{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_1261752824-cq-mini","slug":"1261752824-cq-mini","name":"cq_mini","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/1261752824/cq_mini","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/1261752824-cq-mini","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:1261752824/cq_mini"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_1261752824-cq-mini__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.model.context.protocol.server.instantiation.and.lifecycle.management","name":"model context protocol server instantiation and lifecycle management","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, providing a standardized interface for LLM clients to discover and invoke capabilities through a JSON-RPC 2.0 transport layer. The server handles connection initialization, capability advertisement via the initialize handshake, and maintains bidirectional message routing between client and server implementations throughout the session lifecycle.","intents":["I need to expose my tools and data sources to Claude, ChatGPT, or other MCP-compatible LLM clients","I want to build a standardized integration that works across multiple AI applications without custom adapters","I need to manage server lifecycle, handle client connections, and advertise available resources dynamically"],"best_for":["LLM application developers building multi-tool integrations","Teams standardizing on MCP for AI agent tooling","Organizations migrating from custom API layers to protocol-based integrations"],"limitations":["MCP is a relatively new protocol with evolving specification — breaking changes possible in minor versions","Requires client-side MCP support — not compatible with REST-only or legacy LLM APIs","No built-in authentication beyond transport-level security — requires external auth layer for multi-tenant scenarios"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, custom LLM application, or MCP CLI)","Python 3.8+ or Node.js 16+ depending on server implementation","Network connectivity for JSON-RPC message transport (stdio, HTTP, or WebSocket)"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 request objects","MCP protocol messages (initialize, call_tool, read_resource, etc.)"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 response objects","MCP capability advertisements","Tool execution results with structured metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-server"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1261752824-cq-mini__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.schema.definition.and.capability.advertisement","name":"tool schema definition and capability advertisement","description":"Defines and advertises available tools to MCP clients through a standardized schema format that includes tool names, descriptions, input parameter specifications (with type validation), and return value documentation. The server introspects its capabilities and broadcasts them during the MCP initialize handshake, allowing clients to discover what operations are available without hardcoded knowledge.","intents":["I want Claude or another LLM to automatically discover what tools I've exposed without manual configuration","I need to define input schemas for my tools so the LLM can validate parameters before calling them","I want to provide rich documentation about each tool so the LLM understands when and how to use it"],"best_for":["Developers building LLM agent toolkits with dynamic capability discovery","Teams that need self-documenting integrations for multiple LLM clients","Organizations standardizing tool definitions across multiple AI applications"],"limitations":["Schema complexity is limited by JSON Schema expressiveness — complex conditional logic requires workarounds","Tool descriptions must be concise enough for LLM context windows — verbose documentation may be truncated","No runtime schema validation enforcement — clients may send invalid parameters that servers must handle gracefully"],"requires":["MCP protocol version 1.0+","JSON Schema draft 7 or later for parameter definitions","Tool implementation code that matches advertised schemas"],"input_types":["Tool metadata (name, description, parameters)","JSON Schema definitions for input validation"],"output_types":["MCP tools list response","Tool schema advertisements","Capability metadata for client discovery"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1261752824-cq-mini__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.invocation.and.result.marshaling","name":"tool invocation and result marshaling","description":"Executes requested tools by routing JSON-RPC call_tool messages to the appropriate handler functions, marshaling input parameters from JSON into native types, executing the tool logic, and serializing results back to JSON for client consumption. Handles error cases by returning structured error responses that preserve stack traces and error context for debugging.","intents":["I want the LLM to call my backend functions and get results back in a structured format","I need to handle tool execution errors gracefully and return meaningful error messages to the LLM","I want to execute tools with validated parameters and ensure type safety across the JSON boundary"],"best_for":["Developers building LLM agents that need to execute backend logic","Teams integrating existing codebases with LLM tooling","Applications requiring reliable tool execution with error handling and logging"],"limitations":["Tool execution is synchronous by default — long-running operations block the MCP connection","No built-in timeout enforcement — runaway tool executions can hang the client connection","Result serialization limited to JSON-serializable types — binary data requires base64 encoding or external storage references"],"requires":["Tool handler functions implemented in the server codebase","Parameter marshaling logic (typically auto-generated from schemas)","Error handling and logging infrastructure"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC call_tool requests with tool name and parameters","Validated parameter objects matching tool schemas"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC result objects with tool output","Error responses with error codes and messages","Structured result metadata (execution time, resource usage, etc.)