{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver","slug":"1mcpserver","name":"1mcpserver","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/particlefuture/1mcpserver","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/1mcpserver","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.automatic.mcp.server.discovery.and.registration","name":"automatic-mcp-server-discovery-and-registration","description":"Scans the local machine for installed MCP servers and automatically discovers their configurations, endpoints, and capabilities without manual setup. Uses filesystem introspection and process detection to identify MCP server installations, then registers them into a centralized registry accessible via remote HTTP endpoints. This eliminates the need for manual configuration files or hardcoded server addresses.","intents":["I want to automatically detect all MCP servers installed on my machine without manually configuring each one","I need to discover available MCP servers and their capabilities without reading documentation or config files","I want to expose my local MCP servers to remote clients without managing individual server URLs"],"best_for":["developers managing multiple MCP servers across different projects","teams deploying MCP infrastructure who want zero-touch server discovery","AI agent builders who need dynamic server availability without hardcoded endpoints"],"limitations":["Discovery is limited to servers installed in standard system paths or registered in environment variables","No built-in support for servers running in isolated containers or non-standard installation directories","Discovery latency increases linearly with number of installed servers (no caching between discovery cycles)","Cannot discover servers that don't expose standard MCP protocol metadata or initialization endpoints"],"requires":["Local machine with filesystem access to MCP server installations","MCP servers installed and accessible via PATH or standard installation directories","HTTP client capability to reach https://mcp.1mcpserver.com/mcp/ endpoint","Network connectivity to remote MCP registry service"],"input_types":["filesystem paths","environment variables","process listings"],"output_types":["MCP server registry (JSON)","server metadata (capabilities, endpoints, authentication requirements)","HTTP endpoint URLs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.remote.mcp.server.aggregation.and.routing","name":"remote-mcp-server-aggregation-and-routing","description":"Aggregates multiple local MCP servers into a single remote HTTP endpoint (https://mcp.1mcpserver.com/mcp/) that routes incoming MCP protocol requests to the appropriate local server based on tool/resource namespacing or explicit server selection. Implements request routing logic that translates HTTP-based MCP calls into local IPC or socket communication with individual servers, then marshals responses back to remote clients.","intents":["I want to expose all my local MCP servers through a single remote URL without managing individual server endpoints","I need to route MCP requests from remote clients to the correct local server based on the requested tool or resource","I want to access my local MCP servers from cloud-based AI agents or remote environments"],"best_for":["developers using cloud-based AI agents (Claude, ChatGPT) that need access to local MCP servers","teams with distributed MCP server deployments who want a unified remote interface","builders creating multi-tenant MCP platforms where clients need isolated server access"],"limitations":["Remote latency adds 50-200ms per request compared to local IPC communication","No built-in request batching or pipelining — each MCP call requires a separate HTTP round-trip","Authentication/authorization must be handled at the HTTP layer; no native MCP protocol-level access control","Streaming responses may be inefficient over HTTP compared to native socket-based MCP communication"],"requires":["Network connectivity to https://mcp.1mcpserver.com/mcp/ (or self-hosted instance)","Local MCP servers running and discoverable by 1mcpserver","HTTP client support in the remote MCP consumer","Optional: authentication credentials if the remote endpoint requires them"],"input_types":["MCP protocol requests (JSON-RPC format)","tool invocation payloads","resource queries"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (JSON-RPC format)","tool execution results","resource data"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.server.configuration.persistence.and.management","name":"mcp-server-configuration-persistence-and-management","description":"Stores and manages MCP server configurations (endpoints, authentication credentials, capabilities metadata) in a persistent registry, allowing users to save discovered servers and customize their settings without re-discovery on each startup. Provides a configuration management interface that tracks server status, availability, and custom metadata alongside auto-discovered server information.","intents":["I want to save my MCP server configurations so they persist across restarts without re-discovery","I need to customize authentication credentials or endpoint overrides for specific MCP servers","I want to track which servers are currently available and their health status"],"best_for":["developers with stable MCP server deployments who want persistent configuration","teams managing production MCP infrastructure with custom authentication requirements","users who want to override auto-discovered server endpoints with custom URLs"],"limitations":["Configuration storage is local to the 1mcpserver instance — no built-in multi-machine synchronization","No version control or audit trail for configuration changes","Credentials are stored in plaintext or with basic encryption — not suitable for highly sensitive secrets","Configuration conflicts between auto-discovery and manual overrides are resolved by simple precedence rules, not intelligent merging"],"requires":["Persistent storage (filesystem or database) accessible to 1mcpserver","Write permissions to the configuration storage location","Optional: encryption key if using credential encryption"],"input_types":["server endpoint URLs","authentication credentials (API keys, tokens)","custom metadata (labels, tags, descriptions)"],"output_types":["configuration registry (JSON or database records)","server status reports","configuration validation results"],"categories":["automation-workflow","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.request.translation.and.marshaling","name":"mcp-protocol-request-translation-and-marshaling","description":"Translates