{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_alex-llm-attack-mcp-server","slug":"alex-llm-attack-mcp-server","name":"attAck MCP Server","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/alex-llm/attAck-mcp-server","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/alex-llm-attack-mcp-server","categories":["mcp-servers","code-review-security"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:alex-llm/attack-mcp-server"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_alex-llm-attack-mcp-server__cap_0","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.att.ck.tactic.and.technique.search.with.semantic.matching","name":"att&ck tactic and technique search with semantic matching","description":"Enables semantic search across the MITRE ATT&CK knowledge base to retrieve adversarial tactics, techniques, and sub-techniques by natural language queries. The MCP server exposes search endpoints that map user queries against a structured ATT&CK dataset, returning matched tactics/techniques with metadata including IDs, descriptions, and associated threat actors. Implements query-to-knowledge-base matching without requiring users to know exact ATT&CK IDs or taxonomy structure.","intents":["I need to find which ATT&CK techniques are used for lateral movement in a Windows environment","Show me all persistence techniques used by a specific threat actor","I want to search for techniques related to credential dumping across the ATT&CK matrix","Find techniques that match a description of observed adversary behavior"],"best_for":["security analysts and threat researchers building LLM-powered threat intelligence tools","red teamers and penetration testers integrating ATT&CK context into agent-based workflows","SOAR platform developers adding adversarial technique lookup to incident response playbooks"],"limitations":["Search quality depends on the underlying ATT&CK dataset version — no automatic updates when MITRE releases new techniques","Semantic matching may return false positives if queries use non-standard security terminology","No fuzzy matching for misspelled technique names or acronyms","Search scope limited to ATT&CK framework — cannot correlate with other threat intelligence sources"],"requires":["MCP client compatible with model-context-protocol specification (e.g., Claude Desktop, custom MCP host)","Network access to retrieve ATT&CK knowledge base (either bundled or fetched from MITRE)","LLM with tool-use/function-calling capability to invoke search endpoints"],"input_types":["natural language queries (free-form text)","tactic names (e.g., 'Persistence', 'Defense Evasion')","technique descriptions or observed behaviors"],"output_types":["structured JSON with technique metadata (ID, name, description, tactics, platforms)","threat actor associations","technique relationships and sub-techniques"],"categories":["search-retrieval","security-intelligence"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alex-llm-attack-mcp-server__cap_1","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.tactic.to.technique.hierarchical.traversal","name":"tactic-to-technique hierarchical traversal","description":"Enables navigation of the ATT&CK matrix hierarchy by allowing users to query all techniques under a specific tactic, or retrieve the parent tactic(s) for a given technique. Implements bidirectional relationship mapping between tactics (high-level adversary goals like 'Persistence' or 'Lateral Movement') and techniques (specific methods to achieve those goals). Returns structured results preserving the hierarchical relationships needed for threat modeling and coverage analysis.","intents":["Show me all techniques under the 'Persistence' tactic to understand attack surface","What tactic does the 'Pass the Hash' technique belong to?","List all sub-techniques for a specific parent technique like 'Create Account'","I need to map our detection coverage against all techniques in the 'Execution' tactic"],"best_for":["security architects designing detection strategies aligned to ATT&CK","compliance teams mapping controls to adversarial techniques","threat modeling practitioners building attack trees from ATT&CK tactics"],"limitations":["Hierarchy is static and reflects MITRE's taxonomy — cannot create custom tactic groupings or reorganize techniques","No support for cross-tactic technique relationships (e.g., techniques used in multiple tactics)","Returns only direct parent-child relationships — no transitive closure or path queries","Limited to ATT&CK's official tactic definitions — cannot query by custom threat model categories"],"requires":["MCP client with support for hierarchical data structures in tool responses","Understanding of ATT&CK tactic names and IDs","LLM capable of processing nested JSON structures"],"input_types":["tactic identifiers or names (e.g., 'TA0003', 'Persistence')","technique identifiers or names (e.g., 'T1098', 'Account Manipulation')"],"output_types":["flat lists of techniques with metadata","hierarchical JSON structures showing tactic-technique relationships","technique counts per tactic"],"categories":["search-retrieval","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alex-llm-attack-mcp-server__cap_2","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.threat.actor.technique.association.lookup","name":"threat