{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt","slug":"ai4finance-foundation--fingpt","name":"FinGPT","type":"model","url":"https://ai4finance.org/research/fingpt-open-source-finllm.html","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/ai4finance-foundation--fingpt","categories":["model-training"],"tags":["chatgpt","finance","fingpt","fintech","large-language-models","machine-learning","nlp","prompt-engineering","pytorch","reinforcement-learning","robo-advisor","sentiment-analysis","technical-analysis"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.parameter.efficient.lora.fine.tuning.for.financial.domain.adaptation","name":"parameter-efficient lora fine-tuning for financial domain adaptation","description":"Implements Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to fine-tune open-source base models (Llama-2, Falcon, MPT, Bloom, ChatGLM2, Qwen) on financial tasks by decomposing weight updates into low-rank matrices, reducing fine-tuning cost from ~$3M (BloombergGPT) to ~$300 per adaptation. The system applies instruction tuning with financial-specific datasets to teach models financial terminology, concepts, and reasoning patterns without full model retraining.","intents":["Fine-tune an open-source LLM on proprietary financial data without massive compute budgets","Adapt a base model to financial domain tasks (sentiment analysis, forecasting, report analysis) in weeks instead of months","Enable continuous model updates as new financial data becomes available","Create multiple specialized financial models from a single base model for different use cases"],"best_for":["FinTech startups and teams with limited ML infrastructure budgets","Financial institutions wanting to customize models on proprietary data","Researchers exploring domain-specific LLM adaptation patterns"],"limitations":["LoRA adds ~5-10% inference latency compared to full model due to rank decomposition overhead","Fine-tuning quality depends heavily on instruction dataset quality and diversity — poor data leads to degraded financial reasoning","Requires GPU memory for training (minimum 16GB VRAM for 7B models, 40GB+ for 13B models)","No built-in A/B testing framework to validate fine-tuned model performance against baseline"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","PyTorch 1.13+","GPU with CUDA 11.8+ (or CPU, but training will be extremely slow)","HuggingFace transformers library 4.30+","Financial training dataset (minimum 1000 examples for meaningful adaptation)"],"input_types":["text (financial news, earnings transcripts, reports)","structured financial data (stock prices, market indicators)","instruction-response pairs for supervised fine-tuning"],"output_types":["fine-tuned model weights (LoRA adapters)","model checkpoints saved to HuggingFace Hub","evaluation metrics (perplexity, task-specific accuracy)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","model-fine-tuning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multi.source.financial.data.ingestion.and.temporal.alignment","name":"multi-source financial data ingestion and temporal alignment","description":"Implements a Data Source Layer that continuously collects and temporally aligns financial data from heterogeneous sources including news articles, stock market data, earnings call transcripts, and regulatory filings (10-K, 10-Q). The system addresses the temporal sensitivity of financial information by maintaining synchronized timestamps across sources and handling real-time data streams, enabling models to understand market context and causality.","intents":["Ingest real-time financial news, stock prices, and earnings data to keep models current with market conditions","Align temporal events across multiple sources (e.g., match news sentiment to stock price movements on same date)","Build training datasets that preserve temporal ordering and causality for forecasting tasks","Handle missing or delayed data from different sources without breaking the pipeline"],"best_for":["FinTech platforms building real-time market intelligence systems","Quantitative trading teams needing synchronized multi-source market data","Financial research teams analyzing cause-effect relationships between news and price movements"],"limitations":["Data collection latency varies by source (news APIs: 5-30min delay, market data: real-time, earnings transcripts: 24-48hr delay)","No built-in handling for data quality issues like duplicate articles, corrupted transcripts, or missing fields","Requires API keys and rate-limit management for multiple data providers (Bloomberg, Reuters, SEC EDGAR, etc.)","Temporal alignment assumes clock synchronization across sources — timezone mismatches can cause 24hr+ drift"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","API credentials for financial data providers (SEC EDGAR, news APIs, market data feeds)","Database or data warehouse for storing aligned historical data (PostgreSQL, MongoDB, or cloud equivalent)","Network connectivity for continuous data polling/streaming"],"input_types":["text (news articles, earnings transcripts, financial reports)","structured data (stock prices, trading volumes, market indicators)","semi-structured data (HTML-formatted SEC filings, PDF earnings reports)"],"output_types":["aligned temporal datasets with synchronized timestamps","cleaned and deduplicated financial records","training datasets with temporal context (e.g., news + price movement