{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server","slug":"1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server","name":"chaining-mcp-server","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/1999AZZAR/chaining-mcp-server","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:1999AZZAR/chaining-mcp-server"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.sequential.tool.chaining.with.context.propagation","name":"sequential-tool-chaining-with-context-propagation","description":"Enables MCP clients to execute multiple tools in sequence where output from one tool automatically becomes input context for the next tool in the chain. Implements a state machine pattern that tracks execution flow, maintains intermediate results, and handles error propagation across chain steps. The server parses tool invocation requests, validates schemas at each step, and ensures context is properly serialized between tool boundaries.","intents":["I need to run a series of dependent operations where each step depends on the previous result","I want to automate multi-step workflows without manually managing intermediate data between tools","I need to build complex agent behaviors that require sequential reasoning and tool composition"],"best_for":["AI agent developers building multi-step reasoning workflows","Teams implementing complex automation pipelines via MCP","LLM application builders needing deterministic tool orchestration"],"limitations":["No built-in branching logic — chains execute linearly without conditional splits","Context propagation adds latency proportional to chain depth; each step serializes/deserializes state","No transaction semantics — partial chain failures don't automatically rollback prior tool executions","Chain definitions must be pre-defined; dynamic chain generation at runtime not supported"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (Claude, custom client, or MCP SDK)","Tool definitions with compatible input/output schemas","JSON serialization support for context passing between tools"],"input_types":["tool definitions (JSON schema)","initial input data (JSON)","chain configuration (sequence of tool names and parameter mappings)"],"output_types":["final tool output (JSON)","execution trace with intermediate results","error logs with failure point in chain"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.schema.validation.and.transformation","name":"mcp-tool-schema-validation-and-transformation","description":"Validates incoming tool invocation requests against registered tool schemas and transforms parameters between chain steps using schema-aware mapping. The server maintains a registry of tool definitions with JSON Schema validation, performs type coercion where safe, and rejects malformed requests with detailed error messages indicating which schema constraint was violated. Supports parameter renaming and structural transformation between tool boundaries.","intents":["I need to ensure tool inputs conform to expected schemas before execution","I want to map outputs from one tool to inputs of another tool with different parameter names","I need detailed validation errors that tell me exactly what went wrong with tool parameters"],"best_for":["Developers building robust MCP integrations with strict type safety","Teams managing large tool registries where schema consistency is critical","Systems requiring audit trails of parameter validation"],"limitations":["Schema validation limited to JSON Schema Draft 7 — advanced OpenAPI features not supported","Type coercion is conservative; implicit conversions (string to number) may fail when stricter validation is needed","No schema versioning — breaking schema changes require manual migration of existing chains","Parameter mapping is declarative only; complex transformations require custom tool wrappers"],"requires":["Tool definitions with valid JSON Schema","MCP server running with tool registry initialized","JSON-serializable parameters"],"input_types":["tool invocation requests (JSON with tool name and parameters)","tool schema definitions (JSON Schema format)"],"output_types":["validation success/failure response","transformed parameters (JSON)","validation error details with schema path"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.mcp.client.context.management.and.state.persistence","name":"mcp-client-context-management-and-state-persistence","description":"Manages execution context and intermediate state across tool invocations within a single MCP session, storing results from each tool step and making them available to subsequent steps. The server maintains an in-memory context store keyed by execution session ID, serializes intermediate results, and provides context retrieval mechanisms for tools that need access to prior outputs. Supports context scoping (global vs. chain-local) and automatic cleanup of stale context.","intents":["I need to access the output of a previous tool step within the current chain execution","I want to maintain state across multiple tool invocations without external databases","I need to debug chains by inspecting intermediate results at each step"],"best_for":["Single-session MCP workflows where context doesn't need to persist across server restarts","Debugging and development of tool chains","Stateful agent implementations that need working memory"],"limitations":["Context is in-memory only — lost on server restart; no built-in persistence to disk or database","No context size limits enforced — large intermediate results can cause memory exhaustion","Context cleanup is automatic but timing is unpredictable; stale