{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp","slug":"4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp","name":"4everland/4everland-hosting-mcp","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/4everland/4everland-hosting-mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp","categories":["mcp-servers","deployment-infra"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.based.hosting.service.integration.with.decentralized.storage.backends","name":"mcp-based hosting service integration with decentralized storage backends","description":"Implements a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes 4EVERLAND Hosting APIs as standardized tool calls, enabling LLM agents and AI code generators to directly invoke deployment operations without custom HTTP client code. The MCP abstraction layer translates tool schemas into backend API calls, supporting multiple decentralized storage networks (Greenfield, IPFS, Arweave) through a unified interface that abstracts network-specific implementation details.","intents":["I want my AI agent to deploy generated code directly to decentralized storage without writing custom API integration code","I need to expose 4EVERLAND Hosting capabilities as standardized MCP tools that any LLM can understand and invoke","I want to support multiple decentralized storage backends (Greenfield, IPFS, Arweave) through a single deployment interface"],"best_for":["AI agent developers building autonomous deployment workflows","LLM application builders integrating decentralized hosting into code generation pipelines","Teams migrating from centralized hosting to decentralized storage networks"],"limitations":["MCP protocol overhead adds ~50-100ms per tool invocation due to JSON serialization and transport","No built-in retry logic or exponential backoff — requires external orchestration for fault tolerance","Limited to tool-based invocation patterns; streaming deployment logs not supported through MCP","Requires separate authentication credentials for each decentralized storage backend"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ (depending on MCP server implementation)","Valid API credentials for 4EVERLAND Hosting service","MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, LangChain MCP adapter, or custom)","Network connectivity to 4EVERLAND backend and target decentralized storage networks"],"input_types":["code (JavaScript, TypeScript, HTML, CSS, static assets)","deployment configuration (JSON/YAML with storage backend selection)","authentication tokens (API keys for 4EVERLAND and storage networks)"],"output_types":["deployment status (JSON with transaction hash, IPFS CID, or Arweave TX ID)","hosted URL (decentralized or gateway URL depending on backend)","deployment metadata (storage backend used, file manifest, gas costs if applicable)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ai.generated.code.deployment.to.decentralized.storage.with.automatic.backend.selection","name":"ai-generated code deployment to decentralized storage with automatic backend selection","description":"Accepts AI-generated code artifacts (from code generation models or agents) and automatically routes them to the optimal decentralized storage backend based on file size, cost, and latency requirements. The system handles file staging, network-specific transaction preparation (gas estimation for Greenfield, IPFS pinning configuration, Arweave bundling), and returns a unified deployment result with gateway URLs and content identifiers across all backends.","intents":["I want to deploy AI-generated code directly from my LLM output without manual backend selection or configuration","I need automatic cost optimization when choosing between Greenfield, IPFS, and Arweave for different code artifacts","I want a single deployment endpoint that handles all network-specific complexity (gas fees, pinning, bundling) transparently"],"best_for":["AI code generation platforms (Cursor, GitHub Copilot extensions, custom agents)","Serverless function deployment systems using decentralized storage as backend","Web3 development teams building AI-assisted smart contract deployment tools"],"limitations":["Backend selection heuristics are static; no dynamic cost monitoring or real-time fee comparison","Large code artifacts (>100MB) may exceed IPFS gateway timeouts; requires manual Arweave routing","No built-in code validation or security scanning before deployment to decentralized networks","Deployment finality depends on underlying network confirmation times (Greenfield: ~6s, IPFS: immediate, Arweave: ~30min)"],"requires":["4EVERLAND Hosting API key with deployment permissions","Wallet or account credentials for target decentralized networks (Greenfield, IPFS, Arweave)","Sufficient balance/credits for storage costs on selected backend","Code artifacts must be <5GB total size (network-dependent limits)"],"input_types":["code files (JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, HTML, CSS, static assets)","deployment manifest (JSON specifying storage backend preference, TTL, access controls)","optional: build artifacts or compiled binaries"],"output_types":["deployment receipt (transaction hash, content ID, timestamp)","access URLs (IPFS gateway URL, Arweave gateway URL, Greenfield HTTP endpoint)","cost breakdown (storage fees, transaction costs, estimated retrieval costs)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.schema.generation.and.registration.for.4everland.hosting.apis","name":"mcp tool schema generation and registration for 4everland hosting apis","description":"Dynamically