture supports batch iteration, random sampling, and train/test split management through the datasets library's memory-mapped file handling and automatic caching mechanisms.","intents":["Load large QA datasets without exhausting GPU/CPU memory during training","Iterate over dataset batches with configurable batch sizes for model training","Sample subsets of questions for rapid prototyping and validation","Cache preprocessed dataset splits locally to avoid re-downloading"],"best_for":["ML engineers training models on resource-constrained hardware","Researchers iterating rapidly on model architectures with large datasets","Teams deploying models in production with strict memory budgets"],"limitations":["Parquet format requires datasets library — no native SQL query support","Lazy loading adds ~50-100ms per batch fetch due to deserialization overhead","No built-in data versioning — dataset updates require re-downloading entire parquet files","Memory-mapped access slower than pre-loaded in-memory datasets for repeated epochs"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library >= 2.0","Python 3.6+","Parquet reader (pyarrow or fastparquet)"],"input_types":["parquet file format"],"output_types":["Python dict/Dataset objects with lazy iteration","batched tensors for PyTorch/TensorFlow training loops"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-allenai--ai2_arc__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.train.test.split.stratification.and.benchmark.reproducibility","name":"train-test split stratification and benchmark reproducibility","description":"Provides pre-defined train/test splits (Challenge set: 1,119 test questions; Easy/Medium/Hard tiers: stratified by difficulty) with fixed random seeds and deterministic sampling, ensuring reproducible model evaluation across research teams. The split structure enables fair comparison of model architectures by controlling for data leakage and maintaining consistent evaluation protocols across published benchmarks.","intents":["Ensure reproducible model evaluation across different research teams and hardware","Compare model performance fairly by using standardized train/test boundaries","Stratify evaluation by difficulty level to diagnose model weaknesses","Publish results with confidence that others can replicate exact benchmark conditions"],"best_for":["Researchers publishing QA model benchmarks requiring reproducibility","Teams comparing multiple model architectures on identical test sets","Academic groups validating claims about model reasoning capabilities"],"limitations":["Fixed splits prevent dynamic evaluation — no cross-validation support built-in","Test set size (1,119 questions) may be insufficient for fine-grained statistical significance testing","No stratification by question type or reasoning category — only difficulty tiers","Deterministic splits can lead to overfitting to specific test questions across published models"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library","Python 3.6+"],"input_types":["dataset split identifier (train/test/validation)"],"output_types":["stratified question subsets with preserved label distributions"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-allenai--ai2_arc__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.cross.framework.dataset.compatibility.and.format.export","name":"cross-framework dataset compatibility and format export","description":"Supports seamless integration with multiple data processing ecosystems (pandas DataFrames, polars, MLCroissant metadata format) and export to standard formats (CSV, JSON, parquet), enabling interoperability across PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn, and custom training pipelines. The HuggingFace Datasets library abstraction handles format conversion automatically, removing friction from data pipeline construction.","intents":["Load dataset directly into pandas for exploratory data analysis and statistics","Export to CSV/JSON for use in non-Python ML frameworks or data warehouses","Integrate with MLCroissant metadata standards for reproducible ML workflows","Convert to polars for high-performance data manipulation on large subsets"],"best_for":["Data scientists performing EDA before model training","Teams using heterogeneous ML stacks (Python + R + SQL)","Researchers publishing datasets with standardized metadata (MLCroissant)"],"limitations":["Format conversion adds latency — ~100-500ms for full dataset export depending on target format","No built-in schema validation — exported formats may lose type information","polars integration requires separate installation and may have version compatibility issues","MLCroissant export is metadata-only — doesn't include actual question data in standard format"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library >= 2.0","pandas (for DataFrame export)","polars (optional, for high-performance operations)","Python 3.6+"],"input_types":["HuggingFace Dataset object"],"output_types":["pandas DataFrame","polars DataFrame","CSV file","JSON file","parquet file","MLCroissant metadata JSON"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-allenai--ai2_arc__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.open.domain.question.answering.evaluation.framework","name":"open-domain question-answering evaluation framework","description":"Enables evaluation of open-domain QA systems (not just multiple-choice) by providing ground-truth answer labels that can be compared against model predictions using standard metrics (exact match, F1 score, BLEU). The dataset structure supports both extractive QA evaluation (matching answer