{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot","slug":"0dayhunter-pentest-copilot","name":"pentest-copilot","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/0dayhunter/pentest-copilot","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/0dayhunter-pentest-copilot","categories":["mcp-servers","code-editors"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:0dayhunter/pentest-copilot"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.based.penetration.testing.tool.integration","name":"mcp-based penetration testing tool integration","description":"Exposes penetration testing utilities and security scanning capabilities through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server interface, allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to invoke security tools via standardized resource and tool definitions. Implements MCP server lifecycle management with stdio transport, enabling bidirectional communication between LLM clients and pentest-specific functionality without custom API wrappers.","intents":["Integrate penetration testing tools into Claude conversations without building custom API layers","Enable LLM-driven security assessments by exposing pentest capabilities as MCP resources and tools","Orchestrate multiple security scanning tools through a unified MCP interface","Automate reconnaissance and vulnerability discovery workflows via Claude prompts"],"best_for":["Security researchers and penetration testers using Claude as their primary interface","Teams building LLM-powered security automation workflows","Organizations integrating pentest tools into AI-assisted security operations"],"limitations":["Requires MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, or custom MCP client implementation)","No built-in authentication/authorization — relies on host system security model","Tool execution runs with privileges of the MCP server process — no sandboxing","Limited to tools available on the host system where MCP server runs"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop or equivalent)","Host system with penetration testing tools installed (nmap, metasploit, etc.)","Python 3.8+ or Node.js 16+ (depending on implementation)","Network access to target systems (for actual pentest operations)"],"input_types":["text prompts describing pentest objectives","target IP addresses or domain names","scan parameters and configuration options"],"output_types":["structured vulnerability reports","raw tool output (nmap XML, Metasploit results)","markdown-formatted security findings"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","security-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.reconnaissance.data.collection.and.aggregation","name":"reconnaissance data collection and aggregation","description":"Collects and aggregates reconnaissance data (DNS records, WHOIS information, port scans, service enumeration) from multiple sources and presents it through MCP resources, allowing Claude to access comprehensive target intelligence in a structured format. Likely implements wrapper functions around standard reconnaissance tools (nmap, dig, whois) with output normalization and caching.","intents":["Gather comprehensive reconnaissance data on a target without manually running multiple tools","Access aggregated DNS, WHOIS, and network information through Claude conversation","Build a complete picture of target infrastructure before launching deeper attacks","Cache reconnaissance results to avoid redundant scans"],"best_for":["Penetration testers conducting initial reconnaissance phases","Security researchers mapping attack surfaces","Teams automating information gathering workflows"],"limitations":["Reconnaissance accuracy depends on tool availability and network conditions","WHOIS and DNS data may be outdated or incomplete","Port scanning can be slow for large IP ranges — no built-in parallelization hints","Results may trigger IDS/WAF alerts if not rate-limited"],"requires":["nmap, dig, whois, or equivalent tools installed on host","Network connectivity to target systems","Appropriate permissions to scan target networks"],"input_types":["target domain names","IP addresses or CIDR ranges","reconnaissance scope parameters"],"output_types":["structured DNS records","WHOIS registration data","port and service enumeration results","aggregated intelligence reports"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.vulnerability.scanning.and.exploitation.guidance","name":"vulnerability scanning and exploitation guidance","description":"Provides vulnerability scanning capabilities (likely wrapping tools like Nessus, OpenVAS, or Metasploit) and generates exploitation guidance based on discovered vulnerabilities. Implements tool invocation with result parsing and risk assessment, presenting findings through MCP resources that Claude can analyze and recommend exploitation paths for.","intents":["Scan targets for known vulnerabilities and get immediate exploitation recommendations","Identify exploitable weaknesses without manual vulnerability database lookups","Generate step-by-step exploitation guidance for discovered CVEs","Prioritize vulnerabilities by exploitability and impact"],"best_for":["Penetration testers conducting vulnerability assessment phases","Security teams automating vulnerability discovery and prioritization","Red teamers seeking rapid exploitation paths"],"limitations":["Vulnerability detection