{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_ai-research-airesearchass","slug":"ai-research-airesearchass","name":"AI Research Assistant","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/ai-research/Airesearchass","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/ai-research-airesearchass","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:ai-research/Airesearchass"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_ai-research-airesearchass__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.based.tool.registration.and.schema.binding","name":"mcp protocol-based tool registration and schema binding","description":"Registers research tools through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) standard, enabling Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to discover and invoke research capabilities via standardized JSON-RPC 2.0 message passing. Tools are exposed through MCP's resource and tool endpoints with full schema validation, allowing clients to understand tool signatures before invocation without custom integration code.","intents":["I want to connect my AI research workflows to Claude without building custom API integrations","I need my research tools to be discoverable by multiple LLM clients through a standard protocol","I want to avoid vendor lock-in by using an open protocol for tool integration"],"best_for":["Teams building research automation that needs to work across multiple LLM providers","Developers integrating research tools into Claude projects via MCP","Organizations standardizing on MCP for AI tool orchestration"],"limitations":["MCP is still evolving; breaking changes possible in protocol versions","Requires MCP-compatible client support — not all LLM platforms support MCP yet","No built-in authentication layer — relies on client-side credential management"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude desktop app with MCP support)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ runtime for the MCP server","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 message format"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 requests","Tool invocation parameters as JSON","Resource queries as strings"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 responses","Tool results as structured JSON or text","Resource content as text or structured data"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-protocol"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ai-research-airesearchass__cap_1","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.research.paper.retrieval.and.semantic.search","name":"research paper retrieval and semantic search","description":"Searches academic databases and research repositories using semantic similarity matching, likely leveraging embeddings to find papers relevant to research queries beyond keyword matching. Returns structured metadata (title, authors, abstract, DOI) and optionally full-text content, enabling researchers to discover relevant literature programmatically without manual database navigation.","intents":["I need to find research papers related to my current investigation topic","I want to search for papers by semantic meaning rather than exact keywords","I need to retrieve paper metadata and abstracts to build a literature review"],"best_for":["Academic researchers building automated literature review workflows","AI agents that need to ground responses in peer-reviewed research","Teams building research synthesis tools that require paper discovery"],"limitations":["Search results depend on underlying database coverage — may miss recent preprints or non-indexed papers","Semantic search quality varies by embedding model used; may return tangentially related papers","Rate limiting on academic database APIs may throttle bulk searches","Full-text access restricted by publisher paywalls and copyright"],"requires":["API access to academic databases (e.g., arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, CrossRef)","Embedding model for semantic search (local or cloud-based)","Internet connectivity for database queries"],"input_types":["text query string","research topic description","author names","DOI or paper identifiers"],"output_types":["structured JSON with paper metadata","abstracts as text","full-text content where available","citation information"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ai-research-airesearchass__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.citation.and.reference.extraction.from.documents","name":"citation and reference extraction from documents","description":"Parses research documents (PDFs, text) to extract citations, references, and bibliographic metadata in standardized formats (BibTeX, RIS, JSON). Uses pattern matching and optional NLP to identify citation blocks, normalize author names, and resolve DOIs, enabling automated bibliography management and citation graph construction without manual data entry.","intents":["I want to extract all citations from a research paper and convert them to a standard format","I need to build a citation graph showing how papers reference each other","I want to automatically populate my reference manager with citations from documents"],"best_for":["Researchers managing large literature collections","AI agents building knowledge graphs from research papers","Teams automating citation tracking and impact analysis"],"limitations":["Citation extraction accuracy varies by document format and quality — scanned PDFs require OCR","Inconsistent citation formatting across documents reduces extraction reliability","DOI resolution requires network access and may fail for older or non-indexed papers","Author name normalization is heuristic-based and may conflate different researchers with similar names"],"requires":["PDF parsing library (e.g., pdfplumber, PyPDF2) for document input","Optional OCR engine (e.g., Tesseract) for scanned documents","DOI resolver API access (e.g., CrossRef API)","NLP library for entity extraction (optional, for improved accuracy)"],"input_types":["PDF documents","plain text with citations","HTML content","document