{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_adamcooke-contextgate","slug":"adamcooke-contextgate","name":"contextgate","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/adamcooke/contextgate","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/adamcooke-contextgate","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:adamcooke/contextgate"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_adamcooke-contextgate__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.protocol.implementation.with.context.routing","name":"mcp server protocol implementation with context routing","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, enabling bidirectional communication between AI clients and local/remote tools through a standardized message-passing interface. Routes context and tool requests through MCP's resource and tool discovery mechanisms, allowing clients to dynamically discover available capabilities and invoke them with structured arguments.","intents":["I need to expose local tools and data sources to Claude or other MCP-compatible AI clients","I want to build a bridge between my application's context and AI models without custom API layers","I need to standardize how my AI agents discover and call available functions"],"best_for":["AI application developers integrating with Claude Desktop or other MCP clients","Teams building multi-tool AI agent systems with standardized tool discovery","Developers migrating from custom tool-calling protocols to MCP standard"],"limitations":["Limited to MCP-compatible clients (Claude Desktop, some LLM frameworks) — not compatible with OpenAI function calling or other proprietary protocols without adapter layer","Requires client-side MCP support — cannot be used with basic REST API clients","No built-in authentication/authorization — relies on transport layer security (stdio, SSE, or custom transport)"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, LLM framework with MCP support, or custom MCP client)","Node.js or Python runtime depending on server implementation","Understanding of MCP protocol specification and message format"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Tool invocation requests with structured arguments","Resource requests with URI-based addressing"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Tool execution results with structured data","Resource content (text, JSON, binary)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-server"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_adamcooke-contextgate__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.dynamic.tool.and.resource.discovery.with.schema.validation","name":"dynamic tool and resource discovery with schema validation","description":"Exposes available tools and resources through MCP's discovery mechanisms, allowing clients to introspect capabilities before invocation. Validates tool schemas (input parameters, types, constraints) and resource metadata at registration time, ensuring type safety and enabling clients to generate appropriate UI or validation logic without hardcoding tool definitions.","intents":["I want my AI client to automatically discover what tools are available without hardcoding tool definitions","I need to ensure type-safe tool invocations with validated input schemas","I want to expose both callable tools and queryable resources (documents, data) through a unified discovery interface"],"best_for":["Developers building flexible AI agent systems that need to adapt to changing tool availability","Teams with multiple microservices that need to expose capabilities to AI clients dynamically","Applications requiring strong type safety between AI-generated tool calls and backend implementations"],"limitations":["Schema validation happens at registration time, not runtime — runtime type mismatches may still occur if client sends malformed arguments","No built-in schema versioning — breaking schema changes require client reconnection","Resource discovery is static per connection — dynamic resource addition requires reconnection"],"requires":["MCP client capable of parsing tool schemas (JSON Schema format)","Tool definitions with complete JSON Schema specifications for all parameters","Understanding of JSON Schema for complex nested parameter types"],"input_types":["Tool schema definitions (JSON Schema format)","Resource metadata (name, description, MIME type)","Tool invocation requests matching registered schemas"],"output_types":["Tool discovery response with complete schema definitions","Resource listing with metadata","Validation errors if invocation doesn't match schema"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_adamcooke-contextgate__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.context.aware.request.routing.and.execution","name":"context-aware request routing and execution","description":"Routes incoming tool invocation requests to appropriate handlers based on tool name and context, maintaining execution isolation and error handling per request. Implements request/response lifecycle management with proper error propagation back to the MCP client, ensuring that tool execution failures don't crash the server and that clients receive actionable error messages with context.","intents":["I need to route tool calls from my AI client to the correct backend implementation without manual switch statements","I want proper error handling so that one tool failure doesn't break the entire agent","I need to track which tool was called and why it failed for debugging and monitoring"],"best_for":["Developers building production AI agent systems requiring reliability and observability","Teams with multiple tool implementations that need centralized routing logic","Applications requiring detailed error context for debugging AI agent behavior"],"limitations":["Routing overhead adds latency per tool invocation (typically 5-50ms depending on handler complexity)","No built-in request queuing or rate limiting — high-concurrency scenarios may require external load balancing","Error context is limited to what the tool handler returns — no automatic stack trace capture for debugging"],"requires":["Tool handlers registered with the MCP server","Proper error handling in tool implementations (returning structured error responses)","Understanding of MCP error response format"],"input_types":["MCP tool invocation requests with tool name and arguments","Tool handler implementations (functions or classes)"],"output_types":["Tool execution results (success or error response)","MCP-formatted error messages with error codes and descriptions"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_adamcooke-contextgate__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.transport.agnostic.server.communication","name":"transport-agnostic server communication","description":"Supports multiple transport mechanisms for MCP communication (stdio, HTTP with Server-Sent Events, WebSocket, or custom transports), abstracting the underlying protocol details from tool and resource implementations. Allows the same tool definitions to work across different deployment scenarios (local CLI, cloud service, embedded in application) without code changes.","intents":["I want to run the same MCP server locally via stdio and also expose it over HTTP for remote clients","I need to deploy my tools to different environments (desktop, cloud, embedded) without rewriting integration code","I want to choose the transport mechanism that best fits my deployment architecture"],"best_for":["Developers building tools that need to work