{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2","slug":"aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2","name":"Jama Abstract MCP Server","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/aliemregencer/jama-abstract-mcp-v2","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:aliemregencer/jama-abstract-mcp-v2"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.server.instantiation.with.dynamic.tool.registration","name":"mcp protocol server instantiation with dynamic tool registration","description":"Implements a Model Context Protocol server that accepts tool definitions and exposes them through the standardized MCP interface, enabling LLMs to discover and invoke registered tools via a bidirectional message protocol. Uses a schema-based registration pattern where tools are defined declaratively and automatically marshaled into MCP-compliant tool schemas with input validation and response formatting.","intents":["I want to expose my custom business logic as tools that Claude or other MCP-compatible LLMs can call","I need to create a server that advertises available tools to language models without hardcoding them","I want to standardize how my AI agents interact with external systems using a protocol-agnostic approach"],"best_for":["teams building LLM agent infrastructure with multiple tool providers","developers integrating proprietary APIs into Claude or other MCP-compatible models","organizations standardizing on MCP for AI-to-system integration"],"limitations":["MCP is a relatively new protocol with limited client support outside Anthropic Claude ecosystem","No built-in authentication layer — requires external security implementation at transport level","Tool execution is synchronous by default — long-running operations may timeout without explicit async patterns","Schema validation errors are not automatically retried — caller must handle malformed tool responses"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude desktop, custom MCP client library)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ depending on server implementation language","Understanding of JSON Schema for tool input specification"],"input_types":["JSON tool definitions with name, description, and input schema","Tool invocation requests with parameters matching registered schemas"],"output_types":["MCP tool list response with schema definitions","Tool execution results as JSON-serializable objects"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-protocol"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.external.resource.integration.through.standardized.adapters","name":"external resource integration through standardized adapters","description":"Enables connection to external data sources and APIs (databases, REST endpoints, file systems, third-party services) through a pluggable adapter pattern where each resource type has a corresponding adapter that handles authentication, data transformation, and error handling. Adapters implement a common interface that abstracts away protocol-specific details, allowing tools to interact with diverse backends uniformly.","intents":["I want my LLM agent to query data from multiple sources (SQL database, REST API, knowledge base) without rewriting integration code for each","I need to add a new data source to my agent without modifying the core MCP server logic","I want to standardize error handling and retry logic across all external integrations"],"best_for":["enterprises with heterogeneous backend systems needing unified AI access","teams building multi-tenant AI platforms with customer-specific integrations","developers prototyping agents that need to work with multiple data sources"],"limitations":["Adapter development requires understanding both the external service API and the adapter interface contract","No built-in caching — repeated queries to external resources incur full latency costs unless explicitly cached","Adapter errors are propagated as-is to the LLM — requires careful error message design to avoid confusing the model","Rate limiting and quota management must be implemented per-adapter; no centralized throttling"],"requires":["Credentials or API keys for target external services","Network connectivity to external resources","Adapter implementation for each resource type (may be provided or custom-built)"],"input_types":["Resource configuration (connection strings, API endpoints, authentication details)","Query or operation parameters specific to the resource type"],"output_types":["Transformed data from external sources in standardized format","Error responses with diagnostic information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.context.aware.tool.invocation.with.parameter.validation.and.transformation","name":"context-aware tool invocation with parameter validation and transformation","description":"Validates incoming tool invocation requests against registered JSON schemas, transforms parameters into the format expected by underlying implementations, and executes tools with proper error handling and response formatting. Uses schema validation to catch malformed requests before execution, reducing wasted LLM context and preventing runtime errors that confuse the model.","intents":["I want to ensure that tools only receive valid parameters matching their specification before execution","I need to transform user-provided parameters into the format my backend systems expect","I want clear error messages when an LLM provides invalid tool parameters so it can self-correct"],"best_for":["teams building production AI agents where tool failures impact user experience","developers who want to reduce debugging time from invalid tool calls","systems requiring strict input validation for security or compliance reasons"],"limitations":["Schema validation adds ~10-50ms latency per tool invocation depending on schema complexity","Complex nested schemas may be difficult for LLMs to understand, leading to repeated validation failures","Parameter transformation logic must be implemented per tool — no automatic type coercion","Validation errors don't automatically suggest corrections to the LLM; error messages must be carefully crafted"],"requires":["JSON