{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade","slug":"aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade","name":"aayushnaphade","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/aayushnaphade/aayushnaphade","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:aayushnaphade/aayushnaphade"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.protocol.implementation.with.schema.based.tool.registration","name":"mcp server protocol implementation with schema-based tool registration","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, enabling Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to discover and invoke tools through a standardized JSON-RPC 2.0 interface. The server exposes capabilities via JSON Schema definitions, allowing clients to understand tool signatures, parameters, and return types without hardcoded knowledge of specific implementations. Uses bidirectional message passing over stdio or HTTP transports to maintain persistent tool availability across conversation sessions.","intents":["I want to expose custom tools to Claude so it can call them autonomously during conversations","I need Claude to have access to domain-specific functions without modifying the client application","I want to build a tool ecosystem where multiple services can be composed together via MCP"],"best_for":["AI engineers building Claude-integrated applications with custom tooling","Teams deploying specialized services (databases, APIs, internal tools) that need LLM access","Developers creating modular tool ecosystems following the MCP standard"],"limitations":["MCP is a relatively new protocol with limited client support outside Claude ecosystem","Requires clients to implement MCP support — cannot work with standard REST API consumers","No built-in authentication/authorization — security must be implemented at transport or tool level","Synchronous request-response pattern may not suit long-running or streaming operations"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client (Claude, or custom implementation)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ depending on server implementation language","Understanding of JSON Schema for tool definition","Transport mechanism (stdio, HTTP, or WebSocket)"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 requests with tool name and parameters","JSON Schema definitions for tool discovery"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 responses with tool results","Structured tool metadata and capability descriptions"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-protocol"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.discovery.and.capability.advertisement.via.json.schema","name":"tool discovery and capability advertisement via json schema","description":"Exposes available tools to MCP clients through structured JSON Schema definitions that describe tool names, descriptions, required/optional parameters, parameter types, and return value schemas. Clients parse these schemas to understand what tools are available and how to invoke them without requiring out-of-band documentation. The server maintains a registry of tool definitions that clients query during initialization and can refresh on demand, enabling dynamic tool availability.","intents":["I want Claude to know what tools are available and their exact parameter requirements","I need to document tool capabilities in a machine-readable format that clients can parse","I want to enable dynamic tool registration where tools can be added/removed without redeploying the client"],"best_for":["Teams building extensible tool ecosystems with multiple service providers","Developers who want self-documenting tool interfaces without maintaining separate API docs","Organizations deploying tools that need to be discoverable by multiple LLM clients"],"limitations":["JSON Schema complexity can be difficult to author correctly for deeply nested parameter structures","No built-in versioning mechanism — schema changes may break existing client integrations","Limited support for complex validation rules beyond JSON Schema standard constraints","Schema-first approach requires upfront definition work before tool implementation"],"requires":["JSON Schema knowledge and familiarity with schema authoring","MCP client that supports schema parsing and validation","Tool implementation that matches the declared schema"],"input_types":["Tool metadata (name, description, parameters)","Parameter type definitions and constraints"],"output_types":["JSON Schema documents describing tool interfaces","Tool capability listings with parameter requirements"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.bidirectional.json.rpc.2.0.message.routing.and.request.handling","name":"bidirectional json-rpc 2.0 message routing and request handling","description":"Routes incoming JSON-RPC 2.0 requests from MCP clients to appropriate tool handlers and returns structured responses following the JSON-RPC specification. Implements request/response correlation using message IDs, error handling with standardized error codes, and support for both synchronous tool execution and asynchronous result delivery. The routing layer abstracts transport details (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket) so tool implementations remain transport-agnostic.","intents":["I want to handle tool invocation requests from Claude in a standards-compliant way","I need to route different tool calls to different backend services or handlers","I want proper error handling and response correlation so clients know which response matches which request"],"best_for":["Backend engineers building MCP servers that integrate multiple tool providers","Teams needing reliable request-response correlation in distributed tool ecosystems","Developers implementing custom MCP transports or middleware"],"limitations":["JSON-RPC 2.0 is synchronous by design — streaming responses require workarounds or custom extensions","Error handling is limited to standard JSON-RPC error codes; domain-specific errors must be encoded in error messages","No built-in request queuing or rate limiting — high-concurrency scenarios require external orchestration","Message ID correlation adds overhead for request tracking in high-throughput scenarios"],"requires":["JSON-RPC 2.0 client implementation","Tool handler functions that accept parameters and return