spans) and generative QA evaluation (comparing predicted text to reference answers), making it suitable for benchmarking diverse QA architectures.","intents":["Evaluate open-domain QA models that generate free-form answers against reference answers","Compute standard QA metrics (EM, F1) for model comparison","Benchmark retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems on science questions","Validate that QA models can answer questions without multiple-choice constraints"],"best_for":["Researchers developing open-domain QA systems (not just multiple-choice classifiers)","Teams building RAG pipelines that need science-domain evaluation","ML engineers comparing generative vs. extractive QA approaches"],"limitations":["Multiple-choice format constrains evaluation — models must select from 4 options rather than generating arbitrary answers","No reference answer text provided — only correct option label, requiring custom metric implementation for generative QA","Limited to single correct answer per question — no support for multiple valid answers","No answer span annotations — cannot evaluate extractive QA on specific text passages"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library","Custom metric implementation (exact match, F1 score computation)","Python 3.6+"],"input_types":["question text","candidate answer (model prediction)","reference answer label (0-3)"],"output_types":["evaluation metrics (exact match %, F1 score, accuracy)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-allenai--ai2_arc__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.science.domain.reasoning.benchmark.with.difficulty.tiers","name":"science-domain reasoning benchmark with difficulty tiers","description":"Organizes 99,911 science questions into explicit Easy, Medium, and Hard difficulty tiers (plus a separate 1,119-question Challenge set from the ARC competition), enabling targeted evaluation of model reasoning capabilities across complexity levels. The tiered structure allows researchers to diagnose where models fail (e.g., struggling with Hard questions but succeeding on Easy) and to measure progress on increasingly difficult reasoning tasks without requiring manual difficulty annotation.","intents":["Evaluate model reasoning capabilities across difficulty levels to identify failure modes","Train models progressively on easier questions before harder ones (curriculum learning)","Measure model improvement on specific difficulty tiers to track research progress","Benchmark models on a standardized difficulty scale for fair comparison"],"best_for":["Researchers studying model reasoning capabilities and failure modes","Teams implementing curriculum learning strategies for QA models","ML engineers tracking model improvement across difficulty tiers","Academic groups publishing benchmarks with difficulty-stratified evaluation"],"limitations":["Difficulty tiers are pre-assigned — no dynamic difficulty estimation based on model performance","No fine-grained reasoning category labels (e.g., 'requires causal reasoning' vs. 'requires factual recall')","Hard tier may still be solvable by simple pattern matching — no guarantee of true reasoning requirement","Difficulty distribution may not match real-world question distributions in educational settings"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library","Python 3.6+"],"input_types":["difficulty tier identifier (Easy/Medium/Hard/Challenge)"],"output_types":["filtered question subsets by difficulty level"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":23,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["HuggingFace datasets library (transformers ecosystem)","Python 3.6+","Sufficient disk space for 406K+ download (parquet format ~500MB uncompressed)","HuggingFace datasets library >= 2.0","Parquet reader (pyarrow or fastparquet)","HuggingFace datasets library","pandas (for DataFrame export)","polars (optional, for high-performance operations)","Custom metric implementation (exact match, F1 score computation)"],"failure_modes":["Limited to English-language science questions only — no multilingual coverage","Grade-school science focus may not generalize to advanced domain-specific QA","Fixed question set limits continuous evaluation — no dynamic question generation","No temporal metadata or difficulty stratification beyond train/test splits","Parquet format requires datasets library — no native SQL query support","Lazy loading adds ~50-100ms per batch fetch due to deserialization overhead","No built-in data versioning — dataset updates require re-downloading entire parquet files","Memory-mapped access slower than pre-loaded in-memory datasets for repeated epochs","Fixed splits prevent dynamic evaluation — no cross-validation support built-in","Test set size (1,119 questions) may be insufficient for fine-grained statistical significance testing","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.5000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.066Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:22:48.064Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=allenai--ai2_arc","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=allenai--ai2_arc"}},"signature":"eoIr7iEiBln3R2okVRzAAgXzFKqyaMRIZU6gWDxDAGsZDpuWg7vbTt8VmtZGauD9yxCIq9pkU9enSvLQZvV7BA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T18:30:57.886Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/allenai--ai2_arc","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/allenai--ai2_arc","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=allenai--ai2_arc","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}