{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_ai-manifest","slug":"ai-manifest","name":"AI Manifest","type":"repo","url":"https://ai-manifest.org","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/ai-manifest","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"unknown","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_ai-manifest__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.machine.readable.ai.service.discovery.via.standardized.metadata.schema","name":"machine-readable ai service discovery via standardized metadata schema","description":"Enables AI agents and clients to discover service capabilities by parsing a standardized /.well-known/ai.json manifest file containing provider metadata, capability declarations, transport types, and authentication endpoints. Uses a JSON schema-based approach with optional OpenAPI/JSON Schema integration to describe available operations, resources, and prompts without requiring hardcoded integrations or manual documentation parsing.","intents":["I need my AI agent to automatically discover what capabilities a third-party service exposes without manual configuration","I want to publish my API's AI-relevant capabilities in a machine-readable format that agents can consume","I need to map my service's capabilities to multiple agent frameworks (MCP, agents.json) from a single manifest"],"best_for":["Backend engineers building AI agent frameworks requiring standardized service discovery","Platform teams implementing multi-provider agent orchestration","API developers exposing AI-consumable endpoints to agent ecosystems"],"limitations":["Specification is at v0.1 (Community Draft) with no stability guarantee — breaking changes possible","Adoption is extremely low; no major cloud platforms or AI frameworks currently implement the standard","Manifest is static JSON — real-time capability changes require manual updates and cache invalidation","No built-in access control enforcement — only declares auth endpoints; verification is consumer's responsibility","MCP mapping is incomplete (marked with ~) and agents.json alignment is partial"],"requires":["HTTPS endpoint (HTTP not supported)","RSA keypair for JWKS endpoint (for signature verification)","JSON Schema files describing capability inputs/outputs","OpenAPI specification (optional but recommended for REST services)","Node.js 14+ for validation CLI tooling"],"input_types":["JSON manifest file (ai.json)","JSON Schema definitions","OpenAPI specification (optional)","JWKS public key set"],"output_types":["Structured capability declarations","Resource and prompt metadata","Transport type declarations (REST/MCP/WebSocket/SSE)","Authentication scheme specifications"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_ai-manifest__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.jwks.based.cryptographic.signature.verification.for.manifest.authenticity","name":"jwks-based cryptographic signature verification for manifest authenticity","description":"Implements JOSE/JWKS (JSON Web Key Set) signature verification allowing agents to validate that an ai.json manifest has not been tampered with by checking RS256 signatures against the provider's public key set at /.well-known/jwks.json. Supports key rotation with a minimum 7-day overlap window using key IDs (kid) to prevent service disruption during key transitions.","intents":["I need to verify that a service's capability manifest is authentic and hasn't been modified in transit","I want to rotate my signing keys without breaking agent integrations that depend on my manifest","I need to revoke compromised keys and signal this to consuming agents"],"best_for":["Security-conscious API providers exposing capabilities to untrusted agent networks","Platform teams requiring tamper-proof capability declarations in multi-tenant environments","Enterprises integrating with third-party agents where manifest integrity is critical"],"limitations":["Signature verification is consumer's responsibility — AI Manifest only declares the jwks_uri; no built-in enforcement","Key rotation requires careful coordination — minimum 7-day overlap window means old keys must remain valid during transition","Certificate Revocation List (CRL) at /.well-known/ai-crl.json is optional and not universally implemented","Only RS256 algorithm specified in examples; extensibility to other algorithms not documented","No timestamp validation in signature — agents must implement their own freshness checks"],"requires":["RSA keypair (minimum 2048-bit, 4096-bit recommended)","JWKS endpoint at /.well-known/jwks.json serving public keys in JOSE format","Ability to sign manifest JSON with private key using RS256","Consumer-side implementation of JWKS verification logic (not provided by AI Manifest)"],"input_types":["ai.json manifest file","RSA private key (for signing)","JWKS public key set (for verification)"],"output_types":["Signed manifest with signature header","JWKS endpoint response","Verification success/failure status"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_ai-manifest__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.schema.based.capability.declaration.with.optional.openapi.json.schema.integration","name":"schema-based capability declaration with optional