{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_alexander-kastil-smithery","slug":"alexander-kastil-smithery","name":"smithery","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/alexander-kastil/Smithery","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/alexander-kastil-smithery","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:alexander-kastil/smithery"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_alexander-kastil-smithery__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.protocol.implementation.with.stdio.transport","name":"mcp server protocol implementation with stdio transport","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, exposing tools and resources via the MCP standard interface using stdio-based bidirectional communication. The server handles JSON-RPC 2.0 message framing, capability negotiation during initialization, and maintains protocol state across client connections. This enables any MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, custom agents, LLM applications) to discover and invoke server capabilities through a standardized protocol rather than direct API calls.","intents":["I want to expose custom tools and resources to Claude Desktop or other MCP clients without building a custom integration layer","I need to create a standardized interface that multiple LLM applications can connect to simultaneously","I want to leverage the MCP ecosystem to integrate with existing tools and services"],"best_for":["developers building tool integrations for Claude Desktop","teams standardizing on MCP for LLM tool access","builders creating reusable tool servers for the MCP ecosystem"],"limitations":["Stdio transport limits to single client connection per server instance — horizontal scaling requires multiple server processes","No built-in authentication or encryption at transport layer — relies on client-side security and process isolation","Protocol overhead adds latency compared to direct function calls — typical round-trip adds 10-50ms per tool invocation"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, custom SDK, or compatible agent framework)","Node.js runtime or equivalent for running the server process","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 message format and MCP initialization handshake"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 requests","MCP protocol messages (initialize, call_tool, read_resource)"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 responses","MCP tool results and resource content"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-protocol"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alexander-kastil-smithery__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.definition.and.invocation.framework","name":"tool definition and invocation framework","description":"Provides a framework for defining tools with JSON Schema specifications, parameter validation, and execution handlers. Tools are registered with the MCP server and exposed to clients with full schema metadata (name, description, input schema, required parameters). When a client invokes a tool, the framework validates inputs against the schema, executes the corresponding handler function, and returns structured results. This decouples tool definition from tool execution, enabling dynamic tool discovery and type-safe parameter passing.","intents":["I want to define tools with clear schemas so clients understand what parameters are required and what types they accept","I need to validate tool inputs before execution to prevent runtime errors","I want to expose multiple tools through a single MCP server with consistent invocation semantics"],"best_for":["developers building tool servers with multiple related capabilities","teams needing type-safe tool definitions for LLM agents","builders creating domain-specific tool collections (e.g., database tools, file system tools)"],"limitations":["Schema validation is synchronous — complex schemas with deep nesting may add measurable latency","No built-in support for streaming tool results — all outputs must be buffered and returned as complete responses","Tool execution is single-threaded per server instance — long-running tools block other tool invocations"],"requires":["JSON Schema understanding for tool parameter definitions","Handler function implementation for each tool","MCP client capable of parsing and invoking tools from schema definitions"],"input_types":["JSON Schema object definitions","Tool invocation parameters (JSON)"],"output_types":["Tool execution results (JSON or text)","Error responses with diagnostic information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alexander-kastil-smithery__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.resource.exposure.and.content.serving","name":"resource exposure and content serving","description":"Implements MCP resource protocol for exposing static or dynamic content (files, templates, documentation, configuration) to clients through a URI-based addressing scheme. Resources are registered with metadata (name, description, MIME type, URI) and can be read by clients without executing code. The framework handles resource discovery (listing available resources) and content retrieval (reading specific resource content), enabling clients to access shared context, templates, or reference materials without direct file system access.","intents":["I want to share documentation or templates with LLM clients without exposing the file system","I need to provide context or reference materials that tools can reference","I want clients to discover what resources are available before requesting them"],"best_for":["developers building knowledge-rich tool servers","teams sharing templates or configuration through MCP","builders creating context-aware LLM integrations"],"limitations":["No built-in caching — repeated resource reads fetch fresh content each time","Resource size is limited by protocol message size constraints — large files may require chunking","No access control per resource — all resources visible to any connected client"],"requires":["Resource content source (files, database, generated content)","URI scheme design for resource addressing","MCP client implementation supporting resource reading"],"input_types":["Resource URI strings","Resource metadata definitions"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, JSON, binary