limited to tools available on host system","Exploitation guidance may be generic — requires manual adaptation for specific targets","No built-in exploit delivery or payload generation — guidance only","False positives/negatives depend on underlying scanning tool accuracy"],"requires":["Vulnerability scanning tool (Nessus, OpenVAS, Metasploit, or equivalent)","CVE database access (local or remote)","Network access to target systems","Appropriate scanning permissions"],"input_types":["target IP addresses or hostnames","vulnerability scan parameters","CVE identifiers"],"output_types":["vulnerability reports with severity ratings","exploitation guidance and step-by-step instructions","risk assessments and prioritization lists","remediation recommendations"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_3","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.payload.generation.and.delivery.orchestration","name":"payload generation and delivery orchestration","description":"Orchestrates payload generation (shellcode, reverse shells, web shells) and delivery mechanisms through MCP tool definitions, allowing Claude to request specific payloads and coordinate delivery across multiple attack vectors. Likely implements templates for common payloads (Metasploit integration, custom shellcode generation) with encoding/obfuscation options.","intents":["Generate custom payloads tailored to specific targets and delivery methods","Coordinate payload delivery across multiple attack vectors (web, email, network)","Obfuscate payloads to evade detection systems","Manage payload staging and multi-stage exploitation workflows"],"best_for":["Red teamers conducting targeted exploitation campaigns","Penetration testers executing post-exploitation phases","Security researchers testing detection evasion techniques"],"limitations":["Payload generation may trigger antivirus/EDR detection if not properly obfuscated","No built-in command & control (C2) infrastructure — requires external setup","Delivery coordination limited to what MCP client can execute","Payload staging requires careful network segmentation to avoid detection"],"requires":["Metasploit Framework or equivalent payload generation tool","Encoding/obfuscation tools (msfvenom, custom encoders)","Delivery infrastructure (web server, email relay, etc.)","Target system access or delivery vector"],"input_types":["payload type specifications (reverse shell, web shell, etc.)","target architecture and OS","delivery method parameters","obfuscation/encoding preferences"],"output_types":["generated payload binaries or scripts","encoded/obfuscated payload variants","delivery instructions and staging commands","C2 callback configuration"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.post.exploitation.command.execution.and.persistence","name":"post-exploitation command execution and persistence","description":"Provides post-exploitation capabilities including remote command execution, privilege escalation guidance, and persistence mechanism deployment through MCP tool definitions. Implements command execution wrappers (likely SSH, WinRM, or reverse shell integration) with output capture and analysis, allowing Claude to execute commands on compromised systems and recommend persistence techniques.","intents":["Execute commands on compromised targets through Claude conversation","Identify and exploit privilege escalation opportunities","Deploy persistence mechanisms (backdoors, scheduled tasks, rootkits)","Maintain access across system reboots and credential changes"],"best_for":["Red teamers conducting post-exploitation and persistence phases","Penetration testers demonstrating impact of vulnerabilities","Security researchers testing detection of persistence mechanisms"],"limitations":["Command execution requires prior system compromise or valid credentials","Persistence techniques may be detected by EDR/SIEM systems","No built-in anti-forensics or log cleanup — leaves audit trails","Privilege escalation depends on target system configuration and available exploits"],"requires":["Valid shell access or command execution capability on target","SSH, WinRM, or reverse shell connection to target system","Appropriate privileges for persistence mechanism deployment","Knowledge of target OS and available privilege escalation vectors"],"input_types":["shell commands to execute","privilege escalation technique specifications","persistence mechanism types","target system information"],"output_types":["command execution results and output","privilege escalation recommendations","persistence deployment status and verification","post-exploitation guidance"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_5","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.lateral.movement.and.network.pivoting.coordination","name":"lateral movement and network pivoting coordination","description":"Orchestrates lateral movement techniques (credential harvesting, network reconnaissance from compromised hosts, pivot chain setup) through MCP tools, allowing Claude to plan and execute multi-hop attack chains across network segments. Implements network mapping from compromised systems and coordinates pivot infrastructure setup.","intents":["Plan lateral movement paths through network segments from a compromised host","Harvest credentials and enumerate adjacent systems","Set up pivot chains to access isolated network segments","Coordinate multi-hop