{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_a-shkurenkov-gfhf","slug":"a-shkurenkov-gfhf","name":"gfhf","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/a.shkurenkov/gfhf","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/a-shkurenkov-gfhf","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:a.shkurenkov/gfhf"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_a-shkurenkov-gfhf__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.model.context.protocol.server.instantiation.and.lifecycle.management","name":"model context protocol server instantiation and lifecycle management","description":"Implements a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that manages bidirectional communication between AI clients and external tools/resources. The server handles protocol initialization, message routing, resource discovery, and graceful shutdown using the MCP specification's standardized message format and transport layer abstraction.","intents":["I need to expose custom tools and resources to Claude or other MCP-compatible AI clients","I want to build a bridge between my application and AI models without reimplementing protocol handling","I need to manage tool availability and versioning across multiple AI client connections"],"best_for":["AI application developers integrating custom tools with Claude or other MCP clients","Teams building internal tool ecosystems that need AI-native access patterns","Open-source maintainers wanting to expose their tools via standardized MCP interface"],"limitations":["Limited to MCP protocol specification — cannot extend beyond standard message types without protocol modification","No built-in authentication or authorization layer — security must be implemented at transport or application level","Synchronous request-response pattern may introduce latency for long-running operations without explicit async/streaming support"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (Claude, Anthropic SDK, or compatible tool)","Network connectivity or local IPC for server-client communication","Understanding of MCP protocol specification and message structure"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Tool invocation requests with parameters","Resource read/list requests"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Tool execution results","Resource content and metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-server"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_a-shkurenkov-gfhf__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.schema.definition.and.registration.with.parameter.validation","name":"tool schema definition and registration with parameter validation","description":"Provides a mechanism to define tools with JSON Schema-based parameter specifications and register them with the MCP server for discovery by AI clients. The system validates incoming tool invocations against declared schemas before execution, ensuring type safety and preventing malformed requests from reaching tool handlers.","intents":["I need to define what parameters my tools accept so AI clients know how to call them correctly","I want automatic validation of tool inputs before my handler code runs","I need to expose tool capabilities and signatures to AI models for proper planning and invocation"],"best_for":["Developers building tool ecosystems where AI clients need to understand parameter requirements","Teams wanting schema-driven tool development with validation guarantees","Projects requiring tool discoverability and capability advertisement to multiple AI clients"],"limitations":["Schema validation is limited to JSON Schema specification — complex conditional validation logic requires custom handler implementation","No built-in support for dynamic schema generation based on runtime state — schemas must be static at registration time","Parameter descriptions are text-only — no structured metadata for tool categorization or grouping"],"requires":["JSON Schema knowledge for parameter definition","Tool handler function implementation matching declared signatures","MCP server instance for tool registration"],"input_types":["JSON Schema objects defining parameter structure","Tool invocation requests with typed parameters"],"output_types":["Validation results (pass/fail with error details)","Tool execution results matching declared return types"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_a-shkurenkov-gfhf__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.resource.exposure.and.content.serving.via.mcp.protocol","name":"resource exposure and content serving via mcp protocol","description":"Enables registration of resources (files, data, or computed content) that can be read or listed by MCP clients through standardized resource endpoints. Resources are identified by URI-like paths and served with metadata (MIME type, size, modification time), allowing AI clients to access application data without direct filesystem or API access.","intents":["I want AI clients to read specific files or data from my application without exposing raw filesystem access","I need to serve computed or dynamic content (database records, API responses) as resources to AI models","I want to control which data is accessible to AI clients through a resource whitelist"],"best_for":["Applications needing fine-grained data access control for AI clients","Teams exposing application data to AI without building custom REST APIs","Projects where resource content is dynamic or computed at request time"],"limitations":["Resource listing may be slow for large datasets — no built-in pagination or filtering at protocol level","No streaming support for large resources — entire content must be buffered and returned in single response","Resource URIs are opaque to clients — no standardized way to discover resource structure or relationships"],"requires":["Resource handler implementation for read/list operations","MCP server instance for resource registration","Understanding of resource URI scheme and metadata requirements"],"input_types":["Resource URI paths","List/read operation requests"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, binary, or structured data)","Resource metadata (MIME type, size, modification time)","Resource listings with URI and metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_a-shkurenkov-gfhf__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.bidirectional.message.routing.and.request.response.correlation","name":"bidirectional message routing and request-response correlation","description":"Implements JSON-RPC 2.0 message handling with request ID tracking to correlate responses with requests across asynchronous communication channels. The system routes incoming messages to appropriate handlers, manages message queues, and ensures responses are delivered to correct clients even in high-concurrency scenarios.","intents":["I need reliable message delivery between AI client and my server without losing requests or responses","I want to handle multiple concurrent tool invocations without mixing up which response belongs to which request","I need to support both synchronous and asynchronous tool execution patterns"],"best_for":["High-concurrency applications with multiple simultaneous AI client connections","Systems requiring guaranteed message delivery and request-response correlation","Projects with long-running tool operations that need async handling"],"limitations":["Message ordering is not guaranteed across multiple concurrent requests — clients must handle out-of-order responses","No built-in message persistence — server restart loses in-flight requests","Request ID collision handling depends on client implementation — no server-side deduplication"],"requires":["JSON-RPC 2.0 compatible client implementation","Network transport layer (TCP, WebSocket, stdio, etc.)","Request ID generation and tracking on client side"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 request messages with method and params","JSON-RPC 2.0 notification messages"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 response messages with result or error","JSON-RPC 2.0 error responses with error code and message"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_a-shkurenkov-gfhf__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.transport.layer.abstraction.for.multiple.communication.protocols","name":"transport layer abstraction for multiple communication protocols","description":"Provides pluggable transport implementations allowing MCP servers to communicate via different protocols (stdio, TCP, WebSocket, HTTP) without changing core server logic. Transport abstraction handles protocol-specific framing, connection lifecycle, and serialization while maintaining uniform message handling at the application layer.","intents":["I want my MCP server to work with Claude via stdio without rewriting code for WebSocket clients","I need to support multiple AI clients connecting via different transport protocols simultaneously","I want to add new transport protocols without modifying core tool and resource handlers"],"best_for":["Tools that need to work across multiple AI platforms with different transport requirements","Teams building extensible MCP servers that may need new transports in future","Projects requiring both local (stdio) and remote (TCP/WebSocket) client connections"],"limitations":["Transport abstraction adds complexity — debugging transport-specific issues requires understanding multiple protocol implementations","Performance characteristics vary significantly by transport — no unified performance guarantees","Some transports (stdio) have inherent limitations (single connection, no multiplexing) that cannot be abstracted away"],"requires":["Transport implementation for desired protocol (stdio, TCP, WebSocket, etc.)","Network infrastructure for remote transports (TCP/WebSocket)","Understanding of protocol-specific connection and framing requirements"],"input_types":["Protocol-specific framing and serialization formats","Connection initialization and handshake data"],"output_types":["Protocol-specific message frames","Connection status and error information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client implementation (Claude, Anthropic SDK, or compatible tool)","Network connectivity or local IPC for server-client communication","Understanding of MCP protocol specification and message structure","JSON Schema knowledge for parameter definition","Tool handler function implementation matching declared signatures","MCP server instance for tool registration","Resource handler implementation for read/list operations","MCP server instance for resource registration","Understanding of resource URI scheme and metadata requirements","JSON-RPC 2.0 compatible client implementation"],"failure_modes":["Limited to MCP protocol specification — cannot extend beyond standard message types without protocol modification","No built-in authentication or authorization layer — security must be implemented at transport or application level","Synchronous request-response pattern may introduce latency for long-running operations without explicit async/streaming support","Schema validation is limited to JSON Schema specification — complex conditional validation logic requires custom handler implementation","No built-in support for dynamic schema generation based on runtime state — schemas must be static at registration time","Parameter descriptions are text-only — no structured metadata for tool categorization or grouping","Resource listing may be slow for large datasets — no built-in pagination or filtering at protocol level","No streaming support for large resources — entire content must be buffered and returned in single response","Resource URIs are opaque to clients — no standardized way to discover resource structure or relationships","Message ordering is not guaranteed across multiple concurrent requests — clients must handle out-of-order responses","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.061Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:16.961Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=a-shkurenkov-gfhf","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=a-shkurenkov-gfhf"}},"signature":"JWKLSIywjo9L4eI0Tuh8JGF4ART+2a594ELXZNo1hzdk5u10AV3KT19EXDSX6uIiI/Y3gg3lADHhugnTcCIaAw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T08:31:25.558Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/a-shkurenkov-gfhf","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/a-shkurenkov-gfhf","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=a-shkurenkov-gfhf","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}