openapi/json schema integration","description":"Allows providers to declare available capabilities (callable operations) using a standardized schema that optionally references OpenAPI specifications or inline JSON Schema definitions. Capabilities are declared as an array of strings or objects with input/output schemas, enabling agents to understand operation signatures without parsing natural language documentation or making exploratory API calls.","intents":["I want to declare what operations my service supports in a format agents can automatically parse","I need to describe input parameters and output types for my API operations in a machine-readable way","I want to support both REST and MCP agents using a single capability declaration"],"best_for":["API providers building agent-friendly interfaces","Teams migrating from REST-only APIs to agent-consumable service definitions","Developers implementing agent frameworks that need to understand service capabilities before making calls"],"limitations":["OpenAPI specification is optional — many providers may declare capabilities without formal schemas","No standardized way to declare rate limits, quotas, or cost per capability","Capability versioning not addressed — no mechanism to deprecate or evolve capability signatures","Schema validation is provider's responsibility — AI Manifest only defines the structure, not enforcement","Complex nested schemas may not translate cleanly between REST and MCP representations"],"requires":["JSON Schema knowledge or OpenAPI familiarity","Ability to host JSON Schema files at provider-specified URLs","Optional OpenAPI specification (3.0+) for REST services"],"input_types":["Capability names (strings)","JSON Schema definitions","OpenAPI operation specifications"],"output_types":["Structured capability declarations","Input/output schema references","Transport-specific operation mappings"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_ai-manifest__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.transport.server.declaration.with.rest.mcp.websocket.sse.support","name":"multi-transport server declaration with rest/mcp/websocket/sse support","description":"Enables providers to declare multiple server endpoints in a single manifest, specifying transport type (REST, MCP, WebSocket, Server-Sent Events) and URL for each. Agents can select the appropriate transport based on their capabilities, allowing a single service to expose the same logical capabilities through different protocols without requiring separate manifests.","intents":["I want to expose my service via both REST and MCP without maintaining separate capability declarations","I need agents to automatically choose the best transport protocol for their architecture","I want to support legacy REST clients and modern MCP agents from a single manifest"],"best_for":["API providers supporting multiple agent frameworks and client types","Platform teams implementing polyglot agent ecosystems","Services transitioning from REST to event-driven or streaming architectures"],"limitations":["Transport selection logic is agent's responsibility — manifest only declares available transports","No guidance on capability parity across transports — REST and MCP versions may diverge","WebSocket and SSE support is declared but not formally specified in v0.1","No fallback mechanism if primary transport is unavailable","Version field for servers is marked as approximate (~) in MCP mapping, indicating incomplete specification"],"requires":["Ability to host multiple server endpoints (REST API, MCP server, WebSocket server, etc.)","HTTPS for all transports (HTTP not supported)","Consistent capability implementation across all declared transports"],"input_types":["Transport type identifier (rest|mcp|ws|sse)","Server URL","Optional server version"],"output_types":["Server declarations array","Transport-specific endpoint URLs","Capability availability per transport"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_ai-manifest__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.read.only.resource.and.prompt.template.declaration","name":"read-only resource and prompt template declaration","description":"Allows providers to declare read-only data resources (e.g., datasets, documents, knowledge bases) and preset prompt templates that agents can reference or retrieve. Resources are declared with URIs and optional schemas, enabling agents to discover and consume provider-hosted data without hardcoding resource URLs or prompt engineering.","intents":["I want agents to discover datasets or documents my service hosts without manual configuration","I need to provide preset prompts that agents can use for common tasks","I want to expose knowledge bases or reference data in a discoverable way"],"best_for":["Data providers exposing datasets to agent ecosystems","Services with curated prompt libraries for specific domains","Knowledge base platforms enabling agent-driven information retrieval"],"limitations":["Resources are read-only — no write operations or mutations supported","No schema for resource metadata (size, format, update frequency) beyond URI declaration","Prompt templates are static — no dynamic prompt generation or personalization","No versioning mechanism for resources