exploitation across network boundaries"],"best_for":["Red teamers conducting network-wide compromise scenarios","Penetration testers demonstrating lateral movement risks","Security teams testing network segmentation effectiveness"],"limitations":["Lateral movement detection depends on network monitoring capabilities","Credential harvesting may trigger security alerts if not rate-limited","Pivot infrastructure requires careful setup to avoid detection","Network topology discovery limited to what compromised host can access"],"requires":["Initial system compromise with command execution capability","Network access from compromised host to adjacent systems","Credential harvesting tools (mimikatz, secretsdump, etc.)","Pivot infrastructure (proxy, VPN, or SSH tunneling)"],"input_types":["compromised host information","target network segments","credential harvesting parameters","pivot infrastructure specifications"],"output_types":["network topology maps from compromised host perspective","harvested credentials and access paths","lateral movement recommendations","pivot chain setup instructions"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.data.exfiltration.and.collection.planning","name":"data exfiltration and collection planning","description":"Provides data exfiltration planning and execution capabilities through MCP tools, allowing Claude to identify valuable data, plan exfiltration methods, and coordinate data collection from compromised systems. Implements data discovery (file enumeration, database queries) and exfiltration method selection (DNS tunneling, HTTPS, steganography) with output formatting.","intents":["Identify and prioritize valuable data on compromised systems","Plan exfiltration methods that evade detection systems","Coordinate data collection across multiple compromised hosts","Format and stage data for secure exfiltration"],"best_for":["Red teamers conducting data theft scenarios","Penetration testers demonstrating data loss risks","Security researchers testing data exfiltration detection"],"limitations":["Data discovery limited to accessible file systems and databases","Exfiltration detection depends on network monitoring capabilities","Large data transfers may be throttled or blocked by network controls","No built-in encryption or obfuscation — requires external tools"],"requires":["Command execution capability on compromised systems","File system and database access on target","Exfiltration infrastructure (external server, DNS server, etc.)","Network bandwidth for data transfer"],"input_types":["data discovery parameters (file patterns, database queries)","exfiltration method specifications","data filtering and prioritization criteria","target systems and data locations"],"output_types":["discovered data inventory and prioritization","exfiltration method recommendations","data staging and formatting instructions","exfiltration status and verification"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.security.tool.evasion.and.detection.avoidance.guidance","name":"security tool evasion and detection avoidance guidance","description":"Provides guidance on evading security tools (antivirus, EDR, IDS/IPS, WAF) through MCP resources, analyzing target security posture and recommending evasion techniques. Implements detection signature analysis, behavioral evasion recommendations, and obfuscation strategy selection based on identified security controls.","intents":["Identify security tools deployed on target systems","Recommend evasion techniques for specific security products","Plan obfuscation and behavioral evasion strategies","Avoid triggering security alerts during exploitation"],"best_for":["Red teamers conducting evasion-focused engagements","Penetration testers testing security tool effectiveness","Security researchers studying detection evasion techniques"],"limitations":["Evasion recommendations may become outdated as security tools update","No guarantee of success — detection depends on specific tool versions and configurations","Some evasion techniques may violate engagement rules or laws","Behavioral evasion may reduce exploitation effectiveness"],"requires":["Target security tool identification (through reconnaissance or system access)","Knowledge of security tool detection signatures and behavioral analysis","Evasion technique database or research materials"],"input_types":["identified security tools and versions","target exploitation methods","evasion technique preferences","behavioral constraints"],"output_types":["security tool analysis and detection mechanisms","evasion technique recommendations","obfuscation strategy guidance","behavioral evasion instructions"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_8","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.exploitation.workflow.orchestration.and.decision.support","name":"exploitation workflow orchestration and decision support","description":"Orchestrates multi-step exploitation workflows through MCP tool definitions, allowing Claude to coordinate reconnaissance, vulnerability assessment, payload generation, and post-exploitation phases in a single conversation. Implements workflow state management and decision support based on discovered information, guiding users through complex attack chains.","intents":["Execute complete penetration testing workflows from reconnaissance to post-exploitation","Get real-time guidance on next steps based on discovered