{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_ageorg06-mcp","slug":"ageorg06-mcp","name":"mcp","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/ageorg06/mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/ageorg06-mcp","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:ageorg06/mcp"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_ageorg06-mcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.model.context.protocol.server.instantiation.and.lifecycle.management","name":"model context protocol server instantiation and lifecycle management","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, handling bidirectional JSON-RPC communication between LLM clients and resource/tool providers. Manages server initialization, capability advertisement, request routing, and graceful shutdown using the MCP transport layer (stdio, SSE, or custom). Provides standardized hooks for resource discovery, tool registration, and prompt template management.","intents":["I need to expose my custom tools and resources to Claude, ChatGPT, or other LLM clients via a standardized protocol","I want to build a server that advertises capabilities (tools, resources, prompts) that LLMs can discover and invoke","I need to handle concurrent requests from multiple LLM clients while maintaining isolated execution contexts"],"best_for":["Teams building LLM-integrated applications that need standardized tool/resource exposure","Developers creating reusable MCP servers for distribution via Smithery or similar registries","Organizations standardizing on MCP for multi-LLM provider compatibility"],"limitations":["Protocol overhead adds ~50-150ms per request-response cycle depending on transport (stdio slower than SSE)","No built-in authentication/authorization — security must be implemented at transport or application layer","Requires explicit capability schema definition; no automatic introspection from existing APIs","Single-threaded event loop in most implementations; high-concurrency workloads need careful resource pooling"],"requires":["MCP client library compatible with your LLM platform (e.g., Claude SDK, custom implementation)","Transport layer support (stdio for local, SSE/WebSocket for remote)","JSON-RPC 2.0 compatible message serialization"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 requests","Tool invocation payloads with typed arguments","Resource URIs and query parameters"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 responses","Tool execution results (text, structured data, or binary)","Resource content (text, JSON, or streaming)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-protocol"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ageorg06-mcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.schema.definition.and.json.rpc.invocation.routing","name":"tool schema definition and json-rpc invocation routing","description":"Provides a declarative schema system for defining tools with typed input parameters, descriptions, and execution handlers. Routes incoming JSON-RPC tool_call requests to registered handler functions, validates arguments against schemas, and returns results or errors in MCP-compliant format. Supports nested object schemas, enums, and optional/required field constraints using JSON Schema subset.","intents":["I want to define a tool with strict input validation so LLMs can't call it with malformed arguments","I need to expose multiple tools from my service and have the MCP server route calls to the correct handler","I want to provide rich descriptions and parameter documentation so LLMs understand how to use my tools"],"best_for":["Developers building agent systems that require reliable tool invocation with input validation","Teams exposing internal APIs or microservices via MCP without rewriting them","LLM application builders who need deterministic tool behavior and error handling"],"limitations":["Schema validation is synchronous; complex validation logic must be implemented in handler functions","No built-in retry logic or circuit breaker for tool execution failures","Tool execution is blocking; long-running operations will stall the event loop unless explicitly async","Error responses are JSON-RPC errors; no structured error codes beyond standard -32000 to -32099 range"],"requires":["JSON Schema compatible schema definitions for tool parameters","Async or sync handler functions matching the tool signature","MCP server instance with tool registration support"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC tool_call requests with typed arguments","Schema definitions (JSON Schema subset)"],"output_types":["Tool execution results (any JSON-serializable type)","JSON-RPC error responses with error codes and messages"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ageorg06-mcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.resource.uri.based.content.retrieval.and.streaming","name":"resource uri-based content retrieval and streaming","description":"Implements a resource discovery and retrieval system where tools and prompts reference external resources via URIs (e.g., file://, http://, custom://). The server resolves URIs, streams content back to clients, and supports MIME type negotiation. Resources can be static files, dynamically generated content, or references to external systems, enabling separation of tool definitions from their supporting data.","intents":["I want my tools to reference external documents, templates, or data without embedding them in the schema","I need to serve large files or streaming content to LLM clients without loading everything into memory","I want to provide context-specific resources (e.g., user-specific documents) that are resolved at request time"],"best_for":["Systems with large knowledge bases or document collections that tools need to reference","Applications requiring dynamic resource resolution based on request context","Teams building RAG-adjacent systems where resources are fetched on-demand"],"limitations":["Resource streaming is unidirectional; clients cannot push updates back to the server","No built-in caching; repeated resource requests will re-fetch from origin","URI resolution is synchronous; slow backends will block the event loop","MIME type negotiation is basic; complex content negotiation requires custom handlers"],"requires":["URI scheme handlers for supported resource types (file, http, custom)","MIME type mappings for content type negotiation","Resource storage or retrieval backend (filesystem, database, HTTP service)"],"input_types":["Resource URIs (string)","Optional MIME type preferences"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, binary, or streaming)","MIME type metadata","Content length and encoding information"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ageorg06-mcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.template.registration.and.context.injection","name":"prompt template registration and context injection","description":"Allows registration of reusable prompt templates with variable placeholders that LLM clients can discover and instantiate. Templates support argument substitution, optional sections, and metadata (name, description, tags). The server stores templates and returns them on request, enabling clients to use standardized prompts without hardcoding them. Supports both static templates and dynamically generated prompts based on request context.","intents":["I want to provide standardized system prompts or few-shot examples that LLM clients can use without reimplementing them","I need to version and update prompts