actor technique association lookup","description":"Retrieves the set of ATT&CK techniques known to be used by a specific threat actor or adversary group. Queries a threat actor database linked to ATT&CK techniques, returning all observed techniques attributed to that actor along with associated metadata (platforms, tactics, detection methods). Enables threat-actor-centric threat intelligence by mapping observed behaviors to known adversary TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, Procedures).","intents":["What techniques does APT28 typically use in their attack campaigns?","Show me all techniques attributed to the Lazarus Group","I observed behavior matching technique T1566 — which threat actors are known to use this?","Build a detection strategy focused on techniques used by a specific threat actor"],"best_for":["threat intelligence analysts building actor-specific detection rules","incident responders correlating observed TTPs to known threat actors","red team operators simulating specific adversary playbooks"],"limitations":["Threat actor attribution is probabilistic and may lag behind actual adversary evolution — database reflects published intelligence with potential delays","No temporal dimension — cannot query which techniques an actor used during a specific time period","Limited to threat actors indexed in the ATT&CK database — emerging or lesser-known groups may not be included","Technique associations are based on public reporting and may not reflect full adversary capability set"],"requires":["MCP client with access to threat actor database (may require separate data source integration)","Knowledge of threat actor names or aliases as indexed in ATT&CK","LLM capable of processing lists of techniques with associated metadata"],"input_types":["threat actor names or aliases (e.g., 'APT28', 'Lazarus Group', 'FIN7')","technique IDs to reverse-lookup associated actors"],"output_types":["lists of techniques with full metadata (ID, name, description, platforms, tactics)","threat actor profiles with associated technique counts","technique-to-actor mappings"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alex-llm-attack-mcp-server__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.platform.specific.technique.filtering","name":"platform-specific technique filtering","description":"Filters ATT&CK techniques by target platform (Windows, macOS, Linux, cloud platforms, mobile, etc.), returning only techniques applicable to a specific environment. Implements platform-aware querying that maps techniques to their supported platforms, enabling environment-specific threat modeling and detection strategy development. Supports multi-platform queries to identify cross-platform techniques.","intents":["Show me all persistence techniques applicable to Windows systems","Which ATT&CK techniques can be executed on Linux servers in our environment?","Find techniques that work across Windows, macOS, and Linux for cross-platform attack scenarios","What cloud-specific techniques should we focus on for AWS security?"],"best_for":["security teams building platform-specific detection rules and controls","infrastructure architects assessing attack surface per platform","incident responders correlating observed techniques to platform capabilities"],"limitations":["Platform definitions are static and may not reflect emerging platforms or custom environments","No support for platform variants or versions (e.g., Windows 10 vs Windows Server 2019) — only broad platform categories","Techniques may have platform-specific variations not captured in the filtering logic","Cloud platform filtering limited to major providers (AWS, Azure, GCP) — no support for niche or on-premises cloud solutions"],"requires":["MCP client with structured filtering capability","Knowledge of platform names as indexed in ATT&CK (Windows, macOS, Linux, AWS, Azure, GCP, etc.)","LLM capable of processing filtered technique lists"],"input_types":["platform names or identifiers (e.g., 'Windows', 'Linux', 'AWS')","tactic or technique IDs to filter by platform","multi-platform queries (e.g., 'Windows AND Linux')"],"output_types":["filtered lists of techniques applicable to specified platforms","platform coverage matrices showing technique distribution","cross-platform technique sets"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alex-llm-attack-mcp-server__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.technique.metadata.and.detection.guidance.retrieval","name":"technique metadata and detection guidance retrieval","description":"Retrieves comprehensive metadata for specific ATT&CK techniques, including detailed descriptions, detection methods, mitigation strategies, and references to external resources. Queries the ATT&CK knowledge base to return full technique profiles with structured detection guidance and defensive recommendations. Enables security teams to access actionable detection and mitigation information without leaving the LLM agent context.","intents":["Get the full description and detection methods for technique T1566 (Phishing)","What are the recommended mitigations for the 'Pass the Hash' technique?","Show me detection guidance and external references for a specific technique","I