{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hn-47165046","slug":"agent-swarm-multi-agent-self-learning-teams","name":"Agent Swarm – Multi-agent self-learning teams","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/desplega-ai/agent-swarm","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/agent-swarm-multi-agent-self-learning-teams","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":["hackernews","show-hn"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.agent.orchestration.with.dynamic.team.composition","name":"multi-agent orchestration with dynamic team composition","description":"Coordinates multiple specialized agents that can be dynamically instantiated, assigned roles, and managed as a cohesive swarm. Uses a central orchestrator pattern to dispatch tasks to agents based on capability matching, handle inter-agent communication, and aggregate results. Agents maintain independent state but share a common execution context, enabling collaborative problem-solving without explicit pre-defined workflows.","intents":["I want to parallelize complex tasks across multiple specialized agents that work together","I need agents to dynamically form teams based on task requirements without hardcoding workflows","I want agents to communicate and coordinate without a centralized bottleneck"],"best_for":["teams building autonomous systems that require task decomposition across specialized agents","developers prototyping multi-agent reasoning systems where agent roles emerge dynamically","organizations automating complex workflows that benefit from parallel agent execution"],"limitations":["no built-in distributed execution — all agents run in same process/machine, limiting horizontal scaling","inter-agent communication latency increases with swarm size; no documented performance benchmarks for >50 agents","requires explicit agent capability registration; no automatic capability discovery from agent code"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible provider)","sufficient memory for concurrent agent state (estimated 50-100MB per agent)"],"input_types":["natural language task descriptions","structured task definitions with constraints","agent capability schemas"],"output_types":["aggregated results from multiple agents","execution trace with agent interactions","structured task completion status"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","multi-agent-systems"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.self.learning.agent.behavior.adaptation","name":"self-learning agent behavior adaptation","description":"Agents learn from task execution outcomes and adjust their behavior, decision-making, and tool usage patterns over time. Implements a feedback loop where agents capture execution traces, evaluate success/failure, and update internal models or prompts to improve future performance. Learning may occur through prompt refinement, tool selection optimization, or parameter tuning without explicit retraining.","intents":["I want agents to improve their performance on repeated task types without manual intervention","I need agents to learn which tools work best for specific problem classes","I want to capture and apply lessons from failed executions to future attempts"],"best_for":["long-running systems where agents encounter similar task patterns repeatedly","teams wanting to reduce manual prompt engineering through automated behavior optimization","applications where agent performance metrics can be automatically evaluated"],"limitations":["learning mechanism unclear from documentation — may be limited to in-memory prompt adjustment without persistent model updates","no explicit mechanism for preventing negative learning or catastrophic forgetting","learning effectiveness depends on quality of feedback signals; no built-in evaluation framework provided","no multi-agent learning coordination — agents learn independently without sharing insights across swarm"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM API with sufficient context window for storing execution traces","mechanism to evaluate task success/failure (custom evaluation function or external feedback)"],"input_types":["task execution traces","success/failure feedback signals","performance metrics"],"output_types":["updated agent behavior/prompts","learning metrics and improvement curves","tool selection preferences"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_10","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.dynamic.agent.spawning.and.lifecycle.management","name":"dynamic agent spawning and lifecycle management","description":"Enables runtime creation of new agents based on task requirements, with automatic initialization, capability registration, and lifecycle management. Agents can be spawned on-demand for specific tasks and terminated when no longer needed. Lifecycle includes initialization, active execution, idle waiting, and graceful shutdown with state preservation.","intents":["I want to create specialized agents on-demand for specific task types","I need to scale the swarm up/down based on workload","I want to ensure agents are properly initialized and cleaned up"],"best_for":["systems with variable workload requiring dynamic scaling","applications where agent specialization is task-dependent","teams building elastic multi-agent systems"],"limitations":["agent spawning overhead not documented; may be expensive for frequent creation","no documented mechanism for agent template or factory patterns","no automatic load balancing for agent creation across resources","lifecycle hooks may be limited; no documented pre/post-initialization callbacks"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","agent template or factory implementation","resource management (memory, CPU) for spawned agents"],"input_types":["agent specification (type, capabilities, configuration)","task requirements","resource