Schema definitions for each tool's input parameters","Implementation of parameter transformation logic for non-trivial type conversions"],"input_types":["Tool invocation request with tool name and parameters (JSON)","JSON Schema definitions for validation"],"output_types":["Validation success/failure response","Transformed parameters ready for execution","Detailed error messages for validation failures"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.bidirectional.message.protocol.handling.for.request.response.cycles","name":"bidirectional message protocol handling for request-response cycles","description":"Manages the full lifecycle of MCP protocol messages including tool discovery requests, tool invocation requests, and response formatting, implementing proper message sequencing and error handling to ensure reliable communication between LLM clients and the server. Handles both synchronous request-response patterns and asynchronous notification patterns defined in the MCP specification.","intents":["I want my MCP server to properly handle concurrent tool invocation requests from multiple LLM clients","I need to ensure that tool responses are correctly formatted and returned to the requesting client","I want to implement proper timeout and error handling for the MCP protocol layer"],"best_for":["teams deploying MCP servers in production with multiple concurrent clients","developers building resilient AI agent infrastructure","organizations standardizing on MCP for enterprise AI integration"],"limitations":["MCP protocol overhead adds ~50-100ms per round-trip compared to direct function calls","No built-in connection pooling — each client connection consumes server resources","Message ordering is not guaranteed across multiple concurrent requests without explicit sequencing","Large response payloads may exceed MCP message size limits (typically 100MB) requiring chunking logic"],"requires":["MCP protocol implementation library (e.g., @modelcontextprotocol/sdk for Node.js)","Transport layer (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket) configured and running","Proper error handling for network failures and timeouts"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC format)","Tool invocation requests with parameters"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (JSON-RPC format)","Tool execution results","Error responses with diagnostic information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.discovery.and.schema.advertisement.to.llm.clients","name":"tool discovery and schema advertisement to llm clients","description":"Exposes a tools list endpoint that returns all registered tools with their complete JSON Schema definitions, descriptions, and parameter specifications in a format that LLM clients can parse and use for prompt engineering and tool selection. Enables clients to dynamically discover available capabilities without hardcoding tool knowledge, supporting dynamic tool registration and removal.","intents":["I want Claude or other LLM clients to automatically discover what tools are available without me manually updating prompts","I need to add or remove tools at runtime and have clients immediately see the changes","I want to provide rich descriptions and examples so LLMs understand when and how to use each tool"],"best_for":["teams with frequently changing tool sets or multi-tenant deployments","developers building flexible AI agent platforms","organizations where non-technical users need to add new integrations"],"limitations":["Large tool lists (100+ tools) may exceed LLM context windows, requiring client-side filtering","Schema complexity can confuse LLMs — overly detailed schemas may reduce tool usage accuracy","Tool descriptions must be carefully written to avoid ambiguity; poor descriptions lead to incorrect tool selection","No built-in versioning — tool schema changes may break existing client implementations"],"requires":["Tool definitions with complete JSON Schema specifications","Clear, concise descriptions for each tool and parameter"],"input_types":["Tool registration requests with schema definitions"],"output_types":["Tool list response with complete schema definitions (JSON)","Individual tool schema on request"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.error.handling.and.failure.recovery.with.diagnostic.information","name":"error handling and failure recovery with diagnostic information","description":"Implements comprehensive error handling across the tool execution pipeline including validation errors, execution failures, timeout handling, and resource exhaustion, returning structured error responses with diagnostic information that helps both developers and LLMs understand what went wrong. Supports error recovery strategies like retries with exponential backoff for transient failures.","intents":["I want detailed error messages when tools fail so I can debug integration issues quickly","I need my LLM agent to understand when a tool failure is transient vs permanent so it can retry appropriately","I want to monitor tool failures and alert on patterns that indicate systemic issues"],"best_for":["production AI systems where reliability is critical","teams building observability into their AI infrastructure","developers debugging complex multi-tool workflows"],"limitations":["Detailed error messages may leak sensitive information — requires careful sanitization for untrusted clients","Retry logic adds latency for transient failures; must be tuned per tool to avoid excessive delays","Error categorization (transient vs permanent) requires domain knowledge and may be tool-specific","LLMs may misinterpret error messages and make incorrect recovery decisions"],"requires":["Error classification system (validation error, timeout, resource exhaustion, etc.)","Logging infrastructure to capture and analyze failures","Retry policy configuration per tool or resource type"],"input_types":["Tool invocation requests","Error events from external resources"],"output_types":["Structured error responses with error codes and messages","Diagnostic information (stack traces, resource usage, timing data)","Retry