{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_a2395663320-abcd","slug":"a2395663320-abcd","name":"abcd","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/a2395663320/abcd","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/a2395663320-abcd","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:a2395663320/abcd"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_a2395663320-abcd__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.model.context.protocol.server.instantiation.and.lifecycle.management","name":"model context protocol server instantiation and lifecycle management","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, providing a standardized interface for LLM clients to discover, invoke, and manage server capabilities through JSON-RPC 2.0 message transport. The server handles connection lifecycle (initialization, capability advertisement, graceful shutdown), request routing to registered tools/resources, and bidirectional communication with MCP-compatible clients using stdio or HTTP transports.","intents":["I need to expose custom tools and resources to Claude, ChatGPT, or other MCP-aware LLM clients without building custom API integrations","I want to standardize how my AI agents discover and call external functions across multiple LLM providers","I need to manage server state and handle concurrent requests from multiple LLM client sessions"],"best_for":["AI application developers building multi-provider LLM agents","Teams standardizing on MCP for tool/resource abstraction across Claude, OpenAI, and open-source models","Infrastructure engineers deploying centralized tool servers for enterprise LLM applications"],"limitations":["MCP is a relatively new protocol (2024) with limited ecosystem maturity — fewer third-party integrations than REST/OpenAPI","No built-in authentication/authorization layer — security must be implemented at transport or application level","Synchronous request-response model may add latency for long-running operations without explicit async/streaming support","Limited to JSON-RPC 2.0 message format — no support for binary protocols or custom serialization"],"requires":["MCP client library or compatible LLM platform (Claude 3.5+, or custom MCP client implementation)","Node.js 18+ or Python 3.8+ runtime (depending on server implementation)","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 protocol and MCP specification"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 requests","Tool invocation parameters (typed as JSON schema)","Resource URIs and queries"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 responses","Tool execution results (JSON, text, or structured data)","Resource content (text, code, structured data)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-server"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_a2395663320-abcd__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.schema.registration.and.capability.advertisement","name":"tool schema registration and capability advertisement","description":"Registers custom tools with standardized JSON Schema definitions and advertises them to MCP clients during the initialization handshake. The server maintains a registry of available tools, their input/output schemas, descriptions, and execution handlers, allowing clients to discover and validate tool calls before invocation. This enables type-safe tool calling with client-side validation and intelligent tool selection by LLMs.","intents":["I want to define tools with strict input schemas so LLM clients can validate parameters before calling them","I need my MCP server to advertise all available tools to clients so they can intelligently choose which tools to use","I want to ensure type safety and prevent invalid tool invocations by enforcing JSON Schema validation"],"best_for":["Developers building production LLM agents that require strict input validation","Teams needing to expose complex tools with multiple parameters and nested schemas","Applications where tool discovery and dynamic capability advertisement is critical"],"limitations":["JSON Schema validation adds overhead for each tool invocation — complex schemas may impact latency","No built-in versioning mechanism for tool schemas — breaking changes require careful migration planning","Schema complexity is limited by JSON Schema expressiveness — some domain-specific validation logic must be implemented in tool handlers"],"requires":["JSON Schema knowledge and familiarity with schema design patterns","MCP client that supports tool schema validation (most modern MCP clients do)","Tool handler functions that match the registered schema signatures"],"input_types":["JSON Schema definitions","Tool metadata (name, description, category)"],"output_types":["Tool registry (JSON)","Schema validation results (pass/fail with error details)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_a2395663320-abcd__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.resource.exposure.and.content.serving.via.mcp","name":"resource exposure and content serving via mcp","description":"Exposes static or dynamic resources (files, documents, code snippets, knowledge bases) through the MCP resource protocol, allowing LLM clients to read and reference external content without embedding it in prompts. Resources are identified by URIs, support optional templating/parameterization, and can be streamed or returned in full, enabling LLMs to access large documents or real-time data without context window constraints.","intents":["I want to let Claude or other LLM clients read files from my codebase without copying them into the prompt","I need to serve dynamic content (database records, API responses) to LLM clients on-demand","I want to expose a knowledge base or documentation to LLMs so they can reference it during reasoning"],"best_for":["Developers building code analysis or documentation-aware LLM agents","Teams exposing internal knowledge bases or databases to LLM clients","Applications requiring LLMs