incoming HTTP requests into MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC 2.0 format) and marshals responses back to HTTP, handling protocol conversion, error mapping, and payload serialization. Implements MCP protocol semantics including tool calling, resource access, and sampling request handling, ensuring that HTTP clients can invoke MCP capabilities without understanding the underlying protocol details.","intents":["I want to call MCP tools from HTTP clients without implementing MCP protocol parsing myself","I need to convert HTTP request payloads into MCP-compatible JSON-RPC messages","I want error responses from MCP servers translated into standard HTTP status codes"],"best_for":["developers building HTTP-based frontends for MCP tools","teams integrating MCP servers with REST API clients","builders creating web-based MCP dashboards or management interfaces"],"limitations":["Protocol translation adds serialization overhead (~5-10ms per request)","Streaming MCP responses may be chunked or buffered, losing real-time streaming benefits","Complex nested tool arguments may require custom serialization logic","MCP protocol features not commonly used in HTTP contexts (e.g., sampling) may have limited HTTP representation"],"requires":["HTTP server framework (Express, FastAPI, etc.)","MCP protocol library or implementation","JSON serialization/deserialization support"],"input_types":["HTTP request bodies (JSON)","URL parameters","HTTP headers"],"output_types":["HTTP response bodies (JSON)","HTTP status codes","HTTP headers"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.server.health.monitoring.and.status.tracking","name":"mcp-server-health-monitoring-and-status-tracking","description":"Continuously monitors the availability and health of discovered MCP servers by periodically sending heartbeat requests and tracking response times, error rates, and capability availability. Maintains a real-time status dashboard showing which servers are online, offline, or degraded, and provides historical metrics for capacity planning and troubleshooting.","intents":["I want to know which of my MCP servers are currently available and responding","I need to detect when an MCP server goes offline and alert users or fallback to alternatives","I want to track performance metrics (latency, error rates) for my MCP servers over time"],"best_for":["teams running production MCP infrastructure who need uptime visibility","developers debugging MCP server issues and needing real-time status information","builders implementing MCP server failover or load balancing logic"],"limitations":["Health checks add network overhead (typically 1-5% of total request volume)","Heartbeat-based monitoring may miss transient failures or performance degradation","No built-in alerting — status data must be consumed by external monitoring systems","Historical metrics retention depends on storage capacity; no built-in data archival or cleanup"],"requires":["Network connectivity to all monitored MCP servers","Metrics storage (in-memory, database, or time-series store)","Optional: monitoring/alerting system (Prometheus, DataDog, etc.) for external consumption"],"input_types":["MCP server endpoints","health check configuration (interval, timeout, thresholds)"],"output_types":["server status (online/offline/degraded)","performance metrics (latency, error rate, uptime percentage)","historical trend data"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.dynamic.mcp.capability.schema.exposure","name":"dynamic-mcp-capability-schema-exposure","description":"Dynamically queries discovered MCP servers to extract their tool schemas, resource definitions, and sampling capabilities, then exposes this metadata through a unified schema registry accessible to remote clients. Allows clients to discover available tools and resources without hardcoding server-specific knowledge, enabling dynamic tool binding and capability negotiation.","intents":["I want to discover what tools and resources are available on my MCP servers without reading documentation","I need to expose MCP tool schemas to remote AI agents so they can dynamically invoke available tools","I want to build a dynamic UI that shows available tools based on currently running MCP servers"],"best_for":["developers building AI agents that need dynamic tool discovery","teams creating MCP dashboards or management UIs","builders implementing MCP server marketplaces or plugin ecosystems"],"limitations":["Schema extraction requires querying each server, adding startup latency proportional to server count","Schemas are cached and may become stale if servers update their capabilities without notification","Complex or recursive tool schemas may not serialize cleanly to standard schema formats","No built-in schema versioning or compatibility checking between schema versions"],"requires":["MCP servers that expose tool/resource metadata (standard MCP protocol)","Schema storage and indexing (in-memory or database)","Optional: schema validation library (JSON Schema, etc.)"],"input_types":["MCP server endpoints"],"output_types":["tool schemas (JSON Schema format)","resource definitions","sampling capability metadata","unified capability registry"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.server.request.load.balancing.and.failover","name":"mcp-server-request-load-balancing-and-failover","description":"Distributes incoming MCP requests across multiple instances of the same server (if available) using round-robin or weighted load balancing, and automatically fails over to healthy servers when one becomes unavailable. Implements request queuing and retry logic with exponential backoff to handle transient failures gracefully.","intents":["I want to distribute load across multiple instances of the same MCP server for better performance","I need automatic failover when one MCP server instance goes down","I want to retry failed requests automatically without exposing failures to clients"],"best_for":["teams running high-traffic MCP deployments with multiple server instances","developers building resilient MCP infrastructure with automatic failover","builders implementing MCP server clustering or horizontal scaling"],"limitations":["Load balancing adds routing overhead (~2-5ms per request)","Stateful tools (those requiring session affinity) may not work correctly with round-robin load balancing","Failover detection relies on health checks, which may have detection latency (typically 5-30 seconds)","No built-in request deduplication — retries may cause duplicate tool invocations if not idempotent"],"requires":["Multiple MCP server instances