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1261752824-cq-mini__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.resource.exposure.and.content.serving","name":"resource exposure and content serving","description":"Exposes server-side resources (files, database records, API responses, or computed data) to MCP clients through a resource URI scheme, allowing clients to request and retrieve resource contents without direct file system or database access. Resources are advertised with metadata (MIME type, size, last modified) and served through the read_resource MCP message type with support for partial reads and streaming.","intents":["I want to let the LLM read files or data from my system without giving it direct file system access","I need to expose database records or API responses as resources that the LLM can reference and retrieve","I want to control what data the LLM can access through a resource URI whitelist"],"best_for":["Developers building LLM agents that need read-only access to application data","Teams implementing secure data access patterns where LLMs should not have direct system access","Applications exposing dynamic content (logs, metrics, database queries) to LLM clients"],"limitations":["Resources are read-only by default — write operations require separate tool implementations","No built-in caching — repeated resource reads may incur repeated I/O or computation costs","Resource discovery is limited to advertised URIs — clients cannot enumerate or search resources dynamically"],"requires":["Resource backend implementation (file system, database, API, or custom provider)","Resource URI scheme definition and routing logic","MIME type detection and content serialization"],"input_types":["Resource URI strings","Optional range/offset parameters for partial reads"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, binary, or structured data)","Resource metadata (MIME type, size, modification time)","Error responses for missing or inaccessible resources"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_1261752824-cq-mini__cap_4","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.template.management.and.client.side.execution","name":"prompt template management and client-side execution","description":"Defines reusable prompt templates that MCP clients can invoke to generate structured prompts with variable substitution and formatting. Templates are advertised with input parameter schemas and descriptions, allowing clients to discover and execute them without embedding prompt logic client-side. Supports dynamic prompt generation based on runtime context and tool availability.","intents":["I want to define standard prompts that guide the LLM's behavior and are reusable across multiple client applications","I need to parameterize prompts so clients can customize them with context-specific information","I want to version and update prompts server-side without requiring client updates"],"best_for":["Teams standardizing LLM prompting across multiple applications","Organizations that need centralized prompt management and versioning","Developers building multi-tenant LLM systems with customizable prompts"],"limitations":["Prompt templates are static — no support for conditional logic or branching within templates","Template parameters are limited to simple substitution — complex transformations require client-side processing","No built-in prompt evaluation or quality metrics — teams must implement their own testing"],"requires":["Prompt template definitions (typically in YAML, JSON, or Jinja2 format)","Parameter schema definitions for template inputs","Template rendering engine (Jinja2, Handlebars, or custom)"],"input_types":["Prompt template names","Parameter objects matching template schemas"],"output_types":["Rendered prompt strings","Prompt metadata (version, author, tags)","Parameter validation errors"],"categories":["text-generation-language","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, custom LLM application, or MCP CLI)","Python 3.8+ or Node.js 16+ depending on server implementation","Network connectivity for JSON-RPC message transport (stdio, HTTP, or WebSocket)","MCP protocol version 1.0+","JSON Schema draft 7 or later for parameter definitions","Tool implementation code that matches advertised schemas","Tool handler functions implemented in the server codebase","Parameter marshaling logic (typically auto-generated from schemas)","Error handling and logging infrastructure","Resource backend implementation (file system, database, API, or custom provider)"],"failure_modes":["MCP is a relatively new protocol with evolving specification — breaking changes possible in minor versions","Requires client-side MCP support — not compatible with REST-only or legacy LLM APIs","No built-in authentication beyond transport-level security — requires external auth layer for multi-tenant scenarios","Schema complexity is limited by JSON Schema expressiveness — complex conditional logic requires workarounds","Tool descriptions must be concise enough for LLM context windows — verbose documentation may be truncated","No runtime schema validation enforcement — clients may send invalid parameters that servers must handle gracefully","Tool execution is synchronous by default — long-running operations block the MCP connection","No built-in timeout enforcement — runaway tool executions can hang the client connection","Result serialization limited to JSON-serializable types — binary data requires base64 encoding or external storage references","Resources are read-only by default — write operations require separate tool implementations","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.061Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:29.347Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=1261752824-cq-mini","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=1261752824-cq-mini"}},"signature":"1njF37ED963s4/oU0o1odAju3542GYR3MvzKYjiWb+H8oJW/XnlVVObPpgql6ISLA3aJwpMKmGQy+eJ88+l7Dg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T02:24:35.959Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/1261752824-cq-mini","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/1261752824-cq-mini","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=1261752824-cq-mini","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}