pairs)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_10","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.extensible.task.layer.architecture.for.custom.financial.applications","name":"extensible task layer architecture for custom financial applications","description":"Implements a modular task layer that enables developers to define custom financial NLP tasks (beyond sentiment, forecasting, NER) by specifying task-specific prompts, evaluation metrics, and training datasets. The architecture provides templates for common task patterns (classification, extraction, generation, reasoning) and handles instruction-tuning pipeline orchestration. Enables rapid prototyping of new financial applications without modifying core model code.","intents":["Define custom financial NLP tasks (e.g., earnings quality assessment, management credibility scoring) without modifying core models","Reuse instruction-tuning infrastructure for new tasks by specifying task-specific prompts and datasets","Evaluate custom tasks against baselines and track performance improvements","Share custom task definitions with community for reproducibility and contribution"],"best_for":["FinTech teams building domain-specific financial applications","Researchers exploring novel financial NLP tasks","Financial institutions customizing models for internal use cases"],"limitations":["Task definition quality depends on prompt engineering — poorly designed prompts lead to degraded model performance","Requires task-specific training data — generic financial datasets may not contain examples for novel tasks","No built-in transfer learning between tasks — each task requires separate fine-tuning, limiting efficiency","Evaluation metrics must be manually defined — no automatic metric selection for novel tasks","Scaling to many custom tasks increases infrastructure complexity and maintenance burden"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Base fine-tuned FinGPT model","Task-specific training dataset (minimum 100 examples for meaningful fine-tuning)","Task definition template (prompt, evaluation metrics, dataset format)","Instruction-tuning infrastructure from LoRA fine-tuning capability"],"input_types":["task definition (prompt template, evaluation metrics, dataset format)","task-specific training dataset","financial text or structured data relevant to task"],"output_types":["task-specific fine-tuned model","evaluation metrics and performance benchmarks","task definition and code for reproducibility"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.financial.sentiment.analysis.with.domain.specific.classification","name":"financial sentiment analysis with domain-specific classification","description":"Implements a specialized sentiment analysis task layer that classifies financial text (news, earnings calls, reports) into domain-specific sentiment categories (bullish, bearish, neutral) with financial context awareness. Uses instruction-tuned models to understand financial terminology and implicit sentiment signals (e.g., 'guidance raised' = bullish) that generic sentiment models miss. The system includes benchmarking against financial sentiment datasets to validate domain adaptation.","intents":["Classify financial news and earnings transcripts by sentiment to feed into trading signals or risk models","Extract implicit sentiment from financial language (e.g., management tone, guidance changes) that impacts stock prices","Benchmark fine-tuned models against established financial sentiment datasets to validate domain adaptation quality","Build sentiment time-series for technical analysis and market prediction"],"best_for":["Quantitative trading teams building sentiment-based alpha signals","Risk management teams monitoring news sentiment for portfolio exposure","FinTech platforms providing sentiment-driven investment recommendations"],"limitations":["Domain-specific sentiment requires financial training data — generic sentiment datasets (SST-2, IMDB) don't transfer well to financial context","Implicit sentiment signals (tone, guidance changes) require deeper financial knowledge — models may miss subtle signals without sufficient fine-tuning","Sarcasm and irony in financial commentary (e.g., 'great earnings miss') can fool models trained on literal sentiment","Sentiment labels are subjective — inter-annotator agreement on financial sentiment is typically 70-80%, creating noisy training signal"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Fine-tuned FinGPT model (from LoRA fine-tuning capability)","Financial sentiment training dataset (e.g., FinBERT dataset, custom annotated corpus)","Evaluation metrics: F1-score, precision, recall on financial sentiment benchmarks"],"input_types":["text (financial news articles, earnings call transcripts, analyst reports, social media posts)"],"output_types":["sentiment labels (bullish, bearish, neutral)","confidence scores per sentiment class","explanation tokens highlighting sentiment-bearing phrases"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_3","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.stock.price.forecasting.with.temporal.market.context","name":"stock price forecasting with temporal market context","description":"Implements a forecasting task layer that predicts short-term stock price movements by combining LLM-extracted features from financial text (news, earnings, reports) with time-series market data. The system uses instruction-tuned models to reason about how news and fundamental changes impact future prices, then feeds these reasoning