{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent","slug":"1mcp-app-agent","name":"One MCP","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/1mcp-app/agent","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/1mcp-app-agent","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:1mcp-app/agent"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.unified.mcp.server.multiplexing","name":"unified-mcp-server-multiplexing","description":"Acts as a single MCP server that multiplexes connections to multiple downstream MCP servers, routing client requests to appropriate backend servers based on resource type and tool namespace. Implements a proxy/gateway pattern that abstracts away the complexity of managing multiple MCP server instances, allowing a single connection point to expose tools and resources from many servers simultaneously.","intents":["I want to connect my AI assistant to multiple MCP servers without managing separate connections for each one","I need to reduce the number of concurrent MCP server processes running on my machine","I want a single unified interface to access tools from different MCP server implementations"],"best_for":["developers running multiple MCP servers locally who want resource consolidation","teams managing complex tool ecosystems across different AI models","solo developers prototyping multi-tool AI agents without infrastructure overhead"],"limitations":["single point of failure — if the multiplexer crashes, all downstream MCP connections are lost","adds latency to every request due to routing and forwarding overhead","requires all downstream MCP servers to be network-accessible (local or remote)","no built-in load balancing or failover for individual backend servers"],"requires":["MCP protocol implementation (v1.0+)","network connectivity to all downstream MCP servers","Node.js 18+ or equivalent runtime for the multiplexer process","configuration file or environment variables defining downstream server addresses"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC 2.0)","tool invocation requests with parameters","resource read/list requests"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses","aggregated tool definitions from all servers","unified resource listings","tool execution results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-gateway"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.discovery.and.registration","name":"mcp-server-discovery-and-registration","description":"Provides a configuration-driven mechanism to discover, register, and manage multiple MCP server instances, supporting both static configuration files and dynamic registration patterns. Maintains a registry of available servers with their capabilities, endpoints, and health status, enabling the multiplexer to route requests intelligently and handle server lifecycle events.","intents":["I want to add or remove MCP servers from my setup without restarting the multiplexer","I need to know which tools and resources are available across all my connected servers","I want to automatically detect when a downstream MCP server becomes unavailable"],"best_for":["operators managing dynamic MCP server fleets","developers building extensible AI agent platforms","teams with heterogeneous tool ecosystems requiring flexible composition"],"limitations":["static configuration requires restart to apply changes (unless hot-reload is implemented)","no built-in service discovery — requires manual configuration or external orchestration","health checks add periodic network overhead","no automatic conflict resolution if multiple servers expose tools with identical names"],"requires":["configuration file format (YAML, JSON, or TOML)","network access to all registered MCP servers","optional: service discovery system (Consul, Kubernetes DNS, etc.) for dynamic registration"],"input_types":["configuration files","server endpoint URLs","server metadata and capability declarations"],"output_types":["server registry (in-memory or persisted)","aggregated capability manifest","health status reports"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.cross.model.tool.exposure","name":"cross-model-tool-exposure","description":"Exposes a unified set of tools and resources to multiple AI models (Claude, GPT, Ollama, etc.) through a single MCP server interface, translating between different model-specific tool-calling conventions and MCP protocol semantics. Handles schema normalization, parameter validation, and response formatting to ensure tools work consistently across heterogeneous model backends.","intents":["I want to use the same tools with both Claude and GPT without duplicating tool definitions","I need my AI assistant to call tools from multiple MCP servers regardless of which model backend I'm using","I want to switch between different AI models without reconfiguring my tool integrations"],"best_for":["multi-model AI applications requiring tool consistency","teams evaluating different LLM providers without tool ecosystem lock-in","developers building model-agnostic AI agents"],"limitations":["model-specific tool-calling features (e.g., parallel tool calls, streaming results) may not translate cleanly across all models","schema translation adds complexity and potential for subtle incompatibilities","requires maintaining compatibility with multiple tool-calling API versions as models evolve","no automatic capability negotiation — must handle models with different tool-calling feature sets"],"requires":["MCP server implementation","client libraries or SDKs for each target AI model (Anthropic, OpenAI, Ollama, etc.)","tool schema definitions compatible with MCP format"],"input_types":["MCP tool definitions","model-specific tool schemas","tool invocation requests from different model APIs"],"output_types":["normalized tool definitions","model-specific tool-calling payloads","unified tool execution results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.resource.aggregation.and.namespacing","name":"resource-aggregation-and-namespacing","description":"Aggregates