recommendations"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2__cap_6","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.stateless.tool.execution.with.optional.context.preservation","name":"stateless tool execution with optional context preservation","description":"Executes tools in an isolated context where each invocation is independent by default, but optionally supports passing context between invocations through explicit parameters or a shared context object. Maintains separation of concerns between tool logic and state management, allowing tools to be composed into workflows without implicit dependencies.","intents":["I want to execute tools in a predictable way where each call is independent and doesn't have hidden dependencies","I need to pass results from one tool to another in a workflow without storing state on the server","I want to ensure that concurrent tool invocations don't interfere with each other"],"best_for":["teams building stateless, scalable AI agent infrastructure","developers implementing complex multi-step workflows","organizations requiring audit trails and reproducibility"],"limitations":["Stateless execution requires explicit context passing, which increases message size and complexity","No implicit session state means tools can't rely on previous invocations, requiring careful API design","Context preservation across invocations requires explicit serialization, adding latency and complexity","Debugging multi-step workflows is harder without implicit state to inspect"],"requires":["Tool implementations that don't rely on global state or side effects","Explicit context passing mechanism (parameters or context objects)"],"input_types":["Tool invocation requests with explicit parameters","Optional context objects passed between invocations"],"output_types":["Tool results with explicit context for downstream tools","Execution traces showing tool dependencies"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.transport.agnostic.protocol.implementation.with.pluggable.transports","name":"transport-agnostic protocol implementation with pluggable transports","description":"Implements the MCP protocol in a transport-agnostic way, supporting multiple transport mechanisms (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket, custom) through a pluggable transport layer. Allows the same tool definitions and business logic to be exposed through different transports without modification, enabling deployment flexibility.","intents":["I want to expose my MCP server through multiple transports (stdio for local development, HTTP for cloud deployment) without duplicating code","I need to support both synchronous (HTTP) and streaming (WebSocket) clients with the same tool implementations","I want to add a custom transport layer for my specific infrastructure without modifying the core server"],"best_for":["teams deploying MCP servers across different environments (local, cloud, on-premise)","developers building flexible AI infrastructure that supports multiple client types","organizations with custom networking requirements or security constraints"],"limitations":["Transport abstraction adds complexity and potential performance overhead","Each transport has different characteristics (latency, throughput, connection handling) that may require transport-specific tuning","Error handling and timeout behavior varies by transport, requiring careful testing","Custom transport implementations require understanding both MCP protocol and transport-specific details"],"requires":["Transport implementation library or custom transport adapter","Configuration to select and initialize the desired transport"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages via selected transport"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses via selected transport"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":32,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude desktop, custom MCP client library)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ depending on server implementation language","Understanding of JSON Schema for tool input specification","Credentials or API keys for target external services","Network connectivity to external resources","Adapter implementation for each resource type (may be provided or custom-built)","JSON Schema definitions for each tool's input parameters","Implementation of parameter transformation logic for non-trivial type conversions","MCP protocol implementation library (e.g., @modelcontextprotocol/sdk for Node.js)","Transport layer (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket) configured and running"],"failure_modes":["MCP is a relatively new protocol with limited client support outside Anthropic Claude ecosystem","No built-in authentication layer — requires external security implementation at transport level","Tool execution is synchronous by default — long-running operations may timeout without explicit async patterns","Schema validation errors are not automatically retried — caller must handle malformed tool responses","Adapter development requires understanding both the external service API and the adapter interface contract","No built-in caching — repeated queries to external resources incur full latency costs unless explicitly cached","Adapter errors are propagated as-is to the LLM — requires careful error message design to avoid confusing the model","Rate limiting and quota management must be implemented per-adapter; no centralized throttling","Schema validation adds ~10-50ms latency per tool invocation depending on schema complexity","Complex nested schemas may be difficult for LLMs to understand, leading to repeated validation failures","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.51,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.635Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:48.006Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2"}},"signature":"X0r8lM0C13a/qShOsxv1eOQ/U6yXRBnxwjh5ak4L6Dlqu0ibU5uIM+eMs+alIaqOkN8OR2BlcV41RY4i5/TZCA==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T19:32:02.031Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=aliemregencer-jama-abstract-mcp-v2","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}