generates MCP-compliant tool schemas from 4EVERLAND Hosting API specifications and registers them with the MCP server, enabling LLM clients to discover and invoke deployment operations through standard tool-calling interfaces. The schema generation handles parameter validation, type mapping, and error response formatting to ensure LLM-safe invocation patterns.","intents":["I want my LLM to automatically discover what deployment operations are available without reading API documentation","I need type-safe tool schemas that prevent invalid deployment requests before they reach the backend","I want to expose new 4EVERLAND APIs as MCP tools without manually writing schema definitions"],"best_for":["MCP server developers integrating 4EVERLAND Hosting into LLM applications","Teams building internal LLM tools that need dynamic API discovery","API-first platforms that want to expose hosting capabilities through MCP"],"limitations":["Schema generation is static at server startup; runtime API changes require server restart","No support for streaming responses or long-polling operations through MCP tool interface","Parameter validation is schema-level only; business logic validation happens at API layer","Complex nested object types may not map cleanly to MCP schema constraints"],"requires":["4EVERLAND Hosting API specification (OpenAPI/Swagger format or custom schema)","MCP server framework (Node.js or Python MCP SDK)","Access to 4EVERLAND API documentation or introspection endpoint"],"input_types":["API specification (JSON/YAML schema)","tool configuration (which APIs to expose, parameter constraints)"],"output_types":["MCP tool definitions (JSON schema with name, description, parameters, required fields)","tool registry (mapping of tool names to backend API endpoints)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.network.decentralized.storage.abstraction.layer.with.unified.api","name":"multi-network decentralized storage abstraction layer with unified api","description":"Provides a unified abstraction layer that translates deployment requests into network-specific operations for Greenfield (BNB Chain storage), IPFS (content-addressed peer-to-peer), and Arweave (permanent storage), handling protocol differences like transaction signing, fee estimation, and content addressing. The abstraction normalizes responses across networks into a common deployment result format with network-agnostic URLs and metadata.","intents":["I want to deploy code to multiple decentralized networks without learning each network's unique API and transaction model","I need a single deployment interface that handles Greenfield transactions, IPFS pinning, and Arweave bundling transparently","I want to switch between storage backends without changing my deployment code"],"best_for":["Multi-chain Web3 applications requiring storage redundancy","Decentralized hosting platforms supporting multiple storage backends","AI agents that need to deploy code across heterogeneous storage networks"],"limitations":["Network-specific features (Greenfield access control, IPFS replication factors, Arweave bundling) are not fully exposed through abstraction","Cost comparison across networks requires real-time fee data; static estimates may be inaccurate","Content addressing differs per network (Greenfield: object ID, IPFS: CID, Arweave: TX ID); unified URLs require gateway mapping","Deployment finality guarantees vary by network; abstraction cannot provide uniform confirmation semantics"],"requires":["Network RPC endpoints for Greenfield (BNB Chain), IPFS node or gateway, Arweave node or gateway","Wallet/account credentials for each network with sufficient balance","4EVERLAND backend service with multi-network support"],"input_types":["code artifacts (files or directory structures)","deployment configuration (storage backend preference, TTL, access controls)","network credentials (private keys, API keys)"],"output_types":["unified deployment result (network-agnostic URLs, content IDs, metadata)","network-specific details (transaction hash, gas used, pinning status, bundle ID)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.deployment.status.tracking.and.content.retrieval.across.decentralized.networks","name":"deployment status tracking and content retrieval across decentralized networks","description":"Tracks deployment status across Greenfield, IPFS, and Arweave networks, providing unified queries for deployment state (pending, confirmed, failed) and enabling content retrieval through network-appropriate gateways. The system maintains a deployment ledger that maps deployment IDs to network-specific identifiers and provides normalized status responses regardless of underlying network confirmation semantics.","intents":["I want to check if my deployed code is live on the decentralized network without querying each network separately","I need to retrieve deployed code from any of the three networks using a single endpoint","I want to monitor deployment progress as it moves from pending to confirmed state across different networks"],"best_for":["Deployment dashboard and monitoring systems for decentralized hosting","CI/CD pipelines that need to verify deployment completion before proceeding","Web3 applications requiring content retrieval from multiple storage backends"],"limitations":["Status polling adds latency; no real-time event streaming for deployment confirmation","Network confirmation times vary significantly (Greenfield: ~6s, IPFS: immediate, Arweave: ~30min); unified status may be misleading","Content retrieval through