results","Transport layer (stdio, HTTP, or WebSocket) for message delivery"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 request objects with method, params, and id fields","Tool invocation parameters matching declared schemas"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 response objects with result or error fields","Structured tool execution results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.transport.agnostic.tool.execution.with.stdio.http.and.websocket.support","name":"transport-agnostic tool execution with stdio, http, and websocket support","description":"Abstracts the underlying communication transport layer so MCP servers can operate over stdio (for local Claude integration), HTTP (for remote clients), or WebSocket (for persistent bidirectional connections). The server implementation handles transport-specific details like message framing, connection lifecycle, and protocol negotiation, exposing a unified interface to tool handlers. This enables the same tool implementation to be deployed across different transport mechanisms without modification.","intents":["I want to run my MCP server locally with Claude via stdio without network overhead","I need to expose my tools to remote Claude instances via HTTP","I want to maintain persistent WebSocket connections for real-time tool availability"],"best_for":["Developers deploying MCP servers in diverse environments (local, cloud, hybrid)","Teams needing flexibility in how tools are accessed (local vs remote)","Organizations with existing HTTP/WebSocket infrastructure who want to integrate MCP"],"limitations":["Stdio transport is limited to local machine communication — not suitable for remote access","HTTP transport adds latency compared to stdio for local scenarios","WebSocket requires persistent connection management and heartbeat logic to detect disconnections","Transport selection is typically made at deployment time — runtime switching is not standard"],"requires":["MCP server implementation with transport support","Appropriate network configuration (firewall rules for HTTP/WebSocket)","Client support for chosen transport mechanism"],"input_types":["Transport-specific message frames (stdio lines, HTTP bodies, WebSocket frames)"],"output_types":["Transport-specific message responses"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.parameter.validation.and.type.coercion.with.json.schema.enforcement","name":"tool parameter validation and type coercion with json schema enforcement","description":"Validates incoming tool invocation parameters against declared JSON Schema definitions before execution, ensuring type correctness and constraint satisfaction. Performs type coercion where appropriate (e.g., string-to-number conversion) and rejects invalid parameters with detailed error messages indicating which constraints were violated. This validation layer prevents malformed requests from reaching tool handlers and provides clients with immediate feedback on parameter errors.","intents":["I want to ensure tools only receive parameters that match their declared schemas","I need detailed error messages when clients pass invalid parameters","I want to avoid null pointer exceptions and type errors in tool implementations"],"best_for":["Teams building production MCP servers that need robust parameter validation","Developers who want to shift error detection left (at validation time vs execution time)","Organizations with strict data quality requirements"],"limitations":["JSON Schema validation adds latency (~5-50ms per request depending on schema complexity)","Complex nested schemas with many constraints can be slow to validate","Type coercion rules may not match all use cases — some applications need strict type checking","Error messages from schema validation can be verbose and difficult for clients to parse"],"requires":["JSON Schema validator library (e.g., ajv for JavaScript)","Well-defined JSON Schema for each tool parameter set","Client that sends parameters matching the declared schema"],"input_types":["Tool invocation parameters as JSON objects","JSON Schema definitions for validation"],"output_types":["Validation success/failure indicators","Detailed error messages with constraint violations"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["MCP-compatible client (Claude, or custom implementation)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ depending on server implementation language","Understanding of JSON Schema for tool definition","Transport mechanism (stdio, HTTP, or WebSocket)","JSON Schema knowledge and familiarity with schema authoring","MCP client that supports schema parsing and validation","Tool implementation that matches the declared schema","JSON-RPC 2.0 client implementation","Tool handler functions that accept parameters and return results","Transport layer (stdio, HTTP, or WebSocket) for message delivery"],"failure_modes":["MCP is a relatively new protocol with limited client support outside Claude ecosystem","Requires clients to implement MCP support — cannot work with standard REST API consumers","No built-in authentication/authorization — security must be implemented at transport or tool level","Synchronous request-response pattern may not suit long-running or streaming operations","JSON Schema complexity can be difficult to author correctly for deeply nested parameter structures","No built-in versioning mechanism — schema changes may break existing client integrations","Limited support for complex validation rules beyond JSON Schema standard constraints","Schema-first approach requires upfront definition work before tool implementation","JSON-RPC 2.0 is synchronous by design — streaming responses require workarounds or custom extensions","Error handling is limited to standard JSON-RPC error codes; domain-specific errors must be encoded in error messages","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.48999999999999994,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.061Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:33.056Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade"}},"signature":"GeM+X35A49e81GBahsyetJVV4zi52n/Jl56Z1RJoMxbVQDFvft0WDvdFmMgKaaGzCNICuZHFx41tgxoyYFKkCA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T10:45:47.230Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=aayushnaphade-aayushnaphade","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}