{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_akashrajpurohit-catchintent","slug":"akashrajpurohit-catchintent","name":"catchintent","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/akashrajpurohit/catchintent","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/akashrajpurohit-catchintent","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:akashrajpurohit/catchintent"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_akashrajpurohit-catchintent__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.protocol.implementation.with.intent.based.routing","name":"mcp server protocol implementation with intent-based routing","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, exposing tools and resources through a standardized JSON-RPC 2.0 interface that allows Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to discover and invoke capabilities. The server handles protocol negotiation, capability advertisement, and bidirectional message routing between client and server implementations.","intents":["I want to expose custom tools to Claude through a standardized protocol without building custom integrations","I need my AI agent to access external services via a protocol-compliant interface","I want to build composable AI capabilities that work across multiple MCP-compatible clients"],"best_for":["AI application developers building Claude-integrated workflows","Teams deploying MCP servers in enterprise environments","Open-source maintainers creating reusable AI tool ecosystems"],"limitations":["MCP protocol overhead adds latency compared to direct function calls","Requires client-side MCP support — not compatible with non-MCP LLM APIs","Server discovery and capability negotiation adds startup complexity"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude desktop, MCP-compatible SDK)","Node.js runtime or equivalent for server execution","JSON-RPC 2.0 compatible transport layer (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket)"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC method calls","Tool invocation requests with typed arguments","Resource read/list requests"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC responses with tool results","Resource content (text, structured data)","Error responses with diagnostic information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-protocol"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_akashrajpurohit-catchintent__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.intent.extraction.and.semantic.tool.matching","name":"intent extraction and semantic tool matching","description":"Analyzes incoming requests to extract user intent and semantically matches them against available tools using natural language understanding rather than exact string matching. The server likely uses embedding-based or LLM-based intent classification to route requests to the most appropriate tool implementation, enabling fuzzy matching and multi-step intent resolution.","intents":["I want my AI agent to understand what the user is trying to do and pick the right tool automatically","I need flexible tool invocation that works even when the user doesn't know the exact tool name","I want to build a tool system that understands semantic equivalence between different request phrasings"],"best_for":["Developers building conversational AI agents with large tool sets","Teams implementing natural language interfaces to tool ecosystems","Applications requiring robust intent resolution across user input variations"],"limitations":["Intent extraction adds computational overhead per request","Semantic matching may have ambiguity with similarly-named tools","Requires training or configuration data to establish intent-to-tool mappings"],"requires":["Intent classification model or embedding service","Tool registry with semantic metadata and descriptions","Sufficient context in requests to disambiguate intent"],"input_types":["Natural language requests","Structured intent specifications","Tool invocation hints or context"],"output_types":["Matched tool identifier","Confidence score for intent match","Structured arguments for matched tool"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_akashrajpurohit-catchintent__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.capability.discovery.and.advertisement","name":"tool capability discovery and advertisement","description":"Exposes a standardized interface for clients to discover available tools, their parameters, return types, and usage documentation. The server maintains a registry of tools with JSON Schema definitions for input validation and output typing, allowing clients to introspect capabilities and generate appropriate requests without out-of-band documentation.","intents":["I want Claude to know what tools are available and their exact parameter requirements","I need to dynamically advertise new tools to clients without code changes","I want clients to validate tool invocations against schema before sending requests"],"best_for":["MCP server developers exposing tool ecosystems","Teams building dynamic tool registries that change at runtime","Applications requiring strict input validation and type safety"],"limitations":["Schema complexity can make discovery responses large for tool-rich servers","JSON Schema validation adds per-request latency","Requires maintaining schema definitions in sync with tool implementations"],"requires":["JSON Schema definitions for all tools","Tool registry with metadata (name, description, parameters)","MCP client capable of parsing and using schema definitions"],"input_types":["Tool discovery