outputs into forecasting models. Includes support for Chinese market forecasting with localized financial data sources.","intents":["Predict next-day or next-week stock price movements using news sentiment and fundamental analysis","Combine NLP-extracted insights (earnings surprises, management guidance) with technical indicators for multi-modal forecasting","Build forecasting models for both US and Chinese markets with localized financial data","Explain price predictions by showing which news/fundamental factors drove the forecast"],"best_for":["Quantitative hedge funds building multi-modal price prediction systems","Trading platforms providing price target recommendations to retail investors","FinTech teams in Asia-Pacific building localized forecasting models"],"limitations":["Stock price forecasting is inherently noisy — R² typically 0.15-0.35 even with perfect features, limiting practical trading signal quality","Requires synchronized alignment of news/fundamental data with price data — temporal misalignment (e.g., news published after market close) causes data leakage","Models may overfit to recent market regimes — performance degrades during market regime changes (volatility spikes, sector rotations)","Chinese market forecasting requires Mandarin NLP capabilities and access to Chinese financial data sources (not all available in English)","No built-in handling for corporate actions (splits, dividends) that distort price time-series"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Fine-tuned FinGPT model with instruction-tuning on forecasting tasks","Historical stock price data (OHLCV) from data provider (Yahoo Finance, Alpha Vantage, Bloomberg)","Aligned financial news and fundamental data from Data Source Layer","Time-series forecasting library (statsmodels, Prophet, or custom LSTM/Transformer)","For Chinese markets: Mandarin language model and Chinese financial data sources"],"input_types":["text (financial news, earnings transcripts, analyst reports)","structured time-series (stock prices, trading volumes, technical indicators)","fundamental data (earnings, guidance, analyst estimates)"],"output_types":["price movement predictions (up/down/neutral or continuous price targets)","confidence intervals or prediction uncertainty","feature importance scores showing which news/fundamentals drove prediction","backtesting results and performance metrics (Sharpe ratio, max drawdown)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.financial.report.analysis.with.raptor.hierarchical.retrieval","name":"financial report analysis with raptor hierarchical retrieval","description":"Implements a RAPTOR (Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrieval) RAG system that processes long financial documents (10-K, 10-Q, earnings transcripts) by recursively summarizing sections into hierarchical trees, enabling efficient retrieval and reasoning over multi-thousand-page documents. The system extracts key financial metrics, risks, and management commentary from reports without losing document structure or context, supporting multi-source retrieval that combines report analysis with news context.","intents":["Extract key financial metrics, risks, and management commentary from 50+ page 10-K/10-Q filings without manual reading","Answer specific questions about company fundamentals by retrieving relevant report sections hierarchically","Compare financial positions across multiple companies by analyzing their reports in parallel","Combine report analysis with recent news to understand how new information impacts fundamental thesis"],"best_for":["Equity research teams analyzing company fundamentals at scale","Investment managers building fundamental theses from SEC filings","FinTech platforms providing automated company analysis to retail investors"],"limitations":["RAPTOR hierarchical summarization adds computational overhead — processing a 100-page 10-K takes 2-5 minutes vs 30 seconds for flat document chunking","Recursive summarization can lose fine-grained details in lower tree levels — important footnotes or risk disclosures may be abstracted away","Requires tuning of chunk sizes and summarization depth — suboptimal settings lead to either over-summarization (loss of detail) or under-summarization (no efficiency gain)","Multi-source retrieval (reports + news) requires careful weighting — news context can overwhelm fundamental analysis if not balanced","No built-in handling for financial statement tables — OCR or table extraction required for structured data in PDFs"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Fine-tuned FinGPT model for summarization and question-answering","Vector database for storing hierarchical embeddings (Pinecone, Weaviate, or Milvus)","Document processing pipeline (PDF parsing, text extraction, table detection)","Financial documents in text or PDF format (10-K, 10-Q, earnings transcripts)"],"input_types":["text (financial reports, earnings transcripts, SEC filings)","PDF documents (10-K, 10-Q, proxy statements)","natural language queries about company fundamentals"],"output_types":["hierarchical document summaries at multiple abstraction levels","retrieved report sections relevant to queries","extracted financial metrics and risk factors","comparative analysis across multiple companies"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.named.entity.recognition.and.relation.extraction.for.financial.text","name":"named entity recognition and relation extraction for financial