context may accumulate","No multi-session context sharing — each MCP session has isolated context"],"requires":["MCP server instance running","Session ID management from MCP client","JSON-serializable intermediate results"],"input_types":["tool execution results (JSON)","context retrieval requests (session ID + context key)"],"output_types":["stored context (JSON)","context retrieval responses","execution trace with context snapshots"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.error.handling.and.chain.failure.recovery","name":"error-handling-and-chain-failure-recovery","description":"Detects tool execution failures, captures error context, and provides configurable recovery strategies (fail-fast, retry with backoff, skip-and-continue, fallback-tool). The server implements error classification (schema validation errors vs. tool execution errors vs. timeout errors), logs detailed error traces with execution context, and allows chains to define per-step error handlers. Supports conditional error recovery based on error type and retry count.","intents":["I need to know exactly where a tool chain failed and why","I want to automatically retry failed steps with exponential backoff","I need to define fallback tools to execute if a primary tool fails"],"best_for":["Production MCP deployments requiring reliability and observability","Teams building resilient multi-step workflows","Systems where partial failures should not halt entire chains"],"limitations":["Retry logic is exponential backoff only — no custom retry strategies","Error recovery is per-step; no cross-step compensation logic for distributed transactions","Timeout handling depends on underlying tool implementation — no universal timeout enforcement","Fallback tools must be pre-registered; dynamic fallback selection not supported"],"requires":["Tool definitions with error handling configuration","Logging infrastructure to capture error traces","Timeout configuration for each tool step"],"input_types":["tool execution requests","error handler configuration (JSON)"],"output_types":["error details with stack trace","recovery action taken (retry, skip, fallback)","final result or error if recovery failed"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.registry.and.dynamic.tool.discovery","name":"tool-registry-and-dynamic-tool-discovery","description":"Maintains a registry of available tools with metadata (name, description, schema, version) and exposes tool discovery mechanisms to MCP clients. The server implements tool registration endpoints, supports tool versioning, and provides introspection APIs that allow clients to query available tools, their schemas, and capabilities. Tools can be registered at server startup or dynamically added at runtime through registration endpoints.","intents":["I need to discover what tools are available in the MCP server","I want to query tool schemas to understand what parameters they accept","I need to support multiple versions of the same tool"],"best_for":["MCP servers managing large tool ecosystems","Clients that need to dynamically adapt to available tools","Teams building tool marketplaces or plugin systems"],"limitations":["Tool discovery is read-only for clients — no client-side tool registration","No tool versioning semantics — version numbers are metadata only, no automatic compatibility checking","Tool metadata is static — runtime tool capabilities (e.g., available parameters based on state) cannot be expressed","No tool dependency resolution — tools cannot declare dependencies on other tools"],"requires":["Tool definitions with metadata","MCP server with registry implementation","JSON serialization for tool schemas"],"input_types":["tool registration requests (tool name, schema, metadata)","tool discovery queries (filter by name, tag, capability)"],"output_types":["tool list with metadata","individual tool schema and documentation","tool capabilities and version information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.execution.tracing.and.debugging.support","name":"execution-tracing-and-debugging-support","description":"Records detailed execution traces for each tool chain invocation, including tool names, parameters, results, timing, and error information. The server implements structured logging with execution IDs, captures intermediate state at each step, and provides trace retrieval APIs that allow clients to inspect execution history. Traces include timing information for performance analysis and can be exported in standard formats (JSON, structured logs).","intents":["I need to debug why a tool chain produced unexpected results","I want to understand the performance characteristics of my chains","I need to audit what tools were executed and with what parameters"],"best_for":["Development and debugging of complex tool chains","Production systems requiring audit trails","Performance optimization and monitoring"],"limitations":["Traces are in-memory only — not persisted across server restarts","No trace filtering or querying — clients must retrieve full traces and filter client-side","Trace storage is unbounded — large numbers of executions can cause memory exhaustion","No sampling or rate-limiting — high-frequency chains can generate excessive trace data"],"requires":["MCP server with tracing enabled","Execution ID generation and propagation","Structured logging infrastructure"],"input_types":["execution ID for trace retrieval","trace filtering criteria (optional)"],"output_types":["execution trace (JSON with steps, timing, results)","error traces with stack information","performance metrics (latency per