resources (files, documents, knowledge bases, APIs) from multiple MCP servers into a unified namespace with collision detection and resolution. Implements hierarchical namespacing to prevent tool/resource name conflicts, allowing clients to reference resources from specific servers or query across all servers with a single interface.","intents":["I want to access files and documents from multiple sources through a single resource interface","I need to prevent naming conflicts when multiple MCP servers expose resources with the same name","I want to search or list resources across all connected servers without knowing their individual addresses"],"best_for":["knowledge management systems integrating multiple document sources","AI agents needing access to heterogeneous data sources","teams consolidating tool ecosystems from different vendors or teams"],"limitations":["namespace hierarchies add complexity to resource addressing","no built-in deduplication — identical resources from different servers appear as separate entries","resource listing performance degrades with large numbers of servers or resources","no automatic conflict resolution strategy — requires explicit configuration or client-side handling"],"requires":["MCP resource protocol support","namespace configuration or naming convention","network access to all resource-providing servers"],"input_types":["resource requests with optional namespace filters","resource URIs","search queries"],"output_types":["aggregated resource listings","resource metadata","resource content (files, documents, etc.)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.configuration.driven.server.composition","name":"configuration-driven-server-composition","description":"Enables declarative composition of MCP server ecosystems through configuration files (YAML, JSON, or similar), specifying which servers to connect to, which tools/resources to expose, and how to handle conflicts or customizations. Supports templating, environment variable substitution, and conditional server inclusion based on runtime context.","intents":["I want to define my entire MCP server setup in a configuration file that I can version control","I need different MCP configurations for development, staging, and production environments","I want to enable/disable specific MCP servers based on environment variables or feature flags"],"best_for":["DevOps teams managing MCP infrastructure as code","developers building reproducible AI agent setups","organizations with multiple deployment environments requiring configuration variance"],"limitations":["configuration validation errors may only surface at runtime","no built-in schema validation for configuration files","complex conditional logic in configuration becomes hard to maintain","requires restart to apply configuration changes (unless hot-reload implemented)"],"requires":["configuration file format parser (YAML, JSON, TOML, etc.)","environment variable access","optional: configuration schema validator"],"input_types":["YAML/JSON/TOML configuration files","environment variables","command-line arguments"],"output_types":["parsed configuration object","server registry initialized from configuration","validation errors or warnings"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.request.routing.and.dispatching","name":"request-routing-and-dispatching","description":"Implements intelligent routing logic to dispatch incoming tool calls and resource requests to the appropriate downstream MCP server based on tool/resource namespace, availability, or custom routing rules. Handles request/response transformation, error propagation, and timeout management for each routed request.","intents":["I want tool calls to automatically route to the correct MCP server without client-side logic","I need to handle cases where multiple servers provide the same tool and choose which one to use","I want timeouts and error handling to work consistently across all downstream servers"],"best_for":["developers building transparent MCP gateways","teams with complex tool ecosystems requiring intelligent dispatch","systems needing consistent error handling across heterogeneous servers"],"limitations":["routing decisions add latency (typically 10-50ms per request)","no built-in load balancing across multiple servers providing the same tool","error handling complexity increases with number of downstream servers","request/response transformation logic can become a bottleneck for high-throughput scenarios"],"requires":["routing configuration or rules engine","timeout and error handling policies","network connectivity to all downstream servers"],"input_types":["MCP tool call requests","resource access requests","routing metadata (tool name, resource type, etc.)"],"output_types":["routed requests to downstream servers","aggregated responses","error messages with routing context"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent__cap_6","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.translation.and.adaptation","name":"mcp-protocol-translation-and-adaptation","description":"Translates between different MCP protocol versions or adapts MCP messages to work with non-standard server implementations that may have partial protocol compliance. Handles protocol version negotiation, capability advertisement, and graceful degradation when servers lack certain features.","intents":["I want to use older MCP servers alongside newer ones without compatibility issues","I need to work with MCP servers that don't fully implement the specification","I want automatic protocol version negotiation between client and servers"],"best_for":["teams managing heterogeneous MCP server versions","developers integrating legacy or non-standard MCP implementations","organizations with gradual MCP adoption across different teams"],"limitations":["protocol translation adds complexity and potential for subtle incompatibilities","not all protocol features can be gracefully