gateways may be slow or unreliable for large files; no direct peer-to-peer retrieval","Deployment ledger requires persistent storage; no built-in database — requires external state store"],"requires":["4EVERLAND backend with deployment tracking enabled","Access to network explorers or RPC endpoints for status verification","Gateway URLs for Greenfield, IPFS, and Arweave content retrieval","Persistent storage for deployment ledger (database or file system)"],"input_types":["deployment ID (returned from initial deployment request)","optional: network filter (to query specific backend)"],"output_types":["deployment status (pending, confirmed, failed with error details)","content URLs (gateway URLs for retrieving deployed code)","network-specific metadata (transaction hash, block number, pinning status, bundle ID)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.authentication.and.credential.management.for.multi.network.deployments","name":"authentication and credential management for multi-network deployments","description":"Manages authentication credentials for 4EVERLAND Hosting and multiple decentralized storage networks (Greenfield, IPFS, Arweave), supporting multiple credential types (API keys, private keys, wallet addresses) and providing secure credential injection into deployment requests. The system handles credential rotation, expiration tracking, and network-specific authentication flows without exposing secrets to LLM clients.","intents":["I want to securely store and manage credentials for multiple decentralized networks without exposing them to LLM clients","I need to support different authentication methods per network (API keys for IPFS, private keys for Greenfield, wallet addresses for Arweave)","I want to rotate credentials and track expiration without interrupting ongoing deployments"],"best_for":["Multi-tenant hosting platforms requiring credential isolation per user/organization","Deployment automation systems that need to manage credentials for multiple networks","Security-conscious teams deploying to decentralized networks through LLM agents"],"limitations":["Credential storage requires secure backend infrastructure; no built-in encryption at rest","No support for hardware wallet signing or multi-signature schemes","Credential rotation requires manual intervention; no automatic key rotation","Credential leakage through LLM context windows is possible if not carefully isolated"],"requires":["Secure credential storage backend (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, or equivalent)","Network-specific credentials (4EVERLAND API key, Greenfield private key, IPFS API key, Arweave wallet key)","TLS/HTTPS for all credential transmission"],"input_types":["credential configuration (network, credential type, secret value)","optional: credential metadata (expiration date, rotation policy)"],"output_types":["credential validation status (valid, expired, invalid)","credential metadata (network, type, expiration, last rotated)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.cost.estimation.and.optimization.for.multi.backend.deployments","name":"cost estimation and optimization for multi-backend deployments","description":"Estimates deployment costs across Greenfield, IPFS, and Arweave based on file size, storage duration, and network fees, providing cost breakdowns and recommendations for backend selection. The system queries real-time or cached fee data from each network and applies heuristics to recommend the most cost-effective backend for given deployment parameters.","intents":["I want to know the cost of deploying my code before committing to a specific decentralized storage backend","I need recommendations on which backend (Greenfield, IPFS, Arweave) is most cost-effective for my deployment","I want to optimize deployment costs by comparing prices across networks automatically"],"best_for":["Cost-conscious teams deploying to decentralized networks","Hosting platforms that need to provide transparent pricing to users","AI agents making autonomous deployment decisions based on cost constraints"],"limitations":["Cost estimates are based on current fees; actual costs may vary due to network congestion or price volatility","Fee data may be stale if not updated frequently; no real-time fee monitoring","Heuristics for backend selection are static; no machine learning-based optimization","Does not account for retrieval costs or long-term storage economics"],"requires":["Access to real-time or cached fee data from Greenfield, IPFS, and Arweave networks","File size and storage duration parameters for cost calculation","Exchange rate data for converting network-specific fees to common currency"],"input_types":["deployment parameters (file size, storage duration, access frequency)","optional: cost constraints (maximum acceptable cost, preferred backend)"],"output_types":["cost estimates per backend (Greenfield, IPFS, Arweave with breakdown)","backend recommendation (most cost-effective option with reasoning)","cost comparison table (side-by-side pricing across networks)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.deployment.configuration.and.manifest.management.with.validation","name":"deployment configuration and manifest management with validation","description":"Manages deployment configurations and manifests that specify storage backend preferences, access controls, TTL, and other deployment parameters. The system validates configurations against schema constraints, applies defaults, and provides configuration versioning to track changes across deployments.","intents":["I