or prompts","Resource discovery is passive — agents must poll manifest for updates"],"requires":["Publicly accessible URIs for resources","JSON Schema definitions for resource structure (optional)","Prompt template content in structured format"],"input_types":["Resource URIs","Resource names and descriptions","Prompt template text"],"output_types":["Resource metadata declarations","Prompt template content","Resource schema references"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_ai-manifest__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.json.schema.validation.cli.for.manifest.compliance.checking","name":"json schema validation cli for manifest compliance checking","description":"Provides Node.js-based command-line validation scripts (validate-ai.mjs, validate-jwks.mjs, validate-crl.mjs) that check ai.json manifests against the AI Manifest schema, verify JWKS endpoint compliance, and validate Certificate Revocation List format. Outputs validation reports to _reports/ directory and integrates with GitHub Actions for CI/CD pipelines.","intents":["I want to validate my ai.json manifest before publishing it to ensure agent compatibility","I need to verify my JWKS endpoint is correctly formatted and accessible","I want to automate manifest validation in my CI/CD pipeline"],"best_for":["API developers publishing AI Manifest files","DevOps teams implementing manifest validation in CI/CD","Platform teams maintaining registries of AI services"],"limitations":["Validation is structural only — does not verify that declared capabilities actually exist or work","No validation of OpenAPI specs referenced in manifest","JWKS validation only checks format, not key validity or expiration","CRL validation is optional and may not catch revoked keys if not implemented","CLI output format is JSON; no human-readable report generation"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm or yarn for dependency installation","Access to ai.json, JWKS endpoint, and optional CRL files"],"input_types":["ai.json manifest file","JWKS endpoint URL","CRL endpoint URL (optional)"],"output_types":["JSON validation report","Error/warning messages","Schema compliance status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_ai-manifest__cap_6","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.wellknownai.public.registry.with.optional.mirroring.support","name":"wellknownai public registry with optional mirroring support","description":"Maintains a public registry (WellKnownAI at wellknownai.org) where providers can list their ai.json manifests by submitting pull requests to a registry.json file. Supports optional mirroring of manifests without PII constraints, enabling centralized discovery of AI services while maintaining provider autonomy over manifest hosting.","intents":["I want to register my service in a public directory so agents can discover it","I need agents to find my service without knowing my domain in advance","I want to mirror my manifest in a registry for redundancy"],"best_for":["API providers seeking visibility in agent ecosystems","Platform teams building agent marketplaces or service directories","Developers implementing agent frameworks that need service discovery"],"limitations":["Registry adoption is extremely low — minimal services currently listed","No automated discovery mechanism — agents must explicitly query registry.json","Registry is centralized, creating a single point of failure for discovery","No service validation before listing — registry may contain broken or outdated manifests","Mirroring is optional and not universally implemented","No SLA or uptime guarantee for registry"],"requires":["GitHub account for submitting pull requests","Publicly accessible ai.json manifest","Service metadata (name, description, URL)"],"input_types":["Service metadata","ai.json manifest URL","Optional mirror endpoint"],"output_types":["Registry entry in registry.json","Service listing in WellKnownAI directory","Optional mirrored manifest"],"categories":["search-retrieval","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_ai-manifest__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.and.agents.json.mapping.with.transport.agnostic.capability.translation","name":"mcp and agents.json mapping with transport-agnostic capability translation","description":"Provides mapping tables and guidance for translating AI Manifest capability declarations to Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool definitions and agents.json format. Enables a single manifest to serve multiple agent framework ecosystems by defining how capabilities, resources, and prompts map to framework-specific representations (e.g., MCP tools, agents.json actions).","intents":["I want my service to work with both MCP agents and agents.json-based systems from a single manifest","I need to understand how my OpenAPI operations map to MCP tool definitions","I want to avoid maintaining separate capability declarations for different agent frameworks"],"best_for":["API providers supporting multiple agent frameworks","Platform teams building agent orchestration layers","Developers implementing agent frameworks that consume AI Manifest"],"limitations":["Mapping is incomplete and marked with (~) indicating approximate/partial