need to understand how a technique works and what defensive controls apply"],"best_for":["security engineers building detection rules and SIEM queries","compliance teams mapping controls to ATT&CK techniques","threat researchers documenting technique analysis and defensive strategies"],"limitations":["Detection guidance is generic and may require customization for specific environments","Mitigation strategies are high-level recommendations — implementation details depend on infrastructure and tooling","External references may become stale or unavailable — no automatic link validation","No integration with specific SIEM or detection platforms — guidance is platform-agnostic"],"requires":["MCP client with support for rich text and structured metadata in responses","Technique IDs or names to query","LLM capable of processing and summarizing detailed technique profiles"],"input_types":["technique identifiers (e.g., 'T1566', 'T1098.001')","technique names (e.g., 'Phishing', 'Account Manipulation')"],"output_types":["structured JSON with technique metadata (description, detection methods, mitigations, references)","markdown or plain text summaries of detection guidance","lists of external resources and references"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alex-llm-attack-mcp-server__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.sub.technique.enumeration.and.filtering","name":"sub-technique enumeration and filtering","description":"Enumerates and filters ATT&CK sub-techniques (granular variants of parent techniques) with support for hierarchical queries and filtering by tactic, platform, or threat actor. Implements sub-technique-aware querying that preserves parent-child relationships while enabling fine-grained threat modeling. Returns sub-technique metadata including specific implementation details and platform applicability that differ from parent techniques.","intents":["Show me all sub-techniques under 'Create Account' to understand account creation attack vectors","What are the Windows-specific sub-techniques for the 'Execution' tactic?","Find sub-techniques used by APT28 for persistence","List all sub-techniques with platform-specific variations"],"best_for":["security teams building granular detection rules for specific attack variants","threat researchers analyzing technique variations across platforms","red teamers simulating specific sub-technique implementations"],"limitations":["Sub-technique hierarchy is static and reflects MITRE's taxonomy — cannot create custom sub-technique groupings","Some techniques may not have sub-techniques defined — queries may return empty results","Sub-technique metadata may be less detailed than parent techniques in some cases","No support for cross-technique sub-technique relationships or transitive queries"],"requires":["MCP client with support for hierarchical data structures","Understanding of parent technique IDs or names","LLM capable of processing nested technique hierarchies"],"input_types":["parent technique identifiers (e.g., 'T1098' for 'Account Manipulation')","sub-technique identifiers (e.g., 'T1098.001' for 'Account Manipulation: AWS')","filter criteria (platform, tactic, threat actor)"],"output_types":["hierarchical JSON structures showing parent-sub-technique relationships","filtered lists of sub-techniques with metadata","sub-technique counts per parent technique"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alex-llm-attack-mcp-server__cap_6","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.technique.relationship.and.dependency.mapping","name":"technique relationship and dependency mapping","description":"Maps relationships between ATT&CK techniques, including prerequisite techniques, follow-on techniques, and techniques commonly used together in attack chains. Implements graph-based querying that identifies technique sequences and dependencies, enabling attack chain modeling and detection strategy prioritization. Returns structured relationship data showing how techniques are typically chained together in real-world attacks.","intents":["What techniques typically follow 'Initial Access' in attack chains?","Show me the prerequisite techniques needed before executing a specific technique","Find techniques commonly used together in lateral movement attacks","Build a detection strategy that covers the full attack chain from initial access to exfiltration"],"best_for":["threat researchers analyzing attack chains and kill chains","security architects designing defense-in-depth strategies","incident responders correlating observed techniques to predict next adversary actions"],"limitations":["Relationship data is based on published attack chains and may not reflect all real-world variations","No temporal dimension — cannot query technique sequences by time or attack duration","Relationships are directional but may not capture all possible technique orderings","Limited to techniques within ATT&CK — cannot model external attack frameworks or custom techniques"],"requires":["MCP client with support for graph-based data structures or relationship lists","Technique IDs or names to query relationships","LLM capable of processing and reasoning about attack chains"],"input_types":["technique identifiers (e.g., 'T1566', 'T1098')","tactic