constraints"],"output_types":["spawned agent instances","agent lifecycle events","resource utilization metrics"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_11","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.knowledge.sharing.and.collective.learning.across.swarm","name":"knowledge sharing and collective learning across swarm","description":"Enables agents to share learned knowledge, insights, and best practices with other agents in the swarm. Implements mechanisms for knowledge aggregation, consensus building, and propagation of improvements. Knowledge may be shared through a central knowledge base, peer-to-peer communication, or emergent consensus protocols.","intents":["I want agents to learn from each other's successes and failures","I need to aggregate insights from multiple agents into collective knowledge","I want improvements discovered by one agent to benefit the entire swarm"],"best_for":["long-running swarms where collective learning provides value","systems where agent diversity benefits from knowledge cross-pollination","teams building swarms that improve over time through shared experience"],"limitations":["knowledge sharing mechanism unclear — may be limited to simple result aggregation","no documented consensus protocol or conflict resolution for contradictory knowledge","no mechanism to prevent negative knowledge propagation or misinformation","knowledge freshness and staleness not addressed"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","knowledge representation format (embeddings, rules, or structured data)","knowledge storage and retrieval mechanism"],"input_types":["agent execution results and insights","performance metrics","learned patterns and rules"],"output_types":["aggregated knowledge base","consensus insights","knowledge propagation updates"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.agent.capability.registration.and.discovery","name":"agent capability registration and discovery","description":"Provides a registry system where agents declare their capabilities (tools, skills, knowledge domains) in a machine-readable format. The orchestrator uses this registry to match agent capabilities against task requirements, enabling dynamic agent selection and task routing. Capabilities are typically defined as schemas describing input/output types, preconditions, and performance characteristics.","intents":["I want the system to automatically select the right agent for each subtask based on declared capabilities","I need to add new agent capabilities without modifying orchestration logic","I want visibility into what each agent can do and how to invoke it"],"best_for":["systems with heterogeneous agents having different skill sets","teams building extensible agent systems where capabilities are added incrementally","applications requiring transparent agent capability auditing"],"limitations":["no semantic capability matching — likely uses string/keyword matching rather than understanding capability semantics","no capability versioning or deprecation mechanism documented","no conflict resolution when multiple agents claim overlapping capabilities","capability schemas must be manually maintained; no automatic schema inference from agent code"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","capability schema definition format (JSON Schema or similar)","agent implementation that exposes capability metadata"],"input_types":["capability schema definitions","agent metadata","task requirement specifications"],"output_types":["capability registry (queryable data structure)","agent-to-capability mappings","capability match scores for task routing"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.inter.agent.communication.and.message.passing","name":"inter-agent communication and message passing","description":"Enables agents to send messages, share results, and coordinate actions through a message bus or queue system. Messages may include task results, status updates, requests for assistance, or shared knowledge. The communication layer abstracts transport details (in-process, network, queue-based) and ensures message ordering and delivery semantics.","intents":["I want agents to request help from other agents when they encounter unsolvable subtasks","I need agents to share intermediate results without centralizing all data","I want to implement agent consensus or voting mechanisms for critical decisions"],"best_for":["collaborative multi-agent systems where agents need to exchange information","systems requiring agent-to-agent delegation or hierarchical task decomposition","applications where agents benefit from collective knowledge or consensus"],"limitations":["no documented message ordering guarantees or exactly-once delivery semantics","communication overhead not quantified; may become bottleneck with large swarms","no built-in message filtering, routing, or priority queuing","no mechanism for handling message timeouts or dead-letter scenarios"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","message serialization format (JSON, Protocol Buffers, or similar)","transport mechanism (in-process queue, Redis, RabbitMQ, or similar)"],"input_types":["structured messages with sender/recipient/payload","task delegation requests","result sharing payloads"],"output_types":["message delivery status","agent responses to messages","communication logs/traces"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.task.decomposition.and.subtask.generation","name":"task decomposition and subtask generation","description":"Automatically breaks down complex tasks into smaller, manageable subtasks that can be assigned to individual agents. Uses LLM-based reasoning to understand task dependencies, identify parallelizable work, and generate subtask specifications. The decomposition may be static (pre-planned) or dynamic (generated during execution based on intermediate results).","intents":["I want the