{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-agentera--agently","slug":"agentera--agently","name":"Agently","type":"agent","url":"http://agently.tech","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/agentera--agently","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":["agent","agent-based-framework","agent-framework","chatglm","claude","ernie","framework","gemini","google-gemini","gpt","llm-agent","llm-application","llm-apps","llm-framework","llmops","llms","minimax","python","wenxinyiyan"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.fluent.chained.agent.interaction.interface","name":"fluent-chained-agent-interaction-interface","description":"Provides a method-chaining fluent API for defining agent behavior through sequential calls like input().instruct().output().start(), eliminating boilerplate configuration code. The Agent class coordinates runtime context and components through a builder pattern, allowing developers to compose complex agent instructions declaratively without nested function calls or configuration objects.","intents":["I want to quickly define what an agent should do without writing verbose configuration","I need to chain multiple instructions together in a readable, linear way","I want to see agent behavior flow as a sequence of method calls"],"best_for":["Python developers building LLM agents rapidly","teams prototyping agent-based applications with minimal boilerplate","developers migrating from verbose LLM SDKs to declarative frameworks"],"limitations":["Fluent interface only supports sequential chaining — parallel instruction branches require separate agent instances","Method chaining can obscure error handling if exceptions occur mid-chain","IDE autocomplete support depends on type hints being complete across all chainable methods"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework installed via pip","At least one LLM provider API key (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"],"input_types":["text strings (input prompts)","structured data (via input() method)","agent instructions (via instruct() method)"],"output_types":["text responses","structured data (JSON, dictionaries)","agent execution results"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","developer-experience"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.plugin.based.multi.provider.llm.abstraction","name":"plugin-based-multi-provider-llm-abstraction","description":"Abstracts communication with diverse LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Bedrock, Claude, ChatGLM, Gemini, Ernie, Minimax) through a RequestSystem plugin architecture that normalizes API differences into a unified interface. Each provider is implemented as a plugin that handles authentication, request formatting, and response parsing, allowing model switching without application code changes.","intents":["I want to switch between different LLM providers without rewriting my agent code","I need to support multiple model providers for cost optimization or redundancy","I want to abstract away provider-specific API details from my business logic"],"best_for":["teams evaluating multiple LLM providers","applications requiring model portability across cloud providers","cost-conscious builders needing to switch between expensive and cheaper models"],"limitations":["Plugin architecture adds ~50-100ms overhead per request due to abstraction layer indirection","Advanced provider-specific features (like OpenAI's vision_detail parameter) may not be exposed through the unified interface","Custom plugins require understanding the RequestSystem plugin contract and may lag behind provider API updates"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","API keys for desired LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.)","Network connectivity to provider endpoints","Agently framework with provider plugins installed"],"input_types":["prompt text","structured request parameters","model configuration objects"],"output_types":["normalized LLM responses","structured completion objects","token usage metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","model-abstraction"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_10","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.construction.and.template.system","name":"prompt-construction-and-template-system","description":"Provides a prompt construction system that builds LLM prompts from agent instructions, roles, tools, and context through a template-based approach. The system composes prompts dynamically based on agent configuration, role definitions, and available tools, enabling flexible prompt engineering without manual string concatenation or template management.","intents":["I want to construct prompts dynamically based on agent configuration","I need to include role definitions, tools, and context in prompts automatically","I want to manage prompt templates without hardcoding strings"],"best_for":["teams building prompt-driven agent systems","applications requiring dynamic prompt composition","developers optimizing prompts for different agent configurations"],"limitations":["Prompt composition is deterministic — no randomization or A/B testing built-in","Complex prompt logic requires understanding the template system internals","Prompt length is not automatically optimized — may exceed token limits for large contexts"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework","Understanding of prompt engineering principles"],"input_types":["agent instructions","role definitions","tool descriptions","context data"],"output_types":["constructed prompts","formatted prompt strings","prompt metadata"],"categories":["text-generation-language","prompt-engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_11","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.application.integration.and.deployment.patterns","name":"application-integration-and-deployment-patterns","description":"Provides patterns and examples for integrating Agently agents into production applications, including web frameworks, microservices, and deployment scenarios. The framework includes examples for FastAPI integration, MCP server patterns, and application-level orchestration, enabling agents to be embedded in larger systems with clear integration points.","intents":["I want to integrate agents into my existing web application","I need patterns for deploying agents in production","I want to understand how to orchestrate agents at the application level"],"best_for":["teams integrating agents into production systems","developers building agent-based microservices","applications requiring agent deployment and