names to find technique sequences within tactics","attack chain descriptions to match against known patterns"],"output_types":["lists of prerequisite or follow-on techniques","attack chain sequences showing technique relationships","graph structures representing technique dependencies","co-occurrence statistics for techniques used together"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_alex-llm-attack-mcp-server__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.detection.coverage.analysis.and.gap.identification","name":"detection coverage analysis and gap identification","description":"Analyzes detection coverage by comparing implemented detections against ATT&CK techniques, identifying coverage gaps and prioritizing detection development. Implements coverage mapping that correlates existing detections to techniques and returns gap analysis with prioritization based on threat actor usage, platform applicability, and tactic importance. Enables data-driven detection strategy optimization.","intents":["Show me which ATT&CK techniques we don't have detections for","Prioritize detection development based on techniques used by our top threat actors","Identify coverage gaps in our 'Persistence' tactic detections","What techniques should we focus on detecting for Windows systems?"],"best_for":["security operations teams optimizing detection rule portfolios","SIEM administrators prioritizing detection development","compliance teams demonstrating detection coverage against threat models"],"limitations":["Coverage analysis requires integration with external detection systems — MCP server cannot directly query SIEM or detection platforms","Gap prioritization is heuristic-based and may not reflect organization-specific risk profiles","No support for detection effectiveness metrics — only presence/absence of detections","Requires manual input of existing detections — no automatic detection discovery"],"requires":["MCP client with support for coverage analysis workflows","List of implemented detections mapped to ATT&CK techniques (external input)","LLM capable of processing coverage matrices and gap analysis"],"input_types":["lists of detected techniques (e.g., 'T1566', 'T1098')","filter criteria (tactic, platform, threat actor)","prioritization weights (e.g., threat actor prevalence, platform criticality)"],"output_types":["coverage matrices showing detected vs undetected techniques","gap analysis with prioritized recommendations","coverage statistics by tactic or platform","detection development roadmaps"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":37,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client compatible with model-context-protocol specification (e.g., Claude Desktop, custom MCP host)","Network access to retrieve ATT&CK knowledge base (either bundled or fetched from MITRE)","LLM with tool-use/function-calling capability to invoke search endpoints","MCP client with support for hierarchical data structures in tool responses","Understanding of ATT&CK tactic names and IDs","LLM capable of processing nested JSON structures","MCP client with access to threat actor database (may require separate data source integration)","Knowledge of threat actor names or aliases as indexed in ATT&CK","LLM capable of processing lists of techniques with associated metadata","MCP client with structured filtering capability"],"failure_modes":["Search quality depends on the underlying ATT&CK dataset version — no automatic updates when MITRE releases new techniques","Semantic matching may return false positives if queries use non-standard security terminology","No fuzzy matching for misspelled technique names or acronyms","Search scope limited to ATT&CK framework — cannot correlate with other threat intelligence sources","Hierarchy is static and reflects MITRE's taxonomy — cannot create custom tactic groupings or reorganize techniques","No support for cross-tactic technique relationships (e.g., techniques used in multiple tactics)","Returns only direct parent-child relationships — no transitive closure or path queries","Limited to ATT&CK's official tactic definitions — cannot query by custom threat model categories","Threat actor attribution is probabilistic and may lag behind actual adversary evolution — database reflects published intelligence with potential delays","No temporal dimension — cannot query which techniques an actor used during a specific time period","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.41,"ecosystem":0.5900000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.9,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.635Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:29.346Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=alex-llm-attack-mcp-server","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=alex-llm-attack-mcp-server"}},"signature":"wqEJ4I5vcQUnmulDWM5zqS2TC/eh6FDTwQZCi//E7jFNeq2KtToJODVH12CelhoOTBNqB5CyDApE8I5a8F23AA==","signedAt":"2026-06-16T09:05:02.034Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/alex-llm-attack-mcp-server","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/alex-llm-attack-mcp-server","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=alex-llm-attack-mcp-server","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}