{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-ai-agent-test","slug":"ai-agent-test","name":"ai-agent-test","type":"agent","url":"https://github.com/benevbright/ai-agent-test#readme","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/ai-agent-test","categories":["testing-quality","automation"],"tags":["ai","agent","agentic","workflow","llm","local-llm","cli","automation"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-ai-agent-test__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.local.llm.agent.execution","name":"local-llm-agent-execution","description":"Executes agentic workflows using local LLM instances (Ollama, LM Studio, etc.) instead of cloud APIs, enabling offline agent reasoning and decision-making. The system manages prompt formatting, response parsing, and multi-turn conversation state for local model inference without external API dependencies.","intents":["Run AI agents locally without sending data to cloud providers","Test agent logic and tool calling with open-source models before deploying to production APIs","Build cost-effective agents that don't incur per-token API charges"],"best_for":["developers building privacy-sensitive agent applications","teams evaluating open-source LLMs before committing to commercial APIs","cost-conscious teams prototyping agentic workflows at scale"],"limitations":["Local LLM inference speed depends on hardware; typically 5-50 tokens/sec vs 50-100+ for cloud APIs","No built-in model quantization or optimization — requires pre-configured local LLM server","Limited to models available locally; no automatic model downloading or management"],"requires":["Local LLM server running (Ollama, LM Studio, or compatible)","Network connectivity to local LLM endpoint (default localhost:11434 for Ollama)","Node.js 14+ for CLI execution"],"input_types":["text prompts","conversation history (JSON)","system instructions"],"output_types":["text responses","structured tool calls (JSON)","agent decision logs"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","local-inference"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ai-agent-test__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.integration.and.function.calling","name":"tool-integration-and-function-calling","description":"Provides a schema-based tool registry system where developers define tool capabilities as JSON schemas, and the agent automatically routes LLM outputs to appropriate tool handlers. The system parses structured tool calls from LLM responses and executes registered functions with parameter validation.","intents":["Define custom tools that agents can invoke (e.g., web search, database queries, file operations)","Automatically route agent decisions to the correct tool based on LLM-generated function calls","Validate tool parameters against schemas before execution to prevent runtime errors"],"best_for":["developers building multi-tool agents with custom integrations","teams needing deterministic tool routing without manual parsing","rapid prototyping of agent capabilities with schema-driven design"],"limitations":["Tool schema definition is manual; no automatic schema generation from function signatures","No built-in error recovery or retry logic for failed tool calls","Limited to synchronous tool execution; async tools require wrapper functions"],"requires":["JSON schema definitions for each tool","Tool handler functions (JavaScript/TypeScript)","LLM model capable of structured output or function-calling format"],"input_types":["JSON schema definitions","LLM-generated tool call strings","tool parameters (any JSON-serializable type)"],"output_types":["tool execution results (JSON)","error messages with parameter validation details"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","function-calling"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ai-agent-test__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agentic.workflow.orchestration","name":"agentic-workflow-orchestration","description":"Manages multi-step agent workflows with state persistence across turns, including decision branching, tool invocation loops, and termination conditions. The system maintains conversation context, tracks agent reasoning steps, and coordinates between LLM inference and tool execution in a structured loop.","intents":["Build agents that reason over multiple steps and make sequential decisions","Implement agent loops that continue until a goal is reached or max iterations exceeded","Track and debug agent decision-making across multiple reasoning steps"],"best_for":["developers building complex multi-step agents (research, planning, problem-solving)","teams needing visibility into agent reasoning and decision logs","prototyping agent architectures before scaling to production systems"],"limitations":["No built-in persistence layer — workflow state exists only in memory during execution","Max iteration limits are hard-coded; no dynamic termination based on goal achievement","No distributed execution support; workflows run on a single process"],"requires":["LLM endpoint (local or cloud)","Tool definitions for agent actions","Node.js 14+ runtime"],"input_types":["initial task description (text)","system prompt/agent instructions","tool definitions (JSON schemas)"],"output_types":["final agent response (text)","execution trace (JSON with reasoning steps)","tool call history"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ai-agent-test__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.cli.driven.agent.testing","name":"cli-driven-agent-testing","description":"Provides a command-line interface for defining, executing, and testing agent workflows without writing code. Users specify agent configuration (model, tools, instructions) via CLI flags or config files, and the system runs the agent and outputs results to stdout or JSON files for analysis.","intents":["Test agent behavior quickly from the command line without building a full application","Automate agent testing in CI/CD pipelines by invoking agents as CLI commands","Experiment with different prompts, tools, and model configurations without code changes"],"best_for":["developers iterating on agent prompts and tool definitions","non-technical users testing agent behavior without coding","CI/CD pipelines that need to validate agent outputs programmatically"],"limitations":["CLI interface is limited to simple configuration; complex agent logic requires code","No interactive REPL mode for real-time agent interaction","Output formatting is basic; no built-in visualization of agent reasoning"],"requires":["Node.js 14+ with npm or yarn","Local LLM server running (for local execution)","Agent configuration file (JSON or YAML format)"],"input_types":["CLI flags (--model, --tools, --prompt)","configuration files (JSON/YAML)","task descriptions (text input)"],"output_types":["stdout text output","JSON result files","execution logs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","developer-tools"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ai-agent-test__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.conversation.history.management","name":"conversation-history-management","description":"Maintains and manages multi-turn conversation state across agent interactions, including message history formatting, context window management, and turn-by-turn state tracking. The system preserves conversation context between agent reasoning steps and tool invocations, enabling coherent multi-turn agent behavior.","intents":["Maintain conversation context across multiple agent reasoning steps","Implement multi-turn agent interactions where each step builds on previous reasoning","Manage context