{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_10-blaylock-10-project10","slug":"10-blaylock-10-project10","name":"project10","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/10.blaylock.10/project10","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/10-blaylock-10-project10","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:10.blaylock.10/project10"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_10-blaylock-10-project10__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.model.context.protocol.server.instantiation.and.lifecycle.management","name":"model context protocol server instantiation and lifecycle management","description":"Implements the MCP server specification to expose capabilities through a standardized protocol interface. The server handles connection initialization, message routing, and resource lifecycle according to the MCP specification, enabling Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to discover and invoke server capabilities through a well-defined JSON-RPC 2.0 transport layer.","intents":["I need to expose custom tools and resources to Claude through a standardized protocol","I want to build a server that multiple MCP clients can connect to simultaneously","I need to implement proper request/response handling and error propagation for tool calls"],"best_for":["developers building integrations between Claude and custom backend systems","teams deploying MCP servers in production environments requiring standardized protocol compliance","builders creating multi-client tool ecosystems that need protocol-agnostic interfaces"],"limitations":["MCP protocol overhead adds latency compared to direct function calls — typically 50-200ms per round-trip","Requires proper async/await handling and connection state management to avoid resource leaks","No built-in authentication or encryption — security depends on transport layer (typically stdio or SSE)"],"requires":["MCP SDK for the target language (Python, TypeScript, etc.)","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 message format and MCP protocol specification","Async runtime support (tokio for Rust, asyncio for Python, Node.js event loop)"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC requests with method names and parameters","Tool invocation requests with structured arguments"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC responses with results or errors","Tool execution results in JSON format","Resource metadata and capability advertisements"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-server"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_10-blaylock-10-project10__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.capability.registration.and.schema.based.function.calling","name":"tool capability registration and schema-based function calling","description":"Registers callable tools with structured JSON schemas that describe input parameters, return types, and usage documentation. The server uses these schemas to enable clients to understand tool signatures before invocation, supporting type validation, parameter documentation, and intelligent tool selection by LLM clients through schema introspection.","intents":["I need to expose functions with clear parameter schemas so Claude knows how to call them correctly","I want Claude to understand what each tool does and when to use it without trial-and-error","I need to validate incoming tool calls against expected parameter types before execution"],"best_for":["developers building agent systems where Claude needs to understand tool capabilities upfront","teams requiring strict parameter validation and type safety for tool invocations","builders creating discoverable tool ecosystems with self-documenting interfaces"],"limitations":["Schema complexity can impact client-side tool selection — overly detailed schemas may confuse LLM routing","No runtime parameter coercion — type mismatches cause tool invocation failures rather than graceful degradation","Schema updates require server restart or dynamic registration mechanism — no hot-reload by default"],"requires":["JSON Schema understanding and ability to define parameter constraints","MCP SDK with tool registration API","Clear documentation of tool semantics and expected use cases"],"input_types":["JSON Schema definitions for tool parameters","Tool invocation requests with typed arguments"],"output_types":["Tool execution results","Error responses with validation details","Schema metadata for client introspection"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_10-blaylock-10-project10__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.resource.exposure.and.content.serving.through.mcp.protocol","name":"resource exposure and content serving through mcp protocol","description":"Exposes resources (files, data, documents, or computed content) through the MCP resource protocol, allowing clients to request and retrieve content with optional URI templates for parameterized access. Resources are advertised with metadata (MIME type, description) enabling clients to discover and fetch content through a standardized interface without direct filesystem or API access.","intents":["I need to expose files or data to Claude without giving it direct filesystem access","I want Claude to be able to reference and retrieve specific documents or resources by URI","I need to serve dynamic content (computed data, API responses) as resources that Claude can access"],"best_for":["developers building secure document access systems where Claude needs controlled resource visibility","teams exposing APIs or data sources through a unified MCP interface","builders creating knowledge bases or document stores accessible to Claude agents"],"limitations":["Resource streaming adds latency for large files — no built-in chunking or pagination","No caching mechanism — repeated resource requests hit the server each time","Resource URIs must be pre-registered or follow a template pattern — dynamic URI generation requires custom logic"],"requires":["MCP SDK with resource registration API","Understanding of URI templates and MIME type specifications","Backend implementation for resource retrieval and content serving"],"input_types":["Resource URI requests","URI template