URLs"],"output_types":["BibTeX format","RIS format","JSON with structured citation metadata","CSV with author/title/DOI columns"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ai-research-airesearchass__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.research.paper.summarization.and.key.insight.extraction","name":"research paper summarization and key insight extraction","description":"Generates structured summaries of research papers by extracting key findings, methodology, limitations, and contributions. Uses extractive or abstractive summarization techniques to condense papers into actionable insights, with optional section-specific summaries (abstract, methods, results, discussion) for rapid paper assessment without reading full text.","intents":["I want a quick summary of a research paper to decide if it's relevant to my work","I need to extract the key findings and methodology from multiple papers","I want to understand a paper's contributions and limitations without reading the full text"],"best_for":["Researchers conducting rapid literature reviews","AI agents that need to synthesize information from multiple papers","Teams building research dashboards that require paper summaries"],"limitations":["Summarization quality depends on paper structure — poorly formatted papers yield lower-quality summaries","Abstractive summarization may hallucinate or misrepresent nuanced findings","Section extraction assumes standard paper structure (abstract, methods, results, etc.) — non-standard formats fail","Computational cost scales with paper length; very long papers may timeout"],"requires":["Full-text access to research papers (PDF or text)","Summarization model (local LLM or API-based)","Optional document structure parser for section identification"],"input_types":["PDF documents","plain text papers","paper URLs","paper identifiers (DOI, arXiv ID)"],"output_types":["text summary (1-3 paragraphs)","structured JSON with key findings, methodology, limitations","section-specific summaries","bullet-point highlights"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ai-research-airesearchass__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.research.hypothesis.generation.and.validation.planning","name":"research hypothesis generation and validation planning","description":"Assists in formulating research hypotheses based on literature context and suggests experimental designs or validation approaches. Uses reasoning over retrieved papers and domain knowledge to propose testable hypotheses, outline methodology, and identify potential confounds, enabling researchers to move from literature review to hypothesis-driven research design.","intents":["I want to generate research hypotheses based on gaps I've identified in the literature","I need help designing an experiment to test a hypothesis","I want to identify potential confounding variables and control strategies"],"best_for":["Academic researchers in early-stage research planning","PhD students designing thesis research","Teams conducting applied research that needs structured hypothesis validation"],"limitations":["Hypothesis generation is heuristic-based and may miss novel or counterintuitive ideas","Experimental design suggestions are generic — domain-specific constraints require manual refinement","No access to institutional resources or equipment constraints — suggestions may be impractical","Validation planning assumes standard research methodologies; novel approaches may not be suggested"],"requires":["Context from literature review (papers, summaries, key findings)","Domain knowledge or research background from user","Reasoning model capable of multi-step inference"],"input_types":["research topic description","literature summaries or key findings","preliminary observations or data","domain constraints or resources"],"output_types":["structured hypothesis statements","experimental design outlines","methodology suggestions","potential confounds and controls","validation metrics and success criteria"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ai-research-airesearchass__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.research.collaboration.and.annotation.management","name":"research collaboration and annotation management","description":"Manages collaborative research workflows by tracking annotations, comments, and version history on research documents and findings. Enables multiple researchers to annotate papers, share insights, and maintain a shared knowledge base of research decisions, with conflict resolution for concurrent edits and audit trails for research reproducibility.","intents":["I want to collaborate with team members on annotating and analyzing research papers","I need to track who made which annotations and when for research transparency","I want to maintain a shared knowledge base of research decisions and findings"],"best_for":["Research teams conducting collaborative literature reviews","Labs requiring audit trails for research reproducibility","Organizations managing distributed research projects"],"limitations":["Conflict resolution for concurrent edits requires manual intervention or last-write-wins strategy","Annotation storage requires persistent backend — no built-in database included","Real-time collaboration requires WebSocket or polling infrastructure not specified","Version history storage scales with team size and annotation volume"],"requires":["Persistent storage backend (database or file system)","User authentication and authorization system","Optional real-time sync infrastructure (WebSocket, CRDT library)","Document versioning system"],"input_types":["annotations as text or structured metadata","document versions","user identity and permissions","timestamps for audit trails"],"output_types":["annotated documents with metadata","collaboration history and audit logs","shared knowledge base exports","conflict resolution reports"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ai-research-airesearchass__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.research.data.extraction.and.structured.knowledge.base.construction","name":"research