scaling"],"limitations":["Integration patterns are examples — production deployment requires customization for specific infrastructure","No built-in scaling or load balancing — requires external orchestration (Kubernetes, etc.)","Agent state management across deployments requires external persistence"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework","Web framework (FastAPI, Flask, etc.) for integration","Understanding of application architecture patterns"],"input_types":["application code","deployment configurations","integration patterns"],"output_types":["integrated agent endpoints","deployed agent services","application-level orchestration"],"categories":["automation-workflow","application-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_12","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.runtime.context.state.coordination","name":"runtime-context-state-coordination","description":"Maintains execution state through a RuntimeContext object that coordinates between Agent, Components, and RequestSystem during execution. The RuntimeContext tracks agent state, component interactions, and execution metadata, enabling components to access shared state without explicit parameter passing and supporting complex multi-component agent behaviors.","intents":["I want components to share state without explicit parameter passing","I need to track agent execution state across multiple steps","I want components to access shared context during execution"],"best_for":["teams building complex multi-component agents","applications requiring shared state between agent components","developers building stateful agent workflows"],"limitations":["RuntimeContext is instance-scoped — no cross-agent state sharing without explicit APIs","State mutations in components can have unintended side effects if not carefully managed","Debugging state changes across components requires instrumentation or logging"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework","Understanding of shared state patterns"],"input_types":["agent execution context","component state","execution metadata"],"output_types":["shared state objects","context-aware component behavior","execution metadata"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","state-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_13","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.factory.configuration.and.instantiation","name":"agent-factory-configuration-and-instantiation","description":"Provides AgentFactory for creating and configuring Agent instances with consistent initialization and configuration management. The factory pattern enables centralized agent creation with default configurations, provider setup, and component registration, reducing boilerplate and ensuring consistent agent initialization across applications.","intents":["I want a centralized way to create agents with consistent configuration","I need to manage default settings for all agents in my application","I want to avoid repeating agent setup code across my codebase"],"best_for":["teams managing multiple agent instances","applications requiring consistent agent configuration","developers building agent factories for different use cases"],"limitations":["Factory configuration is static — dynamic configuration changes require factory recreation","No built-in configuration validation — invalid configurations are detected at agent creation time","Factory scope is application-level — no per-request factory customization without explicit APIs"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework","Agent configuration parameters"],"input_types":["factory configuration objects","provider settings","component definitions"],"output_types":["configured Agent instances","factory-created agents","agent configuration metadata"],"categories":["automation-workflow","configuration-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.event.driven.trigger.flow.orchestration","name":"event-driven-trigger-flow-orchestration","description":"Provides TriggerFlow, an event-driven workflow system that manages complex agent logic through event listeners and triggers rather than imperative control flow. Components register EventListener plugins that respond to agent lifecycle events (execution start, step completion, error), enabling decoupled, reactive agent behavior patterns without explicit state machines or callback nesting.","intents":["I want to handle agent events (like step completion) without nested callbacks","I need to trigger side effects (logging, notifications, state updates) based on agent execution events","I want to manage complex multi-step agent workflows with clear event dependencies"],"best_for":["teams building event-driven agent architectures","applications requiring reactive agent behavior and side-effect management","developers familiar with event-driven patterns (Node.js, Reactive frameworks)"],"limitations":["Event ordering is sequential within a single agent execution — no built-in support for concurrent event handling","Debugging event flows can be challenging without proper logging instrumentation","Event listener registration is global per agent instance — no scoped event contexts"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework with TriggerFlow module","Understanding of event-driven architecture patterns"],"input_types":["event trigger definitions","event listener callbacks","agent execution context"],"output_types":["event execution results","side-effect outcomes","workflow state transitions"],"categories":["automation-workflow","event-handling"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.modular.component.system.capability.extension","name":"modular-component-system-capability-extension","description":"Extends agent functionality through a ComponentSystem of pluggable modules (EventListener, Tool, Role) that add capabilities without creating new agent types. Components are registered with agents and coordinate through the RuntimeContext, allowing composition of agent behaviors like role-based identity, tool integration, and event handling as independent, reusable plugins.","intents":["I want to add specific capabilities to an agent without subclassing or forking the Agent class","I need to reuse agent components (like roles or tools) across multiple agents","I want to compose agent behaviors from modular, independently-testable pieces"],"best_for":["teams building agent libraries with reusable components","applications requiring flexible agent capability composition","developers preferring composition over inheritance patterns"],"limitations":["Component interaction is implicit through RuntimeContext — no explicit dependency injection framework","Component lifecycle management (initialization, cleanup) is agent-instance-scoped, not global","No built-in component versioning or compatibility checking between components"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework","Understanding of component-based architecture patterns"],"input_types":["component class definitions","component configuration objects","runtime context state"],"output_types":["extended agent capabilities","component execution results","modified runtime context"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","architecture-patterns"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.unified.tool.integration.with.function.registry","name":"unified-tool-integration-with-function-registry","description":"Provides a Tool component that integrates external functions and APIs into agents through a function registry pattern. Tools are registered as components with agents, exposing function signatures and descriptions to the LLM, enabling the agent to call external functions with automatic parameter binding and error handling through the RequestSystem.","intents":["I want to give agents the ability to call external functions and APIs","I need to expose function signatures to the LLM so it can decide when to call them","I want automatic parameter binding and error handling for tool calls"],"best_for":["teams building agents that interact with external systems","applications requiring function calling across multiple APIs","developers building agent-based automation workflows"],"limitations":["Tool parameter validation relies on function signatures — complex nested types may not serialize correctly to LLM function schemas","No built-in retry logic for failed tool calls — requires manual error handling in event listeners","Tool execution is synchronous by default — async tools require explicit async/await handling"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework with Tool component","Functions or APIs to integrate as tools","LLM provider supporting function calling (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"],"input_types":["Python functions","API endpoints","function signatures with type hints"],"output_types":["tool execution results","function return values","error messages from failed tool calls"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","function-calling"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.system.with.checkpoints.and.state.management","name":"workflow-system-with-checkpoints-and-state-management","description":"Provides a WorkflowSystem that orchestrates multi-step agent tasks with explicit checkpoints and state persistence. Workflows define sequences of agent steps, with checkpoints capturing execution state at key points, enabling resumption from failures, visualization of workflow progress, and management of complex task dependencies without manual state tracking.","intents":["I want to define multi-step agent workflows with clear checkpoints","I need to resume workflows from checkpoints if they fail mid-execution","I want to visualize workflow progress and execution state"],"best_for":["teams building long-running agent workflows","applications requiring fault tolerance and resumable execution","developers needing visibility into multi-step agent processes"],"limitations":["Checkpoint storage requires external persistence layer — no built-in database integration","Workflow visualization is static (generated at runtime) — no real-time progress updates","State management is workflow-scoped — no cross-workflow state sharing without explicit APIs"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework with WorkflowSystem module","External storage for checkpoint persistence (database, file system, etc.)","Understanding of workflow definition patterns"],"input_types":["workflow step definitions","checkpoint configurations","workflow state objects"],"output_types":["workflow execution results","checkpoint state snapshots","workflow visualization diagrams"],"categories":["automation-workflow","state-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_6","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.role.based.agent.identity.and.behavior.shaping","name":"role-based-agent-identity-and-behavior-shaping","description":"Provides a Role component that shapes agent identity and behavior through role definitions that influence prompt construction and response generation. Roles are registered as components and modify how agents interpret instructions and generate responses, enabling persona-based agent variants without code duplication through the prompt construction system.","intents":["I want to define agent personas or roles that influence behavior","I need to create multiple agent variants with different identities from a single agent class","I want to shape agent responses through role-based prompting without code changes"],"best_for":["teams building multi-persona agent systems","applications requiring role-based behavior variation","developers creating agent templates with pluggable identities"],"limitations":["Role influence on behavior is prompt-based — no guarantee of consistent role adherence across all responses","Role conflicts are not detected — multiple roles may produce contradictory instructions","Role effectiveness depends on LLM capability — weaker models may ignore role instructions"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework with Role component","LLM provider with good instruction-following capability"],"input_types":["role definitions (text descriptions)","role characteristics","role-specific instructions"],"output_types":["role-influenced agent responses","persona-consistent outputs","modified prompt constructions"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","prompt-engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.asynchronous.agent.execution.with.async.await","name":"asynchronous-agent-execution-with-async-await","description":"Supports asynchronous agent execution through async/await patterns, allowing non-blocking agent operations and concurrent execution of multiple agents. The Agent class provides async methods that integrate with Python's asyncio event loop, enabling agents to be used in async applications without blocking I/O or computation.","intents":["I want to run multiple agents concurrently without blocking","I need to integrate agents into async web frameworks (FastAPI, Starlette)","I want non-blocking I/O for agent operations in production applications"],"best_for":["teams building async web applications with agents","applications requiring concurrent agent