requests","Schema validation queries"],"output_types":["Tool list with JSON Schema definitions","Validation results for proposed invocations","Tool documentation and usage examples"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_akashrajpurohit-catchintent__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.resource.based.context.provisioning","name":"resource-based context provisioning","description":"Provides a resource abstraction layer that allows clients to request contextual information (documents, code snippets, configuration, etc.) through a standardized read/list interface. Resources are identified by URI and can be streamed or returned in full, enabling clients to build context for tool invocations without embedding all data in tool parameters.","intents":["I want to provide Claude with access to large documents or code files without embedding them in every request","I need to expose a file system or knowledge base through MCP without reimplementing access control","I want clients to dynamically fetch context (e.g., current configuration, recent logs) when planning tool invocations"],"best_for":["Developers building knowledge-augmented AI agents","Teams exposing file systems or databases through MCP","Applications requiring dynamic context provisioning based on client requests"],"limitations":["Resource streaming adds latency for large files","No built-in caching — clients must manage resource freshness","Requires implementing access control and resource enumeration logic"],"requires":["Resource registry with URI-to-content mappings","Support for streaming or chunked responses for large resources","Client-side resource caching strategy (if needed)"],"input_types":["Resource URI requests","Resource list/filter queries"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, binary, structured)","Resource metadata (size, type, last modified)","Resource list with URIs and descriptions"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_akashrajpurohit-catchintent__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.bidirectional.message.routing.with.error.handling","name":"bidirectional message routing with error handling","description":"Manages JSON-RPC 2.0 message exchange between MCP client and server, handling request/response correlation, error propagation, and protocol-level exceptions. The server implements timeout handling, malformed request detection, and graceful degradation when tools fail, ensuring robust communication even under adverse conditions.","intents":["I want reliable tool invocation with proper error reporting when things go wrong","I need to handle timeouts and network issues gracefully without breaking the client connection","I want detailed error messages that help debug tool failures"],"best_for":["Production MCP server deployments requiring reliability","Teams building fault-tolerant AI agent systems","Applications with strict error handling and observability requirements"],"limitations":["Error handling adds per-request overhead","Timeout configuration requires tuning for different tool execution times","Protocol-level errors may mask underlying tool implementation issues"],"requires":["JSON-RPC 2.0 compliant message format","Timeout configuration for tool execution","Error code and message standardization"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC requests (method, params, id)","Tool invocation requests"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC responses (result or error)","Structured error objects with codes and messages","Diagnostic information for debugging"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude desktop, MCP-compatible SDK)","Node.js runtime or equivalent for server execution","JSON-RPC 2.0 compatible transport layer (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket)","Intent classification model or embedding service","Tool registry with semantic metadata and descriptions","Sufficient context in requests to disambiguate intent","JSON Schema definitions for all tools","Tool registry with metadata (name, description, parameters)","MCP client capable of parsing and using schema definitions","Resource registry with URI-to-content mappings"],"failure_modes":["MCP protocol overhead adds latency compared to direct function calls","Requires client-side MCP support — not compatible with non-MCP LLM APIs","Server discovery and capability negotiation adds startup complexity","Intent extraction adds computational overhead per request","Semantic matching may have ambiguity with similarly-named tools","Requires training or configuration data to establish intent-to-tool mappings","Schema complexity can make discovery responses large for tool-rich servers","JSON Schema validation adds per-request latency","Requires maintaining schema definitions in sync with tool implementations","Resource streaming adds latency for large files","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.635Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:06.728Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=akashrajpurohit-catchintent","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=akashrajpurohit-catchintent"}},"signature":"UH1bCSkOv8FSAiLAZd+d/G9WmX8DyzGmaZUtlJpPDVqsahK5ZgGf0cCsWIV+q6fMpdNoVHasOVzcAP9/XfkrBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T22:12:49.382Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/akashrajpurohit-catchintent","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/akashrajpurohit-catchintent","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=akashrajpurohit-catchintent","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}