text","description":"Implements financial NER and relation extraction tasks that identify and link financial entities (companies, executives, products, financial instruments) and their relationships (acquisitions, partnerships, executive changes) from unstructured financial text. Uses instruction-tuned models to understand financial-specific entity types (ticker symbols, financial instruments, regulatory bodies) and domain-specific relations (merger announcements, executive appointments, product launches) that generic NER systems miss.","intents":["Extract company names, executives, products, and financial instruments from news and earnings transcripts","Identify relationships between entities (e.g., 'Company A acquired Company B', 'Executive X joined Company Y')","Build knowledge graphs of financial relationships for market intelligence and deal sourcing","Track executive changes, M&A activity, and product launches across companies"],"best_for":["Investment banking teams tracking M&A and corporate action signals","Equity research teams building company relationship maps","FinTech platforms providing market intelligence and deal sourcing"],"limitations":["Financial NER requires domain-specific entity types (ticker symbols, financial instruments, regulatory bodies) — generic NER models trained on news data don't recognize these","Relation extraction is ambiguous in financial text — 'Company A and Company B announced partnership' could mean joint venture, distribution deal, or technology partnership without explicit type","Requires high-quality annotated training data for financial entities and relations — limited publicly available datasets compared to generic NER","Nested entities and overlapping relations (e.g., executive who is also board member) are difficult to extract accurately","No built-in disambiguation — 'Apple' could refer to Apple Inc. or apple fruit; requires context understanding"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Fine-tuned FinGPT model with instruction-tuning on NER and relation extraction","Annotated financial NER dataset (e.g., FinBERT dataset, custom corpus with entity and relation labels)","Knowledge graph database for storing extracted entities and relations (Neo4j, ArangoDB)","Financial text corpus (news articles, earnings transcripts, regulatory filings)"],"input_types":["text (financial news, earnings transcripts, analyst reports, regulatory filings)"],"output_types":["extracted entities with types (company, executive, product, financial instrument, regulatory body)","extracted relations with types (acquisition, partnership, executive change, product launch)","entity linking to canonical identifiers (ticker symbols, CIK numbers)","knowledge graph representation of entities and relations"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_6","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.instruction.tuned.financial.reasoning.with.reinforcement.learning.from.human.feedback","name":"instruction-tuned financial reasoning with reinforcement learning from human feedback","description":"Implements RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) pipeline that enables customization of fine-tuned financial models based on user preferences and domain expertise. The system collects human feedback on model outputs (financial analysis, predictions, recommendations), uses this feedback to train reward models, and then fine-tunes the base model to maximize reward. Enables personalization for different user types (retail investors, institutional traders, risk managers) with different financial objectives.","intents":["Customize financial model behavior to match user preferences (risk tolerance, investment style, time horizon)","Improve model outputs based on domain expert feedback without full retraining","Build personalized financial advisors that adapt to individual investor profiles","Align model outputs with regulatory requirements and compliance constraints"],"best_for":["FinTech platforms building personalized robo-advisors","Financial institutions customizing models for internal use cases","Research teams exploring domain-specific RLHF patterns"],"limitations":["RLHF requires significant human feedback data (1000+ examples) to train effective reward models — expensive and time-consuming to collect","Reward model training is unstable — poor reward model quality leads to model collapse or reward hacking (optimizing for reward signal rather than true financial quality)","Feedback quality depends on annotator expertise — non-expert feedback can degrade model performance or introduce biases","RLHF adds 2-3x training time compared to supervised fine-tuning, increasing time-to-deployment","No built-in mechanism to prevent reward model overfitting to specific feedback patterns — model may not generalize to new scenarios"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Base fine-tuned FinGPT model from LoRA fine-tuning capability","Human feedback dataset (1000+ examples of preferred vs non-preferred model outputs)","Reward model training infrastructure (PyTorch, transformers library)","RLHF training framework (e.g., TRL library, custom PPO implementation)"],"input_types":["model outputs (financial analysis, predictions, recommendations)","human feedback (preference pairs, ratings, or binary comparisons)","user profiles and preferences (risk tolerance, investment style, constraints)"],"output_types":["reward model that scores financial outputs","RLHF-fine-tuned model weights","personalized