or replicas","Health monitoring system to detect server availability","Request queuing mechanism (in-memory or message queue)","Optional: distributed state store for session affinity"],"input_types":["MCP requests","server instance list","load balancing configuration (algorithm, weights)"],"output_types":["routed MCP requests","failover decisions","retry attempts"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver__cap_7","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.mcp.server.authentication.and.authorization.bridging","name":"mcp-server-authentication-and-authorization-bridging","description":"Bridges authentication and authorization between remote HTTP clients and local MCP servers, translating HTTP authentication (API keys, OAuth tokens, mTLS) into MCP-compatible authentication mechanisms. Implements per-server credential management and access control policies that enforce which clients can invoke which tools on which servers.","intents":["I want to authenticate remote clients accessing my local MCP servers through the HTTP endpoint","I need to enforce access control policies so only authorized clients can invoke specific tools","I want to use different authentication credentials for different MCP servers"],"best_for":["teams exposing MCP servers to untrusted remote clients","developers building multi-tenant MCP platforms with per-user access control","builders implementing MCP server security policies and compliance requirements"],"limitations":["Credential translation adds authentication overhead (~10-50ms per request)","No built-in support for complex authorization policies (ABAC, PBAC) — only basic role-based access control","Credentials must be stored securely, requiring additional infrastructure (secret management, encryption)","Token expiration and refresh logic must be implemented per authentication method"],"requires":["Authentication provider (OAuth, LDAP, custom auth service)","Secure credential storage (vault, encrypted database, etc.)","Authorization policy engine or rule evaluator","Optional: mTLS certificates for client authentication"],"input_types":["HTTP authentication headers (Authorization, X-API-Key, etc.)","client certificates (mTLS)","OAuth tokens"],"output_types":["authenticated client identity","authorization decision (allow/deny)","MCP server credentials or tokens"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-1mcpserver__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.server.plugin.discovery.and.dynamic.loading","name":"mcp-server-plugin-discovery-and-dynamic-loading","description":"Discovers MCP server plugins or extensions installed on the local machine and dynamically loads them into running servers without requiring server restarts. Implements a plugin registry that tracks installed plugins, their dependencies, and compatibility with specific server versions, enabling extensibility without downtime.","intents":["I want to install MCP server plugins and have them automatically discovered and loaded","I need to extend MCP server capabilities with custom tools without modifying server code","I want to manage plugin versions and dependencies across multiple servers"],"best_for":["developers building extensible MCP server platforms","teams managing large MCP deployments with custom tool requirements","builders creating MCP server plugin ecosystems or marketplaces"],"limitations":["Dynamic plugin loading may introduce stability risks if plugins are poorly written or incompatible","No built-in plugin sandboxing — malicious plugins could compromise server security","Plugin dependency resolution is basic and may not handle complex version conflicts","Plugin hot-reloading may cause in-flight requests to fail if plugin state is not properly managed"],"requires":["Plugin directory or registry (filesystem or remote)","Plugin manifest format (JSON, YAML, etc.) describing dependencies and capabilities","Dynamic code loading mechanism (Python importlib, Node.js require, etc.)","Optional: plugin signature verification for security"],"input_types":["plugin manifests","plugin source code or binaries","dependency specifications"],"output_types":["loaded plugins","plugin registry","compatibility reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":31,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Local machine with filesystem access to MCP server installations","MCP servers installed and accessible via PATH or standard installation directories","HTTP client capability to reach https://mcp.1mcpserver.com/mcp/ endpoint","Network connectivity to remote MCP registry service","Network connectivity to https://mcp.1mcpserver.com/mcp/ (or self-hosted instance)","Local MCP servers running and discoverable by 1mcpserver","HTTP client support in the remote MCP consumer","Optional: authentication credentials if the remote endpoint requires them","Persistent storage (filesystem or database) accessible to 1mcpserver","Write permissions to the configuration storage location"],"failure_modes":["Discovery is limited to servers installed in standard system paths or registered in environment variables","No built-in support for servers running in isolated containers or non-standard installation directories","Discovery latency increases linearly with number of installed servers (no caching between discovery cycles)","Cannot discover servers that don't expose standard MCP protocol metadata or initialization endpoints","Remote latency adds 50-200ms per request compared to local IPC communication","No built-in request batching or pipelining — each MCP call requires a separate HTTP round-trip","Authentication/authorization must be handled at the HTTP layer; no native MCP protocol-level access control","Streaming responses may be inefficient over HTTP compared to native socket-based MCP communication","Configuration storage is local to the 1mcpserver instance — no built-in multi-machine synchronization","No version control or audit trail for configuration changes","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.43,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:02.370Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=1mcpserver","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=1mcpserver"}},"signature":"SaOOqJo8RE3nGcI9PSkja2WyUilDTFlO3CQveqTHkytU7jjh4ZWkT+YC65Fo1XleXRSEw/60uLXErq+zw34QAw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T03:44:09.384Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/1mcpserver","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/1mcpserver","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=1mcpserver","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}