in multiple deployment contexts","Teams with both local and cloud-based AI agent systems","Organizations standardizing on MCP but with heterogeneous infrastructure"],"limitations":["Transport selection must be made at server startup — cannot dynamically switch transports","WebSocket transport requires additional dependencies and may have firewall/proxy issues","HTTP/SSE transport adds latency compared to stdio (typically 50-200ms per round-trip)","Custom transport implementations require deep understanding of MCP protocol and async I/O"],"requires":["MCP client compatible with chosen transport (e.g., Claude Desktop for stdio, HTTP client for SSE)","Network configuration appropriate for chosen transport (firewall rules for HTTP, etc.)","Runtime environment supporting chosen transport (Node.js for all, Python for some)"],"input_types":["Transport configuration (stdio, HTTP endpoint, WebSocket URL)","MCP protocol messages in transport-specific format"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses via chosen transport","Transport-specific error handling (connection failures, timeouts)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_adamcooke-contextgate__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.resource.exposure.and.querying","name":"resource exposure and querying","description":"Exposes application data and documents as queryable resources through MCP's resource mechanism, allowing AI clients to read and reference external content (files, database records, API responses) as context for reasoning. Resources are identified by URI and can include metadata (MIME type, size, modification time) enabling clients to make intelligent decisions about which resources to include in prompts.","intents":["I want my AI agent to read and reference files or documents from my application without embedding them in every prompt","I need to expose database records or API responses as context that the AI can query on-demand","I want the AI to understand what resources are available and their properties before deciding to read them"],"best_for":["Developers building AI agents that need access to large external knowledge bases or documents","Teams with document management systems that want to expose content to AI clients","Applications requiring dynamic context loading based on AI reasoning"],"limitations":["Resource content is fetched on-demand — large resources may cause latency spikes if AI requests many resources simultaneously","No built-in caching — repeated requests for same resource hit backend every time","Resource URIs must be stable and predictable — dynamic resource generation requires careful URI design","No built-in access control — authorization must be implemented in resource handlers"],"requires":["Resource handlers that can fetch content by URI","Stable URI scheme for identifying resources","Support for resource metadata (MIME type, size, etc.)"],"input_types":["Resource URI requests from MCP client","Resource metadata queries"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, JSON, binary)","Resource metadata (MIME type, size, modification time)","Resource listing with URIs and descriptions"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_adamcooke-contextgate__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.error.handling.and.graceful.degradation","name":"error handling and graceful degradation","description":"Implements MCP error response protocol with structured error codes and messages, handles resource/tool execution failures, and provides fallback mechanisms when context sources are unavailable. Uses MCP error response format to communicate failures back to clients in a standardized way, enabling clients to implement retry logic or alternative strategies.","intents":["I want errors from my context sources to be communicated clearly to Claude without crashing the server","I need to handle partial failures (some resources available, others down) gracefully","I want clients to understand error types so they can implement appropriate retry or fallback logic"],"best_for":["Production deployments where context sources may be temporarily unavailable","Systems integrating unreliable external APIs or databases","Applications requiring high availability and graceful degradation"],"limitations":["Error recovery is client-side responsibility — server doesn't implement automatic retries","No circuit breaker pattern — server will continue attempting to reach failing resources","Error messages may leak sensitive information if not carefully filtered","Timeout handling depends on underlying context provider — no built-in timeout enforcement"],"requires":["Error handling logic in context providers and tool implementations","MCP client capable of handling error responses","Monitoring/logging infrastructure to track error patterns"],"input_types":["Failed resource requests or tool invocations"],"output_types":["MCP error responses with error code and message","Partial results when some resources fail but others succeed"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, LLM framework with MCP support, or custom MCP client)","Node.js or Python runtime depending on server implementation","Understanding of MCP protocol specification and message format","MCP client capable of parsing tool schemas (JSON Schema format)","Tool definitions with complete JSON Schema specifications for all parameters","Understanding of JSON Schema for complex nested parameter types","Tool handlers registered with the MCP server","Proper error handling in tool implementations (returning structured error responses)","Understanding of MCP error response format","MCP client compatible with chosen transport (e.g., Claude Desktop for stdio, HTTP client for SSE)"],"failure_modes":["Limited to MCP-compatible clients (Claude Desktop, some LLM frameworks) — not compatible with OpenAI function calling or other proprietary protocols without adapter layer","Requires client-side MCP support — cannot be used with basic REST API clients","No built-in authentication/authorization — relies on transport layer security (stdio, SSE, or custom transport)","Schema validation happens at registration time, not runtime — runtime type mismatches may still occur if client sends malformed arguments","No built-in schema versioning — breaking schema changes require client reconnection","Resource discovery is static per connection — dynamic resource addition requires reconnection","Routing overhead adds latency per tool invocation (typically 5-50ms depending on handler complexity)","No built-in request queuing or rate limiting — high-concurrency scenarios may require external load balancing","Error context is limited to what the tool handler returns — no automatic stack trace capture for debugging","Transport selection must be made at server startup — cannot dynamically switch transports","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.061Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:08.153Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=adamcooke-contextgate","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=adamcooke-contextgate"}},"signature":"dKaMm1hRp21SyH7Wp30SZmDAveJR6iByvpIngHLRzNoDeoCKnwVu+MugkV3/E3Bp/PTpw0VBD0MkjdoVqfU/DA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T12:11:45.840Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/adamcooke-contextgate","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/adamcooke-contextgate","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=adamcooke-contextgate","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}