execution","developers using async frameworks (FastAPI, Starlette, aiohttp)"],"limitations":["Async support requires all components and tools to be async-compatible — blocking tools will still block the event loop","Debugging async agent execution is more complex than synchronous execution","Error handling in async contexts requires explicit exception propagation through await chains"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework with async support","Understanding of Python asyncio patterns","Async-compatible LLM provider clients"],"input_types":["async agent definitions","async tool functions","async event listeners"],"output_types":["coroutine objects","async execution results","concurrent agent outputs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","async-programming"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_8","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.model.context.protocol.mcp.server.integration","name":"model-context-protocol-mcp-server-integration","description":"Integrates with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers to extend agent capabilities through standardized MCP tool definitions. Agents can connect to MCP servers, discover available tools through the protocol, and execute them with automatic parameter marshaling, enabling integration with any MCP-compatible service without custom adapters.","intents":["I want to connect agents to MCP servers for standardized tool access","I need to discover and use tools from MCP servers dynamically","I want to avoid writing custom adapters for each external service"],"best_for":["teams using MCP-compatible services and tools","applications requiring standardized tool integration","developers building agent ecosystems with MCP servers"],"limitations":["MCP server availability and latency directly impact agent performance","Tool discovery is dynamic — no compile-time validation of available tools","Error handling for MCP server failures requires explicit error handling in agents"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework with MCP integration module","Access to MCP servers (local or remote)","MCP server definitions and connection details"],"input_types":["MCP server connection details","MCP tool definitions","MCP protocol messages"],"output_types":["discovered MCP tools","MCP tool execution results","tool parameter schemas"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","protocol-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-agentera--agently__cap_9","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.structured.data.input.output.with.schema.validation","name":"structured-data-input-output-with-schema-validation","description":"Enables agents to work with structured data (JSON, dictionaries, objects) through input() and output() methods with schema validation. The framework validates structured inputs against expected schemas and ensures outputs conform to specified formats, enabling type-safe agent interactions without manual serialization or validation code.","intents":["I want to pass structured data to agents with schema validation","I need agents to return structured outputs that conform to expected formats","I want type safety for agent inputs and outputs without manual validation"],"best_for":["teams building agent APIs with structured contracts","applications requiring type-safe agent interactions","developers integrating agents with typed backend systems"],"limitations":["Schema validation adds latency (~10-50ms per validation) for complex schemas","LLM-generated structured outputs may not always conform to schemas — requires fallback parsing","Schema definition requires explicit type annotations or schema objects"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework","Schema definitions (Pydantic models, JSON schemas, or type hints)","LLM provider supporting structured output (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"],"input_types":["dictionaries","JSON objects","Pydantic models","typed Python objects"],"output_types":["validated structured data","JSON objects","typed Python objects","schema-conforming outputs"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","type-safety"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":49,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+","Agently framework installed via pip","At least one LLM provider API key (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","API keys for desired LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.)","Network connectivity to provider endpoints","Agently framework with provider plugins installed","Agently framework","Understanding of prompt engineering principles","Web framework (FastAPI, Flask, etc.) for integration","Understanding of application architecture patterns"],"failure_modes":["Fluent interface only supports sequential chaining — parallel instruction branches require separate agent instances","Method chaining can obscure error handling if exceptions occur mid-chain","IDE autocomplete support depends on type hints being complete across all chainable methods","Plugin architecture adds ~50-100ms overhead per request due to abstraction layer indirection","Advanced provider-specific features (like OpenAI's vision_detail parameter) may not be exposed through the unified interface","Custom plugins require understanding the RequestSystem plugin contract and may lag behind provider API updates","Prompt composition is deterministic — no randomization or A/B testing built-in","Complex prompt logic requires understanding the template system internals","Prompt length is not automatically optimized — may exceed token limits for large contexts","Integration patterns are examples — production deployment requires customization for specific infrastructure","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.4729147751962912,"quality":0.6,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:21.549Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:57:11.504Z","last_commit":"2026-05-02T15:20:04Z"},"community":{"stars":1568,"forks":174,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=agentera--agently","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=agentera--agently"}},"signature":"6B+M3CqlcbMp566Q/ln6YHjJy+ngVosL3aPFC2useiL4nYcNm8kF8cHVQa67WAPf/aPwYxBvhKydCJY31q7rAA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T18:41:40.384Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/agentera--agently","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/agentera--agently","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=agentera--agently","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}