information","Coordinate multiple exploitation phases without context switching","Document and replay exploitation workflows for reporting"],"best_for":["Penetration testers conducting full-scope security assessments","Red teamers executing complex multi-phase attack scenarios","Security teams automating penetration testing workflows"],"limitations":["Workflow execution depends on tool availability and network conditions","Decision support based on LLM analysis — may miss edge cases or novel vulnerabilities","No built-in workflow persistence — requires external state management for long-running engagements","Coordination overhead may slow execution compared to manual tool usage"],"requires":["All underlying penetration testing tools (nmap, Metasploit, etc.)","Network access to target systems","Appropriate permissions for all exploitation phases","MCP-compatible client with sufficient context window"],"input_types":["target system specifications","engagement scope and objectives","exploitation constraints and rules of engagement","discovered information from previous phases"],"output_types":["workflow execution logs and results","exploitation recommendations and next steps","vulnerability reports and impact assessments","post-exploitation guidance and persistence options"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_0dayhunter-pentest-copilot__cap_9","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.engagement.reporting.and.finding.documentation","name":"engagement reporting and finding documentation","description":"Aggregates penetration testing findings into structured reports with vulnerability descriptions, impact assessments, and remediation recommendations. Implements templated report generation that formats findings according to industry standards (CVSS scoring, OWASP categories, CWE mappings) and enables Claude to contribute findings and recommendations throughout the engagement.","intents":["I want Claude to help document findings as they're discovered during the engagement","I need structured reports with proper vulnerability categorization and remediation guidance","I want to export findings in standard formats for client delivery"],"best_for":["penetration testers automating report generation during engagements","security teams standardizing vulnerability documentation","consultants who want AI-assisted finding description and remediation guidance"],"limitations":["Report quality depends on finding data completeness and accuracy","Remediation recommendations are generic; client-specific guidance requires manual customization","No built-in client context or business impact assessment; requires manual configuration","Template customization requires modifying server code"],"requires":["Structured finding data with vulnerability information","CVSS scoring and CWE/OWASP categorization","Report template configuration","MCP client with document generation capability"],"input_types":["vulnerability findings with metadata","impact assessments and severity ratings","remediation guidance and references"],"output_types":["structured reports (HTML, PDF, Markdown)","executive summaries with key findings","detailed vulnerability descriptions with remediation"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":29,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop or equivalent)","Host system with penetration testing tools installed (nmap, metasploit, etc.)","Python 3.8+ or Node.js 16+ (depending on implementation)","Network access to target systems (for actual pentest operations)","nmap, dig, whois, or equivalent tools installed on host","Network connectivity to target systems","Appropriate permissions to scan target networks","Vulnerability scanning tool (Nessus, OpenVAS, Metasploit, or equivalent)","CVE database access (local or remote)","Network access to target systems"],"failure_modes":["Requires MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, or custom MCP client implementation)","No built-in authentication/authorization — relies on host system security model","Tool execution runs with privileges of the MCP server process — no sandboxing","Limited to tools available on the host system where MCP server runs","Reconnaissance accuracy depends on tool availability and network conditions","WHOIS and DNS data may be outdated or incomplete","Port scanning can be slow for large IP ranges — no built-in parallelization hints","Results may trigger IDS/WAF alerts if not rate-limited","Vulnerability detection limited to tools available on host system","Exploitation guidance may be generic — requires manual adaptation for specific targets","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.5900000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.061Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:41.319Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=0dayhunter-pentest-copilot","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=0dayhunter-pentest-copilot"}},"signature":"wRlNHGaHfcr3+EL3LGDGldPoK8NZwqXsK+CF8Rmh4F9xbv/Tqokp3TrsBIvM/Vswd30IkVjEeXjvGl7D6zNdDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T10:43:35.271Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/0dayhunter-pentest-copilot","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/0dayhunter-pentest-copilot","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=0dayhunter-pentest-copilot","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}