downgraded","version negotiation adds handshake overhead to each connection","no guarantee of feature parity across different protocol versions"],"requires":["MCP protocol specification knowledge","support for multiple MCP versions","capability detection and advertisement mechanisms"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages in different versions","server capability declarations","protocol version information"],"output_types":["normalized MCP messages","capability manifests","protocol version negotiation results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.resource.consumption.optimization","name":"resource-consumption-optimization","description":"Optimizes resource usage by consolidating multiple MCP server processes into a single multiplexer, reducing memory footprint, CPU overhead, and network connections. Implements connection pooling, request batching, and caching strategies to minimize resource consumption while maintaining responsiveness.","intents":["I want to reduce the number of MCP server processes running on my machine","I need to lower memory usage when running many MCP servers","I want to minimize network overhead when accessing tools from multiple servers"],"best_for":["resource-constrained environments (edge devices, embedded systems)","developers running many MCP servers on a single machine","teams optimizing infrastructure costs for MCP deployments"],"limitations":["multiplexer becomes a resource bottleneck if not properly tuned","connection pooling adds complexity to connection lifecycle management","caching introduces potential for stale data if servers update state frequently","single-process architecture limits horizontal scaling"],"requires":["connection pooling implementation","optional: caching layer (in-memory or distributed)","monitoring and profiling tools to measure resource usage"],"input_types":["MCP requests from multiple clients","server configuration with resource limits"],"output_types":["optimized resource allocation","performance metrics","resource usage reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1mcp-app-agent__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.unified.error.handling.and.logging","name":"unified-error-handling-and-logging","description":"Provides centralized error handling, logging, and observability for all MCP server interactions, capturing errors from downstream servers and presenting them consistently to clients. Implements structured logging with context propagation, error categorization, and optional integration with external logging/monitoring systems.","intents":["I want to see logs from all my MCP servers in one place","I need to understand which server failed when a tool call doesn't work","I want to monitor the health and performance of my entire MCP ecosystem"],"best_for":["operators managing production MCP deployments","developers debugging complex multi-server tool interactions","teams requiring centralized observability across MCP infrastructure"],"limitations":["logging overhead can impact performance under high request volume","structured logging requires consistent error/log format across all servers","no built-in integration with specific logging platforms (requires custom adapters)","error categorization logic may not cover all edge cases"],"requires":["logging framework (Winston, Pino, Bunyan, etc.)","optional: external logging service (ELK, Datadog, CloudWatch, etc.)","structured logging format (JSON recommended)"],"input_types":["errors from downstream servers","request/response metadata","server health status"],"output_types":["structured logs","error reports","performance metrics","health dashboards"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":31,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["MCP protocol implementation (v1.0+)","network connectivity to all downstream MCP servers","Node.js 18+ or equivalent runtime for the multiplexer process","configuration file or environment variables defining downstream server addresses","configuration file format (YAML, JSON, or TOML)","network access to all registered MCP servers","optional: service discovery system (Consul, Kubernetes DNS, etc.) for dynamic registration","MCP server implementation","client libraries or SDKs for each target AI model (Anthropic, OpenAI, Ollama, etc.)","tool schema definitions compatible with MCP format"],"failure_modes":["single point of failure — if the multiplexer crashes, all downstream MCP connections are lost","adds latency to every request due to routing and forwarding overhead","requires all downstream MCP servers to be network-accessible (local or remote)","no built-in load balancing or failover for individual backend servers","static configuration requires restart to apply changes (unless hot-reload is implemented)","no built-in service discovery — requires manual configuration or external orchestration","health checks add periodic network overhead","no automatic conflict resolution if multiple servers expose tools with identical names","model-specific tool-calling features (e.g., parallel tool calls, streaming results) may not translate cleanly across all models","schema translation adds complexity and potential for subtle incompatibilities","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.43,"ecosystem":0.48999999999999994,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.061Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:46.450Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=1mcp-app-agent","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=1mcp-app-agent"}},"signature":"b/sUqJuZAMFOREejw310IdLoCB9yXRkeu1WpXcBRSAiLNCXycYqC6oU6Z/TL2JstbZ3djXMbM6ap8Q6x6oRXCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T20:01:06.158Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/1mcp-app-agent","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/1mcp-app-agent","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=1mcp-app-agent","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}