parameters"],"output_types":["Resource content in specified MIME type","Resource metadata (type, size, description)","Error responses for missing or inaccessible resources"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_10-blaylock-10-project10__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.bidirectional.client.server.communication.and.request.routing","name":"bidirectional client-server communication and request routing","description":"Implements bidirectional message routing between MCP server and clients using JSON-RPC 2.0 over a transport layer (typically stdio or SSE). The server handles incoming requests, routes them to appropriate handlers, executes operations, and returns responses while managing connection state, error handling, and message ordering guarantees.","intents":["I need to handle tool calls from Claude and return results reliably","I want proper error handling and response routing for concurrent client requests","I need to maintain connection state and handle client disconnections gracefully"],"best_for":["developers building production MCP servers requiring reliable message delivery","teams needing robust error handling and connection management","builders creating multi-client server architectures with proper request isolation"],"limitations":["JSON-RPC overhead and serialization/deserialization adds ~10-50ms per message","No built-in request batching — multiple sequential calls require multiple round-trips","Transport layer limitations — stdio is single-threaded, SSE has connection limits"],"requires":["MCP SDK with message handling and routing APIs","Async runtime for handling concurrent requests","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 error codes and response format"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 request messages","Tool invocation requests","Resource access requests"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 response messages","Error responses with error codes and messages","Notification messages for asynchronous events"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_10-blaylock-10-project10__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.server.capability.advertisement.and.client.discovery","name":"server capability advertisement and client discovery","description":"Advertises server capabilities (tools, resources, prompts) to connecting clients through the MCP initialization handshake. The server provides metadata about available operations including tool schemas, resource templates, and prompt definitions, enabling clients to discover and understand capabilities before invoking them without requiring out-of-band documentation.","intents":["I need Claude to know what tools and resources my server provides automatically","I want clients to discover my server's capabilities through protocol introspection","I need to communicate tool documentation and usage guidelines to clients programmatically"],"best_for":["developers building self-documenting MCP servers","teams deploying multiple MCP servers where clients need automatic capability discovery","builders creating dynamic tool ecosystems where capabilities change at runtime"],"limitations":["Capability advertisements are static at initialization — runtime capability changes require reconnection","No versioning mechanism — clients cannot negotiate protocol versions or feature sets","Documentation is limited to schema and description fields — rich formatting not supported"],"requires":["MCP SDK with capability advertisement APIs","Clear documentation strings for tools and resources","Understanding of MCP initialization protocol"],"input_types":["Server configuration specifying available capabilities"],"output_types":["Initialization response with tool, resource, and prompt definitions","Capability metadata including schemas and descriptions"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP SDK for the target language (Python, TypeScript, etc.)","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 message format and MCP protocol specification","Async runtime support (tokio for Rust, asyncio for Python, Node.js event loop)","JSON Schema understanding and ability to define parameter constraints","MCP SDK with tool registration API","Clear documentation of tool semantics and expected use cases","MCP SDK with resource registration API","Understanding of URI templates and MIME type specifications","Backend implementation for resource retrieval and content serving","MCP SDK with message handling and routing APIs"],"failure_modes":["MCP protocol overhead adds latency compared to direct function calls — typically 50-200ms per round-trip","Requires proper async/await handling and connection state management to avoid resource leaks","No built-in authentication or encryption — security depends on transport layer (typically stdio or SSE)","Schema complexity can impact client-side tool selection — overly detailed schemas may confuse LLM routing","No runtime parameter coercion — type mismatches cause tool invocation failures rather than graceful degradation","Schema updates require server restart or dynamic registration mechanism — no hot-reload by default","Resource streaming adds latency for large files — no built-in chunking or pagination","No caching mechanism — repeated resource requests hit the server each time","Resource URIs must be pre-registered or follow a template pattern — dynamic URI generation requires custom logic","JSON-RPC overhead and serialization/deserialization adds ~10-50ms per message","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.061Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:22.209Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=10-blaylock-10-project10","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=10-blaylock-10-project10"}},"signature":"GN5R+JPIVbudto6LcbsjfjNMZnYZEJCRB+9nqpmxeEtUWHTLu1cJC6IjXORsLjcwgvBZQI+HctY23gBYXHh9AQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T18:25:10.129Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/10-blaylock-10-project10","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/10-blaylock-10-project10","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=10-blaylock-10-project10","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}