system to automatically break down a complex task into agent-sized pieces","I need to identify task dependencies and parallelize independent subtasks","I want to handle tasks that reveal new subtasks during execution"],"best_for":["systems handling open-ended tasks with variable complexity","applications where task structure is not known in advance","teams automating workflows that require intelligent task breakdown"],"limitations":["decomposition quality depends on LLM reasoning; no guarantees on optimality or completeness","no mechanism to validate that generated subtasks are actually solvable by available agents","recursive decomposition may lead to excessive subtask proliferation without depth limits","no cost estimation for subtask execution; may generate expensive decompositions"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM API with strong reasoning capabilities (GPT-4, Claude 3+, or equivalent)","task specification format that LLM can parse and reason about"],"input_types":["high-level task descriptions","task constraints and requirements","agent capability information"],"output_types":["subtask list with dependencies","task execution plan/DAG","subtask assignments to agents"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.execution.tracing.and.observability","name":"execution tracing and observability","description":"Captures detailed execution traces including agent decisions, tool invocations, intermediate results, and performance metrics. Provides visibility into swarm behavior through logs, metrics, and visualization. Traces can be used for debugging, performance analysis, learning feedback, and audit trails.","intents":["I want to understand why agents made specific decisions and what information they used","I need to debug failures in multi-agent execution without black-box behavior","I want to measure agent performance and identify bottlenecks"],"best_for":["teams debugging complex multi-agent systems","applications requiring audit trails for compliance","systems where understanding agent reasoning is critical for trust"],"limitations":["trace storage overhead not quantified; may become expensive for long-running swarms","no built-in trace filtering or sampling for high-volume scenarios","trace format and schema not documented; may be tightly coupled to implementation","no real-time streaming of traces; likely batch collection only"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","storage for execution traces (file system, database, or logging service)","visualization tool (custom or third-party) to interpret traces"],"input_types":["agent execution events","tool invocation records","performance metrics"],"output_types":["structured execution logs","performance metrics and statistics","execution timeline/visualization data"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_6","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.agent.state.management.and.persistence","name":"agent state management and persistence","description":"Manages agent state across task executions, including memory of past interactions, learned behaviors, and context. Provides mechanisms to save/restore agent state, enabling agents to resume work after interruptions or share state across multiple task instances. State may be stored in-memory, in a database, or in a vector store for semantic retrieval.","intents":["I want agents to remember context from previous tasks and apply that knowledge","I need to persist agent state so they can resume interrupted work","I want agents to share learned knowledge across multiple task instances"],"best_for":["long-running systems where agents benefit from historical context","applications requiring agent state recovery after failures","teams building agents with persistent memory and learning"],"limitations":["state management approach unclear — may be limited to in-memory storage without persistence","no documented state versioning or rollback mechanisms","no conflict resolution for concurrent state updates from multiple agents","state size limits not documented; may impact scalability with large swarms"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","storage backend (in-memory, database, or vector store)","state serialization format (JSON, pickle, or similar)"],"input_types":["agent state snapshots","state update operations","context queries"],"output_types":["persisted agent state","state retrieval results","state change logs"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.recovery.in.multi.agent.execution","name":"error handling and recovery in multi-agent execution","description":"Implements mechanisms to detect, handle, and recover from failures in multi-agent execution. Includes retry logic, fallback strategies, agent reassignment when one fails, and graceful degradation. Errors may be task-level (subtask failure) or system-level (agent crash), with different recovery strategies for each.","intents":["I want the system to automatically retry failed subtasks with different agents","I need graceful degradation when some agents become unavailable","I want to handle partial failures without abandoning entire task execution"],"best_for":["production systems requiring high reliability","applications where task failure is costly and recovery is important","teams building resilient multi-agent systems"],"limitations":["retry strategy not documented; may lack exponential backoff or jitter","no mechanism to distinguish transient vs permanent failures","no circuit breaker pattern for failing agents; may retry indefinitely","recovery strategy may not account for partial task completion or side effects"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","error detection and classification logic","fallback agent pool or alternative execution strategies"],"input_types":["task execution results with error status","agent health/availability information","failure