alignment","MCP is noted as 'not REST' in mapping table, indicating fundamental architectural differences","agents.json alignment is partial — not all AI Manifest features map cleanly","No automated translation tool — mapping is manual and framework-specific","Mapping may diverge as MCP and agents.json evolve independently","Complex capabilities with nested schemas may not translate cleanly across frameworks"],"requires":["Understanding of MCP tool definition format","Familiarity with agents.json specification","Ability to manually translate schemas between frameworks"],"input_types":["AI Manifest capability declarations","JSON Schema definitions","OpenAPI specifications"],"output_types":["MCP tool definitions","agents.json action declarations","Framework-specific capability representations"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_ai-manifest__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.http.caching.directives.and.etag.based.manifest.freshness.management","name":"http caching directives and etag-based manifest freshness management","description":"Specifies HTTP caching best practices for ai.json manifests using Cache-Control headers (max-age=600 recommended), ETags, and Last-Modified headers to enable efficient manifest discovery without overwhelming provider infrastructure. Agents can use ETags to detect manifest changes and avoid re-parsing unchanged manifests.","intents":["I want agents to cache my manifest to reduce server load while staying reasonably fresh","I need to signal when my manifest has changed so agents update their cached copy","I want to optimize discovery performance by leveraging HTTP caching standards"],"best_for":["High-traffic API providers concerned about discovery overhead","Platform teams implementing agent frameworks with manifest caching","Services with frequently-changing capabilities requiring efficient update propagation"],"limitations":["Caching directives are recommendations only — not enforced by AI Manifest","10-minute default cache window (max-age=600) may be too long for rapidly-changing capabilities","ETag implementation is provider's responsibility — no standard format specified","No mechanism to force immediate cache invalidation across all agents","Agents may ignore caching headers or implement their own policies"],"requires":["HTTP server supporting Cache-Control, ETag, and Last-Modified headers","Ability to generate consistent ETags for manifest versions","Understanding of HTTP caching semantics"],"input_types":["ai.json manifest content","Manifest version/timestamp"],"output_types":["HTTP response headers (Cache-Control, ETag, Last-Modified)","304 Not Modified responses for unchanged manifests"],"categories":["automation-workflow","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":23,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["HTTPS endpoint (HTTP not supported)","RSA keypair for JWKS endpoint (for signature verification)","JSON Schema files describing capability inputs/outputs","OpenAPI specification (optional but recommended for REST services)","Node.js 14+ for validation CLI tooling","RSA keypair (minimum 2048-bit, 4096-bit recommended)","JWKS endpoint at /.well-known/jwks.json serving public keys in JOSE format","Ability to sign manifest JSON with private key using RS256","Consumer-side implementation of JWKS verification logic (not provided by AI Manifest)","JSON Schema knowledge or OpenAPI familiarity"],"failure_modes":["Specification is at v0.1 (Community Draft) with no stability guarantee — breaking changes possible","Adoption is extremely low; no major cloud platforms or AI frameworks currently implement the standard","Manifest is static JSON — real-time capability changes require manual updates and cache invalidation","No built-in access control enforcement — only declares auth endpoints; verification is consumer's responsibility","MCP mapping is incomplete (marked with ~) and agents.json alignment is partial","Signature verification is consumer's responsibility — AI Manifest only declares the jwks_uri; no built-in enforcement","Key rotation requires careful coordination — minimum 7-day overlap window means old keys must remain valid during transition","Certificate Revocation List (CRL) at /.well-known/ai-crl.json is optional and not universally implemented","Only RS256 algorithm specified in examples; extensibility to other algorithms not documented","No timestamp validation in signature — agents must implement their own freshness checks","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.06666666666666667,"quality":0.37,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:29.132Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.564Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=ai-manifest","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=ai-manifest"}},"signature":"2VEY+JgeeVxy8zAQ7E4wdOnd0YDVOANRoUj7+CMXPNldhpl1yl/StqqNFnRMPDKwMbZf9WFL0Bu1NnqAFKW6DQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T22:11:35.808Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/ai-manifest","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/ai-manifest","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=ai-manifest","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}