data extraction and structured knowledge base construction","description":"Extracts structured data from research papers (tables, figures, key metrics, experimental results) and populates a knowledge base with normalized, queryable data. Uses table detection, OCR, and semantic parsing to convert unstructured paper content into structured formats (JSON, CSV, RDF), enabling downstream analysis and cross-paper comparisons without manual data entry.","intents":["I want to extract all experimental results and metrics from a set of papers into a database","I need to compare findings across papers by extracting key metrics in a standardized format","I want to build a queryable knowledge base from research papers"],"best_for":["Meta-analysis and systematic review researchers","Teams building research knowledge graphs","Organizations conducting large-scale literature analysis"],"limitations":["Table extraction accuracy varies by PDF quality and table complexity — scanned documents require OCR","Figure extraction and interpretation requires computer vision — text-based figures may fail","Semantic parsing of results is heuristic-based and may misinterpret domain-specific notation","Normalization of metrics across papers requires domain knowledge and manual validation"],"requires":["PDF parsing library with table detection (e.g., pdfplumber, Camelot)","OCR engine for scanned documents (e.g., Tesseract)","Optional computer vision model for figure extraction","Knowledge base backend (graph database, relational database, or vector store)"],"input_types":["PDF documents","tables as images or text","figures and charts","structured metadata (authors, dates, etc.)"],"output_types":["JSON with extracted metrics and results","CSV tables for analysis","RDF triples for knowledge graphs","normalized structured data"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ai-research-airesearchass__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.research.trend.analysis.and.emerging.topic.detection","name":"research trend analysis and emerging topic detection","description":"Analyzes research publication patterns over time to identify emerging topics, declining research areas, and trend trajectories. Uses temporal analysis of paper metadata (publication dates, citation counts, keywords) and optional topic modeling to surface research trends, enabling researchers to identify hot topics and anticipate future research directions.","intents":["I want to identify emerging research topics in my field","I need to understand how research interest in a topic has evolved over time","I want to find underexplored areas where I could contribute novel research"],"best_for":["Researchers planning long-term research agendas","Funding agencies identifying promising research directions","Teams conducting competitive landscape analysis"],"limitations":["Trend detection requires sufficient historical data — emerging topics with few papers may be missed","Publication lag (6-12 months) means detected trends may already be saturated","Citation counts are biased toward established researchers and institutions","Keyword-based trend detection may miss paradigm shifts that use new terminology"],"requires":["Historical publication data with dates and metadata","Optional topic modeling library (e.g., LDA, BERTopic)","Time-series analysis tools","Citation data for impact assessment"],"input_types":["publication metadata (dates, keywords, authors)","citation networks","research topic or field name","time range for analysis"],"output_types":["trend trajectories as time-series data","emerging topic lists with growth rates","declining research areas","topic evolution visualizations","predictions for future trends"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":42,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude desktop app with MCP support)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ runtime for the MCP server","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 message format","API access to academic databases (e.g., arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, CrossRef)","Embedding model for semantic search (local or cloud-based)","Internet connectivity for database queries","PDF parsing library (e.g., pdfplumber, PyPDF2) for document input","Optional OCR engine (e.g., Tesseract) for scanned documents","DOI resolver API access (e.g., CrossRef API)","NLP library for entity extraction (optional, for improved accuracy)"],"failure_modes":["MCP is still evolving; breaking changes possible in protocol versions","Requires MCP-compatible client support — not all LLM platforms support MCP yet","No built-in authentication layer — relies on client-side credential management","Search results depend on underlying database coverage — may miss recent preprints or non-indexed papers","Semantic search quality varies by embedding model used; may return tangentially related papers","Rate limiting on academic database APIs may throttle bulk searches","Full-text access restricted by publisher paywalls and copyright","Citation extraction accuracy varies by document format and quality — scanned PDFs require OCR","Inconsistent citation formatting across documents reduces extraction reliability","DOI resolution requires network access and may fail for older or non-indexed papers","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.7046883976244289,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.635Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:18:25.566Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=ai-research-airesearchass","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=ai-research-airesearchass"}},"signature":"1LZ1dKwJqDDT/LTm4FbSPTMfYgLt0mgywGu+d+tq/Dpx9TOQPjn4IC2J3dYigzhTZjucuVIiPRJNZHTPcCnBDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T01:54:10.086Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/ai-research-airesearchass","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/ai-research-airesearchass","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=ai-research-airesearchass","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}