step)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.parallel.tool.execution.with.dependency.management","name":"parallel-tool-execution-with-dependency-management","description":"Enables execution of independent tools in parallel within a single chain, with automatic dependency resolution to ensure tools execute in the correct order. The server analyzes tool parameter dependencies, identifies tools that can run concurrently, and executes them in parallel using async/await patterns. Supports explicit dependency declarations and automatic dependency inference from parameter references.","intents":["I want to execute multiple independent tools concurrently to reduce total chain execution time","I need to automatically determine which tools can run in parallel based on their dependencies","I want to optimize chain performance without manually managing concurrent execution"],"best_for":["Performance-critical chains with multiple independent steps","Workflows with significant I/O latency that benefit from parallelization","Teams optimizing MCP server throughput"],"limitations":["Parallelization is limited by MCP server concurrency limits — may not scale to hundreds of parallel tools","Dependency inference is heuristic-based — complex parameter dependencies may not be detected","No resource limits per tool — runaway tools can starve other parallel executions","Partial failures in parallel execution require careful error handling — no automatic rollback"],"requires":["Async/await support in MCP server runtime","Tool definitions with explicit or inferrable dependencies","Concurrency limits configured appropriately"],"input_types":["chain definition with tool dependencies","tool execution requests"],"output_types":["parallel execution results (JSON)","execution timing showing parallelization benefits","dependency graph visualization (optional)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.conditional.branching.and.dynamic.chain.routing","name":"conditional-branching-and-dynamic-chain-routing","description":"Supports conditional execution paths within tool chains based on tool outputs, allowing chains to branch based on results and route to different tools dynamically. The server evaluates conditions (equality, comparison, regex matching) against tool outputs, selects the appropriate next step, and continues execution on the selected branch. Supports nested conditions and fallback paths when no condition matches.","intents":["I need to execute different tools based on the output of a previous tool","I want to implement decision logic within chains without external orchestration","I need to handle multiple possible outcomes from a tool and route accordingly"],"best_for":["Complex workflows with multiple decision points","Adaptive chains that respond to runtime conditions","Systems implementing conditional business logic"],"limitations":["Condition evaluation is limited to simple comparisons — no complex boolean logic or custom functions","Nested conditions can become difficult to maintain — no visual chain editor","No loop constructs — repetitive patterns require separate tool invocations","Condition evaluation is synchronous — cannot wait for external events"],"requires":["Tool outputs that can be evaluated against conditions","Condition definitions in chain configuration (JSON)","Fallback tool definitions for unmatched conditions"],"input_types":["tool output (JSON)","condition definitions (comparison operators, values)"],"output_types":["selected branch path","results from selected branch","execution trace showing condition evaluation"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client implementation (Claude, custom client, or MCP SDK)","Tool definitions with compatible input/output schemas","JSON serialization support for context passing between tools","Tool definitions with valid JSON Schema","MCP server running with tool registry initialized","JSON-serializable parameters","MCP server instance running","Session ID management from MCP client","JSON-serializable intermediate results","Tool definitions with error handling configuration"],"failure_modes":["No built-in branching logic — chains execute linearly without conditional splits","Context propagation adds latency proportional to chain depth; each step serializes/deserializes state","No transaction semantics — partial chain failures don't automatically rollback prior tool executions","Chain definitions must be pre-defined; dynamic chain generation at runtime not supported","Schema validation limited to JSON Schema Draft 7 — advanced OpenAPI features not supported","Type coercion is conservative; implicit conversions (string to number) may fail when stricter validation is needed","No schema versioning — breaking schema changes require manual migration of existing chains","Parameter mapping is declarative only; complex transformations require custom tool wrappers","Context is in-memory only — lost on server restart; no built-in persistence to disk or database","No context size limits enforced — large intermediate results can cause memory exhaustion","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.48999999999999994,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.061Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:33.056Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server"}},"signature":"Vx5LlcttybEGinSvA2neFh/5nKmna+RPVX10aQ29LuRVQh4qubrkdvwKQy12UBAwl+s8IMy5WcggMSjFWPpqDA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T00:31:07.643Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=1999azzar-chaining-mcp-server","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}