want to define deployment configurations (backend preference, TTL, access controls) without hardcoding them in my application","I need to validate deployment configurations before sending them to decentralized networks","I want to version and track changes to deployment configurations across multiple deployments"],"best_for":["Deployment platforms with complex configuration requirements","Teams managing multiple deployment environments with different configurations","Infrastructure-as-code workflows for decentralized hosting"],"limitations":["Configuration validation is schema-level only; business logic validation requires custom code","No built-in support for configuration inheritance or templating","Configuration versioning requires external version control; no built-in history tracking","Complex nested configurations may be difficult to manage through MCP tool interface"],"requires":["Configuration schema definition (JSON Schema or equivalent)","Configuration storage backend (file system, database, or version control)"],"input_types":["configuration manifest (JSON/YAML with deployment parameters)","optional: configuration template or defaults"],"output_types":["validated configuration (with defaults applied)","validation errors (if configuration is invalid)","configuration metadata (version, timestamp, author)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp__cap_8","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.error.handling.and.deployment.failure.recovery.with.retry.logic","name":"error handling and deployment failure recovery with retry logic","description":"Implements comprehensive error handling for deployment failures across Greenfield, IPFS, and Arweave, with network-specific error classification and recovery strategies. The system provides detailed error messages, suggests remediation steps, and supports configurable retry policies with exponential backoff.","intents":["I want detailed error messages when deployments fail, with suggestions for how to fix the problem","I need automatic retry logic for transient failures (network timeouts, temporary unavailability)","I want to understand which network-specific error occurred and how to recover from it"],"best_for":["Reliable deployment systems that need to handle transient failures gracefully","AI agents that need to understand and recover from deployment errors autonomously","Monitoring and alerting systems that need detailed error classification"],"limitations":["Retry logic is not built-in; requires external orchestration or custom implementation","Error classification is heuristic-based; some errors may be misclassified","No automatic rollback or deployment cancellation; requires manual intervention","Error recovery suggestions are generic; network-specific recovery may require domain expertise"],"requires":["Error handling framework (try-catch, error middleware, or equivalent)","Retry policy configuration (max retries, backoff strategy, timeout)"],"input_types":["deployment request (code, configuration, credentials)","optional: retry policy (max retries, backoff multiplier)"],"output_types":["error details (error code, message, network-specific details)","remediation suggestions (how to fix the error)","retry status (whether retry was attempted, retry count)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":31,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ (depending on MCP server implementation)","Valid API credentials for 4EVERLAND Hosting service","MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, LangChain MCP adapter, or custom)","Network connectivity to 4EVERLAND backend and target decentralized storage networks","4EVERLAND Hosting API key with deployment permissions","Wallet or account credentials for target decentralized networks (Greenfield, IPFS, Arweave)","Sufficient balance/credits for storage costs on selected backend","Code artifacts must be <5GB total size (network-dependent limits)","4EVERLAND Hosting API specification (OpenAPI/Swagger format or custom schema)","MCP server framework (Node.js or Python MCP SDK)"],"failure_modes":["MCP protocol overhead adds ~50-100ms per tool invocation due to JSON serialization and transport","No built-in retry logic or exponential backoff — requires external orchestration for fault tolerance","Limited to tool-based invocation patterns; streaming deployment logs not supported through MCP","Requires separate authentication credentials for each decentralized storage backend","Backend selection heuristics are static; no dynamic cost monitoring or real-time fee comparison","Large code artifacts (>100MB) may exceed IPFS gateway timeouts; requires manual Arweave routing","No built-in code validation or security scanning before deployment to decentralized networks","Deployment finality depends on underlying network confirmation times (Greenfield: ~6s, IPFS: immediate, Arweave: ~30min)","Schema generation is static at server startup; runtime API changes require server restart","No support for streaming responses or long-polling operations through MCP tool interface","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.43,"ecosystem":0.49999999999999994,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:02.370Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp"}},"signature":"Qfm8JfLvPDkxYItGA7dExsgcELkVxhhG7eNoIinnDqfNrZ9k8Fl4FZUBnV+t3bt7oDtU3rUc7Vij0u7aOwlsDA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T01:22:20.442Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=4everland-4everland-hosting-mcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}