centrally without modifying client code","I want to expose domain-specific prompt templates (e.g., code review, documentation generation) that clients can discover"],"best_for":["Teams managing multiple LLM applications that share common prompt patterns","Organizations standardizing on prompt engineering best practices across teams","Developers building prompt marketplaces or template libraries"],"limitations":["Template variables are simple string substitution; no conditional logic or loops","No built-in versioning; template updates affect all clients immediately","Template discovery is basic; no full-text search or filtering beyond tags","No audit trail for template changes or usage analytics"],"requires":["Prompt template definitions with variable placeholders","Metadata (name, description, tags) for each template","Storage backend for template persistence"],"input_types":["Prompt template definitions (string with placeholders)","Template metadata (JSON)","Variable values for substitution (key-value pairs)"],"output_types":["Instantiated prompt text (string)","Template metadata and discovery information"],"categories":["text-generation-language","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ageorg06-mcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.capability.advertisement.and.client.discovery","name":"capability advertisement and client discovery","description":"Implements the MCP initialization handshake where the server advertises its supported capabilities (tools, resources, prompts) to connecting clients. Uses a structured capability manifest that includes tool schemas, resource types, and prompt templates. Clients use this manifest to discover what the server can do without trial-and-error or documentation lookups. Supports capability versioning and optional features.","intents":["I want LLM clients to automatically discover what tools and resources my server provides","I need to communicate tool capabilities, parameters, and limitations to clients in a machine-readable format","I want to support multiple versions of my API and let clients negotiate which capabilities to use"],"best_for":["Teams building extensible MCP servers that clients need to auto-discover","Organizations with multiple MCP servers that need to advertise different capability sets","Developers building MCP client libraries that need to introspect server capabilities"],"limitations":["Capability manifest is static at initialization; dynamic capability changes require reconnection","No built-in capability versioning; version negotiation must be custom-implemented","Manifest size grows linearly with number of tools; large tool sets may impact initialization time","No capability deprecation mechanism; removing tools may break existing clients"],"requires":["MCP server instance with initialization support","Tool, resource, and prompt definitions to advertise","Client support for MCP capability negotiation"],"input_types":["Tool schemas, resource types, and prompt templates"],"output_types":["Capability manifest (JSON)","Server metadata (name, version, description)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_ageorg06-mcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.bidirectional.json.rpc.message.transport.and.error.handling","name":"bidirectional json-rpc message transport and error handling","description":"Manages bidirectional JSON-RPC 2.0 communication between server and clients using configurable transport layers (stdio, SSE, WebSocket, or custom). Handles message serialization/deserialization, request/response correlation, error propagation, and connection lifecycle. Implements proper JSON-RPC error codes (-32700 to -32099) for parse errors, invalid requests, and method not found. Supports both request-response and notification patterns.","intents":["I need reliable message delivery between my MCP server and LLM clients with proper error handling","I want to support multiple transport mechanisms (local stdio, remote HTTP, WebSocket) without rewriting the server logic","I need to handle connection failures, timeouts, and malformed messages gracefully"],"best_for":["Teams building production MCP servers that need robust error handling and multiple transport options","Developers integrating MCP into existing systems with specific transport requirements","Organizations requiring high-reliability tool invocation with proper error propagation"],"limitations":["JSON-RPC error codes are limited; complex error scenarios require custom error data fields","Message ordering is guaranteed per connection but not across multiple concurrent connections","No built-in message compression; large payloads increase latency on slow connections","Transport-specific issues (e.g., SSE connection limits, WebSocket frame size) require custom handling"],"requires":["JSON-RPC 2.0 compatible message format","Transport layer implementation (stdio, SSE, WebSocket, or custom)","Error handling strategy for transport-specific failures"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (method, params, id)","JSON-RPC 2.0 notifications (method, params, no id)"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 responses (result, error, id)","JSON-RPC 2.0 error objects (code, message, data)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client library compatible with your LLM platform (e.g., Claude SDK, custom implementation)","Transport layer support (stdio for local, SSE/WebSocket for remote)","JSON-RPC 2.0 compatible message serialization","JSON Schema compatible schema definitions for tool parameters","Async or sync handler functions matching the tool signature","MCP server instance with tool registration support","URI scheme handlers for supported resource types (file, http, custom)","MIME type mappings for content type negotiation","Resource storage or retrieval backend (filesystem, database, HTTP service)","Prompt template definitions with variable placeholders"],"failure_modes":["Protocol overhead adds ~50-150ms per request-response cycle depending on transport (stdio slower than SSE)","No built-in authentication/authorization — security must be implemented at transport or application layer","Requires explicit capability schema definition; no automatic introspection from existing APIs","Single-threaded event loop in most implementations; high-concurrency workloads need careful resource pooling","Schema validation is synchronous; complex validation logic must be implemented in handler functions","No built-in retry logic or circuit breaker for tool execution failures","Tool execution is blocking; long-running operations will stall the event loop unless explicitly async","Error responses are JSON-RPC errors; no structured error codes beyond standard -32000 to -32099 range","Resource streaming is unidirectional; clients cannot push updates back to the server","No built-in caching; repeated resource requests will re-fetch from origin","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.062Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:25.720Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=ageorg06-mcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=ageorg06-mcp"}},"signature":"7AWEyFen1Quv/oD8AAZeJhFt+dTe6Le6Xv8WDgzkWh10PoWblm7Nu7VTiiXJVtyLnhsOZXad9oE3oqBpAN4mCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T00:20:29.886Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/ageorg06-mcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/ageorg06-mcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=ageorg06-mcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}