window limits by tracking conversation length and trimming if needed"],"best_for":["agents that need to reason over multiple turns (e.g., research, debugging, planning)","conversational agents that maintain state across user interactions","teams building agents that need to reference previous reasoning steps"],"limitations":["No automatic context window optimization; developers must manually manage conversation length","No built-in summarization for long conversations; context grows linearly with turns","No persistence — conversation history is lost when process terminates"],"requires":["Message history data structure (array of messages)","LLM with sufficient context window for conversation length","Node.js 14+ runtime"],"input_types":["user messages (text)","assistant responses (text)","tool results (JSON)"],"output_types":["formatted conversation history (array of message objects)","context window usage metrics"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ai-agent-test__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.structured.output.parsing","name":"structured-output-parsing","description":"Parses and validates structured outputs from LLM responses, including tool calls, JSON objects, and formatted text. The system uses pattern matching and schema validation to extract structured data from unstructured LLM text, enabling reliable tool routing and data extraction.","intents":["Extract tool calls from LLM responses reliably without manual regex parsing","Validate LLM outputs against expected schemas before processing","Convert unstructured LLM text into structured data for downstream processing"],"best_for":["agents that depend on reliable tool call extraction","systems requiring strict validation of LLM outputs","teams building agents with multiple output formats"],"limitations":["Parsing robustness depends on LLM output format consistency; hallucinated tool calls may fail validation","No automatic format correction; malformed outputs are rejected rather than repaired","Limited to JSON and simple text formats; no support for complex nested structures"],"requires":["LLM that can produce structured output (JSON or formatted text)","Schema definitions for expected output formats","Node.js 14+ runtime"],"input_types":["LLM response text","JSON schema definitions","tool call format specifications"],"output_types":["parsed JSON objects","validated tool call objects","extraction error messages"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ai-agent-test__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.execution.tracing.and.logging","name":"agent-execution-tracing-and-logging","description":"Captures detailed execution traces of agent workflows, including each reasoning step, tool invocation, and decision point. The system logs agent state transitions, LLM inputs/outputs, and tool results in a structured format for debugging and analysis.","intents":["Debug agent behavior by inspecting each reasoning step and decision","Analyze agent performance and identify bottlenecks in multi-step workflows","Export execution traces for post-mortem analysis and agent improvement"],"best_for":["developers debugging complex agent behaviors","teams analyzing agent performance and decision quality","research teams studying agent reasoning patterns"],"limitations":["Trace output can be verbose for long agent runs; no built-in filtering or summarization","No structured trace storage; traces are logged to stdout or files without indexing","No visualization tools; trace analysis requires manual inspection or external tools"],"requires":["Agent execution with logging enabled","File system access for writing trace logs","Node.js 14+ runtime"],"input_types":["agent execution events","LLM requests/responses","tool invocation details"],"output_types":["structured execution logs (JSON)","human-readable trace output","performance metrics (latency, token counts)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","developer-tools"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ai-agent-test__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.model.compatibility","name":"multi-model-compatibility","description":"Supports execution with multiple LLM backends (local Ollama, LM Studio, cloud APIs) through a unified interface. The system abstracts away model-specific API differences, allowing agents to switch between models without code changes.","intents":["Test agents with different LLM models to compare behavior and performance","Switch between local and cloud LLMs without modifying agent code","Evaluate cost vs. quality tradeoffs by running agents on different model tiers"],"best_for":["teams evaluating multiple LLM options for their agents","developers building model-agnostic agent systems","cost-conscious teams that want to mix local and cloud models"],"limitations":["Model-specific features (function calling, vision) may not be uniformly supported across all backends","No automatic model selection or routing based on task requirements","API compatibility layer adds latency; not all model capabilities are exposed"],"requires":["LLM endpoint configuration (URL, API key if applicable)","Model name/identifier for the target LLM","Node.js 14+ runtime"],"input_types":["model configuration (endpoint, API key)","model identifier (string)","prompts and tool definitions"],"output_types":["LLM responses","model metadata (context window, capabilities)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":33,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Local LLM server running (Ollama, LM Studio, or compatible)","Network connectivity to local LLM endpoint (default localhost:11434 for Ollama)","Node.js 14+ for CLI execution","JSON schema definitions for each tool","Tool handler functions (JavaScript/TypeScript)","LLM model capable of structured output or function-calling format","LLM endpoint (local or cloud)","Tool definitions for agent actions","Node.js 14+ runtime","Node.js 14+ with npm or yarn"],"failure_modes":["Local LLM inference speed depends on hardware; typically 5-50 tokens/sec vs 50-100+ for cloud APIs","No built-in model quantization or optimization — requires pre-configured local LLM server","Limited to models available locally; no automatic model downloading or management","Tool schema definition is manual; no automatic schema generation from function signatures","No built-in error recovery or retry logic for failed tool calls","Limited to synchronous tool execution; async tools require wrapper functions","No built-in persistence layer — workflow state exists only in memory during execution","Max iteration limits are hard-coded; no dynamic termination based on goal achievement","No distributed execution support; workflows run on a single process","CLI interface is limited to simple configuration; complex agent logic requires code","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.07895807121644255,"quality":0.41,"ecosystem":0.7000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.328Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:04:47.473Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":308,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=ai-agent-test","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=ai-agent-test"}},"signature":"eFKSJjHepzQSG1pGCdjyhtTcklyDhKIdcAot8rGRNWwN2YFeiDmQ5gH7q6uHXrX2lcoGkSeYSWRJk+xMK0mHAw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T23:44:51.992Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/ai-agent-test","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/ai-agent-test","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=ai-agent-test","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}