model variants for different user types","feedback quality metrics and reward model performance"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.comprehensive.financial.nlp.benchmarking.and.evaluation.framework","name":"comprehensive financial nlp benchmarking and evaluation framework","description":"Implements a standardized evaluation framework with multiple financial NLP benchmark datasets (sentiment analysis, price forecasting, NER, relation extraction, report analysis) to validate fine-tuned models against established baselines. The system measures performance across diverse financial tasks, provides comparative metrics against proprietary models (BloombergGPT) and open-source baselines, and enables reproducible evaluation of domain adaptation quality.","intents":["Validate that fine-tuned financial models achieve competitive performance on standard financial NLP tasks","Compare different base models (Llama-2, Falcon, MPT) and fine-tuning approaches to identify best options","Track model performance improvements as new training data is added or fine-tuning is refined","Publish reproducible benchmarks to enable community comparison and contribution"],"best_for":["Researchers evaluating financial LLM domain adaptation approaches","Teams selecting base models and fine-tuning strategies for production deployment","FinTech companies validating model quality before deployment to users"],"limitations":["Benchmark datasets may not reflect real-world financial tasks — synthetic or historical datasets may not capture current market dynamics","Benchmark metrics (F1-score, accuracy) don't directly translate to trading profitability or investment returns — high benchmark scores don't guarantee practical utility","Benchmark datasets are static — models may overfit to specific benchmark characteristics and fail on new data distributions","Evaluation is computationally expensive — running full benchmark suite on multiple models requires significant GPU resources","No built-in statistical significance testing — benchmark differences may be within noise margins"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Fine-tuned FinGPT models to evaluate","Benchmark datasets (FinBERT sentiment dataset, financial NER dataset, price forecasting dataset, etc.)","Evaluation metrics library (scikit-learn, seqeval for NER, custom metrics for financial tasks)","GPU for efficient model evaluation"],"input_types":["fine-tuned model checkpoints","benchmark test datasets with ground truth labels","model configuration and hyperparameters"],"output_types":["performance metrics per task (F1-score, accuracy, precision, recall, RMSE, Sharpe ratio)","comparative leaderboard across models and fine-tuning approaches","error analysis and failure case documentation","benchmark reports with reproducible evaluation code"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.provider.model.deployment.and.inference.optimization","name":"multi-provider model deployment and inference optimization","description":"Implements deployment infrastructure that supports inference on multiple base models (Llama-2, Falcon, MPT, Bloom, ChatGLM2, Qwen) with optimization techniques including quantization, batching, and caching to reduce latency and memory requirements. The system enables deployment on diverse hardware (GPUs, CPUs, edge devices) and provides integration with HuggingFace Model Hub for easy model distribution and versioning.","intents":["Deploy fine-tuned financial models to production with low latency (<500ms per inference)","Run multiple model variants simultaneously for A/B testing or ensemble predictions","Optimize inference cost by selecting appropriate model size and quantization level","Distribute models via HuggingFace Hub for community access and reproducibility"],"best_for":["FinTech platforms deploying financial models to production","Teams building real-time financial analysis systems with latency constraints","Researchers sharing fine-tuned models with the community"],"limitations":["Quantization (int8, int4) reduces model precision — may degrade financial reasoning quality by 2-5% depending on quantization level","Batching improves throughput but increases latency for individual requests — tradeoff between throughput and latency","Model size varies significantly (7B to 13B parameters) — larger models have better reasoning but higher latency and memory requirements","Inference optimization is hardware-specific — optimizations for NVIDIA GPUs may not work on AMD or Intel hardware","No built-in monitoring for model drift — deployed models may degrade as market conditions change without detection"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","PyTorch 1.13+ and transformers 4.30+","GPU for inference (NVIDIA A100, H100, or consumer GPUs like RTX 4090)","Inference framework (vLLM, TensorRT, or ONNX Runtime for optimization)","HuggingFace account for model distribution","Monitoring and logging infrastructure for production deployment"],"input_types":["fine-tuned model checkpoints","inference requests (financial text, queries)","model configuration and quantization settings"],"output_types":["model predictions (sentiment, price movements, entity extractions)","inference latency and throughput metrics","deployed model endpoints (REST API, gRPC)","model versioning and rollback capabilities"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-ai4finance-foundation--fingpt__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.real.time.financial.market.monitoring.and.alert.generation","name":"real-time