as base64)","Resource metadata and listings"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alexander-kastil-smithery__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.template.definition.and.exposure","name":"prompt template definition and exposure","description":"Enables definition of reusable prompt templates with variable placeholders that can be discovered and instantiated by MCP clients. Templates are registered with metadata (name, description, arguments schema) and clients can request template content with specific argument values. This allows centralizing prompt engineering on the server side while enabling clients (like Claude) to dynamically use optimized prompts without hardcoding them. Templates support argument validation and can reference other resources or tools.","intents":["I want to define optimized prompts on the server that clients can use without hardcoding them","I need to version and update prompts centrally without modifying client code","I want clients to discover available prompt templates and use them with their own arguments"],"best_for":["teams managing prompt engineering centrally","developers building prompt-heavy LLM applications","builders creating domain-specific prompt libraries"],"limitations":["Template rendering is synchronous — complex templates with many variables may add latency","No built-in versioning — template changes immediately affect all clients","Limited template language support — likely basic variable substitution without advanced logic"],"requires":["Prompt template syntax understanding","Argument schema definitions for template variables","MCP client supporting prompt template discovery and instantiation"],"input_types":["Template definitions with variable placeholders","Argument values for template instantiation"],"output_types":["Rendered prompt text","Template metadata and listings"],"categories":["text-generation-language","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alexander-kastil-smithery__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.client.capability.negotiation.and.feature.detection","name":"client capability negotiation and feature detection","description":"Implements MCP initialization handshake that exchanges server and client capabilities, enabling feature detection and graceful degradation. During initialization, the server declares supported capabilities (tools, resources, prompts, sampling) and the client declares its capabilities. This allows servers to adapt behavior based on client features and clients to discover what functionality is available before attempting to use it. The negotiation happens once per connection and informs all subsequent interactions.","intents":["I want to know what features a connected client supports before trying to use them","I need to gracefully handle clients with different capability levels","I want to advertise my server's capabilities so clients can discover what's available"],"best_for":["developers building flexible tool servers supporting multiple client types","teams managing heterogeneous LLM client environments","builders creating backward-compatible MCP servers"],"limitations":["Capability negotiation is one-time at connection start — cannot dynamically add/remove capabilities mid-session","No capability versioning — clients must support exact capability names","Limited to predefined capability set in MCP spec — custom capabilities require protocol extension"],"requires":["MCP specification knowledge for standard capability names","Client implementation that participates in initialization handshake","Server logic to handle different capability combinations"],"input_types":["Client capability declarations (JSON)","Server capability metadata"],"output_types":["Server capability declarations","Initialization confirmation"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":25,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, custom SDK, or compatible agent framework)","Node.js runtime or equivalent for running the server process","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 message format and MCP initialization handshake","JSON Schema understanding for tool parameter definitions","Handler function implementation for each tool","MCP client capable of parsing and invoking tools from schema definitions","Resource content source (files, database, generated content)","URI scheme design for resource addressing","MCP client implementation supporting resource reading","Prompt template syntax understanding"],"failure_modes":["Stdio transport limits to single client connection per server instance — horizontal scaling requires multiple server processes","No built-in authentication or encryption at transport layer — relies on client-side security and process isolation","Protocol overhead adds latency compared to direct function calls — typical round-trip adds 10-50ms per tool invocation","Schema validation is synchronous — complex schemas with deep nesting may add measurable latency","No built-in support for streaming tool results — all outputs must be buffered and returned as complete responses","Tool execution is single-threaded per server instance — long-running tools block other tool invocations","No built-in caching — repeated resource reads fetch fresh content each time","Resource size is limited by protocol message size constraints — large files may require chunking","No access control per resource — all resources visible to any connected client","Template rendering is synchronous — complex templates with many variables may add latency","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.48999999999999994,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.635Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:24.052Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=alexander-kastil-smithery","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=alexander-kastil-smithery"}},"signature":"Dzqva7XykEAjtgx5foP0ktAfIgjN6x3/WgydnVVX8YR5x9pP0lK/vGLG8NxFvfzZlhG5LelIeW5XPgT2rQsnDA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T17:45:48.599Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/alexander-kastil-smithery","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/alexander-kastil-smithery","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=alexander-kastil-smithery","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}