to access large or frequently-updated content"],"limitations":["Resource access is synchronous — no built-in support for streaming large resources (though some implementations may support it)","No built-in caching or CDN integration — repeated resource requests may incur repeated I/O or computation","Resource discovery is URI-based — clients must know or guess resource identifiers (no full-text search or browsing)","No access control at the MCP protocol level — authorization must be implemented in the server application"],"requires":["MCP client that supports resource reading (most modern MCP clients do)","Resource backend (filesystem, database, API, or in-memory store)","Resource URI scheme and naming convention"],"input_types":["Resource URIs","Optional query parameters or templates"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, code, JSON, binary)","Resource metadata (MIME type, size, last modified)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_a2395663320-abcd__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.bidirectional.client.server.communication.and.request.routing","name":"bidirectional client-server communication and request routing","description":"Implements JSON-RPC 2.0 message routing and bidirectional communication between MCP server and clients, handling request/response pairing, error propagation, and optional server-initiated notifications. The server maintains connection state, routes incoming requests to appropriate handlers, and ensures responses are correctly paired with requests even in concurrent scenarios. Supports both request-response patterns and optional server-to-client notifications for asynchronous events.","intents":["I need my MCP server to handle multiple concurrent requests from LLM clients without blocking or losing state","I want to send notifications from my server to clients (e.g., tool execution status updates) without waiting for a request","I need robust error handling and request tracking so failed requests don't corrupt server state"],"best_for":["High-concurrency LLM applications with multiple simultaneous client connections","Servers that need to push updates or notifications to clients asynchronously","Teams requiring reliable request-response semantics and error handling"],"limitations":["JSON-RPC 2.0 is synchronous by design — long-running operations may timeout without explicit async/streaming support","No built-in request prioritization or rate limiting — all requests are processed in order","Error handling is limited to JSON-RPC error codes — domain-specific error semantics must be encoded in error messages","No built-in request tracing or observability — debugging concurrent issues requires external logging"],"requires":["JSON-RPC 2.0 compliant transport (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket, etc.)","Async/concurrent request handling (e.g., async/await in Node.js, asyncio in Python)","Request ID tracking and response correlation logic"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 request objects","Request IDs (for response correlation)"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 response objects","JSON-RPC 2.0 error objects","Optional server-initiated notifications"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":23,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client library or compatible LLM platform (Claude 3.5+, or custom MCP client implementation)","Node.js 18+ or Python 3.8+ runtime (depending on server implementation)","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 protocol and MCP specification","JSON Schema knowledge and familiarity with schema design patterns","MCP client that supports tool schema validation (most modern MCP clients do)","Tool handler functions that match the registered schema signatures","MCP client that supports resource reading (most modern MCP clients do)","Resource backend (filesystem, database, API, or in-memory store)","Resource URI scheme and naming convention","JSON-RPC 2.0 compliant transport (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket, etc.)"],"failure_modes":["MCP is a relatively new protocol (2024) with limited ecosystem maturity — fewer third-party integrations than REST/OpenAPI","No built-in authentication/authorization layer — security must be implemented at transport or application level","Synchronous request-response model may add latency for long-running operations without explicit async/streaming support","Limited to JSON-RPC 2.0 message format — no support for binary protocols or custom serialization","JSON Schema validation adds overhead for each tool invocation — complex schemas may impact latency","No built-in versioning mechanism for tool schemas — breaking changes require careful migration planning","Schema complexity is limited by JSON Schema expressiveness — some domain-specific validation logic must be implemented in tool handlers","Resource access is synchronous — no built-in support for streaming large resources (though some implementations may support it)","No built-in caching or CDN integration — repeated resource requests may incur repeated I/O or computation","Resource discovery is URI-based — clients must know or guess resource identifiers (no full-text search or browsing)","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.18,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.061Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:46.450Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=a2395663320-abcd","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=a2395663320-abcd"}},"signature":"DM5p3mzM7aYvDlgQJjm/kHqG8xqOOn+WxGuMx1QtgIV39ggDLs6sBaUoqpKo0q92Rq5UrGE0Eucny5ukSUyOCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T22:47:43.510Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/a2395663320-abcd","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/a2395663320-abcd","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=a2395663320-abcd","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}