financial market monitoring and alert generation","description":"Implements an automation layer that continuously monitors financial data streams (news, prices, earnings announcements) and generates alerts when model-detected signals exceed thresholds (sentiment spikes, price anomalies, fundamental changes). The system integrates with the Data Source Layer to ingest real-time data, applies fine-tuned models to extract signals, and triggers alerts through configurable channels (email, Slack, webhooks). Supports both rule-based alerts (e.g., sentiment > 0.8) and learned alerts (e.g., patterns that historically preceded price movements).","intents":["Monitor financial news and market data in real-time to detect trading signals or risk events","Generate alerts when sentiment spikes, earnings surprises, or fundamental changes occur","Integrate alerts with trading systems or portfolio management platforms","Track alert performance and refine thresholds based on historical outcomes"],"best_for":["Quantitative trading teams building real-time signal detection systems","Risk management teams monitoring portfolio exposure to news events","FinTech platforms providing real-time market intelligence to users"],"limitations":["Real-time inference adds latency — alerts may arrive after market has already reacted (typical news-to-price latency is 5-30 minutes)","Alert threshold tuning is difficult — too-sensitive thresholds generate false positives (alert fatigue), too-high thresholds miss real signals","Model predictions are probabilistic — alerts based on model outputs have inherent uncertainty, leading to false positive rates of 20-40%","No built-in handling for market microstructure effects — alerts may be triggered by noise trading or technical factors unrelated to fundamentals","Requires continuous monitoring infrastructure — system downtime or data feed interruptions cause missed alerts"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Real-time data streaming infrastructure (Kafka, Redis Streams, or cloud equivalents)","Fine-tuned FinGPT models for signal extraction","Alert routing infrastructure (email, Slack, webhook integrations)","Monitoring and logging for alert system health","Historical backtesting framework to validate alert thresholds"],"input_types":["real-time financial data streams (news, prices, earnings announcements)","model predictions (sentiment, price movements, fundamental changes)","alert configuration (thresholds, channels, filters)"],"output_types":["real-time alerts (email, Slack messages, webhook payloads)","alert metadata (timestamp, signal strength, supporting evidence)","alert performance metrics (true positive rate, false positive rate, latency)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+","PyTorch 1.13+","GPU with CUDA 11.8+ (or CPU, but training will be extremely slow)","HuggingFace transformers library 4.30+","Financial training dataset (minimum 1000 examples for meaningful adaptation)","API credentials for financial data providers (SEC EDGAR, news APIs, market data feeds)","Database or data warehouse for storing aligned historical data (PostgreSQL, MongoDB, or cloud equivalent)","Network connectivity for continuous data polling/streaming","Base fine-tuned FinGPT model","Task-specific training dataset (minimum 100 examples for meaningful fine-tuning)"],"failure_modes":["LoRA adds ~5-10% inference latency compared to full model due to rank decomposition overhead","Fine-tuning quality depends heavily on instruction dataset quality and diversity — poor data leads to degraded financial reasoning","Requires GPU memory for training (minimum 16GB VRAM for 7B models, 40GB+ for 13B models)","No built-in A/B testing framework to validate fine-tuned model performance against baseline","Data collection latency varies by source (news APIs: 5-30min delay, market data: real-time, earnings transcripts: 24-48hr delay)","No built-in handling for data quality issues like duplicate articles, corrupted transcripts, or missing fields","Requires API keys and rate-limit management for multiple data providers (Bloomberg, Reuters, SEC EDGAR, etc.)","Temporal alignment assumes clock synchronization across sources — timezone mismatches can cause 24hr+ drift","Task definition quality depends on prompt engineering — poorly designed prompts lead to degraded model performance","Requires task-specific training data — generic financial datasets may not contain examples for novel tasks","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.3835362832774316,"quality":0.47,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.35,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:21.549Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:59:50.673Z","last_commit":"2026-04-24T06:21:03Z"},"community":{"stars":19916,"forks":2830,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=ai4finance-foundation--fingpt","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=ai4finance-foundation--fingpt"}},"signature":"U3fG5feFsoxnyxzaBw4z6xQoI6Mj178eDXX/2wqgISu5FJHWzVp67d6rSgWYE2BprtA70RUDZtVxPxEuI0arCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T07:16:30.642Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/ai4finance-foundation--fingpt","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/ai4finance-foundation--fingpt","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=ai4finance-foundation--fingpt","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}