classification"],"output_types":["recovery actions (retry, reassign, fallback)","error logs and recovery traces","final task status (success, partial success, failure)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.performance.monitoring.and.optimization","name":"performance monitoring and optimization","description":"Tracks performance metrics across the swarm including agent utilization, task completion time, tool invocation costs, and LLM token usage. Provides insights into bottlenecks and enables optimization decisions such as agent rebalancing, tool selection optimization, or prompt refinement. Metrics may be collected in real-time or aggregated periodically.","intents":["I want to understand which agents are bottlenecks in my swarm","I need to optimize LLM token usage across multiple agents","I want to identify expensive tool invocations and find cheaper alternatives"],"best_for":["teams optimizing cost and performance of multi-agent systems","applications where LLM token usage is a significant cost factor","systems requiring continuous performance tuning"],"limitations":["metric collection overhead not quantified; may impact performance","no built-in alerting or anomaly detection for performance degradation","optimization recommendations likely manual; no automated optimization loop","no cost modeling for different execution strategies"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","metrics collection infrastructure (Prometheus, CloudWatch, or similar)","performance baseline for comparison"],"input_types":["agent execution metrics","tool invocation records","LLM API usage data"],"output_types":["performance dashboards/reports","bottleneck identification","optimization recommendations"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-47165046__cap_9","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.integration.and.function.calling.across.agents","name":"tool integration and function calling across agents","description":"Enables agents to invoke external tools, APIs, and functions as part of task execution. Provides a unified interface for tool registration, invocation, and result handling across the swarm. Tools may be local functions, REST APIs, or specialized services, with automatic parameter binding and error handling.","intents":["I want agents to call external APIs and tools to complete tasks","I need to make tools available to multiple agents without duplication","I want to control which agents can invoke which tools"],"best_for":["systems where agents need to interact with external services","applications requiring tool access control and auditing","teams building agent systems that augment LLM capabilities with external tools"],"limitations":["tool invocation latency not documented; may become bottleneck with many tools","no built-in tool result caching; repeated invocations may be expensive","tool parameter binding likely manual; no automatic schema inference from function signatures","no mechanism for tool versioning or deprecation"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","tool definitions (function signatures, API schemas, or similar)","API credentials for external tools"],"input_types":["tool definitions and schemas","tool invocation requests with parameters","agent capability requirements"],"output_types":["tool invocation results","tool availability/status information","tool usage logs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":42,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible provider)","sufficient memory for concurrent agent state (estimated 50-100MB per agent)","LLM API with sufficient context window for storing execution traces","mechanism to evaluate task success/failure (custom evaluation function or external feedback)","agent template or factory implementation","resource management (memory, CPU) for spawned agents","knowledge representation format (embeddings, rules, or structured data)","knowledge storage and retrieval mechanism","capability schema definition format (JSON Schema or similar)"],"failure_modes":["no built-in distributed execution — all agents run in same process/machine, limiting horizontal scaling","inter-agent communication latency increases with swarm size; no documented performance benchmarks for >50 agents","requires explicit agent capability registration; no automatic capability discovery from agent code","learning mechanism unclear from documentation — may be limited to in-memory prompt adjustment without persistent model updates","no explicit mechanism for preventing negative learning or catastrophic forgetting","learning effectiveness depends on quality of feedback signals; no built-in evaluation framework provided","no multi-agent learning coordination — agents learn independently without sharing insights across swarm","agent spawning overhead not documented; may be expensive for frequent creation","no documented mechanism for agent template or factory patterns","no automatic load balancing for agent creation across resources","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.58,"quality":0.34,"ecosystem":0.46,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.692Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-04T08:09:59.925Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=agent-swarm-multi-agent-self-learning-teams","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=agent-swarm-multi-agent-self-learning-teams"}},"signature":"+HMBL4KpQactdOvrjXgppkSo5hlf6EuG9OPF42ZgyVxWKSBpRwY6ReKGhuH/oJYAMgaBTawJMBluxipsyjRTCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T17:22:35.471Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/agent-swarm-multi-agent-self-learning-teams","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/agent-swarm-multi-agent-self-learning-teams","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=agent-swarm-multi-agent-self-learning-teams","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}